BIR Update Sessions: General Updates January-February 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
EVALUATOR ORIENTATION Serving on Off-Site and On-Site Committees OVERVIEW.
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Committee? A Primer for New Visiting Committee Members.
World’s Largest Educational Community
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
Q Comp Peer Reviewer Training Covering: Job Description and Expectations Norms and Confidentiality Agendas Interviews Rubric and Debriefing Wrap-up.
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Overview of California’s Accreditation Process Year-Out Pre-Visit Webinar Joint CTC-NCATE Visits Fall 2011-Spring 2012 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program
BIR Update Program Sampling Cluster November 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
Webinar on the OSEP Self Assessment and Site Review Process for State and Multi-State Deaf-Blind Projects October 29, 2004.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Overview of California’s Accreditation Process Year-Out Pre-Visit Webinar Very Small Institution (1-2 programs) Site Visits Spring 2012 Ensuring Educator.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Leaders Meeting Friday, August 27, – 11:00AM 107 Main Building Jennifer Skaggs, Ph.D. SACS.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Nuts & Bolts: How to plan for a CTC Accreditation Visit October 2008.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
California’s Accreditation System: Providing Information about Your Intern Program Spring Intern Director’s Meeting April Ensuring Educator Excellence.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
JOBTALKS Communications: Secondary Interview Business Career Planning and Placement Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D.
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Overview Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building – Lexmark Public.
BIR Session Team Lead Update October 29, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
BIR Update Session NCATE Team Members February 5, 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
Program Standards for Bilingual Authorization Jo A. Birdsell, Ed.D. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Technical Assistance Meetings November 21 & 25,
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Preparing Your Self Study
1 Accreditation 101 February 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
BIR Update Session Programs Cluster Site Visits Ensuring Educator Excellence.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence BIR Session Team Lead Update December 2,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Site Visit: Consultant Advice March 2008 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
THE EVALUATION AND POST EVALUATION Evaluator Training Workshop November 4, 2014.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Common Standards August 19, :30 am-3:00 pm.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Planning for the Accreditation Site Visit July 2009.
2009 Shelby County Schools District Accreditation Thompson High School.
Judy Beachler, Cosumnes River College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College The Accreditation Team(s)
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
JOBTALKS The Follow-Up Interview Career Search Strategies Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D.
JOBTALKS The Secondary Interview Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D Contents used in this presentation are adapted from.
Review visit Heli Mattisen Visit to one HEI – 1-3 days Committee has a working room where, among others, pre-requested documents/materials.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
What every benchmarking coordinator needs to know
Polices, procedures & protocols
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team?
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
University Supervisors
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Agenda for Overview SBCUSD Commission-approved Programs
Presentation transcript:

BIR Update Sessions: General Updates January-February 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence

2 Topics to be addressed 1. Accreditation Handbook 2. Common Standards 3. Team Member Ethics 4. Travel Information 5. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the site 6. Technology on the visit

3 Topics continued 7. Working as a team member 8. Interview strategies 9. Standard Findings 10. Accreditation Recommendation 11. Evaluating the visit Plus specialized topics

4 Accreditation Handbook Accreditation Handbook (2009) Best resource for team members Chapter 10: Accreditation Site Visit Team Member Information Review this chapter before arriving at the site visit

5 Common Standards Entirely rewritten/new Standards: Standard 2 – Unit and Program Evaluation System Standard 9 – Assessment of Candidate Competence New language: Standard 1: Unit implements and monitors a credential recommendation process that ensures that candidates recommended for a credential have met all requirements. Edits to other standards for clarity and inclusion of all programs Commission adopted edits in November 2008

6 Common Standard Glossary Glossary definitions of the terms in the Common Standards Defines terms in the Common Standards plus Intern Program Second Tier Credential Programs Standards/Glossary

7 Prior to the visit   Make travel arrangements   Submit food/special needs   Read document (s) appropriate for your team assignment   Review electronic evidence that is available   Formulate basic questions Member information page

8 Travel arrangements Use Sacramento Travel to book flights Use the most economical mode of transportation Hotel shuttle, if available A Shuttle Service A Taxi if necessary Submit transportation receipts for reimbursements !

