知識管理報告 Semantic interpretation and knowledge extraction 第四組 M9711014 余思慧 M9701103 林道明 M9701105 謝明哲 M9701108 曾世賢.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 OOA-HR Workshop, 11 October 2006 Semantic Metadata Extraction using GATE Diana Maynard Natural Language Processing Group University of Sheffield, UK.
Advertisements

Learning Semantic Information Extraction Rules from News The Dutch-Belgian Database Day 2013 (DBDBD 2013) Frederik Hogenboom Erasmus.
So What Does it All Mean? Geospatial Semantics and Ontologies Dr Kristin Stock.
Verb Semantics Janine Scott Nov. 9, Overview Introduction to Grammatical Concepts Background & features of WordNet Using WordNet online Dr.
Noun. Noun - verb noun Noun - verb article- adj. - adj. - Noun - verb.
SPICE! An Ontology Based Web Application By Angela Maduko and Felicia Jones Final Presentation For CSCI8350: Enterprise Integration.
Human Language Technologies. Issue Corporate data stores contain mostly natural language materials. Knowledge Management systems utilize rich semantic.
NaLIX: A Generic Natural Language Search Environment for XML Data Presented by: Erik Mathisen 02/12/2008.
Gimme’ The Context: Context- driven Automatic Semantic Annotation with CPANKOW Philipp Cimiano et al.
Queensland University of Technology An Ontology-based Mining Approach for User Search Intent Discovery Yan Shen, Yuefeng Li, Yue Xu, Renato Iannella, Abdulmohsen.
Integration of Information Extraction with an Ontology M. Vargas-Vera, J.Domingue, Y.Kalfoglou, E. Motta and S. Buckingham Sum.
Designing clustering methods for ontology building: The Mo’K workbench Authors: Gilles Bisson, Claire Nédellec and Dolores Cañamero Presenter: Ovidiu Fortu.
Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing Noriko Tomuro November 16, 2006.
Information Retrieval
ANSWERING CONTROLLED NATURAL LANGUAGE QUERIES USING ANSWER SET PROGRAMMING Syeed Ibn Faiz.
Knowledge Representation and Semantic Capturing Albena Strupchanska Linguistic Modelling Department, Institute for Parallel Processing, Bulgarian Academy.
Information Retrieval – and projects we have done. Group Members: Aditya Tiwari ( ) Harshit Mittal ( ) Rohit Kumar Saraf ( ) Vinay.
Erasmus University Rotterdam Introduction Nowadays, emerging news on economic events such as acquisitions has a substantial impact on the financial markets.
Erasmus University Rotterdam Introduction With the vast amount of information available on the Web, there is an increasing need to structure Web data in.
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
Empirical Methods in Information Extraction Claire Cardie Appeared in AI Magazine, 18:4, Summarized by Seong-Bae Park.
Processing of large document collections Part 10 (Information extraction: multilingual IE, IE from web, IE from semi-structured data) Helena Ahonen-Myka.
1 Wikification CSE 6339 (Section 002) Abhijit Tendulkar.
“How much context do you need?” An experiment about context size in Interactive Cross-language Question Answering B. Navarro, L. Moreno-Monteagudo, E.
A Semi-automatic Ontology Acquisition Method for the Semantic Web Man Li, Xiaoyong Du, Shan Wang Renmin University of China, Beijing WAIM May 2012.
Authors: Ting Wang, Yaoyong Li, Kalina Bontcheva, Hamish Cunningham, Ji Wang Presented by: Khalifeh Al-Jadda Automatic Extraction of Hierarchical Relations.
INF 384 C, Spring 2009 Ontologies Knowledge representation to support computer reasoning.
Author: William Tunstall-Pedoe Presenter: Bahareh Sarrafzadeh CS 886 Spring 2015.
Artificial intelligence project
Interpreting Dictionary Definitions Dan Tecuci May 2002.
Scott Duvall, Brett South, Stéphane Meystre A Hands-on Introduction to Natural Language Processing in Healthcare Annotation as a Central Task for Development.
A service-oriented middleware for building context-aware services Center for E-Business Technology Seoul National University Seoul, Korea Tao Gu, Hung.
NLP And The Semantic Web Dainis Kiusals COMS E6125 Spring 2010.
Annotating Words using WordNet Semantic Glosses Julian Szymański Department of Computer Systems Architecture, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications.
Web Usage Mining for Semantic Web Personalization جینی شیره شعاعی زهرا.
Comparing syntactic semantic patterns and passages in Interactive Cross Language Information Access (iCLEF at the University of Alicante) Borja Navarro,
Markov Logic and Deep Networks Pedro Domingos Dept. of Computer Science & Eng. University of Washington.
BioRAT: Extracting Biological Information from Full-length Papers David P.A. Corney, Bernard F. Buxton, William B. Langdon and David T. Jones Bioinformatics.
Understanding User’s Query Intent with Wikipedia G 여 승 후.
Authors: Marius Pasca and Benjamin Van Durme Presented by Bonan Min Weakly-Supervised Acquisition of Open- Domain Classes and Class Attributes from Web.
Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #4 Vision for Semantic Web.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
Shridhar Bhalerao CMSC 601 Finding Implicit Relations in the Semantic Web.
Lexico-semantic Patterns for Information Extraction from Text The International Conference on Operations Research 2013 (OR 2013) Frederik Hogenboom
1 Masters Thesis Presentation By Debotosh Dey AUTOMATIC CONSTRUCTION OF HASHTAGS HIERARCHIES UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI Tarragona, June 2015 Supervised.
L/O/G/O 報告者:陳宜樺 報告日期: 2015/08/26 Research on Semantic Web Mining.
Semantic web Bootstrapping & Annotation Hassan Sayyadi Semantic web research laboratory Computer department Sharif university of.
Programming Errors. Errors of different types Syntax errors – easiest to fix, found by compiler or interpreter Semantic errors – logic errors, found by.
Acquisition of Categorized Named Entities for Web Search Marius Pasca Google Inc. from Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) ’04.
Knowledge Structure Vijay Meena ( ) Gaurav Meena ( )
Title Authors Introduction Text, text, text, text, text, text Background Information Text, text, text, text, text, text Observations Text, text, text,
1 A Medical Information Management System Using the Semantic Web Technology Networked Computing and Advanced INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, NCM '08. Fourth.
Using Semantic Relations to Improve Information Retrieval
Jean-Yves Le Meur - CERN Geneva Switzerland - GL'99 Conference 1.
Instance Discovery and Schema Matching With Applications to Biological Deep Web Data Integration Tantan Liu, Fan Wang, Gagan Agrawal {liut, wangfa,
Knowledge Engineering. Sources of Knowledge - Books - Journals - Manuals - Reports - Films - Databases - Pictures - Audio and Video Tapes - Flow Diagram.
Personalized Ontology for Web Search Personalization S. Sendhilkumar, T.V. Geetha Anna University, Chennai India 1st ACM Bangalore annual Compute conference,
The World of Verbs.
Automatically Extending NE coverage of Arabic WordNet using Wikipedia
Kenneth Baclawski et. al. PSB /11/7 Sa-Im Shin
CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing
Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing
Zachary Cleaver Semantic Web.
Extracting Semantic Concept Relations
Automatic Detection of Causal Relations for Question Answering
Metadata Framework as the basis for Metadata-driven Architecture
Batyr Charyyev.
Semi-Automatic Data-Driven Ontology Construction System
Extracting Why Text Segment from Web Based on Grammar-gram
Presentation transcript:

知識管理報告 Semantic interpretation and knowledge extraction 第四組 M 余思慧 M 林道明 M 謝明哲 M 曾世賢

Introduction  The goal of this research is to build a knowledge baseabout a given topic by reading an encyclopedic article, or a Web site.  two possible applications could be derived from our research: (a) the automatic construction of databases from texts for problem solvers and (b) querying text databases in natural language.

Introduction(con)  This paper describes a KAS that is fully based on the output of a semantic interpreter.  The system builds the inference rules from the natural language descriptions of the users and stores them in the predicates used by the semantic interpreter.

The semantic interpreter  For instance, the predicate graduate from has the following superpredicates. GRADUATE-FROM RECEIVE-AN-ACADEMIC-DEGREE GET-AWARD GET TRANSFER-OF-POSSESSION ACTION

Inferences based on the hierarchical organization of predicates  If one wants to acquire a relation for each of the jobs somebody had, their location, time, and duration, the interpreter already provides a hierarchy of subpredicates of work-be-employed. For instance, the predicate do-service, encompassing such usages as ‘‘ serve as ambassador/teacher/etc. ’’ has the hierarchy DO-SERVICE WORK-BE-EMPLOYEED TRANSFER-OF-POSSESSION ACTION

Acquiring lateral common sense inferences  The user needs to tell the system some inferences that link predicates to predicates ‘‘ laterally, ’’ that is, not through the is-a relation.

Acquiring lateral common sense inferences(con)

Detecting over-specification  People tend to over-specify the ontological categories in the rules. For instance, a user may type the following: R1. If human X1 enrolls at university X2, then X1 attends X2.

From the interpreter output to the templates “ John Kennedy attended elementary schools in Brookline and Riverdale ’’ is read, the parser produces the output: (SUBJ ((PN JOHN KENNEDY)) VERB ((MAIN-VERB ATTEND ATTENDED) (TENSE SP)) OBJ ((ADJ ELEMENTARY) (NOUN SCHOOLS)) PREP (AND ((IN ((PN BROOKLINE)))) ((IN ((PN RIVERDALE))))))

From the interpreter output to the templates(con)

Testing  In order to test the system, we selected 50 articles at random from over 5000 biographical articles in The World Book Encyclopedia  We let C be the total number of correct slots for all articles, I the total number of incorrect slots, and M the total number of missed slots. Then, the measure of recall is given by C/(C + I + M), and the measure of precision is C/(C + I).  The results obtained were 87% recall and 97% precision.

Related research  The authors implement a marker propagation algorithm that uses the verb entailment,the glosses and the concept hierarchy in WN. As the authors observe, the lack of semantic relations for the verbs and the few number of entailments that WN provides are some of the serious limitations with their approach.

Conclusions  We have described an approach to knowledge acquisition that is based on a semantic interpreter of English designed to achieve semantic interpretation on a large scale. The system also can acquire some inferences needed for understanding and acquisition from English sentences entered by users.