ARENA2012, Erlangen 19-22 June Lunar Space Missions for Ultrahigh- energy Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos Observation G. A. Gusev, V. A. Chechin, and V. A. Ryabov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

A.A. Ivanov for the Yakutsk array group The scientific goals of the Yakutsk array under modernization.
The National Science FoundationThe Kavli Foundation APS April 2008 Meeting - St. Louis, Missouri Results from Cosmic-Ray Experiments Vasiliki Pavlidou.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Design Study the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers construction.
Use of floating surface detector stations for the calibration of a deep-sea neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, N. A. B. Gizani, A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis,
July 29, 2003; M.Chiba1 Study of salt neutrino detector for GZK neutrinos.
Remote sensing in meteorology
September 16-19, 2008 Hamburg 2008 Olaf Scholten For the NuMoon collaboration KVI, Groningen.
The NuMoon experiment: first results Stijn Buitink for the NuMoon collaboration Radboud University Nijmegen 20 th Rencontres de Blois, 2008 May 19.
The Pierre Auger Observatory Nicolás G. Busca Fermilab-University of Chicago FNAL User’s Meeting, May 2006.
Radio detection of UHE neutrinos E. Zas, USC Leeds July 23 rd 2004.
By Devin Gay Radio Ice Cerenkov Experiment. RICE got off the ground and into the ice in 1995 They got started when AMANDA collaborations agreed to co-
Presented by Steve Kliewer Muon Lifetime Experiment: A Model.
ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna NASA funding started 2003 for first launch in 2006 Phase A approval for SMEX ToO mission 600 km radius, 1.1 million.
07/05/2003 Valencia1 The Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays Introduction Data Acceleration and propagation Numerical Simulations (Results) Conclusions Isola.
Tuning in to UHE Neutrinos in Antarctica – The ANITA Experiment J. T. Link P. Miočinović Univ. of Hawaii – Manoa Neutrino 2004, Paris, France ANITA-LITE.
The neutrons detection involves the use of gadolinium which has the largest thermal neutron capture cross section ever observed. The neutron capture on.
SPHERE PEG GAY FAIRBURY JR SR HIGH SCHOOL. PROJECT SPHERE  Cherenkov light: radiation which is emitted whenever charged particles pass through matter.
The National Science FoundationThe Kavli Foundation Mapping the Ultra-high--energy Cosmic-ray Sky with the Pierre Auger Observatory Vasiliki Pavlidou for.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
Search for isotropic microwave radiation from electron beam in the atmosphere T. Yamamoto a, I. S. Ohota a, Y. Inome a, D. Ikeda b, H. Sagawa b, S. Ogio.
PERSPECTIVES OF THE RADIO ASTRONOMICAL DETECTION OF EXTREMELY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS BOMBARDING THE MOON R.D. Dagkesamanskii 1), I.M. Zheleznykh 2) and.
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
COMMUNICATION THEORY.
Probing Extreme Universe through Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Yamamoto Tokonatsu Konan University, Japan Introduction UHECR observation Recent results.
RADAR Detection of Extensive Air Showers Nils Scharf III. Physikalisches Institut A Bad Honnef Nils Scharf III. Physikalisches Institut A Bad.
RELEC project (Relativistic ELECtrons). Unified platform “Karat” for small spacecraft 2 MICROSATELLITE KARAT FOR PLANETARY MISSIONS, ASTROPHYSICAL AND.
Studies of the Energy Resolution of the ANITA Experiment Amy Connolly University of California, Los Angeles CALOR06 June 6 th, 2006.
Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Research with the Pierre Auger Observatory Methods, Results, What We Learn, and expansion to Colorado Bill Robinson.
1 of 22 Glaciers and Ice Sheets Interferometric Radar (GISIR) Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

