WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Drinking Water – Monitoring and Reporting Darragh Page Inspector Environmental Protection Agency
Outline of Presentation Monitoring Monitoring Requirements Monitoring Shortfall Actions Necessary Reporting Monitoring Programmes Annual Returns Non-Compliances Risk to Human Health EPA Actions
Monitoring of Drinking Water Minimum Requirements set out in Table B of Part 1 of the Schedule Expanded version of monitoring frequencies in Appendices 1 and 2 of EPA Handbook
Monitoring Frequencies
Monitoring in 2005 16,500 samples analysed 200,000 individual tests carried out However, Serious Monitoring Deficiency
Monitoring Deficiency 65.0% 35.6% 88 supplies 291 supplies 498 supplies
What Needs to Happen? Monitoring programmes must be documented Supplies not monitored must be included in monitoring programme All supplies identified must be monitored at least at the minimum frequency LAs should review progress with monitoring programme on quarterly basis
2007 Regulations EPA the supervisory authority LA must submit monitoring programme to the EPA when directed to do so Programme must specify where samples are to be taken EPA can amend a monitoring programme
2007 Regulations EPA can insist on additonal monitoring (e.g. Crypto) EPA reviewing Handbook (section on monitoring programmes unlikely to change much)
Reporting Reporting Monitoring Programmes Reporting Annual Monitoring Results Reporting Non-Compliances Reporting Risks to Human Health
Annual Reporting Compliance Monitoring of all supplies to be submitted on EPA Template by 28 th February each year It will be an offence not to submit returns by this date from next year EPA reports will now focus on enforcement as well as monitoring
Annual Reporting Common Errors: Not using the template Wrong units used (esp. for boron, aluminium, fluoride and copper) Incorrect supply codes used (all must be xxxxPUBxxxx or xxxxPRIxxxx) Samples misclassified (e.g. follow up samples classified as Check samples)
Reporting Non-Compliances Regulation 10 of DW Regs 2007: EPA must be notified by LA of failure to meet standard EPA Guidance Booklet to be published this month outlines when notification required EPA must be notified on notification template and ed to
Reporting Non-Compliances Notification Must Include: General supply details Details of the failure An indication of the cause Details of HSE advice Monitoring History Actions to be taken
Action Programmes EPA to assess and decide whether action prorgamme needed within 14 days LA must submit and agree action programme with EPA within 60 days EPA can amend programme before approval LA must complete actions within specified timeframe Consumers must be informed of actions taken/to be taken EPA may also use Reg 10(4)(a) or inspections as an enforcement tool
Reporting Risks to Human Health Regulation 9 Where risk to human health must consult with HSE and notify the EPA EPA to decide to issue direction in consultation with HSE Consumers must be advised
Reporting Risks to Human Health Risk to Human Health could include: Failure to meet a parametric value Presence of micro-organisms that have no parametric value Presence of substances that have no parametric value
Enforcement to Date No. of Notifications Received: 60 No. of Directions Issued:14 No. of Boil Water/Restrictions: 21
Key Issues Chlorine alarms not installed Chlorine booster stations needed Actions must deal with root cause of problem and not “patch job” Plants run above design capacity Tighter control over chemicals used
EPA Actions Guidance Booklet on Notifications and Action Programmes to be published Handbook to be reviewed Cryptosporidium Risk Assessment being revised
EPA Handbook Will include: Guidance on monitoring programmes Guidance on notifications and action programmes Guidance on exempted supplies (binding) Guidance on auditing supplies (binding)