2015 Coal Handling and Storage Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wastewater and Stormwater Discharge from Landfills Rick Pinneo Illinois EPA.
Advertisements

Coal Combustion Products and Electronic Waste Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
Coal Combustion Residuals Proposed Regulation Air and Waste Management Association Southern Section August 6, 2010.
Chapter F.A.C. Updates F. Thomas Lubozynski, P.E. Waste Program Administrator.
Annual Inspections of First Nation Water and Wastewater Facilities Derek Hill, P.Eng., Senior Engineer Mohammed Karim, P.Eng., Senior Engineer, Water\Wastewater.
Proposed Effluent Guidelines For the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category by Janet Goodwin.
Michele Robertson, PG Is Deep Injection a Disposal Option in Arizona? GATEKEEPER REGULATORY ROUNDUP 2011 February 16, 2011.
Ohio Livestock Environmental Assurance Program. KEY REGULATIONS Chapter 6, LEAP Federal State –Ohio EPA –Ohio Dept. of Agriculture –Ohio Dept. of Natural.
GEORGIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION SMALL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Rochelle Routman, PG Environmental Specialist Georgia Power
Coal Ash Ponds The Romeo and Juliet Story of Coal Fired Power Plants Society sees them as toxic together, but currently, one cannot exist without the other.
By Nick Garlisch What is Coal Ash? Coal ash is what remains after coal is burned When coal is burned, roughly 10% of the coal.
Overview of the Revised CAFO Regulations Ralph Summers EPA Region 7.
Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Overview of Environmental Regulations and Drought Impacts in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT July 13, 2015.
Chapter F.A.C. Updates Solid Waste Program.
OSM CCB Placement in Coal Mines - Proposed Rulemaking John R. Craynon, P.E. Chief, Division of Regulatory Support Office of Surface Mining Reclamation.
Adem.alabama.gov Coal Combustion Waste Regulation Stephen A. Cobb Governmental Hazardous Waste Branch Land Division.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Overview of the Final EPA Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Regulations April 1, 2003.
Coal Combustion Residuals Final Regulation August 19, 2015 Frank Ney U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 4.
CCR Final Rule Utility Perspective on Key Compliance Items
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Integrated Constructed Wetlands Regulatory Aspects - the EPA’s role Aoife Loughnane Inspector, Environmental Licensing Programme Environmental Protection.
CCR Rule: Consultant’s Perspective 2015 Air & Waste Management Association Meeting Callaway Gardens, GA Presented by: Randy Sullivan, Principal & Senior.
David Dippel, P.G. Frank Zeng, P.E. Waste Permits Division Municipal Solid Waste Permits Section 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Jim Roewer Executive Director USWAG. CCR Background 1993 and 2000 Bevill Amendment Regulatory Determinations – Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) do not.
EPA’s Proposed CCB Regulations & Morgantown STAR Project 1 Shawn A. Seaman September 27, 2010
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee. Conference Call Meetings July 8 and August 19 Mercury Discharges – Utility Request to Address Permit Requirements for.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
PowerSouth Energy Cooperative:
SPCC & CCP Issues Jim Roewer APPA E&O Conference April 12, 2006.
Life After Landfill – regulatory requirements Kate Hamer and Thomas Gallasch Waste to Resources, Regulation and Compliance EPA 27 th September 2007.
Manure Wastewater Handling & Storage Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Manure Wastewater Storage and Handling.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
MICHAEL E. SCOTT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Available Information on the Beneficial Reuse of Coal Combustion Products 1.
NPDES Permitting for Coal Ash Ponds in North Carolina EMC Meeting January 12, 2012 Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. 1.
David K. Paylor Virginia State Board of Health March 17, 2016.
Missouri Waste Control Coalition Environmental Conference July 14, 2015 CCR Rule What Location Restrictions Mean for Missouri.
COAL ASH 101 with Elizabeth Scrafford. What’s the deal with Coal Ash Agenda Agenda ●Coal Ash is a byproduct of burning coal and contains high levels of.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Gary J. Pendergrass, PE, RG Midwest Environmental Compliance Conference May 13, 2015 | Overland Park, Kansas USEPA Coal Combustion Residuals Rule: Impact.
Results of the Review of MSW Landfill Regulations from Selected States and Countries Landfill Facility Compliance Study presented to California Integrated.
30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 210, Subchapter E Presented by Kara Denney September 23, 2015.
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
2017 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Solid Waste Handling Standards
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CAFO Rule and the Proposed Idaho NPDES CAFO General.
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Annual Inspections of First Nation Water and Wastewater Facilities
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2017 Meeting – Alexandria, VA
Van Wert, OH Water and Wastewater Element Training
Chesterfield Neighborhood Coal Ash Update January 9th, 2019
Senator Dance Town Hall Coal Ash Update December 5, 2018
2018 Environmental Trade Fair
2018 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
May 15, 2018 David Paylor, Director
2019 Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Monica Vallin-Baez
Presentation transcript:

2015 Coal Handling and Storage Conference CCR & ELG Compliance Strategies for Utilities – Managing Risk Michael Roush, PE Patricia M. Scroggin, PE October 7, 2015

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)

CCR Rule Overview Fly ash Bottom Ash Boiler Slag FGD byproducts Federal Register published version on Friday, April 17th Compliance dates triggered by published date (effective October 19th, 2015) Federal Minimum Standard – States can be more restrictive CCR is defined as fly and bottom ash, boiler slag or FGD materials Beneficial uses defined/unencapsulated uses discouraged

CCR Rule Overview Publish Documents on CCR website Citizen Suit Authority Rule does not apply to: Landfills no longer receiving CCR by October 19, 2015 “Closed” CCR impoundments Inactive ponds that are closed by April 17, 2018 CCR units at facilities no longer generating electricity by October 19, 2015 Non-utility operations (manufacturing, universities, hospitals, etc.) CCR beneficially used, placed in mines, or disposed in municipal landfills

CCR Rule – Key Differences from Proposed Version Aquifer location restriction (5’ above) Groundwater schedule extended (1 year to 30 months) No liner retrofit requirements for existing impoundments Alternative liners allowed for new facilities/closures Failure to meet location restrictions or groundwater protection standards requires closure (or retrofit) Timeframes for closure: Standard five year closure Impoundments < 40 acres – up to 7 years Impoundments > 40 acres – up to 15 years Inactive ponds – no CCR after effective date/closed before April 2018 Fugitive dust controls required

Required Demonstrations & Recordkeeping Requirement New CCR Landfills Existing CCR Landfills New CCR Ponds Existing CCR Ponds Inactive CCR Ponds Initial Date Required for Facilities1 Locational Restrictions2 Placement Above the Uppermost Aquifer OCT 2018 Wetlands Seismic Impact Zones Fault Areas Unstable Areas Design Requirements Composite Liner OCT 2016 Leachate Collection & Removal System Prior to Initial Receipt Groundwater Monitoring OCT 2017 1 Date for new facilities generally required before initial receipt of CCR materials or within 6 months of sampling initiation. 2 If location, groundwater or safety criteria not satisfied, ponds must cease receiving CCR within 6 months & begin closure process.

Required Demonstrations & Recordkeeping Requirement New CCR Landfills Existing CCR Landfills New CCR Ponds Existing CCR Ponds Inactive CCR Ponds Initial Date Required for Facilities1 Structural Integrity Criteria Marker DEC. 2015 Hazard Potential Classification Assessments OCT 2016 Emergency Action Plan APR. 2017 History of construction3 OCT. 2016 Construction Plan3 Prior to Initial Receipt Structural Stability Assessments3 Safety Factor Assessments2,3 Weekly Inspections OCT. 2015 Annual Inspections 3 JAN. 2016 1 Date for new facilities generally required before initial receipt of CCR materials or within 6 months of sampling initiation. 2 If location, groundwater or safety criteria not satisfied, ponds must cease receiving CCR within 6 months & begin closure process. 3 Only required for ponds with height of 20 ft. or more: or with height of 5 ft. or more and volume > 20 acre-ft.

