Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo 2007.10.23.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
Advertisements

Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
10/23/07RTML EDR Oct GDE1 Cornell Plans for RTML EDR Work G. Dugan Cornell LEPP.
Issues in ILC Main Linac and Bunch Compressor from Beam dynamics N. Solyak, A. Latina, K.Kubo.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
BDS GDE context LC-ABD2 : WP4 - Beam Line Design 12 th April 2007, LC-ABD Plenary, RHUL Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, The Cockcroft Institute.
Issues of stability and ground motion in ILC Andrei Seryi SLAC October 17, 2005 Selected pages from: Full talk at
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
SLAC ILC Accelerator: Luminosity Production Peter Tenenbaum HEP Program Review June 15, 2005.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
Main Linac Integration Work Packages Chris Adolphsen Dec 11, 2007 High Priority Items in Red.
8/28/07RTML EDR KOM1 Cornell Plans for RTML EDR Work G. Dugan Cornell LEPP.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
ILC Start-End Simulations Glen White, SLAC May 13, 2014 AWLC14, Fermilab.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC for RDR team of editors.
@ Fermilab May 15-17, 2006, FNAL KIRTI RANJAN – DOE Review1 ILC Simulation for RDR Kirti Ranjan Fermilab.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
DESY GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 / 12 Status of RTML Design and Tuning Studies PT SLAC.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Simulations Group Summary K. Kubo, D. Schulte, N. Solyak for the beam dynamics working group.
Dynamic Tuning Selected Highlights Freddy Poirier (DESY) ILC accelerator physics group meeting 28 th January 2008.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Simulations (LET beam dynamics ) Group report Kiyoshi Kubo.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Emittance Tuning Simulations in the ILC Damping Rings James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
GDE Main Linac and RTML Beam Dynamics Conveners: Nikolay Solyak, Cris Adolphsen, Kyioshi Kubo April 20, Room 303, 14:30 – 18:00.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
Emittance preservation in the main linacs of ILC and CLIC Andrea Latina (CERN) Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) LCWS University of Texas at Arlington - Oct
Tor Raubenheimer KEK Mtg Goals KEK January 19 th, 2006.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Emittance preservation in the RTML of ILC and CLIC Andrea Latina (CERN) Nikolay Solyak (FNAL) LCWS University of Texas at Arlington - Oct
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC Americas Region February 7, ILC Source Systems Work Packages and EDR Discussions ILC GDE Meeting IHEP, Beijing, China J. C.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
February 4, 2007 Global Design Effort 1. February 4, 07 Global Design Effort IR&MDI: 2 Tuesday’s discussion EDR organization Work Package distribution.
BDS Status Update Glen White, SLAC July ADI Fuze Meeting.
1 Status of the BCD GDE Area System Leaders Meeting (Jan.19-20, 2006) Nobu Toge (KEK)
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Global Design Effort RTML KOM Close-out Ross, Walker.
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
15-August-2005Peter Tenenbaum for WG1 Convenors 1 Low Emittance Transport and Beam Dynamics (WG1) Snowmass Meeting “I hear the roar of the big machine,
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
RTML and Main Linac Design (2.6.1 and 2.7.1)
Reliability, MPS, Operations and Tuning Work Packages
Presentation transcript:

Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo

Why “information for simulations”? In Summary of Accelerator Physics Group in DESY GDE Meeting, we have List of 10 Critical Issues. The first issue is: Define critical specifications for components Often, we are asked what is the tolerances, how much errors do we assume. But there is no common answer. We should have common set of “standard” assumptions, errors, tolerances. Let us make one set of documents and data files.

DRAFT: “Task Information for simulations” of ILC Acc. Physics Group (Simulations Group) The first table is based on the meeting on Aug. 7 and 21, 2007 Description of each task is based on quarkpt 16-May and modified by K.Kubo Revised

Tasks of “Information for simulations” Goal is to make a common set of data, or data base, for assumptions and input parameters of simulations. –This can be used as “standard” assumptions in simulations. –This can be used as suggested specifications of hardware. Assign contact person for each task and Contact person is responsible to –Communicate with experts –Gather relevant information –Make documentation(s). –If suitable, make a set of data file(s) which can be used in simulation studies. –Not responsible to make new information. These are not “Work Package”. Time schedule –First set of out put by the GDE meeting in October –Can be tentative. Further update will be necessary, but we need models for simulation studies. (There may be exceptions)

List A: Information for simulations Contact Lattice designMark Woodley (SLAC), Allex Valishev (FNAL) Alignment modelK. Kubo (KEK) Ground motion and vibration model P. Lebrun (FNAL), Dirk Kruecker (DESY) RF (BC, ML) error modelD. Schulte (CERN) Magnet error modelJames Jones (ASTeC) BPM performance model Cold and Warm ? BSM(Beam size monitor) performance model G. Blair (RHUL) Cavity wakefieldRoger Barlow (Manchester) Collimator wakefield Other impedance Stray electromagnetic fieldsN. Solyak (FNAL) DRAFT LIST

Lattice Design Goals of the Project The goal is to make a complete and self-consistent optics design from the DR exits to beam dumps, for both e+ and e-. This should include the undulator section for e+ source. The design should define beam diagnostics and correction sections. Deliverables Complete set of lattice files of LET (from the DR exits to beam dumps) in an agreed standard format (or formats). Note: The format will probably be MAD format, with expanded list of components, without any macros. Since the lattice designs of RTML and BDS have been developed by their Area Group in RDR phase. and the ML lattice design has been also developed by different groups around the word, main effort of this task will be matching between areas. It is not clear which group will be responsible to this task primarily.

