Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Mathematical Tasks*
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Nationellt Centrum för Matematikutbildning vid Göteborgs Universitet Teaching Math through Problem Solving 1 Teaching School Mathematics through Problem.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
Modifying Assessment Items What is the concept/skill being assessed? How could a test item writer ask this in a TEI format? What types of classroom activities.
Strengthening Mathematics Instruction Cognitive Complexity and Instructional Strategies Dr. Vicki Jim
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Math Tasks There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and on their perceptions about what mathematics.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Kindergarten Math Curriculum and Resource Parent Night Diana Garaitonandia, Ed.D. Louise Kirsh Susan Alloway Mandi Cooper.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Laurel County SSA Day 4 Jim Moore Jennifer McDaniel
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Providing All Students with Access to High Quality Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Tasks in Achieving Equity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
March 19, Elementary Principals Mathematics Update Velvet M. Simington K-12 Mathematics Program Manager ,
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh February 15, 2007
VCLA. What is our purpose? Questions: Do you believe that students need opportunities to take risks, struggle, make mistakes and work in self-directed.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
SHIFTING FROM MATHEMATICAL WORKSHEETS TO MEANINGFUL TASKS FACILITATED BY: CYNTHIA BELL NUMERACY SPECIALIST LITERACY ASSISTANCE CENTER.
Los Angeles Unified School District – Instructional Support Services Algebra I Unit 1 Training 07/10/07Adapted from the PRISMA project developed by the.
1 Improving Teaching and Learning Through Questioning Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris March 16 & 18, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
CAAT Follow Up Meeting #1 Clay County High School Clay County Middle School.
Putting the Common core math standards into action
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Debbie Delozier, Stafford County Public Schools Fanya Morton, Stafford County Public Schools Kathryn Munson, Chesterfield.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Teachers in Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting on Mathematics Instruction.
The 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice in the Common Core State Standards Sherry Gettemy Marcia Torgrude Content Created by June Apaza and Vicki Kapust.
Laurel County SSA Day 4 High School Breakout Session Jim Moore Jennifer McDaniel
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics CCSS Standards of Mathematical Practice: Reasoning and Explaining The Common Core State Standards Illustrating.
Mt. Olive Elementary School February 9, 2015 Joyce Bishop, Ph.D.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
Teaching & Learning Trajectories: Building Coherence, Connections, and Retention Across Grades Session 3 May 10, 2012 Oakland Schools Gerri Devine
HSTW MMGW/TCTW Southern Regional Education Board Numeracy Across the Curriculum Friday, July 17, 2015 Jason Adair Amanda Merritt.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Improving Mathematical Number Sense & Technology Integration Teacher Quality Grant Peyton Forest Elementary Atlanta Public Schools Atlanta, GA July 23,
How can the examination of student/educator work be supported as a routine for continuous improvement?
The Mathematical Education of Inservice Teachers: Lessons Learned Opportunities & Challenges Diane J. Briars NCSM Immediate Past President Co-Director,
5 Practices for Leading Productive Math Discussions in Class Peg Smith and Mary Kay Stein University of Pittsburgh.
Using High-Level Tasks to Become Better Mathematicians
MELT: Fraction, Ratio, Proportion and Geometry
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Common Core and PACC State Standards
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Presentation transcript:

Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving

Day 1: Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving Solve, analyze, and discuss mathematical tasks. Consider the effects of different levels of mathematical tasks on students’ achievement. Work in a student-centered environment to complete a mathematical task.

“There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and on their perceptions about what mathematics is than the selection or creation of the tasks with which the teacher engages students in studying mathematics.” Lappan & Briars, 1995 Analyzing Mathematical Tasks

What are Mathematical Tasks? We define mathematical tasks as a set of problems or a single complex problem the purpose of which is to focus students’ attention on a particular mathematical idea.

Why Focus on Mathematical Tasks? Tasks form the basis for students’ opportunities to learn what mathematics is and how one does it Tasks influence learners by directing their attention to particular aspects of content and by specifying ways to process information The level and kind of thinking required by mathematical instructional tasks influences what students learn

Professional Practice Norms Listening to and using others’ ideas. Adopting a tentative stance toward practice -- wondering about the rationale/outcome for other’s professional decisions instead of espousing certainty and being judgmental about what the teacher was thinking or what you believed should have happened. Backing up statements with evidence and providing reasoning. Talking with respect yet engaging in critical analysis of teachers and students portrayed.

