Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives Lecture slides to accompany
Advertisements

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 7 Authored by: Dr. Don.
Evaluating Business and Engineering Assets Payback Period.
Exam 4 Practice Problems Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E.
Executive Summary Version After-Tax Economic Analysis
1 By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CE ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTION CHP 7 -Benefit/Cost.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Benefit-Cost Ratio Lecture No. 66 Chapter 16 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2006.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 17 Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Framework of Benefit- Cost Analysis Valuation of Benefits.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008 McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis Describing Project Cash Flows Initial Project Screening Method Present Worth.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 6 Authored by: Dr. Don.
Lecture No. 54 Chapter 16 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5th edition, © 2010.
EVALUATING PROJECTS WITH THE BENEFIT / COST RATIO METHOD
Benefit/Cost Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
1 Internal Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return (IRR): The interest rate i* at which NPW = 0 Note: This is the same as finding the roots of a polynomial.
Comparing Projects Using Time Value of Money
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
CHAPTER 11 EVALUATING PROJECTS WITH THE BENEFIT / COST RATIO METHOD $$$ $
First step is to identify cash flows as either benefits, disbenefits, or costs Benefits(B)--Advantages to the people Disbenefts--Disadvantages to the people.
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Benefit Cost Ratio Course Outline 8.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Developed.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Benefit-Cost Ratio Lecture No. 53.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
Lecture No. 26 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch.3 Authored by Dr. Don Smith,
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1 Developed.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 12-1 Developed.
Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fourteenth Edition By William.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 9 Benefit/Cost.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Blank & Tarquin: 5 th edition. Ch.13 Authored by Dr. Don Smith,
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 11-1 Developed.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Blank & Tarquin: 5 th edition. Ch.12 Authored by Dr. Don Smith,
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Incremental Analysis Lecture No.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Blank & Tarquin: 5 th edition. Ch.14 Authored by Dr. Don Smith,
Ch 10-1 © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ Ostwald and McLaren / Cost Analysis and Estimating.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney Economic Analysis of Alternative Water Plans: 1. Benefit/Cost Analysis.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. CHAPTER V PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS McMc Graw Hill ENGINEERING.
1 1. Order alternatives from lowest to highest initial investment. 2. Let Alternative A 0 (do nothing) be considered the current best. 3. Consider next.
8-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 8 Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives © 2012 by.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives.
1 Incremental Analysis A technique or approach that can be used with NPW, EAW, and later with IRR and Cost/Benefit to determine if an incremental expenditure.
Class # 7 Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Selection from Independent Projects Under Budget Limitation
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Benefit Cost Analysis and Public Sector Economics
Adopted and modified by Dr. W-.W. Li of UTEP, Fall, 2003
Chapter 5 PROJECT EVALUATION METHOD
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis
Rate of Return Analysis: Multiple Alternatives
Chapter 5 PROJECT EVALUATION METHOD
Rate of Return Analysis: Single Alternative
Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy, 8th edition
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Adopted and modified by Dr. W-.W. Li of UTEP, Fall, 2003
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. CHAPTER IX B/C Analysis and Public Sector Economics McMc Graw Hill ENGINEERING ECONOMY Fifth Edition Blank and Tarquin

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 2Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Learning Objectives 9.1 Public Sector Analysis 9.2 B/C for single project 9.3 Alternative Selection 9.4 Multiple Alternatives Using the B/C Ratio Approach

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 3 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. Section 9.1 Public Sector Projects

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 4Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Public Sector Projects Public Sector: Ownership – by citizens- the public Public Sector Projects: Provide needed services to the public and “no profit”

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 5Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Types of Projects Hospitals Parks and recreation facilities (娱乐设施) Highways, dams, bridges Courts, schools, prisons Public housing Many other types

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 6Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Characteristics – Compared CharacteristicPublic SectorPrivate Sector Size of Investment LargerSome Large; medium to small Life EstimatesQuite Long: years Shorter: 2-25 years Annual Cash Flow Estimates No Profit: Costs and benefits Profit: revenues and cost estimates

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 7Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Attributes Public Sector Projects do not have “profits” per se Projects can have certain undesirable consequences associated Thus, can be controversial in nature Draw media attention – debated on pros and cons( 正面和反面)

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 8Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Estimating for Public Projects: Costs Basic elements for public projects: Costs Construction, operations, maintenance less salvage values Initial costs fairly well know Future O&M are less known and must be estimated

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 9Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Estimating: Benefits and Disbenefits Benefits advantages to the public stated in $$ Disbenefits Expected undesirable consequences ( 不 良的结果 ) to the owners (public) Both are very hard to estimate

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 10Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 General Principle For public projects we find: It is very difficult to estimate and reach agreement on the economic impacts of benefits and disbenefits for public sector projects.

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 11Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Funding Sources – Compared CharacteristicPublic SectorPrivate Sector FundingTaxes, fees, bonds, pvt. funds Sale of new stock, bonds, loans, ret. earnings Interest RateTends to be lower Higher: At market cost Social discount rate

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 12Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Additional Comparisons CharacteristicPublic SectorPrivate Sector Selection criteria Multiple or many Rate of return or present value Environment of the evaluation Political arena (debated, pressure groups) Primarily economic Not as “clean” as in the private sector

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 13Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 Evaluation Process The viewpoint finally adopted will: Determine the estimates of.. Costs Benefits Disbenefits Thus, the viewpoint must be established before the economic evaluation

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 14Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.1 See Example 9.1(P307) This is a common problem Define the viewpoints A given viewpoint will drive the analysis Multiple views = multiple results!

