OTC Modeling Committee April 2015 Update Presented by: Dan Goldberg Thursday April 9 th, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Initial evaluation of 2011 CMAQ and CAMx simulations during the DISCOVER-AQ period in the mid-Atlantic 13 th Annual CMAS Conference: 10/28/14 Pat Dolwick,
Advertisements

Simulating isoprene oxidation in GFDL AM3 model Jingqiu Mao (NOAA GFDL), Larry Horowitz (GFDL), Vaishali Naik (GFDL), Meiyun Lin (GFDL), Arlene Fiore (Columbia.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Bay breeze enhanced air pollution event in Houston, Texas during the DISCOVER-AQ field campaign Christopher P. Loughner (University of Maryland) Melanie.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Ozone Production Efficiency in the Baltimore/Washington Urban Plume Presentation by Linda Hembeck Co-Authors: Christopher Loughner, Timothy Vinziguerra,
Talat Odman and Yongtao Hu, Georgia Tech Zac Adelman, Mohammad Omary and Uma Shankar, UNC James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim, Georgia DNR.
Sensitivity of U.S. Surface Ozone to Isoprene Emissions & Chemistry: An Application of the 1°x1 ° North American Nested GEOS-CHEM Model GEOS-CHEM Model.
Impact of chemistry scheme complexity on UK air quality modelling Met Office FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: Fax:
Model Evaluation with Satellite Data: NO 2, HCHO, and Beyond Monica Harkey Tracey Holloway Alex Cohan Rob Kaleel.
The Maryland State Implementation Plan By Russell Dickerson, Tim Canty, Dan Goldberg, Xinrong Ren, Tim Vinciguerra et al., The University of Maryland 1145.
West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study Modeling Results November 7, 2013 Technical Project Team ENVIRON, Alpine Geophysics, Univ. of North Carolina.
Sensitivity Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) April 29, 2015 Western States Air Quality.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2015 Scope of Work University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Status of Technical Analysis Technical Oversight Committee September 14, 2006.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
Air Resources Laboratory CMAS meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina Yunsoo Choi 1,2, Hyuncheol Kim 1,2, Daniel Tong 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Rick Saylor 3, Ariel.
Melanie Follette-Cook Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) CMAS Conference October 27-29, 2014.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
The Sensitivity of U.S. Surface Ozone Formation to NO x and VOCs as Viewed from Space: the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Bryan Duncan 1, Yasuko Yoshida.
Presented at the AQAST 9 th Semiannual Meeting Wednesday June 3 rd, 2015 Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Co-authors: Tim Canty, Tim Vinciguerra,
Evidence for an increase in the photochemical lifetime of ozone in the eastern United States Presented at the 14 th CMAS Meeting Wednesday October 7 th,
Western Ozone Conference Understand the nature, causes and trends of ozone in the western U.S. outside CA Identify additional assessment work needed to.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
The Role of Interstate Transport of Air Pollutants in Achieving Ozone NAAQS Attainment David M. Flannery Steptoe & Johnson PLLC for the Midwest Ozone Group.
Scientific Insight from CMAQ modeling for the MDE SIP
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) WSAQS 2011b Base Case Updates University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International.
1 Results of 2010/2015 Post-CAIR Ozone Source Apportionment Modeling August 2005 OAR/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Studying.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS/3SDW Progress Review to the 3SAQS Technical Committee University of North.
Chemical Condition and Surface Ozone in Urban Cities of Texas During the Last Decade: Observational Evidence from OMI, CAMS, and Model Analysis Yunsoo.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Simulation Experiments for TEMPO Air Quality Objectives Peter Zoogman, Daniel Jacob, Kelly Chance, Xiong Liu, Arlene Fiore, Meiyun Lin, Katie Travis, Annmarie.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
The Role of Background O 3 in the NAAQS Review George T. Wolff Air Improvement Resource, Inc.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
Uncertainties in isoprene-NO x -O 3 chemistry: Implications for surface ozone over the eastern United States TEMP PAR Leaf Area ISOPRENE + NO x  O 3 Arlene.
Background ozone in surface air over the United States Arlene M. Fiore Daniel J. Jacob US EPA Workshop on Developing Criteria for the Chemistry and Physics.
Ozone Sensitivity to Nitric Oxide Emissions in WRF-Chem
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
Model Future: Nesting with Regional Models
Rui Zhang1,2, Daniel Cohan1, Alex Cohan3, and Arastoo Pour-Biazar4
Kenneth Craig, Garnet Erdakos, Lynn Baringer, and Stephen Reid
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.
Gabriele Curci Model study of the impact of updated European biogenic emission inventory from NatAir on air quality using Chimere.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
Overview of WRAP 2014 Platform develop and Shake-Out project update
Impacts on CMAQ Peak Ozone Predictions from using Different BEIS Biogenic Emissions Options April 22, 2019.
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

