Jonathan Pleim 1, Shawn Roselle 1, Prakash Bhave 1, Russell Bullock 1, William Hutzell 2, Deborah Luecken 2, Chris Nolte 1, Golam Sarwar 2, Ken Schere.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
Advertisements

Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Preliminary Results CMAQ and CMAQ-AIM with SAPRC99 Gail Tonnesen, Chao-Jung Chien, Bo Wang, UC Riverside Max Zhang, Tony Wexler, UC Davis Ralph Morris,
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Jonathan Pleim and the CMAQ Development.
Atmospheric Mercury Simulation with CMAQ Version Russ Bullock - NOAA Air Resources Laboratory* Kathy Brehme - Computer Sciences Corp. 5 th Annual.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
Center for Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Adel Hanna Director, CMAS October 6, th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
Development and Preliminary Results of Image Processing Tools for Meteorology and Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran Center for Environmental Modeling for.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
Using CMAQ-AIM to Evaluate the Gas-Particle Partitioning Treatment in CMAQ Chris Nolte Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Prakash Bhave, Shawn Roselle, Frank Binkowski, Chris Nolte, Shaocai Yu, Jerry Gipson, & Ken Schere CMAS Conference – Paper #6.8 Chapel Hill, NC, October.
Application of the CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to a Coastal Urban Site Chris Nolte NOAA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC 6.
Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model Version 5.1 K. Wyat Appel, Sergey Napelenok, Christian Hogrefe, Kristen M. Foley, George.
Prakash V. Bhave, Ph.D. Physical Scientist PM Model Performance Workshop February 10, 2004 Postprocessing Model Output for Comparison to Ambient Data.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
CMAQ Model Development: Current Model Configuration and Future Plans
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
New Features of the 2003 Release of the CMAQ Model Jonathan Pleim 1, Gerald Gipson 2, Shawn Roselle 1, and Jeffrey Young 1 1 ASMD, ARL, NOAA, RTP, NC 2.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Cloud-mediated radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols simulated by newly developed two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ during 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS over the Gulf.
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
VISTAS Modeling Overview Oct. 29, 2003
Simulation of the indirect radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model over the continental United States: Preliminary.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
Jonathan Pleim NOAA/ARL* RTP, NC A NEW COMBINED LOCAL AND NON-LOCAL PBL MODEL FOR METEOROLOGY AND AIR QUALITY MODELING * In Partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Examining the impact of aerosol direct.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Rochelle Balmori, Shu-Yun Chen, Prakash Karamchandani and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Justin T. Walters and John J. Jansen.
Using Linked Global and Regional Models to Simulate U.S. Air Quality in the Year 2050 Chris Nolte, Alice Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division,
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
PREMAQ: A New Pre-Processor to CMAQ for Air Quality Forecasting Tanya L. Otte*, George Pouliot*, and Jonathan E. Pleim* Atmospheric Modeling Division U.S.
Simulation of PM2.5 Trace Elements in Detroit using CMAQ
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
Policy-driven priorities for improvements to the CMAQ photochemical modeling system Heather Simon, Kristen Foley, Sharon Phillips, Norm Possiel, Shawn.
Modeling the impacts of green infrastructure land use changes on air quality and meteorology—case study and sensitivity analysis in Kansas City Yuqiang.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
JEHN-YIH JUANG, Donna Schwede, and Jon Pleim
Presentation transcript:

Jonathan Pleim 1, Shawn Roselle 1, Prakash Bhave 1, Russell Bullock 1, William Hutzell 2, Deborah Luecken 2, Chris Nolte 1, Golam Sarwar 2, Ken Schere 1, Jeffrey Young 1, James Godowitch 1, Tanya Otte 1, and Wyat Appel 1 1 NOAA/ARL*, RTP, NC 2 USEPA/ORD, RTP, NC THE 2006 CMAQ RELEASE AND PLANS FOR 2007 * In Partnership with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Outline Upgrades for 2006  CMAQ version 4.6  MCIP version 3.2 Preliminary evaluation Plans for 2007 and beyond

Gas Chemistry  New Carbon Bond (CB05) mechanism and associated EBI solver 52 chemical species and 156 reactions Summer daily maximum 1-hr ozone concentrations ~ 9% higher compared to CB-IV Comparison of CB05 versus CB-IV will be presented by Deborah Luecken. Upgrades for 2006 – CMAQv4.6

CMAQv4.6 Upgrades (cont.) Heterogeneous Chemistry  Modified N 2 O 5 heterogeneous hydrolysis reaction probability (  ) Now a function of sulfate, nitrate, temperature, and relative humidity  Restored gas-phase reactions involving N 2 O 5 and H 2 O to CB05 and SAPRC99 mechanisms  Winter: net decrease in production of nitrate  Summer: slight increase in production of nitrate  GAMMA_N2O5 added to aerosol diagnostic file  Effects of these changes will be presented by Prakash Bhave

