Radiative Impacts of Cirrus on the Properties of Marine Stratocumulus M. Christensen 1,2, G. Carrió 1, G. Stephens 2, W. Cotton 1 Department of Atmospheric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantifying sub-grid cloud structure and representing it GCMs
Advertisements

R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
Robin Hogan, Andrew Barrett
Veldhoven, Large-eddy simulation of stratocumulus – cloud albedo and cloud inhomogeneity Stephan de Roode (1,2) & Alexander Los (2)
Aerosol-Precipitation Responses Deduced from Ship Tracks as Observed by CloudSat Matthew W. Christensen 1 and Graeme L. Stephens 2 Department of Atmospheric.
1 A First Look at Mid-Level Clouds Using CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS Data Stanley Q. Kidder, J. Adam Kankiewicz, Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute.
Variability of Liquid Water Path in Marine Boundary Layer Clouds
Semi-direct effect of biomass burning on cloud and rainfall over Amazon Yan Zhang, Hongbin Yu, Rong Fu & Robert E. Dickinson School of Earth & Atmospheric.
Wesley Berg, Tristan L’Ecuyer, and Sue van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Evaluating the impact of aerosols on.
Low clouds in the atmosphere: Never a dull moment Stephan de Roode (GRS) stratocumulus cumulus.
Investigation of the Aerosol Indirect Effect on Ice Clouds and its Climatic Impact Using A-Train Satellite Data and a GCM Yu Gu 1, Jonathan H. Jiang 2,
Clouds and Climate: Cloud Response to Climate Change SOEEI3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 5 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Clouds and Climate: Cloud Response to Climate Change ENVI3410 : Lecture 11 Ken Carslaw Lecture 5 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
IACETH Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science Boundary Layer parametrisation in the climate model ECHAM5-HAM Colombe Siegenthaler - Le Drian, Peter.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 1 Joao Teixeira, Brian.
Figure 2.10 IPCC Working Group I (2007) Clouds and Radiation Through a Soda Straw.
Current issues in GFS moist physics Hua-Lu Pan, Stephen Lord, and Bill Lapenta.
Towards stability metrics for cloud cover variation under climate change Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton, Matt Wyant, Peter Blossey University of Washington.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
Cloud Biases in CMIP5 using MISR and ISCCP simulators B. Hillman*, R. Marchand*, A. Bodas-Salcedo, J. Cole, J.-C. Golaz, and J. E. Kay *University of Washington,
Photo by Dave Fratello. Focus To evaluate CAM5/CARMA at 1x1 degree resolution with aircraft observations. - Improve cirrus cloud representation in the.
Cyclone composites in the real world and ACCESS Pallavi Govekar, Christian Jakob, Michael Reeder and Jennifer Catto.
Length Scale analysis of the transition from shallow to deep convection João Paulo A. Martins (1) Pedro M. A. Miranda (1) Pedro M. M. Soares (1) João Teixeira.
Large-Eddy Simulation of a stratocumulus to cumulus transition as observed during the First Lagrangian of ASTEX Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Atmospheric TU Delft Stephan de Roode, Harm Jonker clouds, climate and weather air quality in the urban environmentenergy.
LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
Clouds, Aerosols and Precipitation GRP Meeting August 2011 Susan C van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins,
Observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback Robert J. Burgman and Amy C. Clement Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Evaluation of CMIP5 Simulated Clouds and TOA Radiation Budgets in the SMLs Using NASA Satellite Observations Erica K. Dolinar Xiquan Dong and Baike Xi.
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
Estimation of Cloud and Precipitation From Warm Clouds in Support of the ABI: A Pre-launch Study with A-Train Zhanqing Li, R. Chen, R. Kuligowski, R. Ferraro,
The ASTEX Lagrangian model intercomparison case Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen TU Delft, Netherlands.
Synthesis NOAA Webinar Chris Fairall Yuqing Wang Simon de Szoeke X.P. Xie "Evaluation and Improvement of Climate GCM Air-Sea Interaction Physics: An EPIC/VOCALS.
Evaluating forecasts of the evolution of the cloudy boundary layer using radar and lidar observations Andrew Barrett, Robin Hogan and Ewan O’Connor Submitted.
