Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: 2012-09-17 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1521r2 Submission January 2012 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 AP and Network Discovery Enhancements Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0567r1 Submission May 2012 Huawei Slide 1 Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0537r0 Submission May 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Passive and Active Scanning Mixture Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, Intel, Qcomm Slide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning.
Doc.: IEEE /1169r1 Submission January 2012 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 FILS Association Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /933r6 Submission July 2012 Fang Xie (CMCC)Slide 1 Access Control Mechanism for FILS Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1042r3 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /1042 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/1127r01 Sep 2012 Hiroshi Mano (ATRD)Slide 1 TGai- Motion/Straw Poll-Sep-2012-Indian Wells Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2 November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Probe Request and Response in TGai Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0257r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Submission doc.: IEEE ai March 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, IntelSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning Improvement.
Doc.:IEEE /0259r4 Submission March 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: March 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE / ai Submission Nov 2011 Huawei Technologies Co. LtdSlide 1 Broadcast Probe Response in TGai Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0061r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Response frame transmission interval Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0547r1 Submission May 2012 Dapeng Liu, China MobileSlide 1 Extend 802.1X for higher layer configuration in FILS Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0158r2 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 Proposed Additions to SFD Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1093r0 Submission September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 System information update procedure for 11 ah Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0258r7 Submission May 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: May 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1233r3 Submission Sep 2011 Slide 1 Passive Scanning Improvement Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai September 2012 Lei Wang, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Ad Hoc Discussions of ai Passive Scanning during.
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 Lei Wang, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai AP/STA Initiated FILS Optimizations.
Doc.: IEEE /1042r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/0761r0 July 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Operating Channels Information Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission July 2011 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TGai FILS Proposal Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0568r0 Submission May 2012 Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei Slide 1 AP Discovery Information Broadcasting Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0263r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRI Spec Framework Proposal: Selection of the AP for Scanning Date: Slide 1 March 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital Slide 1 Passive Scanning Improvement Ad Hoc Report Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1051r2 Multi-channel information for AP discovery 1 September 2012 HTC Corp. NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.
Doc.: IEEE /0896r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Request Filtering Criteria Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0042r1 Submission January 2013 Yongho Seok, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Fast Moving Scan Channel Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0059r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRI Selection of the AP for Scanning Date: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0158r0 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 Proposed Additions to SFD Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission Nov Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Rapid Scanning Procedure Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0258r6 Submission May 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: May 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0269r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone ChengYan FengZTE Corporation No.800, Middle Tianfu Avenue, Hi-tech District, Chengdu,
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Proposed SFD Text for ai Link Setup Procedure
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
FILS Association Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address
Scanning from Specific Channel
GAS procedure in TGai Date: Authors: Mar 2012 Month Year
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing the Probe Response transmission
Band adjustment for fasat AP discovery
Listen to Probe Request from other STAs
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Prioritized Active Scanning in TGai
Access distribution in ai
AP Status Broadcast Date: Authors: November 2011
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Cooperative AP Discovery
Access distribution in ai
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
GAS procedure in TGai Date: Authors: May 2012 Month Year
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Abstract This proposes to reduce the frame length of probe response frame during active scanning procedure to preferred AP Slide 2Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Conformance w/ TGai PAR & 5C Slide 3Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012 Conformance QuestionResponse Does the proposal degrade the security offered by Robust Security Network Association (RSNA) already defined in ? No Does the proposal change the MAC SAP interface?No Does the proposal require or introduce a change to the architecture?No Does the proposal introduce a change in the channel access mechanism?No Does the proposal introduce a change in the PHY?No Which of the following link set-up phases is addressed by the proposal? (1) AP Discovery (2) Network Discovery (3) Link (re-)establishment / exchange of security related messages (4) Higher layer aspects, e.g. IP address assignment 1,2

