Outcomes for Mathematical Literacy: Do Attitudes About Math Change?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dave Sobecki Miami University Hamilton Brian Mercer Parkland College.
Advertisements

Building for Success in Calculus David Bressoud St. Paul, MN The First Two Years of College Math: Building Student Success Reston, VA October 5–7, 2014.
Presented by the Learning Commons Rachel Wendt. Agenda History, Development, and Planning Results and Outcomes Overview Summer Schedule Contact Information.
Using Mathematical Practices to Promote Productive Disposition
July 11, 2013 Tinley Park, Illinois Math Literacy An Accelerated Pathway for Developmental Math Kathleen Almy Rock Valley College.
Effects of MMM on Performance, Attitudes and Efficacy of Students in Precalculus Brad Bailey June 3, 2011.
The Development of Life Purpose in Pepperdine University Undergraduates Cindy Miller-Perrin Don Thompson Pepperdine University Faculty Conference October.
Title 4 Effects of a student designed multimedia project on 8th graders attitude and performance.
Examining the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Math Reality vs. Math Myth: A Partnership for Student Success Dianne Siegfreid, Concurrent Enrollment, Weber State University, Utah Dixilee Blackinton,
Past and Future Grade Math Curriculum Revisions Walter Whiteley York University, Director of Applied Mathematics Chair, COU Math Review Task Force.
Using Measurable Outcomes to Evaluate Tutor Programs Jan Norton, Presenter.
AN EVALUATION OF THE EIGHTH GRADE ALGEBRA PROGRAM IN GRAND BLANC COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 8 th Grade Algebra 1A.
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
Hands on Statistics: Active learning in College Guojing Wang, Maika Yanagishita, Andrew Hwang, James Florczak Introduction As learning assistants for Statistics.
ABSTRACT Key Terms: Parent involvement, Common Core State Standards, Homework, K – 2 Mathematics In this study, the 2015 REU mathematics team from Elizabeth.
 Students have an opportunity to make choices in middle school that are new and exciting and like nothing they have experienced before…
Mathematics Across the Curriculum A strategy for Quantitative Literacy: Session 2 Åsa Bradley & Beverly Vredevelt Spokane Falls Community College
Innovations in MTH 100E Kristen Bieda and Raven McCrory, Teacher Education Steven Wolf, Post-Doc in CREATE for STEM.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
Iuliana Zsoldos-Marchis
Increasing Success Rates in Mathematics: Lecture/Lab with Prescriptive Remediation Aiken Technical College Achieving the Dream College Since 2007.
Operation STEM Cleveland State University February 22, 2014.
Economics and business students: different, different but the same Dr Inna Pomorina Bath Spa University.
Forward and “Backwards” Design of a Mathematics Co-Requisite Barbara Kirkwood Donna Krampe Ivy Tech Community College-Southwest Region.
Effectiveness of Instructional Techniques to Create Retainable Quantitative Skills Kathy Baughman Assistant Professor of Accounting Wei-Chung Wang Assistant.
Redesign of Precalculus Mathematics THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA College of Arts and Sciences Course Redesign Workshop October 21, 2006.
ACCELERATED ALGEBRA II HONORS Mrs. Sanchez
Do They Say Thank You? Evaluation of a Social Skills Curriculum in a Youth Development Program.
Admit It: Not All Students Really Need “That” from Math Class AACC 95 th Annual Convention San Antonio, Texas April 20, 2015 Parkland College.
Learning Support Math at East Tennessee State University Daryl Stephens.
A College-level Analysis of Service-Learning at CUNY, Queensborough Community College IARSCLE 2011 Nov. 3, 2011 Chicago, IL Sharon S. Ellerton, PhD Assoc.Prof.
Tyler J. Evans HSU Mathematics October 31, Outline  Overview of entry level mathematics curriculum at HSU  Current placement and goals for the.
