Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
Data Teams. Data Teams in Action Medical/Education connections Double Entry Journal MVP – Most Valuable Point Explain one MVP with a partner and then.
PORTFOLIO.
Parents as Partners in Education
Creating District C.I.P. And Building S.I.P. Making Sure The Canaries Don’t Die While You Are Data Mining.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Build Readiness Collect & Analyze Data Set Goals Based On Data Investigate Research Based Practices Make Action Plan Implement & Monitor Evaluate Effectiveness.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Data Teams. Which comes first – the data or the team?
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Data Teams. Data Teams in Action Medical/Education connections Double Entry Journal MVP – Most Valuable Point Explain one MVP with a partner and then.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
The School Effectiveness Framework
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School

Objectives for Today Discuss the meaning of cause and effect as it relates to the teacher evaluation system. Understand how an effective data analysis process can determine cause and effect.

Using Cause and Effect Data

FEAP’s: Practice Indicators Related to Cause and Effect & Data Analysis Continuous Professional Improvement a.Designs purposeful professional goals to strengthen the effectiveness of instruction based on students’ needs b.Examines and uses data-informed research to improve instruction and student achievement c.Uses a variety of data, independently and in collaboration with colleagues, to evaluate learning outcomes, adjust planning, and continuously improve the effectiveness of the lessons d.Collaborates with the home, school, and larger communities to foster communication and to support student learning and continuous improvement e.Engages in targeted professional growth opportunities and reflective practices

1.Instructional Design & Lesson Planning a. Aligns instruction with state adopted standards at the appropriate level of rigor b. Sequences lessons and concepts to ensure coherence and required prior knowledge c. Designs instruction for students to achieve mastery d. Selects appropriate formative assessments to monitor learning e. Uses diagnostic student data to plan lessons f. Develops learning experiences that require students to demonstrate a variety of applicable skills and competencies FEAP’s: Practice Indicators Related to Cause and Effect & Data Analysis

State Model (based on Marzano research) Indicator: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Individual Lessons and Units The teacher determines how effective a lesson or unit of instruction was in terms of enhancing student achievement and identifies causes of success or difficulty. Indicator: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Specific Pedagogical Strategies and Behaviors The teacher determines the effectiveness of specific instructional techniques regarding the achievement of subgroups of students and identifies specific reasons for discrepancies. Domain 3 – Reflecting on Teaching

Danielson Framework Effective teaching requires both assessment of learning and assessment for learning. Assessments of learning ensure that teachers know that students have achieved the intended outcomes. Assessments for learning enable teachers to incorporate assessments directly into the instruction and to modify or adapt instruction as needed to ensure student understanding. Even though such assessments are used during instruction, teachers must design them during the planning process. Such formative assessment strategies are ongoing, and both teachers and students can use them to monitor progress toward instructional outcomes. Component: 1f. Designing Student Assessments

Learning Activity 1 How do you define cause and effect?

Causal Instructional Strategies Key strategies revealed by research to have the highest probability of impacting student learning when used appropriately and in appropriate instructional contexts. These are the controllable actions in a school that impact student learning. Florida’s Common Language Document

Causal Model of Teacher Evaluation Describes the link between classroom practices and behaviors that have a direct impact on student learning and assigns greater importance in evaluation ratings to factors having the most direct link to student learning (based on contemporary research).

Cause and Effect Data Sets Effect data: Outcomes or student achievement results Cause data: Professional practices, actions of adults, that create specific effects or results

Application of Antecedents of Excellence Results Indicators High results, high understanding Replication of success likely Losing Low results, low understanding Replication of mistakes likely Learning Low results, high understanding Replication of mistakes unlikely High results, low understanding Replication of success unlikely Leadership and Learning Matrix Leading Lucky Cause Data Effect Data p

Learning Activity 2 Think of a student achievement challenge we wish to conquer. Place an X in the quadrant that best describes our status and provide a justification for the quadrant you selected. Be prepared to share your thinking with the group in five minutes.

Through effective data collection, teachers and leaders can make the link between actions of adults and results in student achievement data.

Monitor the implementation of a few strategies that have the greatest impact on student learning.

Provide timely, specific focused feedback for growth, and allow for focused practice.

Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Percent of Staff Proficient in Using Nonfiction Writing in Content Percent of students proficient or higher in Algebra I Percent of students proficient or higher in reading Cause and Effect Data

Cause & Effect Effective Questioning Techniques Proficiency and frequency of using higher order questioning strategies and student results on formative assessments

Learning Activity 3 Collecting Cause Data: Higher Order Questioning Techniques

Collecting cause data on the proficiency and implementation of specific strategies … …and effect data on student learning, provides clarity on what works best.

Data Analysis for Cause & Effect Collaborative Processes to Improve Teaching

Data Teams are a model for continuous, collaborative action that inspires and empowers professionals to discover cause and effect relationships.

Data Team meetings are collaborative, structured, scheduled meetings that focus on the effectiveness of teaching and learning.

Data Teams have a common focus or common standard, a common formative assessment, and a common scoring guide.

25 Benefits of Formative AssessmentsClarifyLearningIntentions Elicit Evidence of Learning Promote Feedback Encourage Learners to Own Their Learning

Formative What students should know How instruction needs to be adjusted How to improve student skills Assessment FOR learning

Summative After instruction occurs Used when determining grades Various audiences for the data Assessment OF learning

Remember… It isn’t the method that determines whether the assessment is summative or formative, it is how the results are used.

Formative assessment is capable of triggering big boosts to students’ achievement – the educational equivalent to the cure for the common cold. James Popham, 2010 Strategic Priorities for School Improvement, Harvard Education Letter, No. 6

Formative Assessment and Cause and Effect

The Data Teams Process Six Steps to Data-Driven Instructional Decisions

The Data Team Process 1. Collect & Chart Data 2. Analyze & Prioritize 3. Set & Review SMART Goals 4. Select Instructional Strategies 5.Determine Results Indicators 6. Monitor & Evaluate Results

Learning Activity 4 The Data Teams Process

Questions and Reflection