1 1 The LHCb Upgrade Outline LHCb Detector LHCb Detector Selected Physics Results Selected Physics Results Upgrade Plans Upgrade Plans Summary Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

Overview of the LHCb experiment Status and Results
Guoming CHEN The Capability of CMS Detector Chen Guoming IHEP, CAS , Beijing.
Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb upgrade Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade – main drivers Overview of the sub-detector.
7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC University M&O Personnel University with major hardware responsibility at CERN Based on > 10 years of US Zeus experience.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
Introduction Silicon Tracker project: design production Tracking strategy and performance Design and performance of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Kim Vervink.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique des Hautes Energies July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Tomasz Szumlak (University of Glasgow) Epiphany 2010, Jan 2010, Krakow, Poland 1 Status of the LHCb experiment Outline Introduction to the LHCb.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
Abraham Gallas SECOND WORKSHOP ON: FLAVOR PHYSICS IN THE LHC ERA Valencia December 2012 The LHCb upgrade.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Jornadas LIP, Dez P. Martins - CFTP-IST The NA60 Silicon Vertex Telescopes Dimuon measurements Dimuon measurements Vertex telescope used in: Vertex.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Future b and c experiment with hadron machine Tomasz Skwarnicki Representing LHCb collaboration.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Abraham Gallas for the LHCb Collaboration Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics 2011 Chicago 9-14 June 2011 The LHCb upgrade.
Chris Parkes 1 Interaction Point Muon System Calorimeters Tracking System Vertex Locator RICH Detectors Upgrade: Beyond the Energy Frontier Chris Parkes,
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
1 LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance Gerhard Raven NIKHEF and VU, Amsterdam Representing.
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
1 The LHCb Upgrade Outline LHCb Detector LHCb Detector Selected Physics Results Selected Physics Results Upgrade Plans Upgrade Plans Test beam campaign.
LHCb trigger: algorithms and performance Hugo Ruiz Institut de Ciències del Cosmos March 12 th -17 th 2009, Tsukuba, Japan On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
Burkhard Schmidt, CERN on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb upgrade 1.
Technological advances for the LHCb upgrade Marina Artuso Syracuse University.
Beauty and charm at the LHC, Jeroen van Tilburg, FOM Veldhoven 2014 Jeroen van Tilburg Beauty and charm at the LHC: searches for TeV scale phenomena in.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
Magnetic Shielding Studies of the LHCb RICH Photon Detectors Mitesh Patel, Marcello Losasso, Thierry Gys (CERN )
Burkhard Schmidt, CERN.  Lecture I  Physics Motivation for the HL-LHC  Lecture II  An overview of the High-Luminosity upgrade of the LHC  Lecture.
On behalf of the LHCb VELO project
Overview and update of LHCb Upgrade
The LHCb Upgrade LHCb now Upgrade motivation New trigger and DAQ
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
The LHCb Upgrade Outline LHCb Detector Selected Physics Results
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

1 1 The LHCb Upgrade Outline LHCb Detector LHCb Detector Selected Physics Results Selected Physics Results Upgrade Plans Upgrade Plans Summary Summary On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Tomasz Szumlak AGH-UST XXII International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering (DIS) 28/04 – 02/05/2014, Warsaw, POLAND

3  LHCb is dedicated for studying heavy quark flavour physics  It is a single arm forward spectrometer with pseudorapidity coverage 2 < η < 5  Precise tracking system (VELO, upstream and downstream tracking stations and 4 Tm magnet)  Particle identification system (RICH detectors, calorimeters and muon stations)  Partial information from calorimeters and muon system contribute to L0 trigger (hardware) that works at LHC clock – 40 MHz  Full detector readout at 1 MHz The LHCb detector at LHC ( JINST S08005)

4 „Input” for the LHCb detector – LHC performance

5 Operation conditions of the LHCb in 2011  recorded luminosity L ≈ 1,2 [fb -1 ] at beam energy 3.5 [TeV]  LHCb stably operated at L inst = 4.0 x [cm -2 s -1 ] (nominal 2.0 x )  Average number of visible interactions per x-ing µ = 1.4 (nominal 0.4)  Data taking efficiency ~90 % with 99 % of operational channels  HLT (High Level Trigger) input ~ 0.85 MHz, output ~ 3 kHz  Ageing of the sub-detectors monitored – according to expectations Luminosity leveling  Use displaced p-p beams  Lower inst. Luminosity  Stable conditions during the run  Lower pile-up

