The Research Question A Comparison of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES) and the FRAX® in Identifying Men at Risk for Osteoporosis -Alvah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 68 Chapter 68 Fracture Risk Assessment: The Development and Application of FRAX ® Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

OSTEOPOROSIS Definitions Definitions Causes Causes Investigations Investigations Treatments Treatments Case studies Case studies.
The FRAX tool for Osteoporosis Should all GP’s be calculating the Frax score prior to treatment Dr Sanjeev Patel Consultant Physician & Senior Lecturer.
Update on Osteoporosis Dr Terence O’Neill Consultant Rheumatologist.
Friday, May 25, Welcome and Introduction 2.ACGME “Next Accreditation System” (NAS) 4.Update on the ESAP In Training Examination (ESAP-ITE) 5.APDEM.
Chapter 66 Chapter 66 Clinical Use of Bone Densitometry Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
WHO Osteoporosis Definition (1996)
Qualitative study on acceptability of screening Research team: Alison Heawood (PI, Bristol), Clare Emmett (Qualitative Researcher, Bristol), Niamh Redmond.
Osteoporosis in Adults with Cerebral Palsy
Increasing screening for osteoporosis Team /2013 Thanks to Georgia Carlson and N Topeka staff.
OSC Recommendations for Bone Mineral Density Reporting Slides prepared by Kerry Siminoski, MD, FRCPC William Leslie, M.Sc., MD,
Bone Health and Osteoporosis
OSTEOPOROSIS and fracture risk Prof. J. Preželj KO za endokrinologijo, diabetes in presnovne bolezni.
M Ravanbod Medical oncologist Bushehr – 11/91 A 50 y/o white man comes for check up and wants to discuss about prostate cancer. Negative family history.
Assessment of Colon & Prostate Cancer Screening in WA Peggy Hannon, PhD, MPH Alliance for Reducing Cancer NW.
How to Overcome Barriers and Develop Collaborative Guidelines Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP Chair, Guidelines International Network Director, Clinical.
RESULTS INTRODUCTION Laurentian_University.svgLaurentian_University.svg‎ (SVG file, nominally 500 × 87 pixels, file size: 57 KB) Screening for Developmental.
Identification of individuals at high- risk of fracture Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
“Known knowns, known unknowns, unknown unknowns….. Ronald Dumsfeld Senior Lecturer in Metabolic Bone Diseases.
1 Tuesday 28 Oct 2008 Hall I Session I: 8:00- 10:00 Symposium... 1 Tuesday 28 Oct 2008 Hall I Session I: 8:00- 10:00 Symposium...
RESULTSINTRODUCTION Accuracy of Screening Tests for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Primary Care Settings Marjolaine M. Limbos 1, PhD & David P. Joyce 2, MD,
Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Indices of Performances of CPRs Nicola.
Fracture risk assessment
QUALITY TOOL BOX OSTEOPOROSIS GENERAL & MEDICAL REHABILITATION COUNCIL [GMRC]
Genetic-Environmental Interaction: Implications for Osteoporosis Prevention Strategies.
Internal Medicine Weekly Conference 1392 Internal Medicine Weekly Conference 1392 Alimohammad Fatemi Assistant Professor of Rheumatology Alimohammad Fatemi.
Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden (EU-27 Report) EU Osteoporosis Consultation.
PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION BY DR. ANGELA ESOIMEME MBBS, MPH, FWACGP.
RESULTS INTRODUCTION Laurentian_University.svgLaurentian_University.svg‎ (SVG file, nominally 500 × 87 pixels, file size: 57 KB) Comparison of the ASQ.
Estrogen plus Progestin, BMD and Fractures: Women’s Health Initiative Jane A. Cauley University of Pittsburgh JAMA 2003; 290 (13) :
AFF: Bone Density and Structure with BP Use Based on Poster FR0030 “Bone Density and Structure of Patients on Bisphosphonates with Atypical Femur Fractures”
Prostate Cancer Coalition of NC A statewide collaborative effort by concerned organizations and individuals to support awareness, early detection, and.
Assessment of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in patients with consisted fracture Author: Roxana Costache, 5 th year student, General Medicine Coordinators:
Sang-Rim Kim, Kwang Woo Nam, Yong-Geun Park, Sung-Rak Lee*, In Im**, Yong-Chan Ha*** Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Jeju National.
Five-year incident fracture risk assessed by quantitative multisite ultrasound: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. W. P. Olszynski 1, J. P. Brown.
Promoting Patient Involvement in Medication Decisions David H. Hickam, MD, MPH Professor, Dept. of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland,
Osteodensitometry, Bone Biomechanics and Fracture Risk João Costa, Rui Miranda, Rui Pinto “Normal” Bone Introduction The bone formation takes place in.
Chapter 47 Assessing Fracture Risk: Who Should Be Screened? © American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Contributed by John Schousboe, Brent Taylor,
Osteopenia and Osteoporosis Bradley K. Harrison, MD.
Falls and Fracture Risk assessment and management.
NICE, FRAX & NOGG VTS meeting Jonathan Day 7 th April 2010.
Beyond Journal Club: Transforming Evidenced Based Practice and Teaching in a Residency Patient-Centered Medical Home.
R1 김형오 / Prof. 김덕윤 1.  Osteoporosis  Asian region is considered to be on the verge of an emerging osteoporosis epidemic  50% of the world’s osteoporotic.
Hwa-Jin Lee Department of nuclear medicine, Pusan University Hospital Study on the Analysis of Comparison with GE prodigy and FRAX Tool in Absolute Fracture.
Prevention and Screening Tests in the Elderly
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Events with Statins
Rational Use of DXA-BMD
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Goal-directed Treatment for Osteoporosis
Appropriate Osteoporosis Treatment by Family Physicians in Response to FRAX vs CAROC Reporting: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial  Karen A. Beattie,
Making Decisions With Your Osteoarthritis Patients
Osteoporosis Definition
Bone Biology and Osteoporosis: Back to the Basics
Guidance for Bone Health in Parkinson's
US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:
Prostate Cancer Screening- Update
2010 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada Papaioannou A, et al. CMAJ 2010 Oct 12. [Epub ahead of print].
Targeting Osteoporosis Therapies to Patients at Highest Risk for Fracture.
The Research Question Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Tools in Women Years Old Jennifer L. Pecina MD, Lindy Romanovsky, MD Stephen P.
Evaluation of Different Screening Tools for Predicting Femoral Neck Osteoporosis in Rural South Indian Postmenopausal Women  Kripa Elizabeth Cherian,
Deciding on Pharmacological Treatment Post Fracture
Bone Biology and Osteoporosis: Back to the Basics
Deciding on Pharmacological Treatment Post Fracture
S B A R SBAR Information Tool
Bone Biology and Osteoporosis: Back to the Basics
Figure 1: Assessment of basal 10-year risk of fracture with the 2010 tool of the Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada. Figure 1:
Receiver under the operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the test accuracy of the final risk score in the entire external validation sample (c statistic=0.84,
Interpretation The World Health Organization (WHO) Osteoporosis Guidelines (T Score vs Z score) A Z-score less than –2 indicates the diagnosis is below.
Development and validation of a preoperative scoring system to predict 30 day mortality in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery  M.J. Maxwell, C.G.
Figure 1. Relative risks of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures (and 95% CIs) in response to the treatments for ... Figure 1. Relative risks of.
Presentation transcript:

The Research Question A Comparison of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES) and the FRAX® in Identifying Men at Risk for Osteoporosis -Alvah R. Cass, MD, SM, Angela J. Shepherd, MD, Rechelle Asirot, MD, Maimoona Nizami, MD & Manju Mahajan, MD How do the MORES and FRAX® compare in identifying men at risk for osteoporosis? – FRAX®designed to assess the risk of future fracture with/without DXA scan (11 factors) – 2011 USPSTF endorsed FRAX for screening based on 10-year fracture risk – MORES developed to identify men at risk of osteoporosis (age, wt, COPD) – Family physicians are ideally suited to engage men in shared decisions regarding early detection and treatment of osteoporosis

What the Researchers Did Population: 1498 men from the NHANES III dataset, 50 years-of-age and older with a valid DXA scan Design: Blinded comparisons of the MORES and FRAX® to identify men at risk for osteoporosis Methods/Intervention: – DXA scan: reference standard (T-score ≤ -2.5, femoral neck or total hip) – Sensitivity, specificity, and ROCs for the MORES (positivity criterion ≥ 6 points) and FRAX® (positivity criterion 10-year fracture risk ≥ 9.3%) – Proportions of men correctly identified for treatment based on National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines

What the Researchers Found 4.5% (n=67) of the men had osteoporosis 11.9% (n=178) of the men were treatment candidates based on NOF guidelines The MORES was more sensitive (96% v 39%) but less specific (61% v 89%) than the FRAX® The MORES correctly identified 81.5% (n=145) men who met NOF treatment guidelines compared to only 50% (n=89) for the FRAX® ROC Analysis Area Under the Curve – MORES – 0.87 (0.81, 0.92; 95% CI) – FRAX® – 0.79 (0.74, 0.85; 95% CI)

What This Means for Clinical Practice The MORES performed better than the FRAX  (using the USPSTF recommended threshold of 9.3%) to: – identify men at risk for osteoporosis, and – identify men most likely to benefit from treatment. We suggest a two-staged approach for men aged ≥50 who are concerned about osteoporosis, 1st: The MORES provides a simple clinical approach to identifying men at greatest risk for osteoporosis for whom a DXA scan is reasonable. 2nd: Given the results of the DXA, the FRAX  provides an excellent approach to estimating 10-year fracture risk and guiding treatment decisions.