International research project GALA: Monitoring of high energy gamma-ray astrophysical sources.
10. Satellite Communication & Radar Sensors
The Second International Workshop on Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and their sources INR, Moscow, April 14-16, 2005 from Extreme Universe Space Observatory.
Electromagnetic Design of Broadband Antenna Feed Systems for the Northern Cross Radio Telescope (Bologna, Italy) Designed Broad Band Antenna Feed Systems.
radio lobe sound disk  t p ~ km  optical light cone The Vision *) see e.g. A. Ringwald,ARENA 2005 Build ~100 km 3 hybrid detector to: Confirm GZK cutoff.
Simulations of radio emission from cosmic ray air showers Tim Huege & Heino Falcke ARENA-Workshop Zeuthen,
Humberto Salazar (FCFM-BUAP) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, CTEQ- Fermilab School Lima, Peru, August 2012 Ultrahigh Cosmic Rays: The highest energy.
Position sensitive scintillation detectors for the trigger system in the space experiment NUCLEON Supervisors: Anatoliy I. Kalinin a Students: Irina Cioara.
0 April 22, 2013 A. Romero-Wolf Interferometry in UHE particle astrophysics Andres Romero-Wolf Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
P.W. Gorham et al.. TEST BEAM A SLAC Time relative to beam entry Antenna V/V rms Time relative to beam entry Antenna V/V rms close to shower maximumshower.
M.Chiba_ARENA20061 Measurement of Attenuation Length for Radio Wave in Natural Rock Salt and Performance of Detecting Ultra High- Energy Neutrinos M.Chiba,
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
JINR astrophysical studies JINR astrophysical studies in the NUCLEON and TUS space experiments Alushta Tkachev.
ARENA-2005 THE UPPER LIMIT TO THE EHE NEUTRINO FLUX FROM OBSERVATIONS OF THE MOON WITH KALYAZIN RADIO TELESCOPE. A.R.Beresnyak, R.D.Dagkesamanskiy, A.V.Kovalenko.
Russian Aviation and Space Agency Institute for Space Research NASA 2001 Mars Odyssey page 1 Workshop HEND Procedures of HEND data convolution for.
1 João Espadanal, Patricia Gonçalves, Mário Pimenta Santiago de Compostela 3 rd IDPASC school Auger LIP Group 3D simulation Of Extensive Air.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
Sept. 2010CRIS, Catania Olaf Scholten KVI, Groningen Physics Radio pulse results plans.
Neutrinos and Z-bursts Dmitry Semikoz UCLA (Los Angeles) & INR (Moscow)
RICE: ICRC 2001, Aug 13, Recent Results from RICE Analysis of August 2000 Data See also: HE228: Ice Properties (contribution) HE241: Shower Simulation.
What we do know about cosmic rays at energies above eV? A.A.Petrukhin Contents 4 th Round Table, December , Introduction. 2. How these.
Studies of Askaryan Effect, 1 of 18 Status and Outlook of Experimental Studies of Askaryan RF Radiation Predrag Miocinovic (U. Hawaii) David Saltzberg.
31/03/2008Lancaster University1 Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy From Simon Bevan University College London.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
Olivier Deligny for the Pierre Auger Collaboration IPN Orsay – CNRS/IN2P3 TAUP 2007, Sendai Limit to the diffuse flux of UHE ν at EeV energies from the.
Simulation of Terrestrial Gamma Ray and Neutron Flashes (Small variations of thundercloud dipole moment) L.P. Babich, Е.N. Donskoĭ, A.Y. Kudryavtsev, M.L.
L. CazónHadron-Hadron & Cosmic-Rays interactions at multi-TeV energies. Trento,2-Dez Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory L. Cazon, for the.
Jeong, Yu Seon Yonsei University Neutrino and Cosmic Ray Signals from the Moon Jeong, Reno and Sarcevic, Astroparticle Physics 35 (2012) 383.
Lateral Distribution Functions of Extensive Air Showers Abstract The energy is among the characteristics of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (E>5 x
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
ARENA08 Roma June 2008 Francesco Simeone (Francesco Simeone INFN Roma) Beam-forming and matched filter techniques.
Bergische Universität Wuppertal Jan Auffenberg et al. Rome, Arena ARENA 2008 A radio air shower detector to extend IceCube ● Three component air.
Arnaud Bellétoile SUBATECH NANTES Manchester, 19/07/07 CODALEMA Collaboration Radio-detection of UHECR with the CODALEMA experiment for the CODALEMA collaboration.
Topicality of this work is caused by the fact that modern detectors aren't effective in searching electrons and positrons with energies higher than 1 TeV.
Flux Limits for Ultra-High Energy Neutrinos
Design of the LORD Experiment and Perspectives of Ultra-High Energy
R. Bucˇık , K. Kudela and S. N. Kuznetsov
the least path loss? E3A03 A. When the moon is at perigee
Modern Status LUNAR ОRBITAL RADIO DETEKTOR
Presentation transcript:

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Lunar Space Missions for Ultrahigh- energy Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos Observation G. A. Gusev, V. A. Chechin, and V. A. Ryabov. P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Two stages of a lunar experiment with the regolith as a target for the interaction of ultrahigh- energy cosmic rays and neutrinos are considered. The first stage deals with the LORD experiment within the framework of the Luna-Glob space mission scheduled for The current status of the LORD-instrumentation development is discussed. The aperture of the lunar orbital radio detector exceeds all existing ground-based arrays. Successful realization of the LORD experiment will make it possible to start the second stage of the program. Multi-satellite lunar orbital systems are proposed to increase the aperture and the measurement informativity and accuracy.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Outlook of Presentation Problems of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays and neutrinos observation. LORD space experiment and design of apparatus Multi-satellite circumlunar array, the results of Monte Carlo simulation Conclusion

ARENA2012, Erlangen June The Main Goal of the LORD Experiment The primary goal of the LORD experiment is the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays and neutrinos. An investigation of the nature and spectra of cosmic particles with energies E ≥ eV ( “ ultra-high energies ”, UHE) is one of the most challenging problems of modern physics and astrophysics. Information on these particles is important for solving fundamental problems of astrophysics and particle physics relating to cosmic ray sources and acceleration mechanisms.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Currently we have a very controversial and paradoxical situation in UHE region. We know neither the nature of UHE particles, nor their sources or processes where they were accelerated to such extremely high energies. The many facts of the experimental observations at different CR detectors contradicts to the current understanding of the Universe, because a flux of these energetic particles must be suppressed, owing to the GZK CR spectrum cutoff (EGZK ≈ 7∙10 19 eV, Pierre Auger Observatory (PAO) spectrum extrapolation dN/dE ~ E -4.3 ) caused by the interaction with microwave cosmic background. For resolving these contradictions, new independent measurements are necessary.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Currently radio method is used as the basis for a number of experiments and projects on the ultrahigh-energy particle detection in such radio- transparent media as the atmosphere, salt domes and ice sheets of Antarctic and Greenland. LORD EXPERIMENT

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Cosmic rays, neutrino interact with regolith and produce coherent Cherenkov radiation pulse, which after refraction on the Moon surface goes out to vacuum. It can be observed by the LORD apparatus, amplitude, polarization, frequency spectrum being measured. Its aperture is more than one order comparatively PAO one.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Limits for CR and Neutrino Fluxes and LORD Performance

ARENA2012, Erlangen June LORD apertures for UHECR & UHEN detection are higher than in all ongoing experiments (with one exception for neutrino detection by LOFAR in the energy range more, than eV) and for energy eV are about 3·10 5 km 2 sr for UHECR and 4 · 10 3 km 2 sr for UHEN (AUGER aperture for UHEN about 100 km ^2 sr)

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Lay-out of Luna-Glob Apparatus

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Flight Module of Luna-Glob

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Data Acquisition System 2 Gsps, 10 bit, 2 x 4096 samples Antenna System Flight Payload Controller 16 Mbyte memory RF-1 RF-2 Calibration Spacecraft Scientific instruments Block Diagram of LORD Detector Data Commands Power Supply 27 V

ARENA2012, Erlangen June LORD DEVICE Antenna 1 Antenna 2 Registration system dimensions are in millimeters

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Antenna system of LORD device Frequency band – MHz Gain ~ 7.5 dB Polarization - LP & RP Length =1515 mm Diameter= 500 mm

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Antenna with low noise preamplifier (LNA)  LNA 40 dB, NF=1.1dB, T N = 30K

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Registration block of the LORD equipment L×W×H = 420 mm ×320 mm×80 mm, Weight= 12 kg, Power Supply = 27 V, 60 W

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Low noise amplifier for the LORD equipment

ARENA2012, Erlangen June E-cards for the LORD equipment

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Currently, all electronic components are investigated with a view to develop performance in order to improve the accuracy of determining the physical parameters in the experiment LORD

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Main characteristics of broadband ( MHz) antennas - Voltage Standing Wave Ratio of Antenna (VSWR) - Directivity diagrams at different frequencies - Cross polarization directivity diagrams at different frequencies - 3-D directivity diagrams at different frequencies

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Voltage Standing Wave Ratio of Antenna (VSWR) Frequency (MHz) VSWR = (1+γ)/ (1-γ), where γ is reflection coefficient. In our antenna 0.09 ≥ γ in the frequency band MHz

