Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Advertisements

1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
1 Introduction to Geneva ATLAS High Level Trigger Activities Xin Wu Journée de réflexion du DPNC, 11 septembre, 2007 Participants Assitant(e)s: Gauthier.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Steering Journée de réflexion – Sept. 14 th 2007 Till Eifert DPNC – ATLAS group.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Trigger (& some DAQ basics) tutorial Alessandro Cerri (CERN), Ricardo Goncalo (Royal Holloway)
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
First year experience with the ATLAS online monitoring framework Alina Corso-Radu University of California Irvine on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration.
TRIGGER DATA FOR PHYSICS ANALYSIS ATLAS Software Tutorial – 22 nd to 24 th April 2009 Ricardo Gonçalo – Royal Holloway.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
ATLAS Software tutorial 21 st – 23 rd October 2009 ATLAS Software tutorial 21 st – 23 rd October 2009 Jörg Stelzer DESY Ricardo Gonçalo RHUL.
TRIGGER-AWARE ANALYSIS TUTORIAL ARTEMIS Workshop – Pisa – 18 th to 19 th June 2009 Alessandro Cerri (CERN), Ricardo Gonçalo – Royal Holloway.
What’s in the ATLAS data : Trigger Decision ATLAS Offline Software Tutorial CERN, August 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo - RHUL.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Trigger ESD/AOD Simon George (RHUL) Ricardo Goncalo (RHUL) Monika Wielers (RAL) Contributions from many people.
L1Calo Intro Cambridge Group, Dec 2008 Norman Gee.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
1 John Baines Commissioning of the ATLAS High Level Trigger.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
Trigger ESD/AOD Simon George (RHUL) Ricardo Goncalo (RHUL) Monika Wielers (RAL) Reporting on the work of many people. ATLAS software week September.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Status of trigger software and EDM Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL – on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ.
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Commissioning and Performance of the CMS High Level Trigger Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago for the CMS collaboration.
ATLAS Software tutorial 4 th – 7 th May 2010 ATLAS Software tutorial 4 th – 7 th May 2010 Jörg Stelzer DESY Ricardo Gonçalo RHUL.
Latest News & Other Issues Ricardo Goncalo (LIP), David Miller (Chicago) Jet Trigger Signature Group Meeting 9/2/2015.
Overlap Removal and Timing Optimization Studies Nicole Carlson, Northwestern University 8/8/07 Supervisor: Tomasz Bold.
M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
The ATLAS Trigger Configuration System Design and Commissioning A.dos Anjos, P.Bell, D.Berge, J.Haller, S.Head, T.Kohno, S.Li, T.McMahon, M.Nozicka, H.v.d.
Status of the ATLAS first-level Central Trigger and the Muon Barrel Trigger and First Results from Cosmic-Ray Data David Berge (CERN-PH) for the ATLAS.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Trigger Items: Overview & Midterm Results Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 11/11/2010.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
ANDREA NEGRI, INFN PAVIA – NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM – ROME 20th October
1 Data taking period E1 Plots E1 - August 5th. Producing the plots Triggers used Plots I.Trigger. II.Luminosity. III.Jets. IV.Leptons. V.MET. What Next?
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Trigger Data for Analysis
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
Concluding discussion on Commissioning, Etmiss and DPD
Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL BNL Analysis Jamboree – Aug. 6, 2007
CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management
Commissioning of the ATLAS High Level Trigger
The University of Manchester
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
CHEP La Jolla San Diego 24-28/3/2003
Implementation of DHLT Monitoring Tool for ALICE
Presentation transcript:

Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge

3 Level Trigger System  Level 1:  Hardware based  Coarse granularity detector data  Calorimeter and muons only  Latency 2.2  s  Output rate up to ~75 kHz  Level 2: ~500 farm nodes(*)  Seeded by level 1  Only detector ”Regions of Interest” (RoI) processed  Full detector granularity in RoIs  Fast reconstruction  Average execution time ~40 ms  Output rate up to ~2 kHz  Event Builder: ~100 farm nodes(*)  Event Filter (EF):~1600 farm nodes(*)  Seeded by level 2  Full detector granularity  Potential full event access  Offline algorithms  Average execution time ~4s  Output rate up to ~200 Hz (*) four dual-CPU cores at ~2GHz per farm node 19. Sep 2008Trigger Tutorial Introduction 2

The Level 1 Trigger Pre-processor Cluster Processor Jet/Energy Processor End-cap Muon Trigger (TGC) Barrel Muon Trigger (RPC) Muon-CTP-Interface (MuCTPI) Central Trigger Processor (CTP) LTP BusyTTC Detector Front-Ends/Read-out LTP BusyTTC Muon DetectorsCalorimeter Detectors Common Merger Modules Trigger objects: Muons, EM and hadronic clusters, jets, total and missing E T CTP Available in AOD: 19. Sep Trigger Tutorial Introduction

