Patty Stephens, M.Ed, NBCT 7-12 Math Instructional Specialist, Northshore School District Jeanne Flahiff, M.A., NBCT 7-9 ELA teacher & instructional coach,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Common Core State Standards What’s It All About? Karen Kennedy, Ed.D. Mathematics Consultant.
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
Power of Proficiency Scaling ATI Summer 2014
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
Pamela T. Moore Associate Superintendent, Teaching and Learning Services Pinellas County Schools The Florida Standards: What Every Parent Should Know.
 Honor the challenge in this work and set the tone for teachers as learners  Build conceptual knowledge of fractions, and acknowledge most of us come.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
The SLO Process Session 2 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
The SLO Process Session 2 updated October 28, 2014 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
Overview 1 © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Mathematics General Overview.
Common Core Elementary Symposium Transitioning to the Common Core
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
 Honor the challenge in this work and set the tone for teachers as learners  Build conceptual knowledge of fractions, and acknowledge most of us come.
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
Math Content Workshop Focus: Progression of Fractions in Grades 3-5
Addressing Challenges in the Common Core: Mathematics Specialists in Elementary and Middle Schools Patricia F. Campbell Center for Mathematics Education.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
California unemployment: 1,371,2218.3% (July 2014) California Employment Development Department.
Common Core Orientation Transforming Teaching & Learning DELCAC Session March 20, 2013.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
Everett Public Schools Madison Elementary School LMS Department August 28, 2014.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
SUNNYSIDE PRINCIPALS Math Module Plan. Good Afternoon 1. What challenges have you faced in starting off the school year specifically related to.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
+ Sunnyside District Day One Math Training Focus 2; Training for Teachers by Math Leaders; Fall 2014.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Sunnyside School District
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
Building Conceptual Understanding of Fractions Part Two
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
TIPM3 March 13, SBAC Update See Link on protopage Claims (p. 17) Reporting Scores (p.19) Summative Assessment Targets Grade 3 (p. 27) Summative.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
Overview Criteria Item Examples.  Create a sense of “measured urgency” ◦ Timeline is not immediate, but close ◦ Urgency in you and your teachers ◦ Difference.
CEDAR RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2015 acos2010.wikispaces.com.
SCS -TNCore Rollout 2013 Study Group # 1. Common Core State Standards Module 1: An Introduction: Making Sense of Tasks Setup and Implementation.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Fractions: Teaching with Understanding Part 2 This.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Building Conceptual Understanding of Fractions Part One
Understanding Depth of Knowledge as it Relates to Unpacking the WV CSOs Adapted from the Office of Instruction’s Presentations posted on Teach st.
With great power comes great responsibility.
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
Shifting to a Standards-Based Mindset
CTB CADDS Sally Valenzuela Director, Publishing Strategic Initiatives CTB/McGraw-Hill.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
For Elementary Schools.  The structure of the new assessment  How does it inform instruction?  What the data tells us  Where are we now?  How do.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
Dr. Lois McKee- Assistant Principal Curriculum Mr. William Scales- Testing Coordinator The Florida Standards: What Every Parent Should Know Seminole High.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Everett Public Schools Evergreen Middle School LMS Department August 28, 2014.
CCSS & Smarter Balanced Mathematics: Key Shifts to Claims tinyurl.com/UPK5math University of Portland Brian Graham Camas School District TOSA M.Ed.
Leap Frog Fractions 4th Grade
Extend understanding of fraction equivalence and ordering.
Understanding New Expectations for Rigor in Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Patty Stephens, M.Ed, NBCT 7-12 Math Instructional Specialist, Northshore School District Jeanne Flahiff, M.A., NBCT 7-9 ELA teacher & instructional coach, Northshore School District AMLE 2015 October 16,

Teachers? Administrators? Instructional Coaches? Other?

Large suburban district Traditionally high performing Changing demographics Vague feeling of not being prepared Not knowing what steps to take next to operationalize the new standards

Develop deep teacher understanding of the standards through DOK training and proficiency scaling Use proficiency scales to communicate the standards to other stakeholders, including students and parents. Embed the standards in curriculum, assessment, and instructional practice. Prezi: Using DOK & Proficiency Scaling to Operationalize the Common Core

What is DOK? Why is DOK important? How can we use DOK to address depth and rigor?

Progression of cognitive demand Focuses on the degree of depth or complexity of knowledge reflected in the content standards Describes how deeply a student needs to understand the content for a given standard

Level 1: Recall and Reproduction Level 2: Basic Skills and Concepts Level 3: Strategic Thinking and Reasoning Level 4: Extended Thinking

DOK 1: DOK 1: Identify this utensil. DOK 2: DOK 2: Explain the function of the fork. DOK 3: DOK 3: Identify two examples of when a fork would not be the best utensil for a type of food and explain why. DOK 4: DOK 4: Design an investigation to determine the optimal number and length of tines for a salad fork.

Educators use a framework (DOK) to build a rigorous leveled view of each standard or cluster. Used in designing both instruction and assessments to inform both teacher and student.

A student performing at this level can… Advanced Describes cognitive task that extends from standard. Requires decision-making, expressing reasoning, or application of material explicitly taught to new contexts. NOT the standards of the next grade level. Proficient Describes cognitive task required by the standard as defined by CCSS including expectations for content, process, skills, and/or performance to be explicitly taught. Basic Describes cognitive step just before standard that is explicitly taught; includes concepts broken into distinct segments, foundational skills and key vocabulary. Below Basic May describe foundational understandings and skills. Student may lack independence, having partial success of basic and/or proficient content with assistance.

A student performing at this level can… Advanced Provide justification for creating equivalent fractions with denominators other than denominators 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 100. Interpreting information from a complex graph of data including fractions with unlike denominators Formulate an original story problem that requires the use of equivalent fractions and/or comparing fractions with different denominators Formulate a model to represent multiple fractions with unlike denominators that would equal one whole Proficient Extend understanding of fraction equivalence and ordering. Explain why two fractions are equivalent by using visual fraction models, describing how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Recognize and generate equivalent fractions. Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model. Basic Express whole numbers as fractions Compare fractions with like denominators and numerators Represent fractions using visual models to place, show equivalence or compare using simple fractions Given a set of fractions find equivalent fractions Multiply numerators and denominators to find equivalent fractions Define a fractions as parts of a whole Compare fractions by reasoning about their size of the whole Comparing simple fractions using visual models using the symbols >, <, = Below Basic *Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Lacks independence

Schedule for Day 1: 8-11 – Instruction and Guided Practice – Overview and Purpose Setting – DOK – Proficiency Scaling – Lunch 12-3 – Proficiency Scaling – Work in collaborative groups to create Proficiency Scales for your grade-level standards Schedule for Day 2: 8-11 – Proficiency Scaling – Work in collaborative groups to create Proficiency Scales for your grade-level standards – Lunch 12-2 – Feedback – Grade-level feedback – Feedback within domains 2-3 – Revision – Read and incorporate feedback into final scales

Grades 7-9: : Implementing new curriculum August 2016: DOK training and proficiency scaling for middle grades. 6-8? 7-9? : Creating leveled assessments Grades 10-12: Currently in curriculum adoption, no capacity at this time

The value is in the process, not just in the scales. Teachers are experts and must be the ones to engage in this work. Have every teacher involved. Once you’ve created a scale, you can use a scale. Scales are living documents and will change as our own understanding develops. Use this work to help inform future curriculum adoptions.

Jeanne Flahiff 7-9 ELA Specialist Patty Stephens 7-12 Math Specialist