Capturing the Student Perspective: Advising at Missouri State University Marilee L. Teasley & Dr. Erin M. Buchanan, Department of Psychology Abstract When.
Mississippi e-Learning for Educators: Reaching Teachers Across the State.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: That students do not.
College of Computing & Informatics Educational Initiatives for Undergraduate Programs AAAT Meeting September 11, 2014 Audrey Rorrer.
CRC Redesigning Elementary Algebra at Cosumnes River College Sacramento, California Mary Martin
Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh Attitudes and Beliefs about Physics from a UK Academics’ Perspectives Robyn Donnelly 1, Cait MacPhee.
Student Preferences For Learning College Algebra in a Web Enhanced Environment Dr. Laura J. Pyzdrowski, Pre-Collegiate Mathematics Coordinator Institute.
AFFECT FACTORS: CASE OF A PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH FOR PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS Hamide Dogan-Dunlap Qianyin Liang University of Texas at El Paso USA
Martha Munoz Janet Soto Latoya Gallardo. Abstract  In this study, the correlation between social confidence and academic confidence in Latinos and Asian.
Welcome to ADVANCED PLACEMENT CALCULUS. Things that I say to parents that make them nervous. Calculus is the first real math class. All of the other classes.
INVESTIGATING STUDENT OUTCOMES IN BEGINNING ALGEBRA Kevin L. McCandless, Ed.D San Jose City College
Exploring Non-Cognitive Influences on College Success with New First-year Advisees Kristin Douglas Associate Dean of the College Mary Windeknecht Director.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE MATHEMATICS THAT COLLEGES STUDENTS SHOULD KNOW AMATYC Conference November 20, 2015 Phil Mahler & Rob Farinelli.
Welcome to Pre- Calculus! Mr. Havens Mr. Peter Havens Mr. Peter Havens Education Wheaton College – B.A. in Mathematics Wheaton College – B.A.
Developing a Metric for Evaluating Discussion Boards Dr. Robin Kay University of Ontario Institute of Technology 2 November 2004.
OBJECTIVES: Algebra I is designed to extend the mathematics that students learned in the middle grades. Students learn to simplify and evaluate algebraic.
Gender Differences in Statistical Anxiety Dennis Pearl & Hyen Oh (Penn State University), Larry Lesser (University of Texas, El Paso) & John Weber (Perimeter.
IF GIRLS AREN’T INTERESTED IN COMPUTING CAN WE CHANGE THEIR MINDS? Julie Fisher Monash University, Melbourne, Australia,
T USCON M ATH L ITERACY 2016 Brian Mercer Parkland College Champaign, IL
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Strategies for Maintaining Positive Student Attitudes toward Science and Technology – an Empirical Study Kenton Machina (Philosophy, now; Andes Chair in.
Changing student attitudes about science and their confidence in understanding real-world connections Annia Fayon Department of Postsecondary Teaching.
TWO PATHS THROUGH DEVELOPMENTAL MATHEMATICS? The Parkland Redesign Adventure Erin Wilding-Martin and Brian Mercer.
“Excuse Me Sir, Here’s Your Change”
Investigating student outcomes in beginning algebra
The effects of physical activity on third grade math scores
Thinking about offering Algebraic Literacy? So are we!
Bridge to success in Math Program
Findings from Cardinal Ambrozic Grade Nine Math Survey
Undergraduate Social Sciences Students’ Attitudes Toward Statistics
Promoting the Transfer of Mathematical Skills in Food Science Programmes Colette Fagan November 13, 2018.
A Computer Science Linked-courses Learning Community
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
ADVANCED PLACEMENT CALCULUS
Math Literacy online Erin Wilding-Martin.
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes for Mathematical Literacy: Do Attitudes About Math Change? Martha B. Makowski & Erin Wilding-Martin November 19, 2015 AMATYC 2015 Session S023