Required Demonstrations & Recordkeeping Requirement New CCR Landfills Existing CCR Landfills New CCR Ponds Existing CCR Ponds Inactive CCR Ponds1 Initial Date Required for Facilities2 Other Fugitive Dust Controls OCT. 2015 Run on, Run off Controls OCT. 2016 Hydrologic & Hydraulic Capacity Requirements Closure Requirements Post Closure Care3 1 Inactive CCR ponds do not receive CCR after Oct. 2015, still contain water/CCR after Oct. 2015 must complete closure by Apr. 2018. Intent to close and closure plan must be submitted by Dec. 2015. 2 Date for new facilities generally required before initial receipt of CCR materials or within 6 months of sampling initiation. 3 Does not apply to CCR ponds that have closed by removing all CCR materials and have verified groundwater not contaminated.

Immediate Reporting Efforts October Initiate Weekly Inspections Dust Control Plans “Containerize” CCR Piles December Closure Plans for Inactive Ponds Install markers at impoundment sites January 2016 Initiate Annual Inspections Other Develop Overall Compliance Strategy Design Groundwater Monitoring – 8 samples by October 2017 Site Surveys Items for overall strategy: Closure Plans for all CCR Facilities – Begin conceptual studies to identify preferred overall site compliance plan/schedule Clean closure vs Cap in place - cost estimates/selection Ash Handling Conversions – review options, costs, etc Alternative CCR disposal – preliminary siting and design for landfills and/or ponds Survey for Run-on/Runoff Control and Hydraulic Capacity Assessments – Fall 2015, modifications designed and in place by Aug 2016

Critical CCR Concepts What triggers a pond closure?

CCR Rule – Triggers for Pond Closure Three triggers, closure begins within 6 months after Structural Integrity Criteria/Safety Factor Assessments 18 months/October 2016 Groundwater contamination from unlined ponds 30 months/October 2017 with first annual report due January 2018 Ponds with one of the following liners would not be subject to closure at this date: 2 feet of compacted soil with a hydraulic conductivity < 1 x 10-7 cm/sec A composite liner (60-mil HDPE on top of specified soil layer) An alternative composite liner that meets this criteria Liner Retrofit is also an option Failure to meet location restrictions 42 months/October 2018

Implementing a Holistic Approach CCR burden is bigger than it may appear Ponds are typically key to overall plant water balance Overlap between ELG/CCR & State Water Quality Criteria Potential Projects Involved: Water Balance Optimization Groundwater Monitoring/Remediation Ash Handling Conversions Wastewater Treatment Systems New Process Ponds New Landfills Pond Closures

Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELG)

Basics of the ELG Rule Legacy Wastewater – not applicable Issued September 30th, 2015 Rule in effect 60 days after entered into Federal Register 50 MW and larger coal units – all electric utilities “An establishment whose generation of electricity is the predominant source of revenue or principal reason for operation” Legacy Wastewater – not applicable First permit applicable November 1st, 2018 “as soon as possible” Absolute last date for compliance December 31st, 2023 Regardless of administratively renewed permits Rolls out in NPDES permit

Rule Definitions Bottom Ash: FGD Wastewater: Ash and slag Under boiler Blowdown/filtrate/FGD gypsum wash water etc. Not: Drains/washdown sumps, scrubber/equipment washdown/cleaning

Options Considered by EPA

Numeric Limits Set by Stream in Rule

FGD Wastewater Treatment Sample Flow Diagram Text

Rule Concerns Anti-circumvention in final rule Zero discharge and applicability Exception: Bottom and fly ash transport water used as Scrubber makeup Internal Monitoring Points on FGD wastewater vs. Common Outfall with reduced concentrations of regulated constituents Existing installed BAT technologies may need to be upgraded Trucking FGD wastewater offsite Compliance still required

Volunteer Clause Applies to FGD wastewater only Thermal evaporation Distillate can be discharged through NPDES permit Compliance can be delayed to December 31st, 2023 Must indicate in writing to permitting authority PRIOR to next permit issuance

Tips on Risk Management under CCR and ELG Holistic approach towards all regulations Get started early Market conditions Define flows and quality Reduce flows if possible Legal should be involved to address interpretations where rule unclear Groundwater Monitoring

QUESTIONS? Patricia Scroggin, P.E. Sr. Water/Wastewater Consultant Burns & McDonnell pscroggin@burnsmcd.com 816-822-3097 Michael Roush, P.E. CCR Handling Specialist Burns & McDonnell mroush@burnsmcd.com 816-823-7069