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Directivity diagram for 200 MHz (Right polarisation) Theta (Degree) Main lobe magnitude = 8,4 dB Angular width (3dB) = 68,8 deg. Side lobe level = -10,2 dB

ARENA2012, Erlangen June 3-D directivity diagram 200MHz

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Cross polarization directivity diagram 200 MHz Theta (Degree) Main lobe magnitude = -4.7 dB Angular width(3 dB) = 74.6 deg Side lobe level = -6.3 dB

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Directivity diagram 300 MHz (Right polarisation) Main lobe magnitude = 9,2 dB Angular width (3dB) = 71,8 deg. Side lobe level = -35,9 dB Theta (Degree)

ARENA2012, Erlangen June 3-D directivity diagram 300MHz

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Cross polarization directivity diagram 300 MHz Main lobe magnitude =-13,1 dB; angular width(3 dB) =42,5deg; side lobe level=-11,7 dB Theta (Degree)

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Theta (Degree) Directivity diagram 500 MHz (Right polarisation) Main lobe magnitude =9,2 dB; angular width(3 dB) =70,9 deg; side lobe level=-38,9 dB

ARENA2012, Erlangen June 3-D directivity diagram 500MHz

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Theta (Degree) Cross polarization directivity diagram 500 MHz Main lobe magnitude =-13,5 dB; angular width(3 dB) =43,7deg; side lobe level=-7,4 dB

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Directivity diagram 800 MHz Main lobe magnitude =6 dB; angular width(3 dB) =112 deg; side lobe level=-20,1 dB

ARENA2012, Erlangen June 3-D directivity diagram 800MHz (Right polarisation)

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Cross polarization directivity diagram 800 MHz Main lobe magnitude =-2,7 dB; angular width(3 dB) = 57deg; side lobe level = -7,7 dB Theta (Degree)

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Some simulation results for an array of circumlunar radio detectors as the LORD

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Sketch of four satellite circumlunar array, using LORD detectors

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Principles of construction of the lunar satellite system for radio detection of ultrahigh-energy particles - Minimum number of detectors spatial separation - latitude, longitude, altitude - recording time synchronization of signals in different detectors allows to localize the source - maximum distance of separation km - minimum distance of separation km

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Why do we need many satellite system radio detection in the context of the LORD experiment? First, the spatial separation of detectors, even at small distances provided synchronization allows us to localize the source of radio emission. This makes it possible to solve the inverse problem of recovering the cascade energy, a large number of measured data being significant. For example, in the case of the four detectors, each event is recorded in 8 channels, so that there are 8 amplitudes and 8 signal spectra in a wide band. In the favorable case, when the scattering is not significant, it becomes also possible to determine the polarization of the electric field in each detector. This allows to discriminate more efficiently the cascade signal from the accidental signals. Second, there is the trivial possibility of using several widely separated and hence independent satellites to increase the aperture of the event logging.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June When it comes to choosing the main parameters of the array of lunar satellites, the main they are the height and spacing between them. As for the spacing in height, it is always due to the inaccuracy of the satellite into orbit. These discrepancies enough to a spacing in height, sufficient to determine the elevation angle of the beam recorded as antenna spacing in height by several meters provides sufficient accuracy of the elevation.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Satellite spacing in latitude and longitude must be such that the «radiation spot " at an altitude satellites was comparable with the distances between satellites, as in this case, all measured at various satellite parameters: amplitude, polarization, angles of escape of radiation from the surface of the moon, time of arrival signals - will be significantly different, allowing us to increase the chances of solving the inverse problem of determining the energy cascade. For this purpose, we used simulation the registration of Cerenkov radiation from the cascade in an array of four satellites spaced as follows: three satellites are spaced in latitude (at the angle δθ) and one in longitude (at the angle δφ) at the same angular distances (see. Fig.) δθ δφ Fig.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Parameters of radio detector array, used in simulations Frequency band 200 – 400 MHz Satellite altitudes 200 – 2000 km Latitude and longitude separation 2 – 15 degrees electric field thresholds 0.1 – 0.2 μV/m MHz Exposure time 1 year