Mathematical Literacy at Parkland College Erin Wilding-Martin emartin@parkland.edu

Algebra at Parkland Approximately 67-75% of incoming freshmen place into developmental math Success rates of about 50% in beginning, intermediate, and college algebra Approximately 75% of developmental math students are on a non-STEM path!

Gen Ed Math or Intro to Stat College Algebra or Pre-Calculus Old Course Sequence Pre-Algebra Beginning Algebra Intermediate Algebra Gen Ed Math or Intro to Stat College Algebra or Pre-Calculus

Redesign Goals Create a new track for gen-ed bound students Keep core algebra content, add data literacy De-emphasize by-hand algebraic simplification Add more applications, exploration, and writing Use technology

Course Sequence – First Revision Pre-Algebra Math Literacy Intro to Statistics or Gen Ed Math Beginning Algebra Intermediate Algebra College Algebra or Pre-Calculus

Course Sequence – Current Version Pre-Algebra Math Literacy Intro to Statistics or Gen Ed Math Intermediate Algebra College Algebra or Pre-Calculus

http://dm-live.wikispaces.com/

Math Literacy Design Alternate but still challenging path Math in context, focus on numeracy, data analysis, and functions Develop critical thinking and conceptual understanding

This Class is Different! Little to no lecture Group work, active participation required Reading, writing, technology Online skills work outside of class

Problem Solving Skills Collaboration as a tool for problem solving and thinking. Keep calm and carry on: Mathematicians don’t know how to solve every problem immediately. They just know how to start thinking about it.

Productive Struggle Real problems don’t follow cookie-cutter patterns; they take work Take responsibility Persistence will pay off

Group Structure Assigning groups Full participation required 3-4 students per group Mix of abilities Full participation required Students may not opt out of group work Points given for quality participation Assignments Daily lessons Unit projects

Outcomes: Do Attitudes ChanGe? Martha Makowski University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign mmakows2@Illinois.edu

Question Do Mathematical Literacy students change their attitudes towards math while taking the class? Pause and ask the people in the audience what they expect might happen.

Survey Structure Surveyed twice: Asked about: First week of the semester Once during the last two weeks of the semester Asked about: Math attitudes (pre and post) Preferred learning methods (pre and post) Nature of mathematics (pre and post) Demographics (pre) A few other things…

Survey Sample 96 students took the pre-survey 67 took the post survey (69.8% retention) Race Male Female Total White 23 (25.0) 29 (31.5) 52 (56.5) Black 19 (20.7) 10 (10.9) Hispanic (0.0) 5 (5.4) Asian Other 1 (1.1) 43 (46.7) 49 (53.3) 92

Measured Attitudes Mathematical attitudes measured along 4 dimensions: Motivation (9 items) Value (8 items) Confidence (15 items) Enjoyment (8 items) Attitudes were measured with 5 point Likert scale items 5 = Strongly Agree 4 = Agree 3 = Neither agree nor disagree 2 = Disagree 1 = Strongly disagree

Math Attitudes The above reflects the average difference in score (post-score minus pre-score). Scores for each test were created by adding up all the items related to that subscale on each test, for each student, and then scaling it back down to a 5 point scale. Tests were run only on those who took both the pre- and post-survey.

Those kind of look like small changes… Attitude Scale N Pre-survey mean Post-survey mean Average difference (s.e.) p-value (diff ≠ 0) Motivation 60 2.822 2.926 0.104 (0.063) 0.1068 Enjoyment 59 2.919 3.100 0.180 (0.071) 0.0143 Value 54 3.734 3.831 0.097 (0.059) 0.1063 Confidence 49 2.869 3.052 0.182 (0.085) 0.0366

Math Attitudes - details Attitude Scale N Pre-survey mean Post-survey mean Average difference (s.e.) p-value (diff ≠ 0) Motivation 60 2.822 2.926 0.104 (0.063) 0.1068 Enjoyment 59 2.919 3.100 0.180 (0.071) 0.0143 Value 54 3.734 3.831 0.097 (0.059) 0.1063 Confidence 49 2.869 3.052 0.182 (0.085) 0.0366 Attitude Scale N* Pre-survey mean Post-survey mean Average difference (s.e.) p-value (diff ≠ 0) Motivation 60 2.822 2.926 0.104 (0.063) 0.1068 Enjoyment 59 2.919 3.100 0.180 (0.071) 0.0143 Value 54 3.734 3.831 0.097 (0.059) 0.1063 Confidence 49 2.869 3.052 0.182 (0.085) 0.0366 So, significant, POSITIVE attitude changes for enjoyment and confidence! Positive attitude shifts for motivation and value, although not significant. The above reflects the average difference in score (post-score minus pre-score). Scores for each test were created by adding up all the items related to that subscale on each test, for each student, and then scaling it back down to a 5 point scale. Tests were run only on those who took both the pre- and post-survey.

