LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G030112-00-D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Tests Stephen Kaye Controller Test Motivation Testing the controller before the next generation helps to shake out any remaining.
Advertisements

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
LIGO-G Z Update on the Analysis of S2 Burst Hardware Injections L. Cadonati (MIT), A. Weinstein (CIT) for the Burst group Hannover LSC meeting,
GWDAW, Dec 2003 Shawhan, Christensen, Gonzalez1 LIGO Inspiral Veto Studies Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech) Nelson Christensen (Carleton College) Gabriela.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Hardware Burst Injections in E9  S2 Alan Weinstein, Caltech Laura Cadonati, MIT Shourov Chatterjee, MIT.
LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
Waveburst DSO: current state, testing on S2 hardware burst injections Sergei Klimenko Igor Yakushin LSC meeting, March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
Introduction to Networks CS587x Lecture 1 Department of Computer Science Iowa State University.
LIGO- G Z LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 S2 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
10/06/2003LSC WIDE COLLOQUIUM1 LSC Pulsar Group and P Shawhan, S Marka, and S Koranda presented by B Allen, R Dupuis, N Christensen, and X Siemens S2 Hardware.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.
LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee LIGO-G Z E10/S3 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
GEO++ Online Detector Characterization System. LIGO-G Z GEO++ working group GEO++ working group Cardiff University: Birmingham University Cardiff.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
Search for Short-Duration GW Bursts Coincident with S2/S3/S4 Gamma-Ray Bursts S5 GRB-GWB Search: First Results Isabel Leonor (for External Triggers group)
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes Used in the E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Part 2 Peter Shawhan,
First Year S5 Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescences Drew Keppel 1 representing the LIGO/VIRGO Compact Binary Coalescence Group 1 California Institute of.
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.
LIGO-G Z r statistics for time-domain cross correlation on burst candidate events Laura Cadonati LIGO-MIT LSC collaboration meeting, LLO march.
Application Design Document Developers: o Uri Goldenberg o Henry Abravanel o Academic.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G E Data Simulation for the DMT John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G D S2 Glitch Investigation Report Laura Cadonati (MIT) on behalf of the Glitch Investigation Team LSC meeting, August 2003, Hannover.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Hardware Burst Injections in Pre-S2  S2 Alan Weinstein, Caltech Laura Cadonati, MIT Shourov Chatterjee,
S.Klimenko, LSC meeting, March 2002 LineMonitor Sergey Klimenko University of Florida Other contributors: E.Daw (LSU), A.Sazonov(UF), J.Zweizig (Caltech)
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Inspiral Glitch Veto Studies
Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Hardware Injections in S4
S2 Inspiral Hardware Injections
Line tracking methods used in LineMon
asyn Driver Tutorial Measurement Computing 1608GX-2A0
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Searching for GRB-GWB coincidence during LIGO science runs
Presentation transcript:

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka (LIGO/Caltech, U. of Oregon, LIGO/Caltech) LSC Meeting March 19, 2003

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Uses of Hardware Signal Injections Complete end-to-end test of detector and analysis Verify that detector does not distort signal in unexpected ways Verify that search algorithm can detect signals ! Check that correct parameters are recovered Checks both calibration and search algorithm Study coupling of GW signal into auxiliary channels To evaluate “safety” of veto conditions

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Signal Injection Architecture Client library awg real-time process Application Control-room workstationVME CPU ethernet Excitation channel e.g. LSC-ETMX_EXC Application passes waveform data to client library Also specifies starting time for injection Client library sends data to awg in 1-second chunks Several seconds of buffering awg adds a data value to digital controller every 1/16384 sec Synchronized with GPS clock Implemented October 2001

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Client Library a.k.a. “SIStr” library (Signal Injection Stream) Simple application interface Open stream (specify channel and starting time) Append waveform data to stream Pass any number of data values at a time Make as many “append” calls as necessary Close stream (sends all data, then releases excitation channel) Library handles buffering and data transmission timing Application just has to provide data as fast as it can Arbitrarily long waveforms can be sent

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Limitations Waveform data must account for transfer function of actuator i.e. weight desired displacement by f 2 Can’t inject arbitrarily large signals Limited by dynamic range of actuator Dewhitening affects available dynamic range as a function of frequency Can’t have two processes injecting into same excitation point e.g. can’t have calibration lines and simulated astrophysical waveform both going into LSC-ETMX_EXC

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Client Programs awgstream Reads waveform data from an ASCII file Can specify start time and an overall scale factor multiawgstream Injects a sequence of waveforms at specified times Others could be written Could calculate waveform on the fly

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Injecting Multiple Waveforms: multiawgstream  client software for injecting multiple waveforms in series  uses SIStr library by P. Shawhan and D. Sigg  user can run multiple multiawgstream clients to inject into multiple channels simultaneously (e.g., inject simultaneuosly into H1/H2:LSC-ETMX_EXC, H1/H2:LSC-ETMY_EXC)  typing “ multiawgstream ” by itself will give usage From a control room machine, type: multiawgstream [-q] [-d]

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Need configuration file! Example: # Hanford S2 burst configuration file for H1:LSC-ETMX_EXC # Specify waveform data files and aliases wffile /mypath/wfsg100Q9.dat wfsg100Q9 wffile /mypath/wfsg235Q9.dat wfsg235Q9 wffile /mypath/wfsg361Q9.dat wfsg361Q9 wffile /mypath/wfsg554Q9.dat wfsg554Q9 wffile /mypath/wfsg850Q9.dat wfsg850Q9 # Specify signal aliases, scale factors, and time offsets wfsg100Q wfsg100Q wfsg235Q wfsg361Q wfsg554Q wfsg850Q wfsg850Q wfsg850Q

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Injections During S1 Correlated noise (for stochastic group) Two sets of files injected simultaneously into L1+H2, with a few amplitudes One set of files simultaneously injected into H1+H2 (one amplitude) Inspiral chirps Into ETMX_EXC in some cases, DARM_CTRL_EXC in others Two inspiral waveforms, various amplitudes Burst waveforms “Sine-Gaussians” (various frequencies) injected into L1+H2 Shortcomings (due to limited time) Calibration lines were not present at time of injections Limited number of waveforms were injected Injections were not done systematically into all interferometers

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Injections Before S2 Tried to do things more systematically than for S1 Time for injections was allocated as part of the run plan Try to cover all interferometers (but susceptible to locking problems) Keep calibration lines going during injections Took a while to shake down how to do this Most successful approach: leave calibration lines on ETMX, inject waveforms into ETMY Correlated (stochastic) noise A few sets of files, a few amplitudes H1+H2 (no calibration lines) H1+L1 (calibration lines on ETMX, but with odd amplitudes)

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Injections Before S2 Inspirals Several different waveforms, including some high-mass ones Injected into ETMX, ETMX  ETMY, ETMX+ETMY Some very loud into ETMX Had calibration lines on DARM Bursts Sine-Gaussians at various frequencies Lots of different polarizations and amplitudes Some loud, though limited by dynamic range of actuation (at least at some frequencies) Had calibration lines on DARM_CTRL

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Injections During S2 “Intra-run” injection sequence 18 inspirals + 24 bursts, injected into ETMY 30-minute sequence, done several times so far Plan for a night of additional studies near end of S2 run Night of April 9-10 Will need to set priorities and make plan in next ~2 weeks