6 Operation conditions of the LHCb in 2012  Beam energy 4.0 [TeV] (15 % increase of the b-barb x-section)  Keep the luminosity at L inst = 4.0 x [cm -2 s -1 ] for this year  Average number of visible interactions per x-ing slightly higher µ = 1.6  Keep high data taking efficiency and quality  HLT (High Level Trigger) input ~ 1.0 MHz, output ~ 5 kHz (upgraded HLT farm and revisited code)  Collected ~ 2.1 fb -1 of collision data

7 Selected physics results (1) B s  μ + μ - : constraining SUSY  Strongly suppressed in the SM  Theory - known with high precision  Enhanced in MSSM  World’s best measurement LHCb & CMS B 0  K*μ + μ - : NP in loops  The largest sample collected  Clear theoretical quantity  Sensitive to Wilson coefficients  World’s best measurement (JHEP 1308 (2013) 131)

8 Selected physics results (2) B 0  K*μ + μ - : NP in loops  Observed forward-backward asymmetry very similar to that predicted by the SM  Cannot clearly state any discrepancy – sample limitation  New base of observables proposed  Reduced dependency on hadronic form factors  Observed discrepancy may be a hint of new heavy neutral Z’ particle (PRL 111, (2013))

9 Overall summary of Run I LHCb:  Superb performance – greatly exceeded any expectations  Stable operation at inst. luminosity 100% higher than nominal  General purpose detector in forward direction  Many world leading results  Over 180 papers published! The pinch of salt:  No conclusive BSM physics discovered  There is still room for NP!  Need push precision to the limits in order to challenge theoretical predictions  Need more data

10 Data taking road map for LHCb before the upgrade

11 Why upgrade (i.e., what’s wrong with the current design…?) Superb performance – but 1 MHz readout is a sever limit  can collect ~ 2 fb -1 per year, ~ 5 fb -1 for the „phase 1” of the experiment  this is not enough if we want to move from precision exp to discovery exp  cannot gain with increased luminosity – trigger yield for hadronic events saturates Upgrade plans for LHCb do not depend on the LHC machine  we use fraction of the luminosity at the moment Upgrade target  full event MHz (flexible approach)  completely new front-end electronics needed (on-chip zero-suppression)  redesign DAQ system  HLT kHz, more than 50 fb -1 of data for the „phase 2”  increase the yield of events (up to 10x for hadronic channels)  experimental sensitivities close or better than the theoretical ones  expand physics scope to: lepton flavour sector, electroweak physics, exotic searches and QCD Installation ~ Upgrade Plans

12 Sensitivities to key flavour observables ( for more see: LHCb Upgrade: Technical Design Report, LHCb-TDR-12 )

13 Projected running conditions for the upgrade  Operational luminosity up to L inst = 2 x [cm -2 s -1 ]  25 ns bunch time spacing  Average number of visible interaction per x-ing µ ≈ 2.6  Challenging environment for tracking and reconstruction  Radiation damage High µ already seen in LHCb!

14 Tomasz Szumlak AGH – University of Science and Technology WIT Pisa 03 – 05/05/2012Tomasz Szumlak AGH – University of Science and Technology WIT Pisa 03 – 05/05/2012 Current trigger system Problem for hadronic channels:  saturation with increasing luminosity  no gain in event yields 5

15 … and the upgraded one Staged approach:  use Low Level Trigger (LLT) as a throttle  enormous gain for hadronic final states such ΦΦ  do as much as you can in HLT

16 Tracking is at heart of the current LHCb success  Upgrade cannot compromise this performance  This is not an easy task At high luminosity we are expecting  More interactions per x-ing  Higher track multiplicities, more vertices, higher detector occupancy  More ghosts (scary and dangerous in many ways…)  Spill-over We need to maintain  High tracking efficiency (~ 90% for p > 5 GeV)  High relative momentum resolution (~ 3.5 x )  Ghost rate as low as possible (less than ~ 10 %)  Single event processing time in HLT as short as possible (~ 25 ms)  And do not add to the material budget… And in addition all of this using full detector MHz

