Fractional Factorial Designs Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2k-p Fractional Factorial Designs
Advertisements

Sequences and Mathematical Induction
Applied Informatics Štefan BEREŽNÝ
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 15 Analysis of Data from Fractional Factorials and Other Unbalanced.
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Introduction Introduction Confounding Confounding –Confounding/Aliasing –Alias Structure Examples and Exercises Examples.
Chapter 4 Systems of Linear Equations; Matrices Section 6 Matrix Equations and Systems of Linear Equations.
Design and Analysis of Experiments
Chapter 8 Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs
Stat Today: Finish Chapter 3; Start Chapter 4 Assignment 3: 3.14 a, b (do normal qq-plots only),c, 3.16, 3.17 Additional questions: 3.14 b (also.
Zeros of Polynomial Functions
Fractional Factorial Designs 2 7 – Factorial Design in 8 Experimental Runs to Measure Shrinkage in Wool Fabrics J.M. Cardamone, J. Yao, and A. Nunez (2004).
Recall that a square matrix is one in which there are the same amount of rows as columns. A square matrix must exist in order to evaluate a determinant.
1.3 Matrices and Matrix Operations.
1 1.1 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Linear Equations in Linear Algebra SYSTEMS OF LINEAR EQUATIONS.
Factorial Experiments
For Discussion Today (when the alarm goes off) Survey your proceedings for just one paper in which factorial design has been used or, if none, one in which.
TH EDITION LIAL HORNSBY SCHNEIDER COLLEGE ALGEBRA.
One-Factor Experiments Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis.
Fractional Factorial Experiments (Continued) The concept of design resolution is a useful way to categorize fractional factorial designs. The higher the.
Chapter 8Design and Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference,
CPE 619 2k-p Factorial Design
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 7 – The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 8 Motivation for fractional.
Ratio Games and Designing Experiments Andy Wang CIS Computer Systems Performance Analysis.
Dr. Gary Blau, Sean HanMonday, Aug 13, 2007 Statistical Design of Experiments SECTION V SCREENING.
Chapter 4 Fractional factorial Experiments at two levels
1 Confounding In an unreplicated 2 K there are 2 K treatment combinations. Consider 3 factors at 2 levels each: 8 t.c’s If each requires 2 hours to run,
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 14 Sequential Experimentation, Screening Designs, Fold-Over Designs.
Dr. Gary Blau, Sean HanMonday, Aug 13, 2007 Statistical Design of Experiments SECTION IV FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTATION.
1 1.4 Linear Equations in Linear Algebra THE MATRIX EQUATION © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
Matrices & Determinants Chapter: 1 Matrices & Determinants.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments.
Fractional Factorial Design Full Factorial Disadvantages Full Factorial Disadvantages –Costly (Degrees of freedom wasted on estimating higher order terms)
1.3 Matrices and Matrix Operations. Definition A matrix is a rectangular array of numbers. The numbers in the array are called the entries in the matrix.
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 17 Block Designs.
Lecture 9 Page 1 CS 239, Spring 2007 More Experiment Design CS 239 Experimental Methodologies for System Software Peter Reiher May 8, 2007.
Psych 5500/6500 Other ANOVA’s Fall, Factorial Designs Factorial Designs have one dependent variable and more than one independent variable (i.e.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs _ Blocking _ Example _ Four Blocks _ Exercise.
1 Resolution III Designs Designs with main effects aliased with two- factor interactions Used for screening (5 – 7 variables in 8 runs, variables.
Elementary Linear Algebra Anton & Rorres, 9 th Edition Lecture Set – 02 Chapter 2: Determinants.
Design Of Experiments With Several Factors
1 The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 8 Motivation for fractional factorials is obvious; as the number of factors becomes large.
Specific Comparisons This is the same basic formula The only difference is that you are now performing comps on different IVs so it is important to keep.
Fundamentals of Engineering Analysis
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 15 Review.
II.3 Screening Designs in Eight Runs: Other Screening Designs in 8 runs  In addition to 5 factors in 8 runs, Resolution III designs can be used to study.
Interval Notation Interval Notation to/from Inequalities Number Line Plots open & closed endpoint conventions Unions and Intersections Bounded vs. unbounded.
Whiteboardmaths.com © 2004 All rights reserved
Section 2.1 Determinants by Cofactor Expansion. THE DETERMINANT Recall from algebra, that the function f (x) = x 2 is a function from the real numbers.
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Fractional Factorials Not Based on the Powers of 2 – Irregular Designs.
Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Part I Experiments in smaller blocks.
1 Chapter 8 Two-level Fractional Factorial Designs.
2 k-p Designs k factors two levels for each factor will only run 2 -p of the possible factor combinations will only run 2 k-p observations total.
CHAPTER 6 Quine-McCluskey Method
DeMorgan’s Theorem DeMorgan’s 2nd Theorem
MTH108 Business Math I Lecture 2.
5 Systems of Linear Equations and Matrices
Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments
Dr Huw Owens Room B44 Sackville Street Building Telephone Number 65891
Fractional Factorial Design
I=ABD=ACE=BCF=BCDE=ACDF=ABEF=DEF
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs
One-Factor Experiments
For Discussion Today Survey your proceedings for just one paper in which factorial design has been used or, if none, one in which it could have been used.
Matrices and Determinants
Presentation transcript:

Fractional Factorial Designs Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis

2 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Designs Introductory example of a 2 k-p design Preparing the sign table for a 2 k-p design Confounding Algebra of confounding Design resolution

3 Introductory Example of a 2 k-p Design Exploring 7 factors in only 8 experiments:

4 Analysis of Design Column sums are zero: Sum of 2-column product is zero: Sum of column squares is = 8 Orthogonality allows easy calculation of effects:

5 Effects and Confidence Intervals for 2 k-p Designs Effects are as in 2 k designs: % variation proportional to squared effects For standard deviations, confidence intervals: –Use formulas from full factorial designs –Replace 2 k with 2 k-p

6 Preparing the Sign Table for a 2 k-p Design Prepare sign table for k-p factors Assign remaining factors

7 Sign Table for k-p Factors Same as table for experiment with k-p factors –I.e., 2 (k-p) table –2 k-p rows and 2 k-p columns –First column is I, contains all 1’s –Next k-p columns get k-p chosen factors –Rest (if any) are products of factors

8 Assigning Remaining Factors 2 k-p -(k-p)-1 product columns remain Choose any p columns –Assign remaining p factors to them –Any others stay as-is, measuring interactions

9 Confounding The confounding problem An example of confounding Confounding notation Choices in fractional factorial design

10 The Confounding Problem Fundamental to fractional factorial designs Some effects produce combined influences –Limited experiments means only combination can be counted Problem of combined influence is confounding –Inseparable effects called confounded

11 An Example of Confounding Consider this table: Extend it with an AB column:

12 Analyzing the Confounding Example Effect of C is same as that of AB: q C = (y 1 -y 2 -y 3 +y 4 )/4 q AB = (y 1 -y 2 -y 3 +y 4 )/4 Formula for q C really gives combined effect: q C +q AB = (y 1 -y 2 -y 3 +y 4 )/4 No way to separate q C from q AB –Not problem if q AB is known to be small

13 Confounding Notation Previous confounding is denoted by equating confounded effects: C = AB Other effects are also confounded in this design: A = BC, B = AC, C = AB, I = ABC –Last entry indicates ABC is confounded with overall mean, or q 0

14 Choices in Fractional Factorial Design Many fractional factorial designs possible –Chosen when assigning remaining p signs –2 p different designs exist for 2 k-p experiments Some designs better than others –Desirable to confound significant effects with insignificant ones –Usually means low-order with high-order

15 Algebra of Confounding Rules of the algebra Generator polynomials

16 Rules of Confounding Algebra Particular design can be characterized by single confounding –Traditionally, use I = wxyz... confounding Others can be found by multiplying by various terms –I acts as unity (e.g., I times A is A) –Squared terms disappear (AB 2 C becomes AC)

17 Example: Confoundings Design is characterized by I = ABC Multiplying by A gives A = A 2 BC = BC Multiplying by B, C, AB, AC, BC, and ABC: B = AB 2 C = AC, C = ABC 2 = AB, AB = A 2 B 2 C = C, AC = A 2 BC 2 = B, BC = AB 2 C 2 = A, ABC = A 2 B 2 C 2 = I Note that only first line is unique in this case

18 Generator Polynomials Polynomial I = wxyz... is called generator polynomial for the confounding A 2 k-p design confounds 2 p effects together –So generator polynomial has 2 p terms –Can be found by considering interactions replaced in sign table

19 Example of Finding Generator Polynomial Consider design Sign table has 2 3 = 8 rows and columns First 3 columns represent A, B, and C Columns for D, E, F, and G replace AB, AC, BC, and ABC columns respectively –So confoundings are necessarily: D = AB, E = AC, F = BC, and G = ABC

20 Turning Basic Terms into Generator Polynomial Basic confoundings are D = AB, E = AC, F = BC, and G = ABC Multiply each equation by left side: I = ABD, I = ACE, I = BCF, and I = ABCG or I = ABD = ACE = BCF = ABCG

21 Finishing Generator Polynomial Any subset of above terms also multiplies out to I –E.g., ABD times ACE = A 2 BCDE = BCDE Expanding all possible combinations gives 16-term generator (book is wrong): I = ABD = ACE = BCF = ABCG = BCDE = ACDF = CDG = ABEF = BEG = AFG = DEF = ADEG = BDFG = CEFG = ABCDEFG

22 Design Resolution Definitions leading to resolution Definition of resolution Finding resolution Choosing a resolution

23 Definitions Leading to Resolution Design is characterized by its resolution Resolution measured by order of confounded effects Order of effect is number of factors in it –E.g., I is order 0, ABCD is order 4 Order of confounding is sum of effect orders –E.g., AB = CDE would be of order 5

24 Definition of Resolution Resolution is minimum order of any confounding in design Denoted by uppercase Roman numerals –E.g, with resolution of 3 is called R III –Or more compactly,

25 Finding Resolution Find minimum order of effects confounded with mean –I.e., search generator polynomial Consider earlier example: I = ABD = ACE = BCF = ABCG = BCDE = ACDF = CDG = ABEF = BEG = AFG = DEF = ADEG = BDFG = ABDG = CEFG = ABCDEFG So it’s an R III design

26 Choosing a Resolution Generally, higher resolution is better Because usually higher-order interactions are smaller Exception: when low-order interactions are known to be small –Then choose design that confounds those with important interactions –Even if resolution is lower

White Slide