OTC Modeling Committee April 2015 Update Presented by: Dan Goldberg Thursday April 9 th, 2015

Description of model used: CAMx v6.10 (12 km OTC model domain) – Date range: May 26 – August 31, 2011 – 10 days spin-up – CB05 Gas-phase chemistry (transitioning to CB6r2) – Anthropogenic Emissions: Baseline 2011 & 2018 NEI v1 from EPA – Biogenic Emissions: BEIS v3.14 from EPA – Meteorology: WRF 2011 CONUS 12 km from EPA – Boundary conditions: GEOS-Chem 2011 from EPA Sensitivity studies with: CB6 & CB6r2 gas-phase chemistry, MEGAN v2.10 biogenic emissions and MOZART-4 boundary conditions Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

2

3

4

5

Sector-by-Sector Analysis July 1 through July 8, 2011 only (so far) – Will conduct the same analysis for 2018 CAMx OSAT is working as coded to do, but perhaps some caveats in the results 6 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

7 Peaks in “Biogenic” ozone are near city centers and areas with low boundary layers Air masses near city centers are NOx-saturated in the model, which attributes O 3 to biogenic VOCs Note peak in the Chesapeake Bay and coastal areas downwind of NYC “Biogenic” ozone in rural areas is 6 – 8 ppb, this value is likely closer to reality Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

8 Peaks in “Mobile” ozone are near city centers and interstates Values are highest in North Carolina, lowest in Canada Chicago & NYC do not show up, perhaps due to unfavorable meteorology during early July 2011 Values are likely overestimated due to Anderson et al., 2014 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

9 Peaks in “EGU” ozone are focused in the Ohio River Valley Values are 6 – 10 ppbv in the Ohio River Valley, lower elsewhere Values are likely underestimated due to Anderson et al., 2014 & Canty et al., 2015 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

10 Peaks in ozone attributed to everywhere else are focused over the Great Lakes & Atlantic Ocean Still trying to determine the cause of this… Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

11 Peak in biogenic O3 at this time is probably due to O 3 being formed in a VOC-limited environment due to NO x saturation because the the PBL is still low Unsure why this portion is so large, perhaps also due to O 3 being formed in a VOC-limited environment over the bay (which would be attributed to anthropogenic VOCs, not isoprene)

12 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

13 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

14 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

O 3 Attributed to a VOC-limited environment in mid-afternoon July 2011 (Baseline) 15 Some areas have > 50% VOC-limited O 3, is this really the case??? Observations show NO x reductions are reducing O 3 (Salawitch, Loughner)

O 3 Attributed to a VOC-limited environment in mid-afternoon July 2011 (Beta) 16 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use “Beta” work shows a much lower % of VOC-limited O 3 Beta Run: - CB6r2 - MEGANv % mobile NO x emissions

17 New Beta simulation attributes 30 – 40% more ozone to EGUs than the baseline simulation; emissions of EGUs remain the same in each simulation. The increase in attribution to EGUs is due to changing gas-phase chemistry and the nonlinearities associated with changing the biogenic & mobile emissions Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use

Conclusions Can develop state-by-state source apportionment plots for any source receptor location in the eastern U.S. – Boundary ozone consistently plays a large role in all locations Sector-by-sector source apportionment is working as coded, but several caveats so far – UMD Beta work should improve this 18 Preliminary work by Dan Goldberg, University of Maryland, please contact prior to use