Alignment model Goals of the Project The goal of the project is to develop and document a model of the initial survey and alignment which is suitable for incorporation into ILC simulations. The model should incorporate the following issues: Errors in the initial construction of the tunnel, with a particular emphasis on the long-wavelength misalignments in the tunnel trajectory. Uncorrelated and correlated alignment errors due to the process of mechanical survey and alignment of components, including correlations between multiple beamlines in the same tunnel (caused, for example, by systematic errors in the survey network). Deliverables One or more technical notes which document the content and design of the model. This should includes formula which give misalignment of every relevant beam line component.

Ground motion and vibration model Goals of the Project The goal of the project is to develop and document models of ground motion and vibration which are suitable for incorporation into ILC simulations. The models should incorporate the following physics: Expected ground motion at typical "reference" sites, including long-term, long-baseline correlated motions (ATL and/or tunnel settling) Technical noise Component vibrations, in particular quadrupole and other multipole magnets Detector and IR noise, incorporating any anticipated correction methods which are not beam- based (geophone or interferometer, for example). The models should represent the best compromise possible between strict accuracy and computational efficiency. Deliverables One or more technical notes which document the content and design of the models, along with results of "test" simulations which can be used to validate the inclusion of the models into simulation programs. It is preferred that a coded-up implementation of the model be made available as well as a technical note describing how to code up such a model. The coded-up versions should include documentation describing how to put them to use.

RF (BC, ML) error model Goals of the Project The goal is to develop and document a model of the field errors of RF cavities which is suitable for incorporation into ILC simulations. The model should incorporate the following issues: Phase and amplitude errors (at the RF source as well as cavity-by-cavity) The model should include static errors, errors which develop over long periods of time (drift), errors which occur over the interval from one bunch train to another (jitter), and errors which develop in the course of a single bunch train. Deliverables One or more technical notes which document the content and design of the model.

Magnet error model Goals of the Project The goal is to develop and document a model of the field errors of magnets which is suitable for incorporation into ILC simulations. The model should incorporate the following issues: Magnet strength errors Magnet harmonic content The model should include static errors, errors which develop over long periods of time (drift), errors which occur over the interval from one bunch train to another (jitter), and errors which develop in the course of a single bunch train. Deliverables One or more technical notes which document the content and design of the model.

BPM performance model Cold and Warm Goals of the Project The goal is to develop and document a model of the errors of BPM which is suitable for incorporation into ILC simulations. The model should incorporate the following issues: Resolution, Offset, and scale factor errors, include static errors, errors which develop over long periods of time (drift). Dynamic range. Dependence on intensity and number of bunches. Deliverables One or more technical notes which document the content and design of the model.

BSM(Beam size monitor) performance model Goals of the Project The goal is to develop and document a model of the errors and performance of beam size monitors which is suitable for incorporation into ILC simulations. Deliverables One or more technical notes which document the content and design of the model.

Cavity Wakefield Goals of the Study There are two sets of goals for this study: goals related to the baseline design, with the TESLA technology cavity and the 9-8Q-9 standard RF unit, and studies of alternate cavity shapes which may produce higher gradients (typically at the expense of stronger wakefields). Baseline Cavity Study Goals Produce a complete set of LRWFs for a standard RF unit, as described above, including misalignments, cavity fabriaction errors, all couplers and loads in the system, and which is consistent with field measurements of LRWFs and the known procedures of the cavity and cryomodule fabrication process. Verify that the current set of short- range wakefields used for ILC simulations is adequate, alternately propose a new set which is adequate. Alternate Cavity Study Goals Produce sets of short- and long-range wakefields for the high gradient cavity models (re-entrant, low-loss, ICHIRO) which are consistent with field measurements and known procedures of fabrication. Determine the wakefields in the case of alternate coupler designs. Deliverables The deliverables are as follows: A technical note describing the results of the baseline cavity studies. A technical note describing the results of the alternate cavity studies. For both baseline and alternate cavities, a set of publicly-available data files which can be used in simulation studies, representing the short- and long-range wakefields of the baseline and alternate cavity designs.

Collimator wakefield Goals of the Study Produce a complete set of wakefiled (wakefunction) of collimators. Deliverables A technical note describing the results of the study. A set of publicly-available data files which can be used in simulation studies.

Other impedance Goals of the Study Check wakefiled(impedance) of beam line components other than RF cavities and collimators. And produce a complete set of wakefiled (wakefunction) of relevant components. Probably following components: Cavity BPM Beam pipe in BDS Beam pipe in undulator section Deliverables A technical note describing the results of the study. A set of publicly-available data files which can be used in simulation studies.