MEASUREMENTS OF RADIATION DOSES IN MULTISLICES COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS A. ELMAHDI*, A. SULIEMAN *Presenting author 1 Sudan Atomic Energy Commission,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jessica Kishimoto The University of Western Ontario Medical Biophysics Undergrad April 7, 2010 The Effect of Dose on Image Quality When Using an Image.
Advertisements

Estimation of Entrance Surface Doses (ESDs) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in Radiological Departments in Mashhad-IRAN Presenter: Mr.
State of Michigan Computed Tomography Regulations
Radiation Dose in CT Scanning: A Team Approach
Managing Patient Dose in Computed Tomography (CT)
RAD309 Patient Dose.
NC HPS Meeting 10/18-19/2001 Boone, NC Recent Advances in CT Technology and Issues of CT Dosimetry T. Yoshizumi 1,2, M. Sarder 1, R. Reiman 1,2, E. Paulson.
1 NEXT 2000: Survey of Computed Tomography (CT) Practice, Workload, Dose Stanley H. Stern, Ph. D. FDA/CDRH Office of Health and Industry Programs Division.
5 th September 2005 Paul Collins Computed Tomography Dosimetry Assessment of Effective Dose in Computed Tomography using an Anthropomorphic Phantom Paul.
Novel single-source high-pitch protocol for CT angiography of the aorta: comparison to high-pitch dual-source protocol in the context of TAVI planning.
Business: Cell/Text: Presented by: Thomas J. LaRocca, M.S., D.A.B.R. Medical Physicist
Institut de radiophysique CT Imaging and Dose Optimization: How medical physicists could help? Prof. Francis R. Verdun.
Current Topics in Medical Physics Research Xiaoming Zheng, PhD. School of Dentistry and Health Science Chengdu, China, 2009.
RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Dose Survey in Computed Tomography DS /CM Kampala IAEA/RCA Kampala.
Radiation Dose in MS-CT coronarography Ladislav Pavic, MD, PhD Sunce Clinics Zagreb / Sarajevo Croatia / Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Radiation Dosimetry of the Patient
Optimizing Patient Radiation Dose
Radiation Protection of Patients Unit
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Part 19.03: Optimization of protection in Mammography.
Current UK legislation and guidelines for radiation protection of patients and staff Prepared by: Dr D. Mladenova.
EVALUATION OF ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM USING SPIRAL CT SCAN 1 Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Medical Radiologic Science, P.O.Box.
The ICRP System of Protection Applied to Medical Exposures
Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Referrals - some legal requirements & duties - Mr John Saunderson, Consultant Physicist / Radiation Protection Adviser, Radiation.
Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological examinations amongst radiology department staff AL Chang, LH Cope, DH Keane, S Wood Presented by.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Dental Radiology Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology Day 7 – Lecture 2(2)
Pratik Mehta, B.A. 1 ; Kate MacGregor, M.P.H. 2 ; Robert Gould, D.Sc. 2 ; Diana Miglioretti, Ph.D. 3 ; J. Anthony Seibert, Ph.D. 4 ; Rebecca Smith-Bindman,
CT physics and instrumentation
Catherine Ashmore Lorna Sweetman North Western Medical Physics Elaine Holt.
BEIR VII Implications of the Report for the Future of Medical Imaging G. Donald Frey, Ph.D. Department of Radiology Medical University of South Carolina.
Low Dose Head Computed Tomography Protocol for Evaluation of Non-traumatic Emergencies in Children Rishi Mhapsekar, MD Marilyn J. Siegel, MD Robert McKinstry.
Computed Tomography Q & A
Reduction of effective and organ dose to the eye lens in cerebral MDCT scans using iterative image reconstruction Zizka J, Jandura J, Kvasnicka T, Klzo.
Image Gallery: Lesion detection on low dose head CT Sarabjeet Singh, MD Mannudeep K. Kalra, MD *Eugene J. Mark, MD *James Stone, MD James H. Thrall, MD.
JUSTIFICATION OF COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS AND RADIATION RISKS IN EVERYDAY RADIOLOGICAL PRACTICE Darka R. Hadnađev, Olivera Nikolić, Sanja Stojanović.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Optimization of Protection in Computed Tomography (CT)-What can radiographers do? IAEA Regional Training Course.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) March 18, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
How we set a DRL An example using CT David Sutton / Colin Martin Kampala IAEA/RCA Kampala.
Part 2.
RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE YOUNG PATIENT: Kenya perspective
Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology
RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Some reasons for unnecessary procedures
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Diagnostic reference levels in Medical Imaging. Concept and practice
Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology
VIII.3. Optimization of Protection for Medical Exposures in Nuclear Medicine. 4. Guidance levels Postgraduate Educational Course in Radiation Protection.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Part 19.04: Optimization of protection in Mammography.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency General Radiography Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology Day 7 – Lecture 1(1)
IS THERE A RATIONAL APPROACH TO RADIATION RISK? Philip F. Judy Ph.D. Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital New England AAPM Chapter Meeting.
Computed Tomography Computed Tomography is the most significant development in radiology in the past 40 years. MRI and Ultrasound are also significant.
Wednesday Case of the Day History: CT pulmonary angiography (image shown) was performed on a 24-year-old female patient with pleuritic chest pain and increased.
Blinded by the Light The irradiation of lenses during routine CT head examinations across a NHS Trust; a quality improvement project Dr Jack Roberts, Dr.
BY GAMINI SENANAYAKE.  Legislation applicable to staff and public Ionising radiation regulations 1999  Legislation applicable to patients – Ionising.
Introduction of a low dose protocol for thoracic ablation under CT guidance Thea Buchan, Jason Godbold, Dr Steve Bandula Interventional Oncology Service,
Head computed tomography doses in four selected hospitals in Nigeria
Patient exposure trends and problems in implementing ALARA
Role of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) in lowering radiation dose for pediatric head CT Electronic Poster-eP 140 Azadeh Tabari, MD.
How we set a DRL An example using CT
Sharan Packer Specialist Inspector (Radiation)
Sample General Electric CT Dose Report from a CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The dose report contains information about the patient (deleted), type.
Pediatric Radiology By Dr. Wambani, J.S. Chief Radiologist
CT dose optimization software synergy – A clinical perspective
Exhibit Number: C19 Evaluation and Reduction of Head Computed Tomography Dose Because of full frame graphic use title slide sparingly because too many.
Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology
Wednesday Case of the Day
David J. Brenner, Maria A. Georgsson  Gastroenterology 
Managing Patient Dose in Computed Tomography (CT)
Presentation transcript:

MEASUREMENTS OF RADIATION DOSES IN MULTISLICES COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS A. ELMAHDI*, A. SULIEMAN *Presenting author 1 Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Radiation Safety Institute. P.O. Box 3001, Post code 11111, Khartoum, Sudan. 2 Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Medical Radiologic Science. P.O Box 1908, Post code 11111, Khartoum, Sudan. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA VR3

Introduction The motivations for this study are the relatively high radiation dose to the patient in CT examinations and the increasing frequency and variety of examinations. The motivations for this study are the relatively high radiation dose to the patient in CT examinations and the increasing frequency and variety of examinations. The UNSCEAR, 2000 has highlighted that the worldwide there about 93 million CT examinations performed annually at a rate of about 57 examinations per 1000 persons. The UNSCEAR, 2000 has highlighted that the worldwide there about 93 million CT examinations performed annually at a rate of about 57 examinations per 1000 persons. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25th/28th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25th/28th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA

The doses tissues from CT can often approach or exceed levels known to increase the probability of cancer. technologists are responsible for managing the dose in collaboration radiologists and medical physicists. In Sudan, the number of CT machines was increased in last few years. Introduction Cont.Introduction ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA

The current study intended to: (i) Measure the radiation dose for patients during CT examinations. (ii) Increase the benefits of CT examination compare with the risk of radiation. (iii) Estimate the effective dose for the patients undergoing CT examination. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Objectives

A total of 130 patients with different CT examinations were referred to Alzaytouna specialist and Alamal National hospitals in the period of study. All the patients were performed using departments’ protocols with Multislice CT (MSCT) 64 slice (Toshiba Sensation aquilion 64). All the patients were performed using departments’ protocols with Multislice CT (MSCT) 64 slice (Toshiba Sensation aquilion 64). ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Materials and Methods

Cont.Materials and Methods  Data were collected to the study the effects of patient-related parameters : (e.g. age, sex, diagnostic of examination, and use of contrast media) on the patient dose).  Data were collected to investigate the effect of exposure-related parameters (gantry tilt, kilo voltage (kV), tube current (mA), exposure time, slice thickness, table increment, number of slices, and start and end positions of scans) on patient dose. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA

The average age of the patients was 45  18 years. The mean effective dose for ANH was 17.4±12.7 mSv, 22.9±14.3 mSv and 2.4±0.9 mSv for the chest, abdomen and brain examinations, respectively. The mean effective doses for ASH specialist hospital were 26.3±7.8 mSv, 47.6±33.0 mSv, and 3.7±1.5 mSv for the chest, abdomen and brain, respectively. The mean effective doses for ASH specialist hospital were 26.3±7.8 mSv, 47.6±33.0 mSv, and 3.7±1.5 mSv for the chest, abdomen and brain, respectively. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Results