17 What we must change to cope with the 40 MHz read-out VELO Si strips (replace all) Silicon Tracker Si strips (replace all) Outer Tracker Straw tubes (replace R/O) RICH HPDs (replace HPD & R/O) Calo PMTs (reduce PMT gain, replace R/O) Muon MWPC (almost compatible)

18 New front-end electronics  Trigger-less  Sends out data with the machine frequency  On chip zero-suppression (SoC)

19 VErtex LOcator VELO2 Current design: R-Φ geometry Si strip sensors with pitch between 38 – 100 µm To be replaced with pixel based device  low occupancy  much easier patter recognition  easier to control alignment  radiation hardness  extremely high data rate ~ 12 Gbit/s  un-uniform data rates/radiation damage  micro-channel CO 2 cooling Read-out ASIC, VeloPix, based on TimePix/Medipix chip  256x256 pixel matrix  equal spatial resolution in both directions  IBM 130 nm CMOS process  great radiation hardness potential ~ 500 Mrad

20 VErtex LOcator VELO2  Predicted performance superior in almost any aspect w.r.t the current VELO  This is essential for physics performance of the upgraded spectrometer  TDR document is out! (VELO Upgrade: Technical Design Report, LHCb-TDR-13)

21 TT and T (IT + OT) trackers TT and IT part of the T stations are Si strips based detectors  pitch 200 µm  long strips 11, 22 and 33 cm OT is a gaseous detector  very long (2.4 – 5 m)  and thin straws (5 mm)  occupancy limited to ~ 10 – 25 % World’s best b hadrons mass measurement!

22 TT tracker upgrade Features after the upgrade  high momentum track on-line selection (part of the trigger)  reconstruct long lived particles decaying outside the VELO  momentum estimate for slow particles  improved matching with VELO segments Upgrade technology  4 – 6 detector planes of Si strip detectors  reduced silicon thickness 500  300 μm  strip length 2.5 – 10 cm  increase acceptance at low η  new read-out electronics with on-chip zero- suppression SALT chip (Tracking Upgrade: Technical Design Report, LHCb-TDR-15)

23 T stations upgrade IT must be completely removed  integrated 1 MHz electronics Decrease the occupancy First option (Central Tracker)  central part: scintillating fibers with SiPM readout (128 readout channels)  build with 5 layers of 250 µm scintillating fibers  outer part is kept as is (straws) Second option (Full Fiber Tracker)  OT removed completely with 1 mm scintillating fibers (Tracking Upgrade: Technical Design Report, LHCb-TDR-15)

24 Particle ID and Calorimeters ASIC prototype Calorimeters (ECAL and HCAL) are maintained  PS/SPD removed (no L0!), e/γ separation provided by tracker (worked out in HLT)  inner modules of the ECAL may be replaced due to radiation damage (LS3)  front-end electronics adapted to 40 MHz read-out  first prototype ready – under study  lower gain Both RICH1 and RICH2 remains  new photo detectors (MaPMTs)  square design to increase coverage  40 MHz read-out ASIC  remove aerogel (cannot operate at expected luminosities) MaPMTs by Hamamatsu (PID Upgrade: Technical Design Report, LHCb-TDR-14)

25 Run II and the upgrade road map Summary

26  Superb performance of the LHCb experiment during Run I  Large number of world’s best physics results  More than 180 papers published  We did not make any considerable dents on the Standard Model  Upgrade of the present detector essential for discovery potential of the LHCb – origin of the CP violation and NP  Can collect ~ 50 fb -1 of data between 2019 and 2028  Base-line technologies of the upgrade have been chosen  Respective TDRs have been/are being submitted to the LHCC  Stay tuned! A lot of exciting time is ahead!

27 Back-up

28 Vertex Locator Dipole magnet TT+IT (Silicon Tracker) Calorimeters Muon system RICH detectors 300(H)/250(V) mrad 15mrad OT Interaction Point OT – Outer Tracker IT – Inner Tracker TT – Trigger Tracker  Single arm spectrometer geometry  Fully instrumented in rapidity range 2 < η <5  Capable of reconstructing backward tracks (-4 < η < -1.5)