Matt Dow Jackson Walker L.L.P. Texas Supreme Court Rules on Covenants Not to Compete.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act 1872.
Advertisements

Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
TRADE SECRETS, UNFAIR COMPETITION, EMPLOYEE RAIDS AND EMPLOYEE COVENANTS Alan N. Greenspan Jackson Walker LLP.
Section 9.2.
Trade Secrets and Confidential Information
Sometimes government legislatures enact statutes that declare certain types of agreements unenforceable, void, or voidable Examples: –New law changes the.
AGREEMENT DECLARED VOID
1. 2 CONSIDERATION Consideration is a required element of every contract.
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 1 PART 3 – THE LAW OF CONTRACTS  Chapter 11 – The Extent of Contractual Rights Prepared by Douglas H. Peterson,
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
The Importance of Noncompete Contracts to Business Viability: What Entrepreneurship Students Need to Know Dr. Patrick R. Geho Associate Professor Department.
Dissecting the Bargain Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 20, 2011.
111 Non-Solicitation – Customers During the Restricted Period, the Employee shall not, either directly or indirectly as a stockholder, investor, partner,
Chapter 11 Formation of Traditional And Online Contracts
Confidentiality Agreements at Ryerson … or “if I tell you, I’ll have to kill you!” Heather Gallant, ORS.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 15 Contracts: Consideration Twomey Jennings Anderson’s Business.
CHAPTER PowerPoint ® Presentation Prepared By Susan McManus, Mount Royal College CHAPTER PowerPoint ® Presentation Prepared By Susan McManus, Mount Royal.
PEOPLE RESOURCING Chapter Thirteen The New Employee.
Contractual Restraints of Trade. All contractual restraints of trade are presumed to be void for reasons of public policy.
15-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 6 Contracts: Nature, Classification, Agreement and Consideration.
Prepared by Douglas Peterson, University of Alberta 8-1 Part 3 – The Law of Contract Chapter 8 Requirement of Consideration.
THE EVER-EVOLVING LAW OF NON- COMPETE AGREEMENTS Amanda L. Reichek The Reichek Firm, PLLC 3100 Carlisle Street, Suite 204 Dallas, Texas
CHAPTER 8: CONSIDERATION By: Mike Francini, Tasia Gorski, Caitlin McNamara, & Sam Zangara Chapter 8: Consideration.
Consideration is legal value bargained for and given in exchange for an act or a promise Elements of Consideration Purely gratuitous promises are.
Creating an Enforceable Contract OBE 118, Section 10 Fall 2004.
© 2008 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 BUSINESS LAW TODAY Essentials 8 th Ed. Roger LeRoy Miller - Institute for University.
Making a Contract Enforceable OBE 118, Section 3 Fall 2004 Was Consideration given? Was there Capacity to Contract? Legal Subject Matter? Was there Genuine.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
BUSINESS LAW JEOPARDY All About Contracts Contract Formation Civil Procedure TORTSTHE “LAW”
Section 4.1 Agreements and Contracts Section 4.1 Agreements and Contracts A contract is any agreement enforceable by law.
Chapter 7 Contract Formation Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College Part 3 – The Law of Contract Chapter 8 – Requirement of Consideration © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 8-1.
Contract Law: A Beginning CHAPTER SIX. 6 | 2 Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. What a Contract Is A contract is a legally enforceable.
Consideration Doctrine and the Updating Problem Richard Warner.
P A R T P A R T Contracts Introduction to Contracts The Agreement: Offer The Agreement: Acceptance Consideration Reality of Consent 3 McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
The Before, During, and After of Non-Compete Agreements (updated October 2015) Presented by: Matt Veech and Andrew Pearce BoyarMiller
Duty of Loyalty Employees owe duty of loyalty to employer -- even if no non-compete agreement Breaches: competing while employed, “seducing” customers.
Chapter 1.  Laws regulating the employment relationship  Evolutionary in nature  Importance of understanding employment law.
Bell Ringer What is legality? What makes something legal/illegal? What could make a contract illegal?
 Three things are necessary in order for there to be a contract: an offer, acceptance and consideration  Consideration is something promised mutually.
Chapter 9 Formation of Traditional And E-Contracts.
OFFERS, CONTRACTS AND RELATED ISSUES: EFFECTIVE CONTRACT WRITING.
A Bargain and an Exchange Consideration means that there must be bargaining that leads to an exchange between the parties. Consideration can be anything.
Variation By Agreement: UCC Article 9 © Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. All rights reserved.
Off-Duty Programs and the IRS: Protecting Your Department Against Unexpected Payroll Taxes William F. Becker Jr., CPA Partner Cherry Bekaert LLP.
TEXAS: NON-COMPETE LAW The Law Office of Raven Applebaum, PLLC.
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 9Slide 1 Legal Value and Bargained-For Exchange Identify when there is legal value.
Huntsville Madison County Bar Association
Achieving Contract Formation
Contract & Consumer Law Chapter 2
Covenants Not to Compete
CHAPTER 12 Consideration
Astrachan Gunst Thomas, P.C.
Chapter 11 Consideration
Legal Environment for Business in Nepal 5 March 2017
Chapter 11 Consideration and Promissory Estoppel
AGREEMENT NOT TO COMPETE ….
Chapter 11 Consideration and Promissory Estoppel
Covenants Not to Compete
Chapter 15 CONSIDERATION
Covenants Not to Compete
Finland Non-competition clauses in employment contracts
CHAPTER 14 ILLEGALITY 2011 Thomson Reuters Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany A Guide to Business Law, 19th.
ROLE OF THE PARTIES OF AN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP
Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) & Teaming Agreements (TAs)
Chapter 11 Consideration
Texas v. Johnson (1989) 491 U.S. 397 Morgan Fraley Pd. 7/8.
CHAPTER 9 Test review.
Presentation transcript:

Matt Dow Jackson Walker L.L.P. Texas Supreme Court Rules on Covenants Not to Compete

Jackson Walker L.L.P. The Statute The covenant must be “ancillary to or part of an otherwise enforceable agreement at the time the agreement is made”

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Light v. Centel A unilateral contract is not an OWEA at the time the agreement is made because the employer is not obliged to perform. Footnote 6 of Light. Any promise dependent on at will term is illusory and not an OWEA

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Light v. Centel “Strict Light” : Employer must promise and perform immediately (The “Next Millisecond Test”)

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff Johnson employed in 1993 Promoted in /98—Signs CNC Receives training from third parties 2001—Participates in new product meetings 3/2002—Leaves to work for competitor

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff To assist Employee in the performance of his/her duties, Employer agrees to provide to Employee special training access to certain confidential and proprietary information

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff: The Court of Appeals Not enforceable because: Information that Johnson had before he signed was past consideration No new information was given at the time that he signed the Agreement Promise to provide more training and new confidential information in the future was illusory, even if performed later

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff: The Supreme Court Question: Whether an at will employee who signs a CNC is bound by the agmt if, at the time the agmt is made, the E has no corresponding obligation?

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff: The Supreme Court Holding: An at will employee’s CNC becomes enforceable when the E performs the promises it made in exchange for the covenant Light’s footnote 6 is expressly disapproved.

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff: Reasonableness Test Johnson argued the covenant was overly broad because Not related to training he got later ASM’s goodwill unrelated to the info he got later No basis to restrict Johnson on customers he already knew about Court rejected: Even though receiving the “same information,” “nothing precluded ASM from seeking the greater protection of a CNC when it did.” Court relied on Johnson’s agreement with Strunk to show it was reasonable

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff: Ancillary Test The consideration given by the employer in the OWEA must give rise to the employer’s interest in restraining competition The covenant must be designed to enforce the employee’s consideration or return promise in the otherwise enforceable agreement

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Sheshunoff : Core concerns “Core concerns” are reasonableness as to time, geography, and scope of activity “We did not intend in Light to divert attention from the central focus of section 15.50(a). To the extent our opinion caused such a diversion, we correct it today.”

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Light and Sheshunoff: The Enforcing Side The technicalities as to whether there is an OWEA are gone The Supreme Court, for the first time, signals a “pro covenant” view of Section 15.50

Jackson Walker L.L.P. Light and Sheshunoff: The Busting Side Ancillary Test Is Still There—For Now Look Carefully at Breadth of Covenant— Juliette Fowler Is Still Good Law Use equitable defenses like “unclean hands”

Jackson Walker L.L.P.