Ramping & Snapback Andy Butterworth AB/RF Chamonix XIV 17 January 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
Advertisements

Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
LHC progress Thursday 30 th April 2015 Coordination: Mike Lamont, Wolfgang Hofle.
BEAM PREPARATION IN INJECTORS AND BEAM CHARACTERISTICS K.Cornelis BE-OP-SPS.
LHC Ramp Commissioning Mike Lamont Reyes Alemany-Fernandez Thanks to: Stefano, Verena, Walter.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.
LHC progress with beam & plans. Of note since last time Transverse damper Beta beating in the ramp Collimation set-up at 450 GeV & validation LBDS – systematic.
Fk. Bordry AB/PO Ability of the converter s to follow the reference function (static, dynamics) I1 I2 I3 Static part is covered by the static definition.
LHC Technical Committee, 23/05/20071 LHC Commissioning Phases Squeeze presented by Massimo Giovannozzi on behalf of the LHCCWG Particular thanks to S.
Beam expected in the afternoon PM: – Establish first-turn – Establish closed orbit – Rough correction of machine parameters Evening: – RF capture Night:
Stefano Redaelli Beam Department - Operations Group Operational Aspects of the Phase II Crab Cavity System LHC-CC09 3 rd LHC Crab Cavity Workshop European.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
Friday to Saturday 02:00: Machine closed. 09:00: Cryogenics all OK. Preparing pre-cycle. 10:00: Pre-cycle started. 11:30: Pre-cycle finished. 14:00: Beam.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
R. Assmann - LTC Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann with W. Venturini and V. Kain LTC Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P.
Nominal intensity bunches ● First ramp with nominal intensity bunches suffered from an instability appearing around 1.8 TeV. ● Nominal intensity bunches.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
LHC Workshop, Jan '05P. Collier AB-OP/LHC1 450 GeV P. Collier AB/OP  Prerequisites  First Turn  Getting Closure  RF Capture  Preliminary Commissioning.
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
TC 25th October1 LHC Real-time requirements What is real-time? What is latency? The time between asking for something to be done and it being done The.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
LHC progress Sunday 3rd May 2015 Coordination: Mike Lamont, Wolfgang Hofle.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
FCC ramp – first stab Mike Lamont. I’(t) = 0 to avoid a voltage discontinuity “it has been shown that if I’(t) is kept low at the end of the snapback,
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
7 th March 2008 Magnet Modelling N. Sammut On behalf of the FIDEL Working Group.
Saturday 11.9 ● From Friday – Minimum required crossing angle is 100  rad in 2010 – Plenty of aperture at triplets: > 13  (n1 > 10) – Can stay with 170.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and MP concerns BI configuration Operational settings Collimators Planning Shift breakdown Thanks to: P.Baudrenghien, G.Bellodi,
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
TC 25th October1 Real-time A system -- e.g., application system, computer system, operating system -- operates in real time to the degree that those of.
LHC 8 & 9 May :10: Injection kicker B1 faulty on oil level –Check in UA and RA. Leaks fixed, to be further checked in TS1 10:30: Pre-cycle started.
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.
04h36: Cryo problem in arc 81. Access. 09h14: Injection.  TI8 injection collimator setup.  Testing new sequence.  New version of vacuum application.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
LEIR re-commissioning and other operational aspects First ideas for new tools and organization First draft re-commisisoning plan H. Bartosik, A. Huschauer,
Tue 23/8 – Wed 24/8 09:00 Start 90 m optics run – Preparation and verification of the collimation functions – Re-generation of functions for Transverse.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Wednesday 8.9 External crossing angles:
LHC Commissioning with Beam
Saturday Coordinators weekend: Mike Lamont, Eva Barbara Holzer
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Powering the LHC Magnets
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
RF and Sequences Andy Butterworth BE/RF
Tuesday TOTEM and transverse loss map (1) OK
Planning at 5 o’clock meeting Friday
Thursday :00: Physics fill from the night shift
450 GeV Initial Commissioning with Pilot Beam - Beam Instrumentation
Friday 16/3 08:30 – 10:15 Access for QPS and EPC (BI in point 4)
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
Another Immortal Fill….
Beam commissioning plans, 2007 and 2008
31/3/2010 Difficult day… but at the end stable beams.
Feedbacks & Stabilization Getting them going
Wednesday :35 : Beam lost because of trip of RCBXH3.L1
Presentation transcript:

Ramping & Snapback Andy Butterworth AB/RF Chamonix XIV 17 January 2005

Outline Procedure for ramping the LHC Initial conditions for ramp commissioning Outline of ramp commissioning –Moving to the nominal cycle –Getting through snapback –Ramping further Measurements and commissioning of accelerator equipment Conclusions

Baseline energy ramp Parabolic-Exponential-Linear-Parabolic (PELP) E inj Injection Energy [GeV] 450 E ft Flat-top Energy [GeV] 7000 E’ max Max Ramp rate [GeV/s] 5.9 E’ p Ramp rate at end of parabolic section [GeV/s] tptp Length of parabolic section [s] 405 RiRi Start Round-out level [% E ft ] 98 PELPs are also used for any synchronized setting – e.g. applying a trim Parabolic I  t 2 Exponential I  e t Linear I  t Parabolic round-out I  t 2 will vary c/o Paul Collier

Baseline energy ramp PELP minimize voltage discontinuities –start with dI/dt = 0 ramp starts slowly –9 GeV in the first minute –minimize dynamic errors –slow snapback: ~70 seconds respect ramp rate of the power converters round-off at high energy –persistent currents, ramp-induced eddy currents

Ramp implementation: functions & timing Ramp is driven by current, voltage and frequency as functions of time, pre-loaded to the power converters and RF –as an array of points (delta-time, delta-reference) –1 ms granularity –arbitrary time spacing –requires linear interpolation of supplied points for all powering circuits power converters –mains, quads, triplets, insertions, spool pieces, orbit correctors... Functions must take into account static & dynamic magnet errors –geometric, beam screen, eddy current in ramp –persistent current decay, snapback

Functions & timing (contd.) The control system for the LHC power converters has dedicated controller embedded in every converter –function generation (current versus time) –current regulation –state monitoring and control (on, off, reset etc.) The same function generator module is also used in the RF systems –voltage & phase, frequency, radial position, power coupler position etc.

Functions & timing (contd.) Execution of functions is triggered by a “start ramp” timing event –the operator decides when to ramp and requests the timing system to send the event The ramp stops naturally when the functions come to an end –not possible to stop while the functions are executing a stop “during the ramp” means generating functions which stop at the desired time

Real time corrections The function generator controller also has a real-time input –accepts corrections up to 50 Hz –in combination with time dependent functions as an offset: Ref = F(t) +dF rt or as a fractional gain: Ref = F(t)(1 + G rt ) Real-time corrections are eventually foreseen... –operator-controlled real-time knobs –beam-based feedback orbit – local and global tune, chromaticity - will not be in place for commissioning –feed-forward from online reference magnets open to question…

Other systems RF Low-level loops control the beam –phase loop locks RF to beam to avoid emittance blowup –must eventually use synchro loop when we want to collide both rings locked to the same frequency program avoids rephasing before physics –but radial loop used during ramp commissioning since exact beam energy is not well known adjusts RF frequency to centre beam at pickup in IR4 measure frequency offset and feed correction forward into functions Beam Dump –loaded with the reference energy ramp –supplies strengths for septum, MKD, MKB as function of beam energy –tracks the energy using a hardware ‘energy meter’

Pre-requisites & initial conditions Circulating beams in both rings at 450 GeV with well adjusted beam parameters Relaxed tolerances: –low intensities  more tolerance on beam parameter variation: tune, Q' etc. –commissioning tunes Q H and Q V widely separated, more coupling allowed –no crossing angle bumps or spectrometer compensation  more aperture

Pre-requisites (contd) Beam instrumentation –continuous PLL tune measurement available (no feedback) with tune history must be possible with pilot bunches feed-forward to correct the tune – closing the loop will come later –Q’ measurement with RF frequency modulation online (head-tail) Q’ measurement highly desirable –orbit acquisition through the ramp and eventually feedback around the beam dump and collimation regions RMS –predictions of persistent current effects & snapback after a fixed time on injection plateau

Pre-requisites (contd) Machine Protection –beam dump commissioned at 450 GeV –initial commissioning of beam loss monitors at 450 GeV –beam interlocks verified system by system –initial collimation settings: as for injection TDI out, collimators at coarse settings (~ 7/8.5  ) Controls –function generation and management (trims, incorporation) –sequencer, ramp timing commissioned RF –beam control: phase, synchro & radial loops operational Transverse feedback OFF –only needed at this stage for injection damping

Phases of ramp commissioning Single beam through snapback Switch to nominal cycle Ramp – single beam Single beam to physics energy Two beams to physics energy [ring1, ring2] [ring1, ring2] pilot [ring1, ring2] pilot++ [ring1, ring2] Star t End 450 GeV on “degauss” cycle moderate intensity (3x10 10 ppb) single bunch at 7 TeV

Move to nominal cycle “Degauss” cycle used during initial commissioning at 450 GeV –degauss “blip” eliminates persistent current decay on the injection plateau –but hysteresis & snapback mean we cannot ramp  must switch to nominal cycle to continue need to transfer all trims made on the degauss cycle to the nominal cycle –transfer of 450 GeV corrections & incorporation into the ramp functions