Table 1: Comparison of patient dose during CT with previous studies Author No. of ptsExamMachine model Present study 130Chest, Abd, Brain& s Toshiba Sensation aquilion 64 A.M Nour (2010) 83AbdSiemens Somatom emotion Entisar Omer (2011) 51CTUSiemens Somatom emotion duo European Commissi on1999 Routine Abd, Pelvis & Liver I.I.Suliman (2010) 445Head, chest, abd& pelvis Toshiba Somatom sensation16

Table 2: Comparison of patient dose during CT with previous studies Author PitchkVpmAs Slice thickness Present study A.M Nour Entisar Omer I.I.SulimanNA12041±175.8±1

Table 3: Comparison of patient dose during CT with previous studies(Dose-mSv) Author CTDIvolDLPEffective dose Present study A.M Nour18.87 mGy865.3 mGy.cm13.5 Entisar Omer European Commission1 999 NA I.I.Suliman

 A total of 130 patients were examined over 4 months. Table 4.1 and Table 4.2 represent the anatomical regions of all patients.  Anatomical regions are important in radiation dosimetry because in CT imaging the applied protocol affects drastically radiation dose (region of interest ROI) and use of contrast media.  There were large variations in the radiation dose to the patients. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Discussion

 In general, these variations of doses can be attributed to the differences in tube voltages (kVp), number of scan, tube current time product (mAs) and repeated scans.  There may be justifiable reasons for some variability in practice; of which the most important one is the difference in anatomical regions.  This difference is greater if operators and practitioners are insufficiently educated in newly emerging technology. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIACont.Discussion

 Further, increasing demand in CT examination in Sudan may induce operators to overcome the ideal referring criteria because the vast majority of CT services are concentrated in Khartoum state.  It is perceived that this is more likely to occur with relatively inexperienced workers and it is also possible that some examinations are carried out more intensively than needed as a mean of radiation risk limitations. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Cont.Discussion

 Patients were referred to the CT scan department for different examinations (e.g. brain, chest, abdomen and others).  The patients were scanned with routine protocols which were desired by the manufacturer adopted by the operator.  ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Cont.Discussion

 The patients were scanned with kVp range from ( ), and scanned with mAs range (87-743) as shown in the Table 4.3, and with the pitch (0.75) or less than (1), and feed/rotation about 18 mm, and slice thickness collimation was (16x1.5), and slice thickness was 5 mm, and rotation time was (0.5 s) and region of scan included thee ROI. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Cont.Discussion

These parameters produced these radiation values represented in Table 4.4 which shows the values of DLP average ( mGy.cm), CTDIvol average (168.3 mGy) and effective dose average (20.05 mSv). The range of DLP was ( mGy.cm) and the large variable in DLP due to repeated of scans and patients. These parameters produced these radiation values represented in Table 4.4 which shows the values of DLP average ( mGy.cm), CTDIvol average (168.3 mGy) and effective dose average (20.05 mSv). The range of DLP was ( mGy.cm) and the large variable in DLP due to repeated of scans and patients. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Cont.Discussion

 In CT examination, patients are exposed to high radiation dose. Therefore, the used of ordinary dose values (CTDI, or DLP) will provide less information regarding the radiation risks.  Effective dose is the unit of choice in this situation (partial exposure) and furthermore, comparisons between different procedures are possible with different imaging modalities. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Cont.Discussion

 In this study, the mean effective dose for Al- amal hospital was 17.4±12.7 mSv, 22.9±14.3 mSv and 2.4±0.9 mSv for the chest, abdomen and brain, respectively.  The mean effective dose for Al-Zaytouna hospital were 26.3±7.8 mSv, 47.6±33.0 mSv, 3.7±1.5 mSv for the chest, abdomen and brain, respectively –TUNISIARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Cont.Discussion

 These factors indicate strongly against measures to provide effective radiation protection.  It is necessary to establish the minimum exposure threshold that will deliver adequate image quality in each application, preferably expressed in terms of clinical effectiveness. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Cont.Discussion

The dose of this study is relatively higher compared to previous studies. This can be attributed to lack of training in CT dose optimization and CT modality. The study showed wide variations of radiation dose and effective dose for the same hospital. Continuous training of workers in this field and establishing the diagnostic reference level in the Sudan are very important. The study showed wide variations of radiation dose and effective dose for the same hospital. Continuous training of workers in this field and establishing the diagnostic reference level in the Sudan are very important. ARAB CONGRESS OF RADIOLOGY (ARC 5) 25 th /28 th APRIL 2012 LE ROYAL HOTEL - HAMAMET –TUNISIA Conclusions

Acknowledgement The authors would like to than all the staff of all hospitals for the kind support.

Thank you for your kind attention