ADAM meeting Geneve, 09-02-2010 SCDTL study for ERHA C. Ronsivalle, L. Picardi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Advertisements

Code parameters optimization & DTL Tank 1 error studies Maud Baylac, Emmanuel Froidefond Presented by JM De Conto LPSC-Grenoble HIPPI yearly meeting, Oxford,
FODO-based Quadrupole Cooling Channel M. Berz, D. Errede, C. Johnstone, K. Makino, Dave Neuffer, Andy Van Ginneken.
STATUS OF THE TOP-IMPLART PROTON LINAC P. Nenzi 1, F. Ambrosini 3, A. Ampollini 1, G. Bazzano 1, F. Marracino 1, L. Picardi 1, C. Ronsivalle 1, C. Snels.
THE TOP-IMPLART PROJECT Concetta Ronsivalle,Mariano Carpanese, Giovanni Messina, Luigi Picardi, Sandro Sandri (ENEA C.R. Frascati, Frascati (Roma)) Carmela.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
THE TOP LINAC PROJECT ISS-ENEA Project to demonstrate operability of a compact proton linac in a medium size hospital HIGH POWER RF TESTS OF THE FIRST.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
A NON LINEAR TRANSPORT LINE FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF F18 PRODUCTION BY THE TOP LINAC INJECTOR C. Ronsivalle, L. Picardi, C. Cianfarani, G. Messina, G.L.
1 Sensitivity of coupled laser- accelerated ion beams into conventional structures P. Antici, M. Migliorati, A. Mostacci, L. Picardi, L.Palumbo, C. Ronsivalle.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
RF structure design KT high-gradient medical project kick-off Alberto Degiovanni TERA Foundation - EPFL.
ACCELERATING A CYCLOTRON 18 MEV PROTON BEAM BY A SCDTL LINAC Luigi Picardi, Concetta Ronsivalle (ENEA C.R. Frascati, Frascati (Roma)), Paola Panichelli,
SIMPLE CHARACTERIZATION METHOD OF SMALL HIGH GRADIENT PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLES Concetta Ronsivalle,Luigi Picardi, Monia Vadrucci (ENEA C.R. Frascati,
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Warm linac simulations (DTL) and errors analysis M. Comunian F. Grespan.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
Linac4 DTL Beam Dynamics 1Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Mini-workshop on DTL design – 13 September 2011 JB Lallement,
X-band Based FEL proposal
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
Physics design on the main linac
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
NC Accelerator Structures
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Large Booster and Collider Ring
The Strong RF Focusing:
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
C. Ronsivalle, L. Picardi, C. Cianfarani, G. Messina, G. L
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
COMB beam: TSTEP simulations up to THz station
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Presentation transcript:

ADAM meeting Geneve, SCDTL study for ERHA C. Ronsivalle, L. Picardi

ADAM meeting Geneve, TOP-IMPLART (ENEA-ISS-IFO Project in Rome) and EHRA Project (Ruvo di Puglia) do not require radioisotopes production at low energy and foresee for their protontherapy complex a completely linear structure. In the following the design of a SCDTL structure up to 35 MeV is presented to be used for TOP- IMPLART and EHRA Projects; the first part up to 17.5 MeV is equal to the structure under development in the framework of the ISPAN Project launched by ENEA-ISS-NRT-CECOM (funded for about 500 K€)

ADAM meeting Geneve, ISPAN (“Irraggiamento Sperimentale con Protoni per modelli cellulari ed Animali”) Project The Project foresees the realization of a test facility at ENEA-Frascati laboratories by using as injector a PL7 425 MHz linear accelerator SCDTL

ADAM meeting Geneve, Outline DESIGN CRITERIA OF SCDTL35 SCDTL35 LAYOUT AND PARAMETERS FROM DESIGN CODE OPTIMIZATION BEAM DYNAMICS IN SCDTL35: - LINAC code results - Matching with the 7 MeV injector (PL7) - Losses distribution (checked also with TSTEP code) - Errors and tolerances study in SCDTL35 - Start-to-end up to 235 MeV including LIGHT35 (from DeGiovanni data- December 2009 version) CONCLUSIONS

ADAM meeting Geneve, Main design criteria and constraints INJECTION ENERGY: 7 MeV OUTPUT ENERGY: 35 MeV ONE 10 MW KLYSTRON WITH A POWER CONTINGENCY OF 3 MW (P<7 MW) NUMBER OF MODULES: 4 EXTERNAL PMQs WITH A MAXIMUM GRADIENT OF 220 T/m (useful radius for protons =2.9 mm) FROM ASTER MAIN DIFFERENCES RESPECT TO SCDTL DESIGN FOR TOP linac (ENEA Technical Report RT/INN/9717,1997) RELEVANT FOR BEAM DYNAMICS: -The old design assumed internal PMQ (Leff=30 mm) with an intertank distance varying in the range 7-35 MeV between 43 and 65 mm too short for allocating external PMQs  (Transverse acceptance  1/  max, and  max  Lperiod) - Higher electric field gradient (limited to12 MV/m in the old design) are required to reduce the total length: attention to keep  /  max  const. In the allowed range of PMQ gradients and to avoid parametric resonances and longitudinal instability) (phase longitudinal advance  l  EOT)

ADAM meeting Geneve, SCDTL35 LAYOUT Modules 3-4 Modules 1-2

ADAM meeting Geneve, SCDTL35 ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS * Include flat stems and 20% of coupling losses Total RF power consumption= 6.57 MW

ADAM meeting Geneve, RF EFFICIENCY FLAT stems for an efficient stem cooling Cylindric stems (diameter=5 mm): no stem cooling  P=1.4 MW

ADAM meeting Geneve, THEORETICAL BEAM DYNAMICS PROPERTIES (from DESIGN data, assuming constant normalized transverse, that means negligible coupling between transverse and longitudinal planes and perfet matched FODO lattice) Transverse acceptance (A t =r 2 /  TWISSmax )= 8.7  mm-mrad Longitudinal phase stable area (foreseen phase acceptance  58.5°=3|  s |) INJECTOR: PL7 OUTPUT BEAM PARAMETERS Exun Exun Eyun Eyun  * DW * El (100%) (rms) (100%) (rms) (deg) (keV) (  deg-MeV) (100%) (100%) ° (90%) 4.8(90%) (at 2998 MHz) (at 2998MHz) * Half width

ADAM meeting Geneve, BEAM DYNAMICS: LINAC CODE RESULTS FOR AN IDEAL MATCHING BETWEEN PL7 AND SCDTL35 (distance from injector=0) M1 M2 M3 M4

ADAM meeting Geneve, Input coordinates Accepted coordinates in the three phase space planes SCDTL35 output beam: transmission=46.3%

ADAM meeting Geneve, BEAM QUALITY IN THESE CONDITIONS: EMITTANCE RMS unnormalized emittance at 35 MeV: 0.7  mm-mrad RMS normalized emittance at 35 MeV: 0.2  mm-mrad

ADAM meeting Geneve, EFFECT OF INJECTOR BUNCH LENGHTENING ON SCDTL TRANSMISSION Bunch lenghtening due to velocity spread in a drift following the injector transmission vs distance between injector output and center of the first PMQ on SCDTL: (matched beam on transverse planes) PL7 428 MHz PL7 425 MHz

ADAM meeting Geneve, MATCHING PL7 at 425 MHz – SCDTL35 (3 EMQs in a LEBT  1 m long before the PMQ at the SCDTL entrance) compatible with the current Frascati installation and ISPAN scheme Total length (up to the middle of the PMQ at the entrance of SCDTL)= mm  X-envelope Y-envelope - +  > <15

ADAM meeting Geneve, MATCHING PL7 AT 428 MHZ-SCDTL (3 PMQs in the a very short LEBT before the PMQ at the SCDTL entrance) to be discussed with ACCSYS  - + Y-envelope X-envelope <15 Total length (up to the middle of the PMQ at the entrance of SCDTL)= mm

ADAM meeting Geneve, LINAC code output in these conditions Accepted PL7 output coordinates in the three phase space planes SCDTL35 output: beam transmission=33.7%

ADAM meeting Geneve, TSTEP code: LOSSES DISTRIBUTION IN SCDTL TANKS AND AVERAGE ENERGY OF LOST PARTICLES

ADAM meeting Geneve, TSTEP code: LOSSES DISTRIBUTION IN TERMS OF POWER Plot normalization: injected current from PL7=1  A

ADAM meeting Geneve, ERRORS AND TOLERANCES STUDY

ADAM meeting Geneve, ERRORS AND TOLERANCES: PMQs Nruns=50, Random errors (uniformly distributed in  |error|) Effect on transmission: markers position on the points corresponding to a factor=0.9 on transmission for a loss with probability of 90% - Rot. angle=2°, gradient=  4%, displacement=50  m

ADAM meeting Geneve, ERRORS AND TOLERANCES: TANKS Nruns=50, Random errors (uniformly distributed in  |error|) Effect on transmission: markers position on the points corresponding to a factor=0.9 on transmission for a loss with probability of 90% - Field amp. error=  2%, tank displacement=  150  m entire tank is displaced independently in x,y each end of tank is independently displaced (tilt)

ADAM meeting Geneve, ERRORS AND TOLERANCES: PHASE SHIFTS Nruns=50, Random errors (uniformly distributed in  |error|) Effect on transmission: markers position on the points corresponding to a factor=0.9 on transmission for a loss with probability of 90% - error in distance between tanks=150  m, error in the length of the cells=50  m

ADAM meeting Geneve, ERRORS AND TOLERANCES (Total Np=100K, nruns=300) PMQs: Rot. angle=2°, gradient=  4%, x-y displacement=  50  m TANKS AND CELLS ERRORS: Field amp. error=  2%, tank displacement=  150  m error in distance between tanks=150  m, error in the length of the cells=50  m Prob=90% of transmission/max. transmission>50% Prob=90% of Exn<0.28  mm-mrad, Eyn<0.29  mm-mrad

ADAM meeting Geneve, THE LOW ENERGY SCDTL PART MEV IS MORE CRITICAL RESPECT TO TOLERANCES (that can be relaxed in the last two modules) tolerance on tank field amplitude error from  2% to  6% tolerance on PMQ displacement from 50  m to 100  m 7-35 MeV MeV 7-35 MeV MeV

ADAM meeting Geneve, START-TO-END (7-235 MeV)

ADAM meeting Geneve, START-TO-END: SCDTL35+LIGHT35(retrieved from DeGiovanni DESIGN data-December 2009) SCDTL35 beam portion that is transmitted up to 235 MeV in LIGHT35 The total capture drops from 33.7 % at SCDTL output to 20 % at LIGHT35 output.

ADAM meeting Geneve, START-TO-END: possible revision of LIGHT35 to optimize the matching between the two structures and reduce losses at high energy REASONS OF THE CAPTURE REDUCTION IN LIGHT35 parameter SCDTL35 LIGHT35 (TERA DESIGN)  s -18° -13° Number of cells/tank 6 (i.e 6  ) 18 (i.e 9  ) Intertank distance at 35 MeV 3.5  4.5  With some modifications in the part at fixed energy ( MeV) it is possible (as it will be shown in the next slides) to increase the longitudinal and transverse acceptance of LIGHT35, so improving the matching between the two structures and avoiding losses at high energy without getting a longer structure (inter-tank distance in the last two modules from 2.5  to 1.5  )

ADAM meeting Geneve, LIGHT35 ORIGINAL LIGHT35 MODIFIED (three more tanks, but no greater final length)

ADAM meeting Geneve, NEW START TO END FROM 7 to 235 MeV PL7 at 428 MHz LEBT 29 cm long SCDTL35 LIGHT35 (modified) LAYOUT: 30% 20% SCDTL35LIGHT35

ADAM meeting Geneve, NEW START TO END FROM 7 to 235 MeV Accepted SCDTL35 output coordinates by LIGHT35 LIGHT35 output beam: transmission from the injector=30%

ADAM meeting Geneve, START TO END MeV: EMITTANCE Final un-normalized RMS emittance:  0.25  mm-mrad Final normalized RMS emittance:  0.2  mm-mrad

ADAM meeting Geneve, CONCLUSIONS A SCDTL structure up to 35 MeV with a length <5.4 m to be used as the first part of ERHA linac has been designed: a prototype of the first two modules up to 17.5 MeV is under realization in the framework of ISPAN Project the transverse emittance of the PL7 output beam is inside the transverse acceptance of SCDTL. The losses are due to longitudinal mismatching due to the jump of RF frequencies the longitudinal capture can be improved passing from 425 MHz to 428 MHz for the PL7 linac (to be discussed in the next contacts with ACCSYS) A proper revision of the LIGHT35 structure design allows to optimize the matching between the low and high energy parts of the linac, bringing the total transmission (in absence of errors) to 30% (near to the typical values of captures in medical electron linacs) and reducing losses at high energy The total length from the injector output from 7 to 235 MeV is  20 m

ADAM meeting Geneve, ADDENDUM: SCDTL35 drawings

ADAM meeting Geneve, ADDENDUM: SCDTL35 drawings