Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research 850.644.9352 Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Ongoing Progress Monitoring and Determining Instructional Level JRF! Leadership Academy July 2006 Randee Winterbottom, Tricia Curran, Stacey Fisher.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
INTRODUCTION TO THE FAST SYSTEM The FAST Team University of Minnesota Theodore J. Christ, PhD
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Marcia L. Kosanovich, Ph.D. Teresa Logan, M.S. Connie Weinstein, M.Ed. The Florida Center for Reading Research Florida State University Just.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
READING FIRST Exemplary Schools Presentation Jefferson Elementary School Medford School District 549C April 2005.
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
Using Data to Inform Instruction Second Year Teacher Induction March 25, 2010.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
AGENDA 1. Task Force Findings 3.Professional Development Reach Higher Shasta Action Items 5.Assessments, Interventions & Instruction 6.What.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research January 22, 2004 Teaching Every Child to Read: A Responsibility.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtII) East Penn School District.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Making a Difference for Struggling Readers Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Using the PMRN and ECI and EI Indices to Make Effective Decisions Elizabeth Crawford, MS, CCC-SLP Director of Interventions The Florida Center for Reading.
MTSS Multi-Tiered System of Support School Intervention Plan St. Patrick School Ed 515 Mary Staley.
PROCESS TO PROGRESS Reading First at MCS. 8 Critical Reading First Elements 1. Systematic and explicit instruction using an approved Scientifically Based.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Supporting Leadership of Effective Reading Programs Stephen M. Nettles, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Cindy Edwards, Administrative Supervisor Response to Intervention, Dyslexia/504 August 2, 2011 A Multi-Tiered Prevention System.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Coaching Teachers to Use Assessment to Inform Instruction The Florida Center for Reading Research
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Reading First Reading First M.W. Cuyler Elementary School September 17, 2004.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Response to Intervention Hofstra University October 21, 2014 Deborah Y. Smith, Ed.D. Principal, Connetquot Elementary School East Islip School District.
Using the PMRN, ECI and EI Indices, and Other Information to Make Effective Decisions Elizabeth Crawford, MS, CCC-SLP Director of Interventions The Florida.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Offered by The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading First Assessment “Catch Them Before They Fall”
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Assistant Principal’s Meeting Miami-Dade County Public Schools
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004 Coaching to Use DIBELS Data to Inform Instruction

Reading First in Florida –Responsibilities of school level personnel –Model for student success –Florida’s formula to leave no child behind –DIBELS measures –Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN) Two important resources – – Background Knowledge

To evaluate effectiveness of building level strategies for organization and management To identify where extra resources and support are needed in specific grade levels and classrooms To evaluate the effectiveness of new or continued curriculum (including supplementary/interventions and instructional strategies) Responsibilities of the Principal

Uninterrupted 90 minute (minimum) block of reading instruction Implement high quality initial instruction Implement differentiated instruction Implement immediate intensive intervention Teacher Responsibilities

From Florida’s Reading First Grant: …Coaches can assist principals in developing grade level instructional teams at each school to monitor individual and classroom level progress in reading and to make data based decisions about instruction… Reading Coaches need in-depth knowledge about Data Analysis Individual Problem Solving Classroom Organization Responsibilities of the Coach

Model for Student Success Continuous Assessment Data-Based Instructiona l Planning Instruction

5Five skills on which early reading instruction should focus 3Three types of assessment to guide instruction Screening Progress monitoring Diagnosis iiHigh quality initial instruction is critical iiiImmediate intensive interventions for children lagging behind in the growth of critical reading skills ii + iii = NCLB

GRADEDIBELS MEASUREREADING COMPONENT ASSESSED Kindergarten Initial Sounds, Phoneme Segmentation Letter Naming, Nonsense Words Phonemic Awareness Phonics First Phoneme Segmentation Letter Naming, Nonsense Words Oral Reading Phonemic Awareness Phonics Reading Fluency SecondNonsense Words Oral Reading Phonics Reading Fluency ThirdOral ReadingReading Fluency

A Web-based data management system that provides: -a convenient place for entering and organizing the results of student assessments, -a secure, centralized, easily accessible location for the storage of student information, -a tool for timely and helpful reports so that educators can effectively analyze data, plan instruction, and communicate student progress. What is the PMRN? (Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network)

Participants will: understand how to use the following reports generated by the Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN) to make instructional decisions –School Status Report –School Grade Summary Report –School Progress Report –Class Status Report –Class Progress Tracking Report Objectives for Today

Risk Level Key

PMRN Sign In Page 1

Page 2

Median Page 3

Page 4

The Class Status Reports from the Progress Monitoring & Reporting Network (PMRN) will help answer three important questions: 1. Who needs extra support? 2. How should groups be formed? 3. Which skills need to be emphasized? Class Status Report

page 5 Kindergarten Class Assessment Period 4 1.Complete the activity on page 6 of your colorful handout by using the report found on page 5. Work individually or with a partner.

Who Needs Extra Support? High Risk:7 Moderate Risk:3 Low Risk:9 page 5

How will small groups be formed? Group 1: Students 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 Group 2: Students 2, 4, 6, 9, 10 (12, possibly) Group 3: Students page 5

Which skills need to be emphasized? Group 1: PA & Phonics Group 2: PA & Phonics Group 3: Phonics & Fluency page 5

Uninterrupted 90 minute block No other personnel to assist during Learning Center time Scott Foresman with Links to Reading First for ii Classroom Organization for this Kindergarten Class

40 minutes will be devoted to whole class ii using Scott Foresman core curriculum 50 minutes will be devoted to small group instruction: Classroom Organization for this Kindergarten Class: Teacher Led-Center MTWTHF G1HR 25 minutes 25 G2MR G3LR

Small group instruction for 50 minutes: –Group 1: Implement SF ERI --25 min. daily –Group 2: Implement SF Links to RF (phonemic awareness and phonics activities will provide students extra practice with the content that was taught during ii) min. daily –Group 3: Use the decodable books from SF to practice the decoding process and fluency min. daily Classroom Organization for this Kindergarten Class: Teacher-Led Center

Reading First Classroom Organization: Learning Centers Teacher-Led Center -Small group instruction Student Centers - Academically engaged - Accountability - Group, Pair, Cooperative, Individual

Keep high risk group sizes small (5-7 as a maximum). For students not making adequate progress in a group of 5-7, it is critical to reduce the group size to 3-5. Monitor high risk student progress more frequently in order to make instructional changes, small group changes, and to accelerate learning. It is important to work with each small group differently based on instructional need. Consider attitudes, behaviors, and work ethics when forming and modifying groups. Flexible Groups at the Teacher-Led Center

With a partner analyze the Progress Report and answer the questions on page 7 of your handout. Page 7

1.When should have more intensive instruction been implemented for: Student 3?After Assessment 3 Student 8?After Assessment 1 Student 16?After Assessment 1 Page 7

The student has not progressed in Oral Reading Fluency, but the target has increased. So, by Assessment 4, he was at high risk. Ongoing Progress Monitoring (OPM) at this point may be an option to collect more data. 2. What do you notice about Student 3? Page 7

Students 3, 4, 8, 10, 14, and After Assessment 3, which students should the teacher have targeted for extra instruction in Oral Reading Fluency? Page 7

Use Progress Reports to: –Monitor progress –Determine which students need more intensive instruction –To form flexible reading groups –Offer instructional strategies to the teacher –Determine types of professional development from which specific teachers could benefit –To write and monitor Academic Improvement Plans (AIPs) Summary of Recommended Uses of Student Data

–To conduct parent conferences SAMPLE

Is the core reading program implemented with fidelity? Is there a need for more professional development for a particular area of reading? Is there a need for more intensive coaching? Are materials allocated to maximize learning? Is personnel use maximized to focus on reading instruction? Is the instructional day scheduled such that reading is THE priority? Important Considerations

Please use the blue question/comment cards found on your table. Questions?

For additional information, please contact: Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research 227 North Bronough Street, Suite 7250 Tallahassee, FL (850) (V) (850) (F)