Comparing Two MathematicalTasks

Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks Solve Two Tasks: z Martha’s Carpeting Task z The Fencing Task

Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks Martha was re-carpeting her bedroom, which was feet long and 10.5 feet wide. How many square feet of carpeting will she need to purchase? Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 1 Martha’s Carpeting Task

Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks Adapted from Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 2 The (Modified) Fencing Task Ms. Olson's 7th grade class at Roosevelt MS will raise rabbits for their spring science fair. The class will use some portion of the school building as one of the sides of its rectangular rabbit pen and will use the fencing that was left over from the school play to enclose the other three sides of the pen. If Ms. Olson's class wants its rabbits to have as much room as possible, what would the dimensions of the pen be? Try to organize your work so that someone else who reads it will understand.

How are Martha’s Carpeting Task and the Fencing Task the same and how are they different? (Consider your own experience in solving the tasks and the “mathematical possibilities” of the tasks.) Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks

Martha was re-carpeting her bedroom which was feet long and 10.5 feet wide. How many square feet of carpeting will she need to purchase? Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 1 Martha’s Carpeting Task Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks

Adapted from Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 2 The Fencing Task Ms. Olson's 7th grade class at Roosevelt MS will raise rabbits for their spring science fair. The class will use some portion of the school building as one of the sides of its rectangular rabbit pen and will use the fencing that was left over from the school play to enclose the other three sides of the pen. If Ms. Olson's class wants its rabbits to have as much room as possible, what would the dimensions of the pen be? Try to organize your work so that someone else who reads it will understand.

How are Martha’s Carpeting Task and the Fencing Task the same and how are they different? (Consider your own experience in solving the tasks and the “mathematical possibilities” of the tasks.) Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks

“Not all tasks are created equal, and different tasks will provoke different levels and kinds of student thinking.” Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000

Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks “The level and kind of thinking in which students engage determines what they will learn.” Hiebert, Carpenter, Fennema, Fuson, Wearne, Murray, Oliver, & Human, 1997

CharacterizingTasks

Characterizing Tasks Goals: Identify characteristics of high and low level mathematical tasks. Martha’s Carpet: Low level The Fencing Task: High level

Sort Tasks A – P into two categories: high level and low level. Develop a list of criteria that describe in general the characteristics of low level and high level tasks. Characterizing Tasks

Categorizing Tasks Are all high-level tasks the same? [Is there an important difference between Tasks J and M?] Are all low-level tasks the same? [Is there an important difference between Tasks E and O?]

Levels of Cognitive Demand & The Mathematical Tasks Framework

Categorizing Tasks “If we want students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem solve then we need to start with high-level, cognitively complex tasks.” Stein & Lane, 1996

Low-Level Tasks Memorization Procedures without Connections (e.g., Martha’s Carpeting Task) High-Level Tasks Procedures with Connections Doing Mathematics (e.g., The Fencing Task) Linking to Research The QUASAR Project

The Mathematical Tasks Framework TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4 Linking to Research The QUASAR Project

The Mathematical Tasks Framework TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4 Linking to Research The QUASAR Project

The Mathematical Tasks Framework TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4 Linking to Research The QUASAR Project

The Mathematical Tasks Framework TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4 Linking to Research The QUASAR Project

The Mathematical Tasks Framework TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4 Linking to Research The QUASAR Project

Stein & Lane, 1996 HighLow Moderate High Low Task Set-Up Task Implementation Student Learning Linking Task Level to Student Achievement

The instructional tasks teachers’ select are crucial in helping students make connections and learn important mathematics concepts. Tasks that engage students in thinking about the defining characteristics of important mathematical concepts help students develop a deep understanding of core mathematical ideas that increase retention and transfer of knowledge to new situations. Linking to Research

“Effective mathematics teaching requires understanding what students know and need to learn and then challenging and supporting them to learn it well.” NCTM, 2000, p.16 Linking to Research

EnactingMathematicalTasks

The S-Pattern Task  Determine the number of tiles in the next 2 figures.  Describe the 20th figure in this pattern, including the number of tiles it contains and how they are arranged. Explain the reasoning that you used to determine this information.

The S-Pattern Task  Write an equation for the number of tiles needed for any figure in the pattern.  Explicitly connect your equation to the diagrams.  Generate as many different equations as you can for this relationship.

The S-Pattern Task Make a graph that shows the relationship between the figure number and the number of tiles in the figure. Share your solutions with your group.

The S-Pattern Task Make a graph that shows the relationship between the figure number and the number of tiles in the figure. Share your solutions with your group.

Group Poster Show all the expressions generated by your group. Explicitly connect your expressions to the diagrams.

Gallery Walk One person from each group stays with the group’s poster to answer questions. Rest of the group members view other posters. Look for: The most common representations The most unusual/surprising representations

A Graph of the Pattern The S-Pattern Task

Another Graph of the Pattern The S-Pattern Task

A Graph of All Values The S-Pattern Task

How would you characterize the level of this task: High or low cognitive demand? What mathematical ideas are embedded in the task? What makes this worthwhile mathematics? De-Briefing the S-Pattern Task

What connections do you see to the Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice?