28.09.2007ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting 28.09.2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
NLC – The Next Linear Collider Project Colorado Univ. - Boulder Calorimetry Cornell-ALCPG Calorimetry Detector Study Plans at Colorado Uriel Nauenberg.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
E/π identification and position resolution of high granularity single sided TRD prototype M. Târzilă, V. Aprodu, D. Bartoş, A. Bercuci, V. Cătănescu, F.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
SoLID EC Design for IHEP 2012/10. Basic Features of Preliminary Design Based on COMPASS Shashlyk module design. 0.5mm lead/0.12mm air gap/1.5mm scintillator/0.12mm.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
ZEUS Calorimeter (1) At HERA high energetic electrons (e) collide with high energetic protons (P). The ZEUS detector measures the properties of the particles.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
1 Tianchi Zhao University of Washington Concept of an Active Absorber Calorimeter A Summary of LCRD 2006 Proposal A Calorimeter Based on Scintillator and.
Proposal for IHEP participation in CBM ECAL
Shashlik type calorimeter for SHIP experiment
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Matching between charged tracks and electromagnetic calorimeter (EMCAL) clusters in ALICE Alberto Pulvirenti University & INFN Catania ACAT 2007 Conference.
Shower Containment and the Size of a Test Calorimeter Adam Para, September 6, 2006.
Study of Sampling Fractions Shin-Shan Yu, A P, Hans Wenzel, October 18, 2006.
CALORIMETER system for the CBM detector Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) CBM Collaboration meeting, October 2004.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
The Tungsten-Scintillating Fiber Accordion Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the sPHENIX Detector Craig Woody, for the PHENIX Collaboration Physics Department,
E.Kistenev Large area Electromagnetic Calorimeter for ALICE What EMC can bring to ALICE Physics and engineering constrains One particular implementation.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the CLAS12 Forward Detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Collaborating institutions: Yerevan Physics Institute (Armenia) James Madison.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
STUDY OF ULTRAREAR DECAYS K 0 → π 0 νν(bar) (Search of K 0 → π 0 νν(bar) decay at IHEP, project KLOD ) V.N. Bolotov on behalf of the collaboration JINR,
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Calibration of the PHENIX Lead Scintillator Calorimeter H.Torii for the PHENIX Collaboration Kyoto Univ./RIKEN Contents Lead Scintillator Calorimeter(PbSc)
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
MAMUD Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, March 29, 2005 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation.
Rare decay Opportunities at U-70 Accelerator (IHEP, Protvino) Experiment KLOD Joint Project : IHEP,Protvino JINR,Dubna INR, Moscow, RAS.
Performance of Shower Maximum Detectors Saori Itoh (Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group (KEK,Kobe,Konan,Niigata,Shinshu,Tsukuba) Introduction Detector.
The LHCb Electromagnetic Calorimeter Ivan Belyaev, ITEP/Moscow.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Detectors for VEPP-2000 B.Khazin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 2 March 2006.
Test Beam: Calorimetric Wishes… Steve Magill, Jose Repond, Andre Turcot, Jae Yu* Jan. 10, 2003 Goals for calorimeter test beam What’s needed for EFA? Requirements.
Edouard Kistenev for the PHENIX Collaboration Calorimetry based upgrade to PHENIX at RHIC CALOR 2012 Santa Fe, NM, June 4-8, 2012.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Use of the D0 Central Preshower in Electron Identification John Gardner University of Kansas APS April 6, 2003.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Seoul National University On behalf of J-PARC E18 Collaboration
for SoLID Collaboration
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
CEPC 数字强子量能器读出电子学预研进展
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
an ecofriendly possibility
The reconstruction method for GLD PFA
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Zhiwen Zhao,UVa for EC group
Presentation transcript:

ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting

ECAL PID2 PID methods applicable for ECAL The aim of ECAL PID is to discriminate  and e  from anything else Charged track matching –Reject (for  ) or identify (for e  ) ECAL clusters produced by charged tracks Flight time measurement –Reject ECAL clusters produced by slow particles (mainly heavy hadrons) Transverse shower shape –Discriminate electromagnetic and hadronic showers Longitudinal shower profile –Discriminate electromagnetic and hadronic showers

ECAL PID3 Flight time from target to ECAL (12 m) Neutral hadrons contribute to photon spectrum mainly at E<2 GeV Significant background is expected from antineutrons at 1.8 GeV Time resolution  t=1 ns is sufficient for rejection of K 0 and neutrons

ECAL PID4 Longitudinal profile of electromagnetic shower (PDG)

ECAL PID5 Prototype of “Two-Sections” ECAL Module Two channel PMT based on PM FEU- 115M dynode system X 0 = 10X X 0 Total radiation length = 20 X o. Number of layers = 85 Lead plate thickness = 1.3 mm Scintillator plate thickness = 4.0 mm Scintillator – Polystyrene + 1.5%PT % POPOP Wave Length Shifting Fibers – Y11 Lucite prism for uniform light mixing Light from the first half of calorimeter (preshower) was collected to one anode and light from the second half to another. V.Brekhovskikh, V.Rykalin 21 September 2006

ECAL PID6 2-segment module design Separate light collection to 2-channel PMT V.Brekhovskikh, V.Rykalin 21 September 2006

ECAL PID7 All calorimeter Preshower Accepted electrons (84%) Rejected pions (93%) Beam measurements of 2-segment module V.Brekhovskikh, V.Rykalin 21 September 2006

ECAL PID8 Simulation model 1 module with 160 layers (Pb 0.7 mm + Sci 1.0 mm) Total radiation length: 20X longitudinal segments, each of 8 layers Various combinations of energies deposited in different segments allow to optimize longitudinal segmentation

ECAL PID9 E det vs Segment number: 5 GeV PhotonsHadrons

ECAL PID10 E det vs Segment number : 10 GeV PhotonsHadrons

ECAL PID11 E det vs Segment number : 15 GeV PhotonsHadrons

ECAL PID12 Longitudinal profile: Photons 5 GeV10 GeV

ECAL PID13 Longitudinal profile: Hadrons 5 GeV10 GeV

ECAL PID14 Longitudinal profile: Muons 5 GeV10 GeV

ECAL PID15 E1/E2, 5 GeV (1X 0 +19X 0 )

ECAL PID16 E1/E2, 5 GeV (2X 0 +18X 0 )

ECAL PID17 E1/E2, 5 GeV (3X 0 +17X 0 )

ECAL PID18 E1/E2, 5 GeV (4X 0 +16X 0 )

ECAL PID19 Identification probabilities (1X 0 +19X 0 ) E 1 /E2 cut GeV  - GeV  - GeV  - S/B=3.5

ECAL PID20 Identification probabilities (2X 0 +18X 0 ) E 1 /E2 cut GeV  - GeV  - GeV  - S/B=3

ECAL PID21 Identification probabilities (3X 0 +17X 0 ) E 1 /E2 cut GeV  - GeV  - GeV  - S/B=2

ECAL PID22 Identification probabilities (4X 0 +16X 0 ) E 1 /E2 cut GeV  - GeV  - GeV  - S/B=1.5

ECAL PID23 To do 3-segment module: the optimal segmentation to be found Realistic momentum distribution of incoming particles Realistic particle multiplicity to be studied Track-ECAL matching and optimization of the matching distance for charged particle rejection Simulation of realistic TOF measurement in ECAL and optimization of ECAL-TOF cut for heavy hadron rejection Photon identification efficiency and hadron contamination of the photon spectrum in central HI collisions