By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Steps to War. As anti- and pro-slavery forces clashed out west, Southerners began to clash with laws passed by Congress Southerners argued that.
Advertisements

Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)
Sectionalism What issues divided the country and the legislation that tried to keep the country together.
 The U.S. purchased Louisiana in Congress had to decide if states being made from this territory would be free or slave.  Missouri applied to.
Jeopardy Famous People Causes of the war Compromise Of 1850 Kansas Nebraska Act Leftovers Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400.
CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.
Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.
SSUSH9 The student will identify key events, issues, and individuals relating to the causes, course, and consequences of the Civil War. a. Explain the.
Dred Scott v Sanford. Who was Dred Scott? A slave born around the 1800’s Married fellow slave: Harriet Robinson 2 children: Eliza and Lizzie Died: Sept.
Dred Scott And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor.
The Dred Scott Decision
Unit 5 Notes 2 Events that led to the Civil War The new Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 required citizens to catch runaway slaves. Those who let slaves get.
 David Wilmot – a Pennsylvanian Democratic Congressman Born in 1814 During his political career was a Democratic, Free Soiler, and Republican. Proposed.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
leading to the Civil War Lincoln/Douglas Debates
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
Dred Scott Decision :The Worst Decision the Supreme Court Ever Made Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) Dred Scott.
The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.
Historical Discussions Congress Passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act The Republican Party is Founded The Supreme Court Hands Down The Dred Scott Decision The.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Dred Scott Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;
V. Sanford Dred Scott A presentation presented by Paola Garcia.
YOU MUST WRITE EVERYTHING DOWN, UNLESS I TELL YOU OTHERWISE.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Causes of the American Civil War. The South Economy was based on Plantations, but only ¼ of the population were plantation owners Supplied the world ¾.
 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
What lead to the Civil War. Missouri Compromise 1819 Missouri asks to join the United States as a slave state – South wanted it to be a slave state –
Bell Ringer  Who was Stephen Douglas?  Why was he important to the politics of slavery?  Take out your homework (#3 on page 331) to be checked in.
The Crisis Deepens & Start of the War Chapter 14.
Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Deaton US History.   What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights.
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Compromises and Events that Led to the Civil War.
Tyler Kennedy Nick Logan.  Born a slave to the Blow family  Sold to Army Surgeon named Dr. John Anderson  Owner died then got a new owner  Lived in.
Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Back to the 1850’s… Law in the 1850’s. Rights of African Americans Still the Fugitive Slave Act Whether free or slave you could NOT be citizen Still segregation.
How did the Civil War test and transform the American Constitutional system? Lesson 17.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
Causes of the Civil War. Should Territories be free or slave? The North: Worried that making new territories into slave territories would give South too.
Jump Start Explain how popular sovereignty was involved in the Kansas-Nebraska Act How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act lead to increased division between the.
America’s Civil War Page 11.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.
Dred Scott.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott By :mina 5B.
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Famous Abolitionists.
FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?
Happy 800th to the Magna Carta!!!!!!
What causes of sectional conflict led to the Civil War?
Pre-Civil War compromises and events
The Dred Scott Decision
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas Dred Scott.
And The case for freedom
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
The Freed Man Shall Not Be Free
Presentation transcript:

By Greg Munetz

He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore, a craftsmen and an all around handyman. In 1819 his original owner named Peter Blow moved to Huntsville, Alabama and then to St. Louis, Missouri. In 1832 his original owner died, then he was sold for $500 to a surgeon in the U.S. army named John Emerson who then moved to the free state of Illinois with Dred in 1834 and then moved to the Wisconsin territory. Later down the line the doctor moved back to Missouri with Dred. Beginning of His Life

When his new master had died (the surgeon) Dred was passed on to a man named John Sanford who was Mrs. Emerson's brother.. After his second master died and he got this new one who's name is above he tried to escape and the buy his way out of slavery. After these attempts failed he filed a suit in 1846 for his freedom. The Beginning Case

Dred went to court in June of 1847 He lost the case on a because he could prove that He and his wife Harriet were owned by Emerson’s widow The next year the Missouri supreme court decided that the case should be retried In the 1850 retrial the St. Louis court decided that he and his family were free. The Case

Two years later the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in again, and reversed the decision that was made by the other court. Dred and his lawyers the decided to take the case to the United States Circuit Court in Missouri. In 1854 the Circuit Court upheld the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court. After this Dred appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney ruled that since Dred Scott was black and a slave he did not have citizenship in the united states therefore he did not have the right to sue for his freedom. The Case Continued…

The decision of this case also declared that the Missouri compromise of 1820, legislation which restricted slavery in certain territory's (free states) was unconstitutional. This decision greatly influenced the nomination of Abraham Lincoln as President. Which eventually led to the secession of the south and the start of the Civil War. Also Peter Blow's sons, who were childhood friends of Dred, had helped pay Dred's legal fees throughout the years. After the Supreme Court's decision, the former master's sons purchased Scott and his wife and set them free. Nine months after he was set free he died from tuberculosis. Conclusion

Cited Page

Fun Slide