ARENA2012, Erlangen June AUGER CR spectrum, used in simulations

ARENA2012, Erlangen June CR registration. Altitude –1000km. Separation – 2 degrees. Threshold – 0.1mkV One satellite – 233 Two satellites – 196 Three satellites – 172 Four satellites – 168

ARENA2012, Erlangen June One satellite – 223 Two satellites – 73 Three satellites – 12 Four satellites – 8 CR registration. Altitude –1000km. Separation – 12 degrees. Threshold – 0.2mkV

ARENA2012, Erlangen June One satellite – 28 Two satellites – 24 Three satellites – 20 Four satellites – 19 CR registration. Altitude –1000km. Separation – 2 degrees. Threshold – 0.2mkV

ARENA2012, Erlangen June One satellite – 23 Two satellites – 3 Three satellites – 0 Four satellites – 0 CR registration. Altitude –1000km. Separation – 12 degrees. Threshold – 0.2mkV

ARENA2012, Erlangen June We can see that for 4 satellites cosmic ray array (CRA) a large separation of satellites results in fast decreasing array aperture. It means that for separations more than 12 degrees CRA transforms in 4 autonomous LORD detectors, therefore the total aperture of the system of four independent detectors is increased 4-fold. Technical implementation presents no difficulties.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Neutrino spectrum from decay of massive particle with mass ev

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Results of joint neutrino event registration by four satellites, having the latitude and longitude difference of 10 degrees One satellite – 40 Two satellites – 34 Three satellites – 27 Four satellites – 22 N NS /N CR = 22/8 ≈ 3

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Interestingly, in the case of registration of neutrinos from the decay of superheavy particles with masses eV, a significant separation of satellites at 12 degrees of latitude does not lead to a marked decrease in statistics (losses 45%, for CR – 97%) as comparing with one detector. This means that an array (NA) of radio detectors at a large spatial separation of detectors about 15 degrees of latitude is mainly to detect neutrinos.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Further simulations aiming the detection of neutrino Separation 13 degrees, altitude 1200 km N NS /N CR = 19/4 ≈ 4.8 Separation 13 degrees, altitude 1500 km N NS /N CR = 5/1=5 Separation 13 degrees, altitude 1700 km N NS /N CR = 15/2.5 ≈ 6 Separation 13 degrees, altitude 1800 km N NS /N CR = 15/2 ≈ 7.5

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Further simulations aiming the detection of neutrino Separation 15 degrees, altitude 500 km N NS /N CR = 4/0 Separation 14 degrees, altitude 500 km N NS /N CR = 4/0 Separation 13 degrees, altitude 500 km N NS /N CR = 9/1 Separation 13 degrees, altitude 700 km N NS /N CR = 14/1.5 = 9 Separation 13 degrees, altitude 800 km N NS /N CR = 7/1 ≈ 7

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Thus, the results of modeling cosmic ray and neutrino multi-satellite system (CRA and NA) (small terrestrial analog arrays) has shown that on the one hand it is possible to create a radio detector, which registers neutrinos with a small admixture of cosmic rays (NA), and on the other hand – the cosmic rays with small admixture of neutrinos (CRA). CRA (4 satellites) aperture exceeds LORD aperture 4-fold. NA aperture is smaller about two times than LORD aperture, but there is no problem of discrimination CR’s and neutrinos. Maximum CRA (24 satellites) aperture may exceed LORD aperture 24-fold. It is impossible to realize array for CR with such aperture in future on the Earth.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Conclusion - Main electronic modules and antennas of the LORD are elaborated and now under construction - Simulation results for circumlunar cosmic ray array (CRA) show the possibility of aperture increasing for cosmic ray registration proportionally the number of satellites, neutrino events being background. - It is possible to realize neutrino array (NA) with small background of cosmic ray events, its aperture being smaller than LORD’s (1 satellite) one.

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Thank you for attention

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Academic council with owners of Antarctica before Antarctic radio background measurements South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) 1985

ARENA2012, Erlangen June Background Processes for Radio Antarctic Muon and Neutrino Detector (RAMAND) A.F. Bogomolov, V.V. Bogorodsky, G.A. Gusev et al. Proc. 20 ICRC, v. 6, p.472 (1987) The curve 1 corresponds to radio pulse background spectrum at the Russian Vostok station, the curve 2 – at the Mirnii station (20 km from the cost) during good whether, the curve 3 – at the Mirnii during storm (23 m/sec). Here the σ is thermal noise rms for temperature about 3000ºC.