Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2002 ADSA 2002 (GRW-1) (abstract 125) G.R. WIGGANS,* P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.C. PHILPOT Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Advertisements

A Risk Management Strategy for Sheep Producers: The Benefits of Breeding Sheep Outside Their Normal Breeding Season K.N. DSouza¹*, D. Singh-Knights² and.
ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)
Modeling nuisance variables for phenotypic evaluation of bull fertility M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
Breed composition of the United States dairy cattle herd R. L. Powell,* H. D. Norman, and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Use of cow culling to help meet compliance for somatic cell standards H. D. Norman and J. R. Wright * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
2005 ADSA/ASAS/CSAS meeting (1) Historical examination of culling of dairy cows from herds in the United States H. DUANE NORMAN, E. HARE, and J.R. WRIGHT.
Derivation of Factors to Estimate Daily Fat, Protein, and Somatic Cell Score from One Milking of Cows Milked Three Times Daily M. M. Schutz* 1 and H. D.
Effects of complex vertebral malformation gene on production and reproduction M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and C. P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs.
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) 2001 Variance of effects of lactation stage within herd by herd yield N. Gengler 1,2, B. Auvray *,1, and G.R. Wiggans 3 1.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Assessment of voluntary waiting period and frequency of estrus synchronization among herds R.H. Miller, 1, * H.D. Norman, 1 M.T. Kuhn, 1 and J.S. Clay.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
Genetic correlations between first and later parity calving ease in a sire-maternal grandsire model G. R. Wiggans*, C. P. Van Tassell, J. B. Cole, and.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Trends in Noncompliance with Milk Quality Standards for Dairy Herd Improvement Herds in the United States H. D. Norman*, J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Synchronization Effects on Parameters for Days Open M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and R. H. Miller* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
2001 NAAB DSEC, April 2002 (1) Revision and Use of Termination Codes PAUL VANRADEN Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
Factors that affect abortion frequency in dairy herds in the United States R.H. Miller,* M.T. Kuhn, H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Methodology for Prediction of Bull Fertility from Field Data M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H.D. Norman* and J.L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
Minimum Dry Period Length to Maximize Performance M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2003 P.M. VanRaden* and M.E. Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Definition.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
Characteristics of milk ELISA results for Johne’s disease in US dairy cows Byrem, T. M. 1 *, H. D. Norman 2 and J. R. Wright 2 1 Antel BioSystems, Lansing,
2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.
Dairy Cattle Production (95314)
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
A National Sire Fertility Index
Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Contribution of inbreeding and recessive defects to early embryo loss
Abstr. M4 Merit of obtaining genetic evaluations of milk yield for each parity on Holstein bulls H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* R.L. Powell, and P.M. VanRaden.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Reproductive trends of dairy herds in the United States
Multiplicative Factors
3Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON Canada
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
E. Hare,*H.D. Norman, and J.R. Wright
Presentation transcript:

Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Abstract M CONCLUSIONS Frequency of deaths of lactating cows increased by 1.7% from 1995 to There was a sudden increase of 0.7% from 2003 to 2004, probably due to the December 31, 2003 change in USDA regulations for euthanizing downer cows because of BSE concerns. Estimates of deaths do not include lactations ending prior to first test which were only reported by DRPC in recent years Death was more likely to occur in early lactation than later. Compared to lactations longer than 250 d, lactations that terminated at less than 46 d had a 16.5% higher death rate. Death rate steadily increased with parity. By the 8 th or greater parity, death rate was 2.01% higher than for first parity cows. Differences among calendar months were relatively small. Frequencies were highest in July, lowest in November (difference of 0.55%). Within-herd breed differences were very small. Frequency of death increased as 305-ME milk yield increased. REFERENCES 1 RESULTS & DISCUSSION Table 1. Analysis of variance results for both PROC GENMOD and PROC GLM of SAS Figure 1. Least-squares estimates (LS) of model effects a)Year trends compared to Death losses were most frequent in latest year (2005), lowest in There was a large increase from 2003 to 2004 (0.7%). The total increase from 1995 to 2005 was 1.72%. The large increase from 2003 to 2004 was likely due primarily to a change in USDA regulations to require that “downer” cows be euthanized 1. While the frequency of downer cows euthanized prior to 2004 is unknown, the 0.7% increase observed indicates a substantial new economic loss for dairymen. b)Parity trends compared to 8+ parities. As anticipated, frequency of death steadily increased from first to subsequent parities. Death rate in first parity was 2.01% lower than in 8+ parities. c)Month trends compared to December. Although differences are significant among calendar months, magnitudes were small. Deaths were least frequent in November, most frequent in July (0.39% higher than December). Trend was for peak in July through August, declining to November, then rising steadily through winter and spring. Whereas estimated differences generally closely paralleled actual frequencies, month trend was an exception, where records ending in February had the highest actual death rate (3.21%). Herd effects may have been responsible for this discrepancy. d)Stage of lactation differences compared to > 250 d. As expected, deaths were much more frequent during early lactation (short records would be represented by deaths and voluntary disposals). Compared to lactations that were longer than 250 d, death rate in lactations < 46 d was 16.5% higher and death rate in lactations of 46 to 90 d was 9.8% higher. INTRODUCTION There are anecdotal reports of increased deaths of lactating cows. OBJECTIVES Assess death losses of lactating cows Determine effects of year, season, parity, stage of lactation at death, breed, and lactation milk yield on frequency of death among lactations MATERIALS & METHODS Lactations ending during 1995 through 2005 were extracted for a 10% sample of herds based on units position of herd code. The following records were excluded: 1) Lactations ending less than 1 year prior to herd leaving test; 2) Lactations without estimates for 305-ME milk yield. Death incidence was binomial (0=live, 1=died) based on termination code 6 reports by DRPC. PROC GENMOD of SAS was employed for a binomial distribution. To insure convergence, herds with less than 400 lactations and herds reporting less than 0.3% deaths were excluded (to guard against incomplete reporting). Remaining for analysis were 2,131,035 lactations from 1,646 herds. Observed frequency of death was 2.92%. The model included herd, year, and month in which lactation ended, parity (8 groups), DIM stage of lactation, breed of cow, and 305-ME milk yield. DIM stage of lactation was defined as 250 d. To compare breeds within herd, 3 groups were Holstein, Jersey, and Other. Because the sample was large, the model was also fit with PROC GLM of SAS. YearMonthParityStageBreed Chi-Square (GENMOD)1, , , F-values (GLM) , RESULTS (con’t.) Within-herd breed differences were small. Differences from other breeds were 0.45% for Holstein and 0.50% for Jersey. Regressions on lactation milk yield (%/1000 lb) were 0.15 for Holstein, 0.19 for Jersey, and 0.22 for other breeds (t-values were > 10). GENMOD and GLM ranked the model effects similarly: stage, parity, year, month, and breed (largest to smallest). Stage was by far the most dominant effect, especially for GLM. All effects were significant, but breed differences were negligible. Because GENMOD and GLM ranked effects similarly, only GLM estimates are presented.