Matthew Giugno Barbara Miller New York State Education Dept. VESID (518) 486-7462 Implications of RtI Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Goose Creek CISD Response to Intervention Training Part I.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
1 Third Annual Massachusetts Summit on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment December 7 th and 8 th, 2010 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support –
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services Louis Danielson Research to Practice.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Response to Intervention in New York State NYSCEA Meeting May 15, 2009 Noel Granger Office of Vocational and Educational.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Current Status – RtI in NYS Matthew Giugno Program Manager for RtI VESID (518)
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
RtI 101 Part A: The Basics of Assessment and Tiered Instruction.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
Response to Intervention: New York State Regulations and Policy Framework Barbara Miller Response to Intervention and.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services.
D62 Response to Intervention
New Eligibility Requirements for Special Education Karen Johnson Leigh Ann Roderick August 1, 2012.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Legal Requirements and Changes: Child Find, Evaluation, Eligibility Administrative Training Carie Hurford Emily McCambridge.
RtI in the Secondary School Setting: Making it Work! Jennifer Maichin Whittney Smith
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Response.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Overview, Considerations, and Implementation Sharon Hance Erie 1 BOCES SETRC Information for this presentation.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Learning Disabilities A general term describing a group of learning problems Largest single disability area 4.0% of all school-age children are classified.
1 Response to Intervention Background and Laws Gaynard Brown Paul Bunyan Special Education Co-op Director.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Information taken from the Kansas Special Education Process handbook. See
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services
Data-Driven Decision Making and the RTI Process
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Matthew Giugno Barbara Miller New York State Education Dept. VESID (518) Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools

Why RtI  Provides appropriate learning for all students  Uses school-wide progress monitoring  Promotes early identification of potential problems (Early Intervening)  Uses multiple measures of performance, not measurement at a single point in time  Can be used as a component of LD determination

Schoolwide Systems Schoolwide Systems AcademicBehavioral Intensive InterventionsIntensive Individual Interventions Small Group InterventionsTargeted Group Interventions Scientific, Research Based Core Instruction Universal Interventions 1-5% 10-20% 80-90%

Regulatory Amendments  Part 117  Part 100  Part 200

Part 117  (d) Diagnostic Screening Screening in literacy, math, motor and cognitive development Screening in literacy, math, motor and cognitive development Review of instruction to ensure that explicit and valid instruction used Review of instruction to ensure that explicit and valid instruction used Periodic monitoring Periodic monitoring Instruction tailored to meet needs “with increasing levels of targeted intervention and instruction” Instruction tailored to meet needs “with increasing levels of targeted intervention and instruction”

Amendments to Parts 100 and 200  Section (ii) Response to Intervention Programs (RtI) Response to Intervention Programs (RtI)  Section (b) Board of Education Requirements Board of Education Requirements  Section (j) - LD Procedures Referral Referral Individual Evaluation Individual Evaluation Process for determining eligibility Process for determining eligibility Criteria for LD determinations Criteria for LD determinations Documentation for eligibility determination Documentation for eligibility determination

Amendments to Section (ii)  Schools may establish RtI as follows: Appropriate instruction for all students Appropriate instruction for all students Increasing levels of intervention Increasing levels of intervention Frequent screenings and assessments Frequent screenings and assessments Increasing levels of intervention Increasing levels of intervention Application of information to make decisions Application of information to make decisions Written notification to parents Written notification to parents Student performance data & gen. ed. servicesStudent performance data & gen. ed. services Strategies to increase learningStrategies to increase learning Parents right to request evaluationParents right to request evaluation

Amendments to Section  District selects RtI structure Criteria to determine levels Criteria to determine levels Types of interventions Types of interventions Data to be collected Data to be collected Progress monitoring Progress monitoring  Staff Development to implement RtI

Evaluation (j) (1)  Underachievement is not due to lack of appropriate instruction, CSE must consider: Data of appropriate instruction Data of appropriate instruction Data-based documentation of repeated assessments provided to parents Data-based documentation of repeated assessments provided to parents

Criteria – (j) (3) Student does not make sufficient progress when using RtI; or Student does not make sufficient progress when using RtI; or Exhibits patterns of strengths and weaknesses: Exhibits patterns of strengths and weaknesses: Performance, achievement or bothPerformance, achievement or both Relative to age, grade-level standards, or intellectual developmentRelative to age, grade-level standards, or intellectual development

200.4 (j) (4)  Not prohibited from considering severe discrepancy, except Not allowed after 7/1/2012 for Not allowed after 7/1/2012 for K-4K-4 LD in ReadingLD in Reading

C4E Allowable Program: Dedicated Instructional Time ( CR) 1. dedicated block(s) of time created for instruction; 2. research-based core instructional program; a response-to-intervention program; and/or individualized intensive intervention shall be provided.

Resources/Links       