Selectionist view: allele substitution and polymorphism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution most base substitutions are selectively neutral drift dominates evolution at the molecular level Under drift, rate.
Advertisements

IMPRS workshop Comparative Genomics 18 th -21 st of February 2013 Lecture 4 Positive selection.
Chapter 19 Evolutionary Genetics 18 and 20 April, 2004
Modeling Populations forces that act on allelic frequencies.
Random fixation and loss of heterozygosity
Change in frequency of the unbanded allele (q) as a function of q for island populations. Equilibrium points a)Strong selection for q, little migration.
Plant of the day! Pebble plants, Lithops, dwarf xerophytes Aizoaceae
Atelier INSERM – La Londe Les Maures – Mai 2004
THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS
Molecular evolution:   how do we explain the patterns of variation observed in DNA sequences? how do we detect selection by comparing silent site substitutions.
14 Molecular Evolution and Population Genetics
Conservation Genetics: Lessons from Population & Evolutionary Genetics.
From population genetics to variation among species: Computing the rate of fixations.
1 Mendelian Genetics in Populations II Migration, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating.
Molecular Evolution with an emphasis on substitution rates Gavin JD Smith State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases & Department of Microbiology.
Dispersal models Continuous populations Isolation-by-distance Discrete populations Stepping-stone Island model.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSIS Molecular Evolution Course #27615 Anders Gorm Pedersen Molecular Evolution Group Center for Biological Sequence.
Positive selection A new allele (mutant) confers some increase in the fitness of the organism Selection acts to favour this allele Also called adaptive.
Molecular Clocks, Base Substitutions, & Phylogenetic Distances.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSIS Molecular Evolution Course #27615 Anders Gorm Pedersen Molecular Evolution Group Center for Biological Sequence.
TGCAAACTCAAACTCTTTTGTTGTTCTTACTGTATCATTGCCCAGAATAT TCTGCCTGTCTTTAGAGGCTAATACATTGATTAGTGAATTCCAATGGGCA GAATCGTGATGCATTAAAGAGATGCTAATATTTTCACTGCTCCTCAATTT.
Population Genetics 101 CSE280Vineet Bafna. Personalized genomics April’08Bafna.
Biodiversity IV: genetics and conservation
Chapter 3 Substitution Patterns Presented by: Adrian Padilla.
Population Genetics Learning Objectives
- any detectable change in DNA sequence eg. errors in DNA replication/repair - inherited ones of interest in evolutionary studies Deleterious - will be.
Lecture 21: Tests for Departures from Neutrality November 9, 2012.
In the deterministic model, the time till fixation depends on the selective advantage, but fixation is guaranteed.
The Evolution of Populations.  Emphasizes the extensive genetic variation within populations and recognizes the importance of quantitative characteristics.
Chapter 23 Notes The Evolution of Populations. Concept 23.1 Darwin and Mendel were contemporaries of the 19 th century - at the time both were unappreciated.
Part VI and Chapter 20 Biology Sixth Edition Raven/Johnson (c) The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Genes Within Populations
Models of Molecular Evolution I Level 3 Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Jim Provan Page and Holmes: Sections 7.1 – 7.2.
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating IV. Genetic Drift V. The Neutral Theory.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings Chapter 23 The Evolution of Populations.
Models of Molecular Evolution III Level 3 Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Jim Provan Page and Holmes: Sections 7.5 – 7.8.
Section 6 Maintenance of Genetic Diversity Levels of genetic diversity result from the joint impacts of: Mutation & migration adding variation Chance &
Remainder of Chapter 23 Read the remaining materials; they address information specific to understanding evolution (e.g., variation and nature of changes)
Evolution of Populations. The Smallest Unit of Evolution Natural selection acts on individuals, but only populations evolve – Genetic variations contribute.
N=50 s=0.150 replicates s>0 Time till fixation on average: t av = (2/s) ln (2N) generations (also true for mutations with negative “s” ! discuss among.
Lecture 20 : Tests of Neutrality
Mutation & genetic variation. Mutations gene – stretch of dna that codes for a distinctive type of rna or protein allele – versions of the same gene.
NEW TOPIC: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION.
Molecular evolution Part I: The evolution of macromolecules.
Objective: Chapter 23. Population geneticists measure polymorphisms in a population by determining the amount of heterozygosity at the gene and molecular.
The plant of the day Pinus longaevaPinus aristata.
Testing the Neutral Mutation Hypothesis The neutral theory predicts that polymorphism within species is correlated positively with fixed differences between.
In populations of finite size, sampling of gametes from the gene pool can cause evolution. Incorporating Genetic Drift.
By Bryce Perry and Cecil Brown
Evolution of Populations
LBA ProtPars. LBA Prot Dist no Gamma and no alignment.
Announcement NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Awards (USRA) in Universities 16 weeks $5,625
Data analyses Course code: ZOO560 Week 3
Polymorphism Polymorphism: when two or more alleles at a locus exist in a population at the same time. Nucleotide diversity: P = xixjpij considers.
Causes of Variation in Substitution Rates
The neutral theory of molecular evolution
Neutrality Test First suggested by Kimura (1968) and King and Jukes (1969) Shift to using neutrality as a null hypothesis in positive selection and selection.
Human Chimp How does DNA evolve? Nucleotide substitutions
The Neutral Theory M. Kimura, 1968
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating
What are the Patterns Of Nucleotide Substitution Within Coding and
Is the CFTR allele maintained by mutation/selection balance?
Testing the Neutral Mutation Hypothesis
1. "HARD" Selection can 'cost' a population individuals:
Is the CFTR allele maintained by mutation/selection balance?
The Evolution of Populations
Genetic Drift, followed by selection can cause linkage disequilibrium
Genetic drift in finite populations
Evolution by Genetic Drift : Main Points (p. 231)
Evolution by Genetic Drift : Main Points (p. 231)
Presentation transcript:

Selectionist view: allele substitution and polymorphism are determined by different, selective processes. Mutation yields advantageous alleles that are driven to fixation by positive natural selection. Two or more alleles are maintained at a locus in a population by balancing selection.

Neutralist view: allele substitution and polymorphism are determined by the same evolutionary process. Mutation provides a continual supply of new alleles. Because many alleles are neutral or effectively neutral, alleles becomes fixed or lost from a population as a result of genetic drift. Polymorphism is simply a snapshot of a continuous process of mutational input and subsequent random extinction or fixation of alleles.

Gene Substitution Allele substitution/fixation: Process whereby one allele replaces an existing allele. What is the probability of fixation for new alleles? How long does the process take (fixation time)? What is the rate of allele substitution?

Fixation Probability Fixation Probability : Probability that a mutant allele (A2) will be fixed in a population Depends upon: (q) initial frequency of allele, (s) selective advantage or disadvantage, (Ne) effective population size. A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 1 1 + s 1 + 2s If assume Kimura 1962 Fixation Prob for A2 P = [1 - e-(4Ne)sq ] / 1 - e-4(Ne)s When a new allele enters a population it has a frequency of 1/2N. when s = 0: P = q = 1/2N Fixation probability for neutral allele.

2s Fixation probability for small s (positive or negative) 1 - e-4(Ne)s P = 2s Fixation probability for advantageous allele (positive s). P = What is the probability of fixation for N = 1000 vs 10,000? N = 1000 N = 10,000 s = 0.0 s = 0.01 s = - 0.001 0.0005 0.02 0.00004 0.00005 0.02 10 -20

Conditional Time to Fixation Conditional Fixation Time : mean time to fixation for mutants that will eventually be fixed in the population Conditional Time to Fixation Depends upon: (q) initial frequency of allele, (s) selective advantage or disadvantage, (Ne) effective population size. For new mutation (q = 1/2N): Neutral allele t = 4Ne generations Kimura and Ohta, 1969 Advantageous allele t = (2/s) ln (2N) generations

What is the conditional fixation time for Ne = 1000 vs 10,000 if the organism in question has a generation time of 2 years? Ne = 1000 Ne = 10,000 s = 0.0 s = 0.01 Maruyama & Kimura (1974) showed: S = -0.01 1658 yrs 1981 yrs 8000 yrs 1658 yrs 80,000 yrs 1981 yrs

Rate of Allele Substitution Depends upon: (2Nu) number of mutations arising at locus per generation, and initial frequency of new allele (1/2N) K = 2Nm x 1/2N = m rate of substitution = rate of mutation! under selection, K = 4 Nesm

Neutral Theory There are several important results from the neutral theory. The probability that a new, neutral allele eventually becomes fixed is q (its initial frequency). The average time to fixation of new, neutral alleles that are destined to be fixed is 4Ne. 3) The rate that neutral mutations are fixed = mfixation/generation). m is also the rate of mutation (e.g. substitutions/site/generation) 4) The average time between consecutive fixations = 1/m. 5) The rate of neutral evolution m depends upon neutral and effectively neutral mutations.