Initial Commissioning – Nominal Cycle Wait minutes on injection plateau before injecting: –reduced persistent currents  “nominal” snapback – bigger but reproducible –limited further decay but will still need to re-commission 450 GeV Look at decay with beam: –energy offset vs. time –tune, chromaticity, orbit drifts –reproducibility after cycling etc. Establish standard operational procedure at 450 GeV –standard checks: momentum, tune, orbit, chromaticity, coupling, dispersion –then launch the ramp as quickly as possible... –try to avoid large scale readjustment of beam parameters every cycle Full recycle to top energy after every attempt –may initially set up for cycling to a lower energy to save time nominal cycle degauss cycle

snap-back decay Injection ~ 1200 s Snapback ~ 70 s Decay & snapback – the problem Drift in multipole components due to decay of persistent currents and consequent snapback at start of ramp The challenge will be anticipating the depth of the snapback and attempting to deal with associated swing of beam parameters ParameterNominal toleranceLimit on b n (MB) – Inj.Approx. DecayParameter swing Q'Q' Q'  2  Q'  ± 1 ±  Q'  +71/-64 c/o L. Bottura

Managing snapback Procedure: –establish length of time on injection plateau –reference model or measurements to establish depth of snapback –predict required corrector functions and incorporate into the machine settings –load functions to hardware –launch ramp (timing event) –track key beam parameters through snapback: tune, orbit, Q‘ for feed-forward to the next cycle

e.g. Chromaticity Infer persistent current change  I Extract total b 3 correction Invoke fit for snapback prediction Convert to currents for b 3 spool pieces Incorporate into ramp functions & download Functions invoked at ramp start  talk: L. Bottura slow Q’ measurements and b 3 corrections during injection Just before ramping… Extract sextupole change in dipoles  b 3 since  b 3 and  I are correlated RT corrections still possible Timing event

RMS First attempts at ramping need model predictions good enough to get low intensities through full snapback If online RMS measurements were available, feed-forward of these to the next cycle would help refine the prediction of the snapback

Beyond Snapback Things should calm down once the snapback is over –dynamic effects considerably reduced after first 100 GeV –eddy currents small & reproducible –correctors optimised using feed-forward Measurements made ‘on-the-fly’ during the ramp are used to modify the corrector functions for subsequent cycles L. Bottura

Stopping with beam in the ramp Must be programmed before starting the ramp –with appropriate round-off behaviour of the functions –need to handle decay after the stop Restart with beam is possible in theory, but problematic –requires a new set of PELP functions to be loaded –including corrections for handling the associated snapback Used for commissioning of beam dump, beam loss monitors, beam measurements, optics checks, physics...

Machine Protection Single beam through snapback Switch to nominal cycle Ramp – single beam Single beam to physics energy Two beams to physics energy Star t End Low intensity, single bunch, low energy... same as at 450 GeV –BLMs: acquisition – no dump, check losses against thresholds –collimators & TDCQ coarse settings Critical machine protection systems must be in place –minimum subset of BLMs connected to beam interlock system –collimators interlocked in place –local orbit stabilisation around beam cleaning insertions and dump region –further commissioning of beam dump & BLMs

System commissioning: Beam dump Commissioning in ramp (with pilot): –extract at pre-defined energies (small steps - to be defined) energy tracking (MKD, MSD, MKB) measure, correct & check trajectories and settings, dilution kicker sweep check instrumentation, feedback, reference settings, interlock thresholds, kicker timings/retriggering –interpolate to build reference functions for settings and interlock thresholds –increase intensity gradually at each energy optimisation of interlocks and settings where necessary

System commissioning: RF Control B-field correction procedures to obtain dB/B < –single bunch pilot, inject/dump Control acceleration through snapback –single bunch pilot, accelerate –dump at progressively higher energies Measure: –capture losses (flash loss of out-of-bucket beam at start of ramp) –continuous measurements of frequency response of loops during ramp –bunch length (emittance growth) - injection mismatch, RF noise –beam losses Feed-forward of measured frequency offset –for eventual switch to synchro loop operation In preparation for physics beams: –Commissioning of programmed longitudinal emittance blowup via RF noise

Conclusions The procedure and mechanisms for ramping the LHC are well defined Strategy for commissioning the nominal cycle –wait for current decay to play out before injecting –aim for reproducibility of snapback –iterative process with feed-forward of corrections –relaxed tolerances during commissioning but the target is likely to be moving RMS –Predictions essential for getting through snapback Machine protection –starts to become critical when ramping further than the end of snapback –even at low intensities