MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS Helsinki b/tau workshop 30.05.-01.06.2002 Lauri A. Wendland / HIP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

TISB TISB: Gruppo del Tau1 TISB 18.Maggio.2001 Sesto Fiorentino Gruppo di lavoro sul : Status report Giuseppe Bagliesi Simone Gennai Giacomo.
Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
CMS reconstruction and identification Part II CMS reconstruction and identification Part II A. Nikitenko Tau jetsTau jets Missing E T (briefly)Missing.
Charged kaon lifetime F. Ambrosino, P. Massarotti. Paolo Massarotti Kloe meeting 10 march 2005.
B Tagging with CMS Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa B  Workshop Helsinki 29 May – 1 June 2002.
Alain Romeyer - January Light higgs decay in SUSY cascade - Status report Introduction Trigger efficiency B tagging Jet calibration Invariant mass.
Search for Charged Higgs bosons with H ± ->  -> hadrons  decay mode in fully hadronic final state Ritva Kinnunen Matti Kortelainen, Sami Lehti and.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Charged Higgs – Uppsala 2006 C.H. Shepherd-Themistocleous- RAL 1 C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Identification of tau.
B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
L. Perera LPC physics meeting 11/17/ Search for H/A →  Lalith Perera Rutgers University for Rutgers CMS Group Amit Lath, Keith Rose, Sunil Somalvar,
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
1 Introduction to Dijet Resonance Search Exercise John Paul Chou, Eva Halkiadakis, Robert Harris, Kalanand Mishra and Jason St. John CMS Data Analysis.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.
1 TTU report “Dijet Resonances” Kazim Gumus and Nural Akchurin Texas Tech University Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab Jan. 26, 2006.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
SUSY06, UC Irvine, June 2006Filip Moortgat, ETH Zurich SUSY06 Higgs (to bb) final states (including the Hemisphere Separation Algorithm) top final states.
Secondary Vertex reconstruction for the D + Elena Bruna University of Torino ALICE Physics Week Erice, Dec. 6 th 2005.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
US CMS UC Riverside, 18-May-2001, S.Kunori1 Status of JetsMET Shuichi Kunori U. of Maryland 18-May-2001 PRS: Physics Reconstruction and Selection.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
Measurements of sin2  1 in processes at Belle CKM workshop at Nagoya 2006/12/13 Yu Nakahama (University of Tokyo) for the Belle Collaboration Analysis.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Reconstruction of Z->tt->e+t jet events with early data in CMS Konstantinos A. Petridis IOP Conference Lancaster 31st March 2008 Overview Motivation.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
QCD Background Estimation From Data Rob Duxfield, Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
HEP Conference 1 NMSSM Higgs Search Search for neutral NMSSM Higgs Studies at 10 TeV, and with the TeV Jehad Mousa University of.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
Impact Parameter Resolution Measurements from 900 GeV LHC DATA Boris Mangano & Ryan Kelley (UCSD)
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group
B Tagging Efficiency and Mistag Rate Measurement in ATLAS
Study of Hb`b, c`c and gg in the `H channel
Search for
Presentation transcript:

MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS Helsinki b/tau workshop Lauri A. Wendland / HIP

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland2 Outline Motivation Tools & methods Secondary vertex (SV) reconstruction Charge reconstruction Effective mass reconstruction Conclusions Future plans

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland3 Motivation If 3-prong  events can be used in addition to 1-prong  decays, a factor of 1.7 of signal events are gained

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland4 Tools & methods Software –ORCA_5_4_1 –CMSIM 123 Reconstruction –Lvl1,2 calo selections (L2cut = 3.4 GeV (lowlumi)) –Lvl3 pixel selection (R S = 0.07, R M = 0.1, R I = 0.4) –full tracker reconstruction (Reco) pixel lines from Lvl3 used as seeds at least 8 hits per track demanded

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland5 Events produced with ORCA_4_5_0, L=2·10 33 cm -2 s -1 Used event samples

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland6 SV reconstruction SV RECO PV MC SV MC  -jet axis  axis  axis The residual of the SV is divided into components along and transverse to the jet axis A double gaussian fit is used to estimate the tails of the residuals

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland7 SV residual along  -jet axis  = 5.4 ± 0.5 mm  s = 1.3 ± 0.1 mm ±2  = 62 % H500 2, 3 tracks H200 2, 3 tracks  = 1.6 ± 0.2 mm  s = 0.65 ± 0.03 mm ±2  = 69 %  = 5.9 ± 2.4 mm  s = 1.0 ± 0.1 mm ±2  = 73 % H500 3 tracks H200 3 tracks  = 1.4 ± 0.4 mm  s = 0.60 ± 0.04 mm ±2  = 80 % cm

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland8 Why are there tails? cm  R = sqrt(  2 +  2 )  Tails come predominantly from jets with low  R  Hit mismatching because of narrowness of jet? H500 2, 3 tracks H500 2, 3 tracks

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland9 Track reconstruction efficiency number of tracks H500H200 number of tracks Initial number of prongs Number of pixel lines Number of reconstructed tracks (at least 8 hits) 0.5

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland10 SV residual transverse to  -jet axis  = 50 ± 11 µm  s = 25 ± 3 µm ±2  = 78 % H500 2, 3 tracks H200 2, 3 tracks  = 43 ± 66 µm  s = 22 ± 2 µm ±2  = 87 %  s = 21 ± 1 µm ±2  = 93 % H500 3 tracks H200 3 tracks  s = 20 ± 1 µm ±2  = 93 % cm

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland11 Flightpath reconstruction 3D reconstructed flightpath in cmBackground efficiency Signal efficiency Signed flightpath is fine for making cuts D-mesons could be a concern

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland12 Charge reconstruction qq Low reliability, because currently tracks are lost H500, 3-prong H500 Reconstructed charge - MC charge Total charge of two  -jets bin 0: 55 % others: 45 %

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland13 Effective mass reconstruction m eff = sqrt((  sqrt(p i 2 + m  2 )) 2 -  p i 2 ) QCD background should contain heavier particles m  cut-off GeV mm mm H500, 3-prong QCD, GeV

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland14 Conclusions SV resolution (without tails) of – µm can be reached in jet axis direction for 200 and 500 GeV Higgs events respectively –20-21 µm can be reached transverse to jet axis –resolution dominated by high boost of the  -jets More efficient track reconstruction method has to be used –The signal resolution as well as background rejection will improve if efficiency of reconstructing all 3 prongs is high

Helsinki b/tau workshop : MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS - Lauri A. Wendland15 Future plans Move to ORCA_6_x_x To use regional track finding instead of pixel seeds To use deterministic annealing filter (DAF)