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 15 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. Section 9.2 B/C Analysis of a Single Project

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 16Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 B/C Analysis – Single Project Historical Point B/C analysis philosophy was instituted and promoted by the Flood Control Act of 1936 Introduced to promote a sense of objectivity in an analysis

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 17Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 B/C Formulations Assignable life, N - years Estimate costs ($) Estimate benefits in ($) Estimate disbenefits in ($) Assign an interest rate – i (%/year)

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 18Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 B/C Formulations Then convert all amounts to either a Present Worth – PW(i%) Annual Worth – AW(i%) Then calculate a B/C ratio in one of three ways…..

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 19Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 B/C Ratios: 3 Formats Three acceptable formats are:

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 20Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Notes Regarding Signs By convention: Costs are assigned (+) signs Salvage values are subtracted from costs Disbenefits are treated more than one way

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 21Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Handling Disbenefits 1.Disbenefit values are subtracted from benefits 2.Disbenefit values are added to costs 3.Either approach will result in a consistent analysis – but be consistent throughout an analysis

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 22Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Decision Rule IF B/C ratio (=>) 1.00 Conditionally accept the alternative IF B/C ratio (<) 1.00 Conditionally reject the alternative IF B/C ratio “close” to 1.00, then intangible factors may sway the decision to accept or reject

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 23Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Conventional B/C Ratio The conventional B/C Ratio is:

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 24Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Modified B/C Ratio Modified B/C subtracts the maintenance and operations costs in the numerator modified Benefits - disbenefits-M&O costs / Initial investment B C 

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 25Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University Convention vs. Modified? It makes no difference which approach is used However, the ratio values will differ (magnitude) But, the same absolute (accept/reject) decision will be the same

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 26Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University Benefit-Cost Difference B-C difference is not a ratio B-C difference is: (Benefits – Costs) (as a PW or AW) If ( B-C ) ≥0, the project is acceptable. B= Benefits – Disbenefits B refers to net benefits

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 27Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University See Example 9-2(P310) Investment cost $15 million Benefits $1,500,000/year Disbenefits $200,000/year M&O cost $500,000/year i= 6% /year, n=10 years. Use B/C to determine if the grant is economically justified.

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 28Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University See Example 9-2(P310) Applies all three approaches to the same problem situation B/C = 0.51 (reject) Mod B/C = 0.39 (reject) (B-C) = $-1.24 million (< 0…reject) Result: Same decision with varying magnitudes of the ratio

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 29Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Example 9.3(P311) Given two alternatives Bypass construction Upgrade construction Note: Unequal lives..use AW i is set to 8%

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 30Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Example 9.3 – Continued Conventional B/C – Bypass = 1.17 Conventional B/C – Upgrade = 1.13 Both B/C ratios are > 1 Both proposal are economically justified at 8% Which one would you select?

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 31Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.2 Uncertain Discount Rate (??) What if the value of “i” is uncertain? Apply a spreadsheet analysis and play “what-if” What if federal funds are available for the upgrade and a 8% rate is applied to that option? Changing discount rates can impact the ratio for that alternative!

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 32 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. Section 9.3 Alternative Selection using incremental B/C analysis

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 33Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.3 Rank on Total Costs – Rules 1.Determine total equivalent costs for both alternatives; 2.Order by total costs: Smaller first then larger Calculate the incremental cost for the larger alternative = (  C) – be the denominator in the B/C ratio

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 34Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.3  (B/C) Approach 3. For both alternatives determine: Total equivalent benefits and disbenefits Calculate the (  B) for the larger cost alternative or  (B-D) if disbenefits are involved 4. Calculate the  { (B-D)/C } ratio

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 35Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.3  (B/C) Approach 5.If  (B/C) (=>) 1.00, go with the higher- cost alternative else, Go with lower-cost alternative!

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 36Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.3 Example 9.4(P314) Design A Design B Construction cost 10,000,000 15,000,000 Maintenance cost/year 35,000 55,000 Patient usage cost/year 450, ,000 The discount rate is 5%, The life of the building is 30 years. Which design should they select?

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 37 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. Section 9.4 Incremental B/C analysis of Multiple Alternatives

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 38Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.4 Incremental B/C for Multiple Projects Select from three or more mutually exclusive alternatives Same approach as that in Chapter 8, Section 8.6 Remember, the Do Nothing alternative always exists and should be evaluated as an alternative.

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 39Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.4 Steps for Multiple Incremental Analysis 1.Using either PW or AW, determine the total equivalent cost for all options. If unequal lives, apply AW 2.Create the rankings based upon lowest to highest total cost of the alternatives 3.Determine the total equivalent net benefits for each alternative

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 40Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.4 Steps – Continued 4. The lowest-cost option is the first Defender and the next-higher cost alternative is the first Challenger. Compute the B/C ratio on the increment If B/C < 0, eliminate the Challenger, else eliminate the Defender. Current winner becomes new Defender

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 41Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.4 Multiple Alternatives…. 5.Compare the new Defender to the next- higher-cost Challenger and repeat the analysis. 6.Continue through the alternative until there are no more Challengers. 7.The last “champion” is the winner.

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 42Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don Smith, Texas A&M University. 9.4 Example 9.5(P317) 4 Alternatives { 1,2,3, and 4} Ranked on total cost as shown Analysis Summary: (2 -1) B/C = 2.24 …Go with {2} (3-2) B/C =0.62…Reject 3, stay with {2} (4-2) B/C = 1.83 Go with 4, final winner