The High Level Trigger  HLT configuration described by the trigger menu  Trigger chains: signatures (1 electron and some missing ET)  Description how electrons and missing ET are calculated and what selection criteria are applied: sequence of algorithms  Algorithm properties are also part of trigger configuration  Information not available for analysis 19. Sep Trigger Tutorial Introduction

HLT Configuration  Concept of Chains (trigger lines)  Chain: list of trigger conditions (multiplicities of HLT TriggerElements) to be evaluated in order  Sequence: Description how algorithms produce TriggerElements  example: EM3  ClusterFinder & Hypo  L2_e5cl  Collection of Chains (each with prescale and path-through rates) is called HLT Menu  Available in AOD:  chains, trigger conditions, TriggerElements, prescales, pass-through  Not available: algorithm names signature (2e j) sequence (e) [EM  “e-FEX, e-Hypo”  e] sequence (j) [JET  “j-FEX, j-Hypo”  j] signature (e’ j’) Chain (2EJ-L2) input = “2EMJET” Chain (2EJ-EF) input = “2EJ-L2” Lvl1 Trigger Item 2EMJET y/n L2 EF HLT Chain 19. Sep Trigger Tutorial Introduction

TriggerDB  Easy trigger configuration via 3 integer keys  Easy reproducibility  Configuration history 19. Sep 2008Trigger Tutorial Introduction 6 Level 1 Menu + Prescales HLT Menu + Prescales Algorithm parameters Release version Conditions Database (COOL) TriggerDB Schema reflects trigger design Configuration data becomes conditions data when used for data taking  Relational database stores trigger configuration – TriggerDB

Trigger Features and TriggerElements  Sequence: description how algorithms produce TriggerElements, example (in xml):   At least two algorithms in sequence  First is a FEX_algo which calculates a “trigger feature” e.g. a TopoCluster  This feature is attached to the TriggerElement “L2_Photon_5”  More features can be calculated and attached to this TE  Last is a Hypo_alg which checks the feature (e.g. “energy of TopoCluster>5?”) and enables/disables TriggerElement  Trigger features are ‘physics objects’. TriggerElements are logical objects (feature based selection decision) 19. Sep Trigger Tutorial Introduction

Two More Terms HLT Steering (during trigger running):  Framework that executes chains of a menu (after application of prescales/pass-throughs)  Stops chain execution if condition is failed  Caches results of algorithms that are called multiple times HLT Navigation (during AOD analysis):  Framework that enables access to trigger features through chains or trigger elements 19. Sep Trigger Tutorial Introduction

The Flow of Trigger Data 1. TriggerDB to configure trigger for data taking 2. Configuration data to COOL 3. Trigger result in each event 4. Shipped to reconstruct- ion sites 5. ESD, AOD, TAG for trigger aware analysis 19. Sep 2008Trigger Tutorial Introduction 9 ESD 100MB/s AOD 20MB/s ESD AOD TAG files/DB L1Result to Tier0 express calib Tier 1 transfer Tier 0 Prompt Reconstruction Express Reconstruction, calibration Tier 1 Reprocessing Tier 2 MC production Conditions Database Trigger Menus into Conditions DB Conditions Database TriggerDB DbProxy LVL2 Result EF Result RODs Front-end LVL2 Subfarm Input EF Event Builder LVL1/ CTP Subfarm Output EF Trigger Result Trigger Objects TriggerDB Replication DPD

Trigger Data for Analysis 19. Sep 2008Trigger Tutorial Introduction 10 TriggerDB All configuration data Online Conditions Database COOL ESD AOD TAG Configures Stores decoded Trigger Menu DPD With decreasing amount of detail

The TrigDecisionTool Interface Access to  Trigger result (L1 items passed, prescaled, vetoed; HLT chains passed, prescaled, pass-through)  HLT::CTPItem, HLT::Chain  Trigger features through TrigNavigation  Trigger configuration  TrigConf::TriggerItem, TrigConf::HLTChain  Not mentioned yet: access to Streams, ChainGroups 19. Sep Trigger Tutorial Introduction

Goal of the Tutorial 1. Check out and run standard UserAnalysis 2. Simple printout of trigger menu 3. Print full chain L1 – L2 – EF 4. Print simple trigger statistics of a few triggers 5. Determine trigger efficiencies with respect to an offline selection 6. Plot trigger efficiencies as function of p T and η Homework: Look at overlap of different triggers 19. Sep Trigger Tutorial Introduction