Attitudes: Additional Results Men had a significantly higher shift in motivation compared to their female counterparts. There were no significant differences in attitudes on the pre-survey between the students who took both surveys (almost-completers) to those who only took the first one (non-completers).

Which attitudes changed?

Whose attitudes changed? 21 of the 67 students who took both surveys increased their attitude on three or four of the scales (31.3%) 6 students decreased their attitudes on three or four of the scales (9.0%) Some students did not change their attitudes on some of the subscales.

Nature of Math/Learning Pre-survey mean Post-survey mean Average diff (s.e.) p-value Learning mathematics is mostly memorizing facts 63 3.000 2.937 -0.063 (0.128) 0.621 There is only one way to solve a mathematics problem 66 2.379 1.955 -0.424 (0.143) 0.004 I enjoy working in small groups in math class 64 3.656 3.719 0.063 (0.126) I learn mathematics best when I get to work in a group 3.515 3.455 -0.061 (0.151) 0.689 I learn mathematics best when I work by myself. 2.833 2.894 0.061 (0.140) 0.666 The math I learn in school rarely helps me when I use math in my daily life. 3.125 2.891 -0.234 (0.117) 0.050

Nature of Math/Learning Pre-survey mean Post-survey mean Average diff (s.e.) p-value Learning mathematics is mostly memorizing facts 63 3.000 2.937 -0.063 (0.128) 0.621 There is only one way to solve a mathematics problem 66 2.379 1.955 -0.424 (0.143) 0.004 I enjoy working in small groups in math class 64 3.656 3.719 0.063 (0.126) I learn mathematics best when I get to work in a group 3.515 3.455 -0.061 (0.151) 0.689 I learn mathematics best when I work by myself. 2.833 2.894 0.061 (0.140) 0.666 The math I learn in school rarely helps me when I use math in my daily life. 3.125 2.891 -0.234 (0.117) 0.050

Thank you! Come see our other talks! Making Math Literacy Work: Managing Groups and Student Expectations S139 Saturday, November 21 10:45 – 11:35 Erin Wilding-Martin & Brian Mercer emartin@parkland.edu Student Experiences in a Problem-Centered Developmental Math Class Research Session Thursday, Nov 19 7:00-9:50 pm Martha Makowski mmakows2@Illinois.edu

Gender Differences Attitude Scale N: Male N: Female Average difference (s.e.) p-value (diff≠0) Motivation 22 38 0.283 (0.127) 0.030 Enjoyment 24 35 0.276 (0.142) 0.057 Value 21 33 0.211 (0.119) 0.082 Confidence 27 0.148 (0.171) 0.392

Completers vs. Non-completers

Course evaluation items There were also a few evaluation items on both the pre-post surveys asking about previous math class experiences and about how they like the class. The first three questions were on the pre-survey; the rest were on the post-survey. Here, low scores (1 or 2) correspond with “Agree” and high scores (4 or 5) correspond with “Disagree.”

Some Other Survey Demographics The table below compares the demographics of those who took only the pre-survey (with the assumption that this group closely overlaps with the students in the class who did not complete it) and those who took both surveys (assuming this group closely matches those who did complete the class). The differences between those who only took the pre-survey and who took both surveys is note-worthy in that the students who don’t make it to the end are more likely to be male or black. I’m not sure if these are significant differences—trying to program the correctly into the stats program I am using is taking longer than some of the other tests I have done.