Matthew Shupe Ola Persson Paul Johnston Duane Hazen Clouds during ASCOS U. of Colorado and NOAA.
Large Eddy Simulation of Low Cloud Feedback to a 2-K SST Increase Anning Cheng 1, and Kuan-Man Xu 2 1. AS&M, Inc., 2. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton,
April Hansen et al. [1997] proposed that absorbing aerosol may reduce cloudiness by modifying the heating rate profiles of the atmosphere. Absorbing.
1. Introduction Boundary-layer clouds are parameterized in general circulation model (GCM), but simulated in Multi-scale Modeling Framework (MMF) and.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Using Ship Tracks to Characterize the Effects of Haze on Cloud Properties Matthew W. Christensen, James A. Coakley, Jr., Matthew S. Segrin, William R.
Boundary Layer Clouds.
Robert Wood, Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington The importance of precipitation in marine boundary layer cloud.
Thomas Ackerman Roger Marchand University of Washington.
Representation of Subgrid Cloud-Radiation Interaction and its Impact on Global Climate Simulations Xinzhong Liang (Illinois State Water Survey, UIUC )
Cloud-climate feedbacks: what we think we know and why we think we know it David Mansbach 14 April 2006 T 1
Modeling Mesoscale Cellular Structures and Drizzle in Marine Stratocumulus Wang and Feingold, JAS, 2009 Part I,II Wang et al, ACP, 2010 Feingold et al,
Yuqing Wang and Chunxi Zhang International Pacific Research Center University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Drizzle and Cloud Cellular Structures in Marine Stratocumulus over the Southeast Pacific: Model Simulations Hailong Wang 1,2,3, Graham Feingold 2, Rob.
An important constraint on tropical cloud-climate feedback Dennis L. Hartmann and Kristin Larson Geophysical Res. Lett., 2002.
The EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise: Implications for Cloudsat as a stratocumulus drizzle meter Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University.
PAPERSPECIFICS OF STUDYFINDINGS Kohler, 1936 (“The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets”) Evaporate 2kg of hoar-frost and determined Cl content;
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Southern Ocean Clouds Characterization.
Three-year analysis of S-HIS dual-regression retrievals using co-located AVAPS and CPL Measurements D. H. DeSlover, H. E. Revercomb, J. K. Taylor, F. Best,
THE INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED ON SHALLOW CUMULUS CONVECTION from LES and bulk theory Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens University of California, Los Angeles.
Background – Building their Case “continental” – polluted, aerosol laden “maritime” – clean, pristine Polluted concentrations are 1-2 orders of magnitude.
Forecasts of Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus with the NCAR, GFDL and ECMWF models. Cécile Hannay (1), Dave Williamson (1), Jim Hack (1), Jeff Kiehl (1),
W. Smith, D. Spangenberg, S. Sun-Mack, P.Minnis
Matthew Christensen and Graeme Stephens
Description of the climate system and of its components
Advisors: Fuqing Zhang and Eugene Clothiaux
The representation of ice hydrometeors in ECHAM-HAM
Precipitation driving of droplet concentration variability in marine low clouds A simple steady-state budget model for cloud condensation nuclei, driven.