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Background Active scanning procedure  Probe request/response exchanges for finding the AP/network[1]  Legacy probe response frame includes all system information elements supported by AP Size of probe response frame is similar to beacon frame except TIM IE (e.g., more than 230 bytes [2])  A STA may send the unicast probe request for scanning the preferred AP (BSSID of the AP is included in MAC header )  In case of actively scanning the preferred AP, if the STA stores the system information of the AP which the STA was previously associated with, the AP does not need to send the probe response including full system information elements  AP configuration change count[3] [4] May be included in the FILS Discovery frame and indicates the change of system parameters of AP/BSS STA can skip the full beacon based on the stored information Slide 4Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Proposal During the active scanning procedure to a preferred AP, if the STA has system parameters of the AP, a STA may include the configuration change count of target AP in the probe request frame When an AP receives the probe request frame including the configuration change count, the AP may send to the STA the optimized probe response frame including only the system information elements which need to be received by the STA based on the received configuration change count Whenever the AP changes the system parameters, the AP will store the old configuration change count and the changed system information element ID (1byte) for the change count  E.g.,) In case of the current configuration change count = ‘3’, the stored information by AP. [change count = 0, ID = ‘x’], [change count = 1, ID = ‘y’], [change count = 2, ID = ‘Z’]  If one parameter is changed in one change count and the change count size is 8 bits, the maximum size of the stored information is 512 bytes  Note that AP does not store the old elements but ID (1 bytes) Slide 5Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Analysis (1/2) Size of Probe response frame is similar to size of beacon frame except for TIM IE  The size of beacon frame/probe response[2] > 100 byte(typical BSS), > 230 bytes (enterprise environment) Mandatory fields: Timestamp (8bytes(B)), Beacon Interval (2B), Capability (2B) The following system information elements can be changed in legacy system [1]  Channel Switch Announcement (5B)  Extended Channel Switch Announcement (6B)  EDCA parameters (20B)  Quiet element (8B)  DSSS Parameter Set (3B)  CF Parameter Set (8B)  FH Parameter Set (7B)  HT Operation element (24B) Slide 6Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Analysis (2/2) Comparison between legacy probe response size and optimized probe response  Size of mandatory fields: 12 bytes  Best case: > 83% (typical BSS), > 92% (enterprise environment)  Worst case: > 64% (typical BSS), > 84% (enterprise environment)  Most of optimized probe response frames will contain only mandatory fields because the BSS system elements hardly change. Slide 7Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012 Updated IELegacy probe response (>100B)Legacy probe response (>230B) Optimized Probe ResponseGain (%)Optimized Probe ResponseGain (%) No change12 B> 88%12B> Channel Switch Announcement (5B) 17 B> 83%17 B> 92 % Quiet element (8B)20 B> 80%20 B> 91% EDCA parameters (20B)32 B> 68%32 B> 86% HT Operation element (24B)36 B> 64%36 B> 84%

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Conclusion During active scanning procedure to a preferred AP, sending the probe response frame including full system parameters can be unnecessary resource overhead and the delay of initial link setup may be increased In this case if a STA sends preferred AP the probe request including AP Configuration Change Count, the AP can send the optimized probe response frame based on the change count Slide 8Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 References [1] IEEE Std ™-2012 [2] IEEE /1503r2, Short beacon [3] IEEE /0741r1, Discussions about ai FILS Discovery Frame (DF) Content Design [4] IEEE /0151r12, Specification Framework for TGai Slide 9Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Straw Poll 1 Do you support that STA may send the probe request frame including the configuration change count of a preferred AP if the STA has the system information elements of the preferred AP during the active scanning procedure to preferred AP?  Y:  N:  Abstain: Slide 10Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Straw Poll 2 Do you support that AP may send the optimized probe response frame including only the system parameters which need to be received by the STA when the AP receives the probe request frame including the configuration change count?  Y:  N:  Abstain: Slide 11Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Motion 1 Move to add the following text to “Section 6.2 Active scanning” in the TGai SFD, 12/0151r12: “ Active scanning to preferred AP STA may send the probe request frame including the configuration change count of a preferred AP if the STA has the system information elements of the preferred AP during the active scanning procedure to preferred AP.” Mover: Seconder: Result Yes No Abstain___________ Slide 12Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Motion 2 Move to add the following text to “Section 6.2 Active scanning” in the TGai SFD, 12/0151r12: “ Active scanning to preferred AP AP may send the optimized probe response frame including only the system parameters which need to be received by the STA when the AP receives the probe request frame including the configuration change count.” Mover: Seconder: Result Yes No Abstain___________ Slide 13Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 Appendix (Issues) How many Element IDs & AP configuration change count should the AP store? May store the information for all AP configuration change counts. If the size of the change count is 8 bits and one parameter is only changed each count, need 512 bytes to store all information To reduce amount of stored information, AP may restrict the cached information according to number of change count (e.g., only 32 or 64 change counts) or a specific duration (e.g., days, months, years, etc.) How does the AP do if the AP receives the unclear change count from STA? AP may send the legacy probe response including full system information AP configuration change count is different from GAS change count GAS change count indicates the change of GAS parameter set Slide 14Jeongki Kim, LG Electronics September 2012