Promoting a Culture of Evidence Through Program Evaluation Patti Bourexis, Ph.D. Principal Researcher The Study Group Inc. OSEP Project Directors’ Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Is research working for you? A self-assessment tool and discussion guide Maria Judd, MSc Senior Program Officer Knowledge Transfer and Exchange.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Head of Learning: Job description
1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.
Whole site approach to improvement Leading the Learning Workshop 3 - for leadership teams in secondary sites Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools Connecting Action and Research.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Family-School-Community Partnering for Student Success
Creating a high performing School What the research says on how our best performing schools come out on top Courtesy of AITSL.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
1 Promoting Evidence-Informed Practice: The BASSC Perspective Michael J. Austin, PhD, MSW, MSPH BASSC Staff Director Mack Professor of Nonprofit Management.
Research Utilization in Nursing Chapter 21
Promoting a Culture of Evidence and Use of Data through Program Evaluation Session Theme 2 Presentation to: OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 21,
LCES Advisory Leadership System… The role of advisory leadership councils in Extension’s programming process.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Principal Learning Teams Research & Evaluation. The Secretariat’s Strategy Demonstrate a commitment to research and evidence-based inquiry and decision.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Lesson Study Opening Activities (Movement Activity) Grouping Subgroup Article Sharing –Subgroup Reporting.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Third Sector Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to the Public Legal Education in Canada National Conference on “Making an Impact” 26.
Using a Logic Model to Plan and Evaluate Your Technology Leadership Development Program Chad Green, Program Analyst Lynn McNally, Technology Resource Supervisor.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Interagency Collaboration: Transition’s Reality Show Sharon deFur Jeanne Repetto coe.ufl.edu.
We are all learners: changing a school culture Tanya Thompson and Keith Jackson St Andrews Middle School.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
The Australian Charter for the Professional Learning of Teachers and School Leaders Understanding the Charter.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Inspection and Sustainable Development Melanie Hunt Director, Learning & Skills.
How good is our school? (4 th edition) Professional learning events November 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Principles of High-Quality Professional Development Dean Richards January 15, 2009.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
Country Director, Czechia
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
February 21-22, 2018.
Learning-oriented Organizational Improvement Processes
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

Promoting a Culture of Evidence Through Program Evaluation Patti Bourexis, Ph.D. Principal Researcher The Study Group Inc. OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 21, 2009

Session purpose Stimulate thinking and discussion about the important outcomes of evaluation for project directors. Illustrate frameworks and processes that project directors can use to support both project implementation and accountability. The Study Group Inc.

Session themes Project directors can use evidence to assure sound project planning, quality implementation and maximum results. Evaluation tools and processes can help project directors do the best job with project planning, implementation and accountability. Part D programs have their own priorities for evidence, which project directors need to support. The Study Group Inc.

First theme Project directors can use evidence to assure sound project planning, quality implementation and maximum results. The Study Group Inc.

Culture of evidence Shared value and belief about the importance of evidence in project planning, implementation, management and accountability. The Study Group Inc.

Kinds of evidence Research Pilot-tests Models theoretical experiential experimental Needs assessment Expert opinion Experience and expertise External review The Study Group Inc.

Kinds of evidence Prior evaluations Statutes/regulations/policies Standards Databases Products/artifacts Documentation Assessments individual programmatic organizational The Study Group Inc.

Characteristics of a culture of evidence Evidence is used throughout the project’s life cycle. Numerous design and implementation changes occur during the projects’ life cycle. Project outcomes are clearly stated in operational terms that are understood by all staff. Project directors make reliance on evidence a priority. Processes for gathering and applying evidence are explicit and integrated into project planning, implementation and management tasks. The Study Group Inc.

Characteristics of a culture of evidence Staff are expected to use evidence to enhance the quality of their work. Staff have a common language and understanding about what evidence is, how to gather it, and how to apply it to improve project performance. There are opportunities for staff to expand their abilities to gather and apply evidence. The Study Group Inc.

Two characteristics of culture of evidence Evidence is used throughout the project’s life cycle. Numerous design and implementation changes occur during the project’s life cycle. The Study Group Inc.

Project life cycle Design Launch Development Stability ImplementationSustainability The Study Group Inc.

Project planning Why evidence is important. Ensures the credibility of the project design: that it reflects our knowledge about successful projects of this type. Demonstrates relevance of the project to the target audience and situation. Builds confidence that the project will succeed. The Study Group Inc.

Project planning The kinds of evidence that are important. Research Models theoretical experiential experimental Databases Needs assessment Prior evaluations Standards The Study Group Inc.

ED mission & principles of high-quality professional development Focuses on teachers as central to student learning, yet includes all other members of the school community. Focuses on individual, collegial and organizational improvement. Is planned collaboratively by those who will participate in and facilitate that development. Requires substantial time and other resources. The Study Group Inc.

Project implementation Why evidence is important. Show that project activities are implemented as planned. Modify activities when performance falls short of expectation or to take advantage of opportunities. Demonstrate that the outcomes are feasible and reasonable. Engender confidence that the project is well- managed and on track to realize its outcomes. The Study Group Inc.

Project implementation The kinds of evidence that are important. Pilot-tests Documentation Assessments individual programmatic organizational Products/artifacts External review Experience and expertise Databases The Study Group Inc.

Stability and sustainability Why evidence is important. Confirm that the project’s implementation is stable. Show that the project outcomes are reliably achieved and attributable to the project. Demonstrate the importance of the project to the target audience and situation. Plan sustainability. The Study Group Inc.

Stability and sustainability The kinds of evidence that are important. Assessments individual programmatic organizational Products/artifacts Documentation Databases Statutes/regulations/policies Expert review Expert opinion The Study Group Inc.

Third characteristic of a culture of evidence Project outcomes are clearly stated in operational terms that are understood by all staff. The Study Group Inc.

Capacity-building “Capacity building involves developing the collective ability---dispositions, skills, knowledge, motivation and resources---to act together to bring about positive change…” (Fullen, 2005). “Organizational capacity is its potential to perform---its ability to successfully apply its skills and resources to accomplish its goals and satisfy its stakeholders’ expectations” (Horton, et. al, 2003). M. Fullen. (2005) Leadership and Sustainability: System Thinkers in Action. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA. D. Horton, et.al. (2003). Evaluating Capacity Development. International Service for National Agricultural Research: The Hague, The Netherlands. The Study Group Inc.

Indicators of increased capacity Increases in staff disposition, knowledge and skill. Increases in use of evidence-based interventions. Closer ties to networks for exchange of resources and expertise. Improvements in policies, processes and management practices. Increases in resources devoted to the particular issue or concern (e.g., money, staff FTE). Changes in agency priorities. The Study Group Inc.

Summary Characteristics of a culture of evidence Evidence is used throughout the project’s life cycle. Numerous design and implementation changes occur during the projects’ life cycle. Project outcomes are clearly stated in operational terms that are understood by all staff. Project directors make reliance on evidence a priority. Processes for gathering and applying evidence are explicit and integrated into project planning, implementation and management tasks. The Study Group Inc.

Summary Characteristics of a culture of evidence Staff are expected to use evidence to enhance the quality of their work. Staff have a common language and understanding about what evidence is, how to gather it, and how to apply it to improve project performance. There are opportunities for staff to expand their abilities to gather and apply evidence. The Study Group Inc.

Contact information Patti Bourexis, Ph.D. Principal Researcher The Study Group Inc.