John Marsham and Steven Dobbie
Assessment of NASA GISS CMIP5 and post-CMIP5 Simulated Clouds and Radiation fluxes Using Satellite Observations 1/15/2019 Ryan Stanfield(1), Xiquan Dong(1),
NRL POST Stratocumulus Cloud Modeling Efforts
Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
VOCALS Open Ocean: Science and Logistics
Presentation transcript:

Radiative Impacts of Cirrus on the Properties of Marine Stratocumulus M. Christensen 1,2, G. Carrió 1, G. Stephens 2, W. Cotton 1 Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2 A53G-0204 Determine the extent to which cirrus affect the radiation budget and dynamics of stratocumulus clouds using data from the Afternoon-Train (A-Train) of satellite observations and large eddy simulations (LES). Cirrus clouds decrease net radiative fluxes above stratocumulus clouds by an amount which depends on the cirrus base altitude and optical thickness. Interregional Annual Average: - Optically thin cirrus (τ < 0.03): -8 ± 4 W m -2 - Optically thick cirrus (τ > 0.03): -27 ± 12 W m -2 Diurnal radiative response is twice as large as the effect caused by cirrus. LES simulations demonstrate that the decreased net radiation causes weaker radiative cooling rates and turbulence, resulting in shallower stratocumulus clouds with less liquid water and precipitation. LES results are consistent with A-Train observations. These results illustrate that cirrus can affect the radiation budget of stratocumulus, thus global circulation models must have comparable skill (to LES) in simulating both low-level stratocumulus and high-level cirrus clouds to provide reliable assessments of low-cloud feedbacks in the climate system. C IRRUS R ADIATIVE F ORCING: The radiative effect depends on the optical depth and cloud base altitude of cirrus. Large values are observed in storm track regions where cirrus are typically thick and have low cloud base heights. Radiative effect is assessed at 3.5 km and defined as the difference in net radiation between profiles containing only stratocumulus and those containing both stratocumulus and cirrus cloud layers. Boxes denote regions that were used in the analysis. I NTERREGIONAL M ONTHLY A VERAGE D IFFERENCES: Cloud top heights, radiative cooling rates, precipitation rates, and free-troposphere subsidence rates significantly decrease in response to overlying optically thick cirrus layers. Differences in stratocumulus properties between day (1:30 pm) and night (1:30 am) are nearly twice as large as the effects caused by cirrus. Histograms are constructed from the monthly means derived from subtropical and midlatitude regions. Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) Grid: 80 X 5 X 300 levels at Δx = Δy = 50 m and Δy = 10 m resolution (24 hour simulation) Microphysics: Double moment bulk prognostic scheme (Saleeby and Cotton 2004, J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, ) Initial Conditions: CCN = 100 cm -3 and GCCN = 1e -4 cm -3 Radiation scheme: Nighttime simulation (Harrington et al. 1999, Atmos. Res., 51, 45-75) Vertical sounding: European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) coincident profile with cirrus and stratocumulus observed by CloudSat on 12/5/2007 at 45° N and 128° W (see above image). 9 Experiments: Nudge pristine ice into the radiation scheme to simulate the effects of cirrus. Multiple levels: 4, 6.5, and 9 km Cirrus optical depths: 0.5, 2, 20 ( τ = 2 for the simulations results shown below) Period: June 2006 – June 2011 (60 months of data) CloudSat: radiative fluxes and precipitation rates CALIPSO: cloud layer altitude and cirrus cloud optical depth ECMWF re-analysis: lower troposphere stability and free-troposphere subsidence rates Vertical profiles: stratocumulus only, stratocumulus & thin cirrus, stratocumulus & thick cirrus Stratocumulus: cloud layer top less than 3 km Thin cirrus: cloud layer base greater than 4 km and optical depth less than 0.03 Thick cirrus: cloud layer base greater than 4 km and optical depth greater than 0.03 C LOUD A MOUNT: Stratocumulus amount is strongly tied to the lower troposphere stability, free-troposphere subsidence rate, and the cloud top radiative cooling rate. Cirrus clouds and solar radiation can affect these processes. Based on the linear fit from these controlling variables we infer that optically thick cirrus clouds reduce stratocumulus cloud amount by 2.7 ± 0.6% on average. LES R ESULTS: Cirrus significantly decrease turbulence and cloud top radiative cooling in stratocumulus thereby causing shallower clouds with less liquid water and precipitation. The effect is more pronounced as the cirrus cloud base altitude decreases. Vertical plots were constructed for the final time step of the simulation (24 hours). Cirrus base = 4 km Control: No Cirrus Cirrus base = 6.5 km Control: No Cirrus Cirrus base = 4 km Annual AverageInterregional Monthly Average Stratocumulus HeightRain RateCloud Top Radiative Heating 500 hpa Subsidence Rate S UMMARY A - T RAIN O BSERVATIONS O BJECTIVE L ARGE E DDY S IMULATIONS Conceptual Diagram (interregional average) ΔQ R ΔLTS Δω Δα RAD Δα LTS Δα SUB