Formal Test for Validity. EVALUATIONS Evaluations An evaluation is an assignment of truth-values to sentence letters. For example: A = T B = T C = F.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRUTH TABLES Section 1.3.
Advertisements

TRUTH TABLES The general truth tables for each of the connectives tell you the value of any possible statement for each of the connectives. Negation.
Constructing a Truth Table
Truth-Tables. Recap Deductive Validity We say that an argument is deductively valid when it has the following property: If the premises of the argument.
Logic & Critical Reasoning
Propositional Logic Lecture 10: Oct 29.
Truth Tables Presented by: Tutorial Services The Math Center.
Sentential Logic 2. REVIEW Deductive Validity We say that an argument is deductively valid when it has the following property: If the premises of the.
Logic ChAPTER 3 1. Truth Tables and Validity of Arguments
Propositional Equivalences. L32 Agenda Tautologies Logical Equivalences.
Review: Logic of Categories = Categorical Logic.
TF truth, falsity, and indeterminacy P is truth-functionally true iff it has the value T for any truth-value assignment. P is truth-functionally false.
Boolean Algebra Computer Science AND (today is Monday) AND (it is raining) (today is Monday) AND (it is not raining) (today is Friday) AND (it is.
Today’s Topics n Review Logical Implication & Truth Table Tests for Validity n Truth Value Analysis n Short Form Validity Tests n Consistency and validity.
1. 2 Day 1Intro Day 2Chapter 1 Day 3Chapter 2 Day 4Chapter 3 Day 5Chapter 4 Day 6Chapter 4 Day 7Chapter 4 Day 8EXAM #1 40% of Exam 1 60% of Exam 1 warm-up.
1 Math 306 Foundations of Mathematics I Math 306 Foundations of Mathematics I Goals of this class Introduction to important mathematical concepts Development.
Propositional Logic USEM 40a Spring 2006 James Pustejovsky.
Through the Looking Glass, 1865
Propositional Logic Lecture 1: Sep 2. Content 1.Mathematical proof (what and why) 2.Logic, basic operators 3.Using simple operators to construct any operator.
Propositional Logic Lecture 2: Sep 9. Conditional Statement If p then q p is called the hypothesis; q is called the conclusion “If your GPA is 4.0, then.
EE1J2 – Discrete Maths Lecture 4 Analysis of arguments Logical consequence Rules of deduction Rules of equivalence Formal proof of arguments See: Anderson,
Predicate Logic. Goal of Logic The goal of logic is to develop formal tests for validity. This is done by finding deductively valid argument forms. In.
Homework 3.
3.2 – Truth Tables and Equivalent Statements
TRUTH TABLES. Introduction Statements have truth values They are either true or false but not both Statements may be simple or compound Compound statements.
Logic ChAPTER 3.
Validity: Long and short truth tables Sign In! Week 10! Homework Due Review: MP,MT,CA Validity: Long truth tables Short truth table method Evaluations!
Propositional Logic.
Chapter 1 Section 1.4 More on Conditionals. There are three statements that are related to a conditional statement. They are called the converse, inverse.
Conditional Statements M Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion.
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH Prof. Shachar Lovett Clicker frequency: CA.
Truth-Tables. Midterm Grades Grade Distribution.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence.
Valid and Invalid Arguments
Reason and Argument Chapter 6 (2/3). A symbol for the exclusive ‘or’ We will use ұ for the exclusive ‘or’ Strictly speaking, this connective is not necessary.