9 Technology at the Visit Standards documents—electronic Standards documents—electronic Self Study Documents—electronic Self Study Documents—electronic Exhibits—electronic Exhibits—electronic Notify CTC staff if you plan to bring a laptop Notify CTC staff if you plan to bring a laptop Notify CTC staff if you need a hard copy of your document (s) Notify CTC staff if you need a hard copy of your document (s) With electronic evidence you may be able to review some of the evidence BEFORE you arrive at the site With electronic evidence you may be able to review some of the evidence BEFORE you arrive at the site

10 Working as a team member Understand your assigned role Understand your assigned role Common Standards Common Standards Program Standards Program Standards Use time wisely Use time wisely Assist in gathering information for other team members Assist in gathering information for other team members Understand the timelines for getting draft of report submitted to lead Understand the timelines for getting draft of report submitted to lead

11 Interview Strategies Introduce Yourself Explain Why You Are Interviewing Each Person Reduce Anxiety Assure Confidentiality Maintain a Professional Perspective Listen Attentively Take Notes Ask Questions Related to Standards Avoid Questions That Can Be Answered “Yes” or “No” Pursue Questions Until You Are Sure They Are Answered Do Not Accept Unsupported Conclusions Be Aware of Time—Adhere to the Schedule Ask a Wrap-Up Question Cross-Check Information

12 Difference between Monday and Tuesday Interviews Monday—gathering information, broad, open-ended questions. “Tell me about your program.” Monday—gathering information, broad, open-ended questions. “Tell me about your program.” Tuesday—gathering information—but focused questions based on what you still need to learn. Let individuals know you have specific questions, but always ask an open ended question at the end Tuesday—gathering information—but focused questions based on what you still need to learn. Let individuals know you have specific questions, but always ask an open ended question at the end

13 Standard Findings The team must reach a decision on each standard— Common and Program — Met—All phrases of the standard are evident and effectively implemented. Met with concern (s)—One or more phrases of the standard are not evident or are ineffectively implemented. Not Met — Significant phrases of the standard are not evident or are so ineffectively implemented that it is not possible to see the standard in the program. Standard Findings Guidance

14 Accreditation Recommendation Accreditation Accreditation Accreditation with Stipulations Accreditation with Stipulations Accreditation with Major Stipulations Accreditation with Major Stipulations Accreditation with Probationary Stipulations Accreditation with Probationary Stipulations Handbook: Chapter 8

15 Stipulations If the recommendation is not “Accreditation,” the team must write proposed stipulations. If the recommendation is not “Accreditation,” the team must write proposed stipulations. Identify the specific area where the institution/program is not meeting the standard (s). Identify the specific area where the institution/program is not meeting the standard (s). Consultant and Team Lead will guide this process. Consultant and Team Lead will guide this process.

16 Team member ethics Accreditation requires the highest standard of ethical behavior and professionalism Accreditation requires the highest standard of ethical behavior and professionalism Interviews are held in strict confidence Interviews are held in strict confidence Team deliberations are confidential and not to be shared with non-team members Team deliberations are confidential and not to be shared with non-team members Ethical and professional behavior of BIR members should not end when the site visit is complete: Ethical and professional behavior of BIR members should not end when the site visit is complete: BIR members should never discuss the details of a review with others BIR members should never discuss the details of a review with others While reports are public, BIR members must always use good professional judgment when asked about reviews While reports are public, BIR members must always use good professional judgment when asked about reviews The success of the accreditation system depends upon YOU! Team Member Ethics

17 Evaluating the visit Electronic survey Team members Team Lead Institution Complete the survey within one week. Contact Administrator of Accreditation (or Division Director) if concerns you do not want to put into writing.