Mootoo Kimura’s concept of neutralism is illustrated in the following diagram from his original paper. Mutation is constantly generating new alleles over the course of time. Most of these mutations are eliminated immediately by purifying selection. However neutral mutations result in novel alleles.

Mootoo Kimura’s concept of neutralism is illustrated in the following diagram from his original paper. However neutral theory predicts that the majority of these new neutral alleles will have a short time to extinction.

Mootoo Kimura’s concept of neutralism is illustrated in the following diagram from his original paper. At a predictable period of time a new neutral mutation will appear that for reasons largely associated with effective population size, become established, and eventually fixed in the population. There is an extended time required for these new neutral alleles to go to fixation.

Mootoo Kimura’s concept of neutralism is illustrated in the following diagram from his original paper. There is an extended time, proportional to 4Ne, required for these new neutral alleles to go to fixation.

Mootoo Kimura’s concept of neutralism is illustrated in the following diagram from his original paper. The inverse of the rate of gene substitution is the mean time between two consecutive substitutions.

Mootoo Kimura’s concept of neutralism is illustrated in the following diagram from his original paper. If we sampled the distribution of alleles at a large number of loci at any one point in time, we would expect a large proportion of alleles to be very low in frequency, a moderate proportion to have an intermediate frequency, and a large proportion of alleles to be fixed.

~ ~ Under the neutral model an important balance is struck Rate of loss of genetic variation by genetic drift Rate of gain of genetic variation by mutation ~ ~ Although alleles come and go, the level of genetic variation remains the same. Steady state frequency of heterozygotes H = 4Nem / 4Nem + 1

Because of two important consequences of neutral evolution: (1) steady rate of allele substitution equilibrium level of heterozygosity We predict the following: There should be a positive correlation between heterozygosity at a locus and its rate of evolution.

Impact of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Led to the recognition that genetic drift can not be neglected when considering molecular evolution. Established the concept that polymorphism within populations and molecular evolution between species are two facets of the same problem. Neutral theory has become a starting point for analyses of DNA sequences…..it serves as the null model.

Each nucleotide substitution represents a unique allele fixation event that occurred in the past. species 1 allele A A T C A C T A A T G A C T ancestral allele species 2 allele A T T G A C C

A T T G A C C G A G G A T A G T G G A T A Lower rate of substitution, Gene 1 Lower rate of substitution, polymorphism G A G G A T A Gene 2 ancestral allele Gene 2 contemp. allele G T G G A T A 1 V Allele frequency Time

Causes of Variation in Substitution Rates Rate of Substitution is determined by: (1) Mutation rate Among genes Among gene regions (2) Probability of fixation Neutral, advantageous, deleterious

Interpreting Variation in DNA sequences How does natural selection modify neutral patterns?

Detecting Positive Selection Using Within # nonsyn. substitutions Species Data KA/NA > KS/NS # nonsyn. substitutions nonsyn. site # syn. substitutions syn. site > Now we consider a more complicated approach…… involving polymorphism.

Testing the Neutral Mutation Hypothesis The neutral theory predicts that polymorphism within species is correlated positively with fixed differences between species i.e. Genes that exhibit many interspecific differences will also have high levels of intraspecific polymorphism.

nonsynonymous polymorphism synonymous polymorphism McDonald-Krietman Test Assume: Only nonsynonymous mutations are adaptive Synonymous mutations are neutral Selectively adaptive (nonsynonymous) mutations more likely to be fixed. Neutral Prediction: nonsynonymous fixed synonymous fixed nonsynonymous polymorphism synonymous polymorphism = Fixed Differences Polymorphisms Nonsynonymous Synonymous 21 26 45% 2 36 5.3% % nonsynonymous G6PDH from D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Eanes et al. 1993

If most nonsynonymous substitutions are adaptive, then they will increase in frequency and be fixed more rapidly than neutral alleles. 1.0 advantageous allele Frequency neutral allele Time As a result, they spend less time in a polymorphic state, therefore contribute less to within species polymorphism.

Another example (N = 6-12 alleles per species for the coding region. Fixed Differences Polymorphisms Nonsynonymous Synonymous 7 17 29% 2 42 4.5% % nonsynonymous Adh from D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. Yakuba MacDonald and Kreitman 1991