Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) THE FUTURE OF DRONES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Advertisements

Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Gregory S. Winton, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm
Presented January 20, 2011 by: John Allen Director, Flight Standards Service (AFS-1) Federal Aviation Administration Public Aircraft Operations Forum.
Drones in the Legal Environment Gene Betler, CLVS CTTS AMA, AUVSI, & Small UAV Coalition member.
About the ALEA  Over 3,600 members  International Association  Primarily Traditional Aviation Assets  Embraced sUAS Technology in early 2005  Is.
Mckennalong.com Commercial UAS Operations Where We Are and Where We Are Going March 24, 2015.
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Said El Said ITS Program Manager Traffic Operations Division.
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS: UNITED STATES & CANADIAN REGULATORY APPROACHES Paul Stephen Dempsey Tomlinson Professor of Law Director, Institute of Air &
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
AN OVERVIEW OF AVIATION INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT.
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Seattle Police Department.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles “Drones”
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the National Airspace System Coming soon to airspace near you…..UAS-101 Presented At: Pecora.
Unmanned Aircraft and Ag Aviation: A Cautious Coexistence Scott Schertz Schertz Aerial Services Hudson, Illinois.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
Law Enforcement UAS Concept of Operations US Forest Service Law Enforcement & Investigations DRAFT.
THE STATE OF UAS REGULATION. T HE FAA M ODERNIZATION AND R EFORM A CT OF 2012 Congress Mandated Safe Integration by Sept., 2015 Why is it taking so long?
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Certification Standards for New Technologies June 9, 2005 Certification Standards for New Technologies Presentation to:
WILDFIRE UAS Concept of Operations US Forest Service Fire & Aviation Management DRAFT.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
UAS Initiative OH/IN UAS Center The OH/IN UAS Center is a joint venture between the states of Ohio and Indiana established in 2013 by Governors John Kasich.
13 Step Approach to Network Design Steps A Systems Approach 8Conduct a feasibility Study 8Prepare a plan 8Understand the current system 8Design.
LAW OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY FALL 2015 © 2015 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Regulatory Law Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. Institute for Software Research School of.
1 Wisconsin Crop Management Conf. 1 Integrating UAV’s into your crop management system January 14, 2015 Brian D. Luck, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Extension.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Noise 101: Federal Noise Laws and Regulations Town of Payson M.L. Chittick, Scottsdale FSDO January.
OPEN MEETINGS ACT General Provisions Article, Sections through 3-501, Annotated Code of Maryland 1.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems. What is a UAS? What is a DRONE?
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems “The Basics” ASPRS Conference San Diego, CA Cherlynn Jones, Air Traffic.
FAA sUAS ARC Support Documentation © ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. The Unmanned Aircraft System Initiative F38 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
Using Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV’s) in
1 DFRC SUAS Program Operations and Risk Management Approach for Small UAS Presented to the Certification Working Group 6/26/2008 Brad Flick/DFRC Chief.
Drone Use & Local Government: Pooling Implications Ann Gergen Executive Director, AGRiP.
UAS Operations in the Golden Triangle Mike Hainsey Executive Director Golden Triangle Regional Airport.
Drone Use & Local Government: Underwriting & Risk Management Implications NLC-RISC Trustees Conference May 5, 2016 San Antonio, Texas Claire Lee Reiss.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
Tim Stombaugh  Dr. Suzanne Smith, Director ◦ (859) ;  Ryan Nolin, Engineer Associate ◦ (802) ;
Presented to: MAPPS Summer Conference Presented by: Randy Willis, Manager, Emerging Technologies Federal Aviation Administration Date:July 16, 2016 Unmanned.
“The use of RPAS/drones and the impact on aviation safety and security
National Search And Rescue Coordinator Council Meeting
REGULATING DRONES AND LIABILITY ISSUES
Roadmap for the Application and Technology Development of UAVs in Japan The Public-Private Sector Conference on Improving the Environment for UAVs, 28th.
DRONES: Reaching New Heights in Environmental Consulting
Regulation of Drones and Liability of their Operators
RPAS – legal frame work and normal use
UNCA UAS Integration 04/23/2017 Louis Toms
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Helping Agriculture One Flight at a Time
Emerging Technology Converging Regulations
Department of Computer Science Tuskegee University
Drones in the Workplace
What Risk Managers Need to Know
Certificate of Waiver or Authority
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Local Ordinance Considerations
AIRLINE TRANSPORTATION AERO 4100 / 5100
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Safety Risk Management Process (SRMP)
Unmanned Aircraft DRONES – UAVs in Cyprus
1 Million+ UAS Registrations
Rural Opportunities Conference
The Integration of Drones
Overview of UAS World.
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Regulatory Impact Analysis for Enabling Regulations: The Federal Aviation Administration's Small UAS Rule Deborah Vaughn Aiken, Phd Director of Regulatory.
UAV’s (Drones).
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Presentation transcript:

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) THE FUTURE OF DRONES

2 A New American Pastime?

3 Our Discussion Today  Some UAS Statistics  What is an Unmanned Aircraft System  Current Regulatory Scheme in United States  Commercial Uses – Applications in Key Industries  Insurance and Underwriting Issues  The Future/ Conclusions  Questions?

Some UAS Statistics

5 The Buzz Overhead

6 Commercial Uses By Industry (Section 333 Exemptions) Data from Center for the Study of Drones at Bard College. As of 7/31/2015

What is an Unmanned Aircraft System? Terms and Definitions

8 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) An unmanned aircraft system (UAS) = unmanned *aircraft that can fly autonomously and does not have a pilot onboard. (*including the operating systems, controls) In this context - small UAS (under 55 pounds)

9 An aircraft by many names…  A few commonly used alternatives to the term DRONE… –UA – Unmanned Aircraft –UAV – Unmanned/Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle –UAS – Unmanned Aircraft System – Next Slide –RPV – Remotely Piloted Vehicle –RPA – Remotely Piloted Aircraft –OPA – Optionally Piloted Aircraft –ROV – Remotely Operated Vehicle –RPAS – Remotely Piloted Aircraft System  For the purposes of the aviation insurance product these are all essentially the same thing.

10 The Components of an Unmanned Aircraft System  The UA or UAV is only one part of the operation/risk.  The “System” includes some/all of the following: –Unmanned Aircraft The air vehicle itself –Payload The business end of the system The systems that collect or transmit data –Mission Support Equipment Equipment needed to transport, maintain, launch, and recover the UA –The People The pilot/operator, visual observer, payload operator, etc. –Data Link The communications between the ground and UA –The Space Airspace, Air Traffic Control, Weather, and Regulations applicable to a given flight –Command and Control Internal/External

11

12 DJI - UAS Specs Phantom 2V+ (no longer in production) Inspire 1  Weight (Battery Included) lbs  Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s  Max Descent Speed 4 m/s  Max Speed 22 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)  Max Flight Altitude 4500 m (14,763.8 ft)  Max Wind Speed Resistance 10 m/s  Max Flight Time Approx. 18 minutes

Current Regulatory Scheme

14 Classifying the Flight FAA classifies use of UAS in the national airspace as: A.Public (Non-Military) B.Civil (Commercial) C.Hobbyist (Model Aircraft)

15 Federal Framework (in general) 500ft, airplanes (rural) 400ft UAS (current) 83ft, private landowner Graphic (modified), curtesy of The Wall Street Journal restricted

16 Public Use  Examples of Government agencies and organizations: State, County, or City governments, Fire Departments, Police Departments, Public Universities.  For public aircraft operations, the FAA issues a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) that permits public agencies and organizations to operate a particular aircraft, for a particular purpose, in a particular area. The COA allows an operator to use a defined block of airspace and includes special safety provisions unique to the proposed operation. COAs usually are issued for a specific period – up to two years in many cases.

17 Civil Use (aka Commercial)  Any operation that does not meet the statutory criteria for a public aircraft operation is considered a civil aircraft operation and must be conducted in accordance with all FAA regulations applicable to the operation.  There are presently two methods of gaining FAA authorization to fly civil (non-governmental): –Section 333 Exemption –Special Airworthiness Certificate

18 Civil Use Section 333 Exemption – a grant of exemption in accordance with Section 333 AND a civil Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA); this process may be used to perform commercial operations in low-risk, controlled environments.Section 333 Exemption “Blanket” COAs have been issued since March, 2015 “Plan of Activities” must be filed within 3 days of flight

19 Civil Use Special Airworthiness Certificate (SAC) : applicants must be able to describe how their system is designed, constructed, and manufactured, including engineering processes, software development and control, configuration management, and quality assurance procedures used, along with how and where they intend to fly. (this seems to be done more with certain kinds of aircraft-like experimental or test).Special Airworthiness Certificate (SAC) The Exemption process is very involved, but the FAA has gradually relaxed the application/approval process.

20 The “Fine Line” Between Civil and Hobbyist Classifications Do I need a Section 333 grant of exemption if I'm not charging for my services?  A. Unless you are flying only for hobby or recreational purposes, you will need FAA authorization via a Section 333 grant of exemption to fly your unmanned aircraft system (UAS) for your business. This applies even if you are only flying to supplement or aide your business and not charging fees for doing so. This according to the FAA.

21 Hobbyist -or- Civil Use (Commercial)?

22 Federal Framework FAA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (announced February 15, 2015): a framework of regulations that would allow routine use of certain small UAS (under 55 pounds) conducting non-recreational operations (aka – Commercial Use of Drones). The new rules would not apply to model aircraft. Model aircraft operators must continue to comply with existing rules. Comment period has ended. 4,585 comments were received. (an example of one is included in your packet)

23 Civil Use This is very general illustration. Criteria is summarized in your handout entitled “Overview of Small UAS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking”

24 The “Amazon Proposal” for sUAS use

Some Commercial Applications

26 Agriculture  Increased Production, Yields  Maximize Resources  Cost Efficient  Increased Data Points Advantages  Precision Chemical & Water Application  Land Monitoring/Surveying  Crop Imaging  Vegetation Mapping  Livestock Monitoring Usage

27 Construction & Infrastructure  Cost Efficient  Accessibility  Decreased Risks to Staff, Equipment  Accurate Data Points  Infrared technology Advantages  Pipeline Monitoring  Bridge and Infrastructure Inspections  Smoke Stack Inspections  Power line inspections Usage

28 Weather Monitoring Advantages  Cost Efficient  Less Human Exposure  Reduced Risk Usage  Collect Data from Dangerous and Remote Areas  Improve Forecast Accuracy  New Data Information about Storm Changes  Surveying and Mapping

29 Media and Entertainment Filming  Expands Creative Filmmaking  Time and Cost Efficient  Increased Safety Advantages  Improved Action Filming  Lower Overhead Shots  Increased quality of Videos/Images Usage

30 Public Safety and Law Enforcement  Accelerated Response Time  Improve Situational Awareness  Diminish Human Error  Cost Efficient Advantages  Search-and-Rescue Missions  Crime Investigation  Surveillance  Bomb Squad, Hostage Response  Shoreline, Coastal Surveillance  Traffic Management Usage

31 Research and GIS  Time and Cost Efficient  Worker Safety  Clearer Images  Improved Accuracy  Mitigates Weather Delays Advantages  Data Collection  3D Mapping  Remote Sensing  Flood Maps  Wildlife Conservation / Science Usage

32 Insurance and/or Claims  Reduce Fraudulent Claims (eg. Agriculture, WC)  Time and Cost Efficient  Lessen Human Error  Improve Customer Experience  Safety – Accessibility to Damaged Areas Advantages Usage  Collect Images of Losses  Infrared technology detects leaks  Gather Information on a Location before Insuring or prior to onsite inspection  Other Risk Engineering or Modeling

Insurance Issues

34 Managing the Risks

35 A Few “Insurance” Issues  UAS = Aircraft ( Federal Aviation Administration vs. Raphael Pirker, decided 11/18/2014 )  “Aircraft” Exclusion in CGL  Scheduled UAS & Equipment  Scheduled Operators (training and knowledge are critical)  Physical loss to hull, payload, parts, etc.  Third Party Liability –Typical Exclusions: Terrorism, War or Hostile Acts; Unlawful Use, Nuclear, Asbestos, Pollution, Privacy  Coverage Sublimits  Terrorism is a “buyback” and needs specific consideration

36 Underwriting Considerations  Almost all aviation underwriting stems from four basic points of risk analysis. –Operator experience –Make and model information –Purpose of Use –Location of Operations  Values and limits required –Aircraft –Payload –Ground Equipment  Operational procedures/risk mitigation items  Training UAS underwriting is based on traditional aircraft underwriting foundation

37 Risk Examples: Commercial & Private Uses  Collision with power lines  Collision with large aircraft  Collision with motor vehicles  Disruption with other safety or rescue operations  Spectator or Bystander injuries (eg. at events, public spaces)  Other property damage  Terrorism or hostile acts (malicious, unauthorized use)  Privacy (Data Storage, Data Retention)

The Future from deceptive to disruptive

39 On the Radar – What’s Next  Continued Technology Advances, Decreased Costs  Growth in Precision Agriculture, Emergency Management Services  Drone Deliveries  Increased State regulatory intervention: Privacy v. Security Debate  Monitoring and creation of “Best Practices” for service and maintenance records

Questions ?

41 Additional Resources  - Federal Aviation Administration, UAS section  - “Know Before You Fly” - AUVSI, AMA & Small UAV Coalition in conjunction with the FAA  - Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International  landscape.aspx - National Conference of State Legislatures, Current Unmanned Aircraft State Law Landscape landscape.aspx 

42 Disclaimer  Certain statements provided herein are based solely on the opinions of AIG and are being provided for general information purposes only. Any opinions provided on economic trends should not be relied upon for investment decisions and are solely the opinion of AIG.  The purpose of this presentation is to provide information, rather than advice or opinion. None of the statements or information are provided for the purpose of legal advice or opinion and should not be considered legal advice or opinion. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue, question, or situation. It is accurate to the best of the presenter's knowledge as of the date of the presentation.  Certain information may be based on information received from sources AIG considers reliable; AIG does not represent that such information is accurate or complete. Certain statements contained herein may constitute “projections,” “forecasts” and other “forward-looking statements” which do not reflect actual results and are based primarily upon applying retroactively a hypothetical set of assumptions to certain historical financial information. Any opinions, projections, forecasts and forward- looking statements presented herein are valid only as of the date of this document and are subject to change. AIG is not soliciting or recommending any action based on any information in this document.