University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate The scholarship of discovery The scholarship.
Advertisements

What is a Survey? A scientific social research method that involves
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Battleground Survey 2010 #12676 September 7-9, 2010.
Writing For Publication Workshop STEM Discipline.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Parent School Climate Survey Results and Analysis November 2010.
UNIVERSITY AS ENTREPRENEUR: IDEAS THAT FLY Arizona Board of Regents January 25, 2007.
Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)
Say what?! Getting and Responding to Feedback in the Pre-award Office Joseph McNicholas, Ph.D. Director Office for Research and Sponsored Projects Loyola.
City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.
Antonio Anne Margarette Madalang Kyle Marron Ritual Krizza
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Illinois CEE Student Survey Results Dr. Julia Melkers, Associate Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia Summary.
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program.
ICE Evaluations Some Suggestions for Improvement.
U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA Measuring Student Perspectives on University Experiences.
EMC Research, Inc th Street, Suite 820 Oakland, CA (510) EMC # Telephone Survey of Cambrian Elementary School District Voters.
Human Resources Office of Summary of Results 1 University of Minnesota Morris.
Nationwide Concept Based Curriculum Survey Analysis Susan Sportsman, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN Director of Academic Consulting Group A Service of Elsevier.
Leveraging Collaborative Technologies for Sharing Tacit Knowledge: An Integrative Model (Research in progress) Vikas Sahasrabudhe
Alumni Survey Fall 2005 Institutional Research and Planning.
Presented by: Meredith Curry Preparing and Planning after Your Junior Year of College May 18, 2012.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
Nobody’s Unpredictable Date Public opinion about individual philanthropy Serbia, December 2009.
An Evaluation of SLIS Student Satisfaction and its Global Impacts Christina Hoffman, MLS Dr. Samantha Hastings, Interim Dean The University of North Texas.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
2013 Student-Faculty Conference Business, Economics and Management Thursday February 14 th, :00 PM 153 Noyes.
A presentation of key findings from a national survey of 800 registered voters conducted September 10-12, 2007.
East Melbourne Medicare Local (EMML) GP Primary Health Networks (PHN) Survey 2015 Interim Results Apr 2015.
EGS Research & Consulting BASELINE SURVEYS OF MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT CHAIR PERSONS, MATHEMATICS FACULTY AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY.
The CPI Principal Investigator Survey Update and Summary Lori L. Taylor Bush School of Government.
Lessons Learned.  Transformations campaign  Develop strategic plan  External review team proposes internal residential program  construct.
March 2007 Conducted for the California Foundation for Commerce and Education Selected Survey Results: Business Executives’ Attitudes on California Education.
Human Resources Office of FACULTY Summary of Results _College of Design_FACULTY.
2005 Performance Development System Survey Human Resources Staff Meeting March 20, 2006.
January 18, 2012 Administrative Council Presentation.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
Work Control Process and Measuring Alignment Presented by: Mike Hughes, Bechtel National Operations Manager John Mathis, Bechtel National Safety Manager.
® MTAC Satisfaction Survey May ® Respondents * 89 Respondents * Primarily MTAC representatives (64%) * Association Executives (24%)
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
1 NC State University 2008 Staff Well-Being Survey Highlights from Overall Results A Presentation to the Staff Senate Nancy Whelchel, Ph.D University Planning.
Teacher Satisfaction Whitney Zimmerman Christine Henry.
Florida’s Educator Outcome Survey 2005 Prepared by Anna Vaccaro, Marketing Research Analyst Ulrich Research Service.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
Welcome to the April 10 th CPI meeting Today’s agenda includes the following items: Update and summary of CPI Principal Investigator survey – Dr. Lori.
Question Everything.  Questionnaire should be: ◦ Valid – Questions should measure what was meant to be measured ◦ Reliable – Should give you the same.
CBC News Poll on Discrimination November Methodology This report presents the findings of an online survey conducted among 1,500 Canadian adults.
Measuring Outcomes of Doctoral Programs: Alumni and Exit Surveys at Western University CAGS October 2015.
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
Baseline Survey of Voter Attitudes about Education in Pennsylvania with focus on CCSS and CSA Survey of 600 randomly selected registered PA voters by The.
Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.
Postgraduate research experience survey (PRES) results
Decision Analyst Web Presence Of Small Businesses Study By: Joel Mincey December 19, 2008 Executive Summary Report.
2009 – 2010 Minnetonka Youth Hockey Assessment Survey Results April 2010.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Assessment Activities Presentation for the NC State Assessment Work Group May 2, 2007 Nancy Whelchel, PhD Assistant Director.
Advanced Lab Topical Conference 2009 Session III: Curricular Roles for Advanced Labs Presented by: Gabe Spalding, Illinois Wesleyan University
Headline charts from ARM polling June Methodology BritainThinks conducted an online survey of 1240 adults living in England between 7 th and 9th.
Outstanding Professor Award Committee Presents:
CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY SPRING 2009
A Roadmap for Higher Education Leaders
Preliminary Findings from the 2008 ISU Faculty Needs Assessment
Presentation transcript:

University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research

Overall Conclusion Faculty, staff and students indicate moderate to strong support for entrepreneurship but minimal understanding of what it is or how it might apply to them.

Widespread support for ASU’s current direction. Question: In general, would you say that ASU is headed in the right direction or is it off on the wrong track?

The word “entrepreneur” elicits a favorable response. Favorability varies substantially among faculty and students from different disciplines. Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B)/Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture Question: Do you have a generally favorable or unfavorable opinion of the word “entrepreneur”?

