Doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 1 On Hidden and Exposed Terminal Problems Notice: This document has.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0247r1 Submission March 2005 Atsushi FujiwaraSlide 1 Advantages of multiple channel usage in 11s WLAN Mesh network Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0534r0 Submission May 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Thoughts on Modifications of the TGn Functional Requirements.
Doc.: IEEE /0340r0 Submission April 2005 Marianna Goldhammer, AlvarionSlide 1 CBP-SG Contention Based Protocol and QoS Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0072r0 SubmissionS. Filin H. Harada, NICTSlide 1 Coexistence algorithms Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /0003r0 Submission January 2006 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Multiple Access and Effects of Aggregation Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2191r0 Submission July 2007 Y. Jeong, et al.Slide 1 Multi-rate Effects on Direct Link Setup Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Submission on comments to +HTC frames
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
[ Considering of Intra-cell multiple CBP response]
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Descriptive Language Usage in TGv
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Contribution on Location Privacy
On Hidden and Exposed Terminal Problems
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
Proposal for Resolving Comments on Intra-Mesh Congestion Control
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
IEEE White Space Radio Intended timeline
Authentication Cluster
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 1 On Hidden and Exposed Terminal Problems Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 2 Abstract This presentation revisits the hidden and exposed terminal problems and reviews the existing solutions for these problems.

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 3 Outline Carrier Sensing Radio Ranges Hidden Terminal Problem Exposed Terminal Problem Dynamic carrier sensing Other approaches Conclusions

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 4 Carrier Sensing Shared Media Physical Carrier Sensing: Sense the channel before transmitting Not enough. Virtual Carrier Sensing: RTS/CTS handshake Not enough. c d b a

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 5 Transmission Range The range within which a packet is successfully received if no interference Dependent on transmission power and attenuation transmitter

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 6 Carrier Sensing Range The range within which a transmitter triggers carrier sense detection Dependent on antenna sensitivity transmitter

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 7 Interference Range The range within which receivers will be interfered with and suffer a loss Interference range bigger than transmission range if d >.5 Rtx [Ref] receiver

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 8 Hidden Nodes Any node within interference range of a receiver can potentially be a hidden node Hidden when not captured by physical carrier sensing (at transmitter) c in Interference range of b AND out of carrier sense range of a b a c

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 9 Hidden Nodes Any node within interference range of a receiver can potentially be a hidden node Hidden when not captured by virtual carrier sensing (RTS/CTS transmission range) b a c c in Interference range of b AND out of carrier sense range of a AND out of transmission range of b

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 10 Exposed Nodes Any node within carrier sense range of transmitter and out of interference range of receiver Prevents simultaneous transmissions Reduction in Spatial Reuse c in carrier sense range of a AND out of interference range of b b a c d

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 11 System Throughput Carrier sense range affects hidden and exposed node problems Hidden and exposed node problems have opposing effects on system throughput Smaller Larger High number of hidden nodes Low number of exposed nodes High collision probability High spatial reuse probability Low number of hidden nodes High number of exposed nodes Low collision probability Low spatial reuse probability carrier sense range

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 12 Physical Carrier Sensing - revisited Physical carrier sensing Assume channel idle if carrier less than threshold Current implementations: Fixed threshold  arbitrary point of performance What if we make it dynamic  Optimal operation point to improve the performance of the system

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 13 Dynamic Physical Carrier Sensing Adaptive threshold as a function of transmitter-receiver distance and receive power Two solutions: [Jing et. al. ’04] –Unique carrier sensing threshold throughout the network Requires info exchange [Veeravali et. al. ’04] –Heterogeneous carrier sensing thresholds in the network Local decisions –Fairness could be an issue Practical issues: –Limits on threshold – antenna sensitivity –Estimation and measurements

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 14 Other Approaches to Address Hidden/Exposed node problems Handshake (virtual carrier sensing) RTS/CTS RRTS Conservative CTS reply Multi-channel – Multi-radio Busy Tone Others Other mechanisms that mitigate the effects Rate control/fairness (scheduling) solutions

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 15 RRTS Receiver initiates RTS Not always helpful B A C D B A C D Helps! Does not Help! RTS from A is not heard at B

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 16 Handshake - Conservative CTS Conservative CTS reply Reply to RTS only if the received power indicates that the distance between S and R is less than.56txRange (no hidden terminal) Reduce transmission range to prevent interference. Dual of carrier sensing Tx power and estimation of distance

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 17 Multi-Channel Multi-Radio Multi-channel –Busy tone –Contention Plane separation High complexity with single-radio Color graphing solutions Challenge: Distributed and dynamic

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 18 Fairness solutions Ordering / scheduling / rate control algorithms Mitigate the hidden node problem by reducing probability of collision Cause of hidden/exposed node: Lack of knowledge Information exchange helps

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2005 Bahareh Sadeghi, Intel CorpSlide 19 Conclusions Hidden/Exposed terminal problems –Improvement of one could worsen the other Virtual carrier sensing –Not a complete solution –High overhead Multi-channel –Recommended for high performance in mesh –Too complex as a solution for hidden/exposed node problems –Helps mitigate the effect Scheduling schemes –Do help, not stand-alone solutions Adaptive carrier sensing –Potential solution