CMAQv4.6 Upgrades (cont.) Aerosols  Updated ISORROPIA to v1.7 Includes correction in activity coefficients for temperatures other than 298 K Winter tests show the maximum increases of 1.8 μg/m3 and 0.5 μg/m3 for aerosol nitrate and ammonium, respectively  Set upper limit for the RH input to ISORROPIA to 95% Reduces extreme aerosol water content in humid conditions Ammonium and nitrate aerosol concentration also reduced

CMAQv4.6 Upgrades (cont.) SAPRC99 and CB05 mechanisms expanded for Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs).  Larger number of gas phase HAPS than v4.5  Several toxic metals and diesel contributions to particulate matter have been added  Details of the toxic capabilities of CMAQv4.6 will be presented by Bill Hutzell. Updates to mercury modeling capability of CMAQv4.6 will presented by Russ Bullock

CMAQv4.6 Upgrades (cont.) New PBL model (ACM2)  Combined non-local and local closure  Description of ACM2 will be presented by Jonathan Pleim Other upgrades  Plume-in-Grid, Carbon Apportionment, and Sulfate Tracking have been updated for CB05 and AE4  A restart file that contains the last time step of the entire 4-D concentration array has been added  Parallel I/O code library updated New version of PARIO required for CMAQv4.6

MCIPv3.2 Modified I/O API header for WRF-ARW  Center of coarse domain need not be the center of projection  Need different GRIDDESC for each WRF-ARW domain Fix in M3Dry when not using P-X LSM in met. model Updated headers for polar stereographic and Mercator LWMASK added to GRIDCRO2D Legacy options targeted for removal in the next release  RADMDry dry deposition, PBL recalculation options, radiation recalculation options, and processing data in MM5v2 format. See the ReleaseNotes and CHANGES files for additional details.

Preliminary evaluation Full evaluation will include:  Jan, Apr, July, Oct, 2001   x = 36 and 12 km  14 and 34 layers (see Wyat Appel’s poster) Preliminary evaluation:  Jan, July, 14 layer,  x = 12 km  Ozone, PM

January Average PM 2.5 vs STN

July Average PM 2.5 vs STN

July Max 8-hr Ozone CMAQv4.6 vs CMAQv4.5

Max 8-hr Ozone for July 2001 SW region (LA,TX, MS, MO, OK) Mid-Atlantic region (WV, KY, TN, VA, NC, SC, GA, AL)

2007/2008 CMAQ Improvements Aerosols  New SOA module in collaboration with HEASD New precursors will include sesquiterpenes and isoprene.  New coarse particle chemistry module. Transfer of volatile inorganic material between the gas phase and the coarse-particle mode will be simulated.  New algorithm to moderate biogenic emissions to account for in-canopy deposition Substantially lower emission fluxes at night when turbulent transport is limited.

2007/2008 CMAQ Improvements In-line Photolysis (developed by F. Binkowski, CEP)  Seven wavelength bands in UV and visible  Updated absorption cross-sections and quantum yields based on Fast-J  Aerosol extinction and scattering  Grid-specific surface albedo and meteorological and chemical profiles.  Effects of clouds to be added Cloud modeling  Adapting WRF/CHEM convective cloud model for CMAQ in collaboration with Georg Grell (NOAA/OAR) Cloud mixing includes updraft, downdraft, and compensating subsidence.  Updating the aqueous chemistry module in CMAQ.  More detailed aqueous mechanism

Satellite data assimilation Collaborative project with University of Alabama at Huntsville and NASA/MSFC to use satellite information to improve meteorology and chemistry modeling  Solar insolation derived from GOES assimilated into met. model (MM5 and WRF)  Photolysis rates derived from GOES and model information used in CMAQ  In future, satellite-derived skin temperature can be used to nudge soil moisture.

2-Way WRF-CMAQ coupling Synchronous meteorology and chemistry calculations Allow chemical feedback to meteorology  Aerosol feedback to the radiation model.  Integrated resolved-scale microphysics and aqueous chemistry  Indirect effects of aerosols on microphysics Consistent air quality modeling in either 2-way coupled or 1-way sequential execution. Prototype anticipated in 2008

Disclaimer: The research presented here was performed under the Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and under agreement number DW This work constitutes a contribution to the NOAA Air Quality Program. Although it has been reviewed by EPA and NOAA and approved for publication, it does not necessarily reflect their views or policies.