CSE 20: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science Prof. Shachar Lovett.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 2 Section 1.1 Fri, Jan 19, 2007.
Predicate Logic. TRUTH-TABLE REMINDERS The problem people had the most trouble with was 1e: construct a truth-table for: (P & (~Q & R)) Many of you only.
Logic Review. FORMAT Format Part I 30 questions 2.5 marks each Total 30 x 2.5 = 75 marks Part II 10 questions Answer only 5 of them! Total 5 x 5 marks.
Truth Tables and Validity Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College pqrSp v qr & s~(p v q)~p~q~p & ~q~(p v q) -> (r & s) (~p & ~q) ->
3.3: Truth Tables. Types of Statements Negation: ~p Conjunction: p ˄ q (p and q) Disjunction: p V q (p or q, or both) Conditional: p → q (if p, then q)
Boolean Algebra. Logical Statements A proposition that may or may not be true:  Today is Monday  Today is Sunday  It is raining.
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting
Chapter 3: Semantics PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning March 13, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Propositional Logic Fall Term 2006 North Central College.
CS1022 Computer Programming & Principles Lecture 1 Logic and Proof.
Warmup Answer the following True/False questions in your head: I have brown hair AND I am wearing glasses I am male OR I am wearing sneakers I am NOT male.
How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting Section 1 Logic.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 1 Section 1.1 Wed, Jan 12, 2005.
Boolean Algebra Monday/Wednesday 7th Week. Logical Statements Today is Friday AND it is sunny. Today is Friday AND it is rainy. Today is Monday OR it.
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: "Truth Tables – Validity vs. Soundness" This PowerPoint Presentation contains a large number of slides, a good.
Lesson 20 INTERPRETING TRUTH TABLES. Review Conditional Statements (Less. 17) Original If p, then q. Converse If q, then p. Inverse If ~p, then ~q. Contrapositive.
CS203 Discrete Mathematical Structures
The Foundations: Logic and Proof, Sets, and Foundations PROPOSITIONS A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either True or False, but not the.
Notes - Truth Tables fun, fun, and more fun!!!!. A compound statement is created by combining two or more statements, p and q.
Statement Forms and Material Equivalence Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Metalogic. TWO CONCEPTIONS OF LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE.
Joan Ridgway. If a proposition is not indeterminate then it is either true (T) or false (F). True and False are complementary events. For two propositions,
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Section 1.1. Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false. Examples of propositions: a) The Moon is made of green.
Mathematics for Computing Lecture 2: Computer Logic and Truth Tables Dr Andrew Purkiss-Trew Cancer Research UK
TRUTH TABLES Edited from the original by: Mimi Opkins CECS 100 Fall 2011 Thanks for the ppt.
Assign Yourself and Do Now Thursday, January 10, 2013.
Chapter 1. Chapter Summary  Propositional Logic  The Language of Propositions (1.1)  Logical Equivalences (1.3)  Predicate Logic  The Language of.
TF truth, falsity, and indeterminacy P is truth-functionally true iff it has the value T for any truth-value assignment. P is truth-functionally false.
Section 3.2: Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Logical Operators (Connectives) We will examine the following logical operators: Negation (NOT,  ) Negation (NOT,  ) Conjunction (AND,  ) Conjunction.
Presentation transcript:

Formal Test for Validity

EVALUATIONS

Evaluations An evaluation is an assignment of truth-values to sentence letters. For example: A = T B = T C = F D = T E = F...

Evaluating WFFs To evaluate a WFF is to determine whether it is true or false according to an evaluation. Let’s consider ((Q & ~P) → R) Here’s our evaluation: Q = T, P = T, R = F.

Evaluation: Stage 1 PQR Write down sentence letters.

Evaluation: Stage 1 PQR TTF Insert truth-values from evaluation.

Evaluation: Stage 2 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTF Copy down the formula to evaluate.

Evaluation: Stage 3 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFT Copy the truth-values of each variable.

Evaluation: Stage 3 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTT Copy the truth-values of each variable.

Evaluation: Stage 3 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTTF Copy the truth-values of each variable.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTTF Find a connective to evaluate.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTTF Need these truth values.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTTF Need these truth values.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTTF Need this truth value.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTFTF Need this truth value.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTFTF Need these truth values.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTFFTF Need these truth values.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTFFTF Need these truth values.

Evaluation: Stage 4 PQR((Q&~P)→R) TTFTFFTTF Need these truth values.

In-Class Exercises Evaluation: P = F, Q = F, R = T ~(~P & ~Q) ~(P → ~Q) ((P & ~Q) & R)

FULL TRUTH-TABLES

Possibilities for One Sentence Letter φ…φ……φ… T F

Possibilities for Two Sentence Letters φψ…φ…ψ……φ…ψ… TT TF FT FF

Possibilities for Three Sentence Letters φψχ…φ…ψ…χ……φ…ψ…χ… TTT TTF TFT TFF FTT FTF FFT FFF

~(~P & ~Q) PQ~(~P&~Q) TT TF FT FF

Copy Whole Column PQ~(~P&~Q) TTT TFT FTF FFF

Copy Whole Column PQ~(~P&~Q) TTTT TFTF FTFT FFFF

Evaluate Each Row PQ~(~P&~Q) TTFTT TFFTF FTTFT FFTFF

Evaluate Each Row PQ~(~P&~Q) TTFTFT TFFTTF FTTFFT FFTFTF

~(~P & ~Q) PQ~(~P&~Q) TTFTFFT TFFTFTF FTTFFFT FFTFTTF

~(~P & ~Q) PQ~(~P&~Q) TTTFTFFT TFTFTFTF FTTTFFFT FFFTFTTF

(~(~P & ~Q) ↔ (P v Q)) So “~(~P & ~Q)” has the same truth-table as “(P v Q).” Why is that? Suppose I say: “you didn’t do your homework and you didn’t come to class on time.” When is this statement false? When either you did your homework or you came to class on time.

In-Class Exercise Write a full truth-table for: ~(P → ~Q)

PQ~(P→~Q) TT TF FT FF

~(P → ~Q) PQ~(P→~Q) TTTT TFTF FTFT FFFF

~(P → ~Q) PQ~(P→~Q) TTTFT TFTTF FTFFT FFFTF

~(P → ~Q) PQ~(P→~Q) TTTFFT TFTTTF FTFTFT FFFTTF

~(P → ~Q) PQ~(P→~Q) TTTTFFT TFFTTTF FTFFTFT FFFFTTF

(~(P → ~Q) ↔ (P & Q)) So “~(P → ~Q)” has the same truth-table as “(P & Q).” Why is that? Suppose I say: “If you eat this spicy food, you will cry.” You might respond by saying “No, that’s not true: I will eat the spicy food and I will not cry.”

In-Class Exercise Write a full truth-table for: (P & (~Q & R))

PQR(P&(~Q&R)) TTT TTF TFT TFF FTT FTF FFT FFF

(P & (~Q & R)) PQR(P&(~Q&R)) TTTTTT TTFTTF TFTTFT TFFTFF FTTFTT FTFFTF FFTFFT FFFFFF

(P & (~Q & R)) PQR(P&(~Q&R)) TTTTFTT TTFTFTF TFTTTFT TFFTTFF FTTFFTT FTFFFTF FFTFTFT FFFFTFF

(P & (~Q & R)) PQR(P&(~Q&R)) TTTTFTFT TTFTFTFF TFTTTFTT TFFTTFFF FTTFFTFT FTFFFTFF FFTFTFTT FFFFTFFF

(P & (~Q & R)) PQR(P&(~Q&R)) TTTTFFTFT TTFTFFTFF TFTTTTFTT TFFTFTFFF FTTFFFTFT FTFFFFTFF FFTFFTFTT FFFFFTFFF

(P & (~Q & R)) PQR(P&(~Q&R)) TTTTFFTFT TTFTFFTFF TFTTTTFTT TFFTFTFFF FTTFFFTFT FTFFFFTFF FFTFFTFTT FFFFFTFFF

TRUTH-TABLES AND VALIDITY

The Truth-Table Test for Validity We know that an argument is deductively valid when we know that if it is true, then its conclusion must be true. We can use truth-tables to show that certain arguments are valid.

The Test Suppose we want to show that the following argument is valid: (P → Q) ~Q Therefore, ~P We begin by writing down all the possible truth- values for the sentence letters in the argument.

Write Down All the Possibilities PQ TT TF FT FF

Write Truth-Table for Premises PQ(P → Q)~Q TTTF TFFT FTTF FFTT

Write Truth-Table for Conclusion PQ(P → Q)~Q~P TTTFF TFFTF FTTFT FFTTT

Look at Lines Where Premises are True PQ(P → Q)~Q~P TTT*FF TF TF FTT T FFTTT