Few consider themselves entrepreneurs. But, again, results vary by discipline. GroupMean Faculty (A)4.7 Faculty (B)5.7 Students (A)4.6 Students (B)5.8 Staff4.5 Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B)/Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture Questions: Thinking of your job or position at ASU, how much, if at all, do you consider yourself to be an entrepreneur? Please use a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 meaning not at all and 10 meaning completely. (Faculty and staff) How much, if at all, do you consider yourself to be an entrepreneur? Please use a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 meaning not at all and 10 meaning completely. (Students)

Students and staff indicate moderate approval of the definitions of entrepreneurship. Half of the respondents from each group were given one definition and half were given a different definition. The two definitions are provided in t he column headings. Question: Please indicate whether the following statement reflects the definition of the word “entrepreneurship.” Use a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means it is a very poor definition and 10 means it is an excellent definition. Means Group “Entrepreneurship is the spirit and process of creative risk-taking.” “Entrepreneurship is the spirit and process of creative risk-taking and innovation that leverages university knowledge to spur development and economic competitiveness.” Faculty Students Staff

Faculty and staff are more likely to have heard about entrepreneurship at ASU than students. Question: How much, if at all, have you heard about entrepreneurship at ASU? Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) /Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture

Few students are familiar with the Edson Student Entrepreneur Initiative. Question: How familiar, if at all, are you with the Edson Student Entrepreneur Initiative? Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture

Entrepreneurship is sometimes incorporated into courses or jobs. Questions: How much, if at all, do you incorporate entrepreneurship in any of the courses you teach? (Faculty survey) How much, if at all, has entrepreneurship been incorporated into courses in your major? (Student survey) How much, if at all, do you incorporate entrepreneurship into your job at ASU? (Staff survey) Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) /Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture

Faculty see a moderate amount of interest in entrepreneurship among students. Question: Do you think your students would want to learn about entrepreneurship? Faculty (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture

Most students want to learn more about entrepreneurship. Question: Would you like to learn more about entrepreneurship? Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture

Students are somewhat more supportive than faculty for entrepreneurship becoming an area of study and/or research at ASU. Question: Below are several statements regarding entrepreneurship. Indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement using a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means you totally disagree and 10 means you totally agree. Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) /Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture Mean

Faculty and students agree that entrepreneurship can be codified, taught and learned. Question: Below are several statements regarding entrepreneurship. Indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement using a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means you totally disagree and 10 means you totally agree. Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) /Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture Mean

Faculty and students report only slight agreement that entrepreneurship does not apply to some disciplines. Question: Below are several statements regarding entrepreneurship. Indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement using a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means you totally disagree and 10 means you totally agree. Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) /Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture Mean

Faculty and students said entrepreneurship should have a somewhat low priority. Question: How much of a priority, if any, should teaching entrepreneurship have at ASU? Please use a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 meaning not a priority at all and 10 meaning a high priority. Faculty (A)/Students (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) /Students (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture Mean

Faculty and staff indicated that ASU constrains them from acting in entrepreneur ways. Question: Next, would you say that ASU enables faculty/staff to act in entrepreneurial ways or constrains faculty/staff from acting in entrepreneurial ways? Please use a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means ASU very much constrains faculty/staff and 10 means ASU very much enables faculty/staff. Mean

Summary of reasons why faculty and staff are constrained to act entrepreneurially Question: In what way or ways does ASU constrain faculty/staff from acting entrepreneurially? (Open ended) ORSPA is a detriment. Too much red tape. Concerns about consequences of failure. No reward or encouragement. Lack of appropriate infrastructure or support. Tenure. No support from chairs, administrators or supervisors. Management resists change. No time due to teaching loads and research requirements. Indirect rates are too high. Lack of empowerment. Micromanagement.

Many faculty have experience outside of academia as a business entrepreneur. Question: Do you have an experience outside of academia as a business entrepreneur? Faculty (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture

And many faculty are currently consulting outside of ASU. Question: Do you currently participate in any consulting outside of ASU? Faculty (A) = CLAS/Fine Arts/Humanities/Public Programs/Mass Communications/Education Faculty (B) = Business/Engineering/Law/Nursing/Architecture

Minorities of students are currently involved in campus clubs or organizations that deal with entrepreneurship or are involved in activities outside of campus that deal with entrepreneurship Questions: Do any of the clubs or organizations with which you are involved deal with entrepreneurship? (Asked only of students who are involved with students clubs or organizations on campus.) Have you been or are you currently involved in any activities outside of campus or ASU that deal with entrepreneurship?

Most students see themselves on a professional career track working for an organization Question: Next, five years from now, where would you like to be career-wise?

Most faculty and students want more information about entrepreneurship. Question: What information about entrepreneurship would you find useful? (Adds to more than 100% due to multiple responses.) Ent = Entrepreneurship

Staff embrace entrepreneurship but are not encouraged to act entrepreneurially. Question: Below are several statements regarding entrepreneurship. Indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement using a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means you totally disagree and 10 means you totally agree.

Most faculty, students and staff prefer communications through . Question: What is the best way to communicate with you about news on topics such as entrepreneurship at ASU? (Adds to more than 100% due to multiple responses.)

Summary of Methodology Five focus groups held primarily to help inform survey questions Faculty from humanities, social sciences, fine arts, public programs, mass communications, and education Faculty from engineering, law, business, nursing and architecture Students from humanities, social sciences, fine arts, public programs, mass communications, and education Students from engineering, law, business, nursing and architecture Staff Three web surveys Faculty (n=641), students (n=655) and staff (n=469) Samples selected Fielded during spring semester 2007 n = Number of completed questionnaires