7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Advertisements

Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
TPTF Presentation Registration of PUN Facilities December 19, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Split Generation Resources (SGRs) (Also known as Jointly Owned.
1 Market Trials Open Market Participant Call Weekly Kick Off Aug 16, 2010.
SBBH Flag Implementation QMWG October 11, SBBH Flag - Background SBBH Flag - Background: –The SBBH acronym stands for “SCED Base Point Below HDL”
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Requirement Documents November 7, 2006 Sai Moorty MMS Project.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
1 Settlement Changes R5 (SEP 2015) and R5.5 (OCT 2015) Blake Holt ERCOT COPS 9/14/2015.
Storage Integration – Look Ahead SCED Issues for ETWG CAES Perspectives Brandon Whittle ETWG Storage Workshop.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
ROS Meeting – 12/06/071Texas Nodal Program - TPTF Update Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force ROS Meeting Stacy Bridges, ERCOT Thursday, 12/06/2007.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Private Use Networks SIG Paper Review TPTF Meeting (version :15)
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal LFC Testing Review Review of materials presented at TAC Changes in Market Trials schedule and activities.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
1 Market Trials Update NATF June 1, 2010.
Optimizing Deployment of CCGT Duct Firing Capacity in the Nodal Market Josh Clevenger Brazos Electric Cooperative.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC September 2 nd, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meetings of &
Resource Parameters Needed for LFC NATF WebEx Meeting 05/11/2010 Dave Maggio Operations Engineer, Supply Integration and Grid Applications.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS 3 Early Delivery System Plan TPTF April 02, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Presentation transcript:

7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations

TPTF7 August, 2006 Notification of Mitigation in SCED If SCED issues a base point based on a mitigated offer, is there a requirement that QSEs be notified? –If not, is it something to add as a nice-to-have?

TPTF7 August, 2006 Use of Combined Cycle Power Augmentation Methods Protocol (9) –A QSE representing combined-cycle Resources shall provide ERCOT with the possible operating configurations for each power block with accompanying limits and price points. Power augmentation methods must be made available to ERCOT as part of one or more of the configurations. Price points for the range of the curve represented by the power augmentation method must reflect the price of the added capability. Such power augmentation methods may include: (a)Combustion turbine inlet air cooling (CTIAC) methods; (b)Duct firing; (c)Other ways of temporarily increasing the output of combined-cycle Resources; and (d)For QFs, an LSL that represents the minimum energy available, in MW, from the Resource for economic dispatch based on the minimum stable steam delivery to the thermal host plus a justifiable reliability margin that accounts for changes in ambient conditions. Assumption is that this is instructing QSEs to include these methods when considering their configuration limits and bids and ERCOT does provide any specific type of dispatch or commitment to account for these methods.

TPTF7 August, 2006 Use of Generic Incremental Cost for Energy Dispatch in RUC Protocol (4) –To determine the projected energy output level of each Resource and to project potential congestion patterns for each hour of the RUC, ERCOT shall calculate proxy Energy Offer Curves based on the Mitigated Offer Caps for the type of Resource as specified in Section , Mitigated Offer Cap and Mitigated Offer Floor, for use in the RUC. Proxy Energy Offer Curves are calculated by multiplying the Mitigated Offer Cap by a constant selected by ERCOT from time to time and applying the cost for all Generation Resource output between HSL and LSL. The constant selected by ERCOT may not be more than Multiplying offers by a small constant (.001) will prevent offers from influencing commitment ERCOT is concerned that using Mitigated Caps instead of available Offers will produce a inaccurate dispatch prediction within RUC leading to a different set of transmission constraints than would be present in SCED

TPTF7 August, 2006 Energy Offer Curves for RUC Committed Units Is a QSE required to submit an Energy Offer Curve for a RUC committed unit? –If Yes: This would be consistent with Zonal Protocols Would allow Settlement Calculations to be simpler Needs to be in Protocols –If No: RUC calculation depends on Energy Offer Curve (through RTAIEC) Using Proxy Curves developed around Output Schedule leads to times when it is financially rewarding for QSEs to not enter offer curve

TPTF7 August, 2006 Use of Telemetered Ramp Rate in Real-Time Protocols (1) –ERCOT shall use the telemetered Resource Status for all applications requiring status of Resources during the Operating Hour, including SCED, Load Frequency Control (LFC), and Network Security Analysis processes. QSEs shall provide ERCOT with accurate telemetry of the current capability of each Resource including the Resource Status, Ramp Rates, HSL, and LSL and a text reason for any Resource where a Ramp Rate is deviating from a standard Ramp Rate curve for the Resource, or the HSL is less than, or LSL is greater than, the normal high and low limits set in Section 3.7.1, Resource Parameter Criteria. Protocols –(c) Normal Ramp Rate by using the curve submitted by the QSE and the Resource’s MW telemtery; –(d) Emergency Ramp Rate by using the curve submitted by the QSE and the Resource’s MW telemtery; In Protocols , SCED ramp rates are calculated using normal and emergency ramp rates. What then, is the purpose of having a telemetered ramp rate? –ERCOT believes that using a telemetered ramp rate in SCED would be preferable since generation characteristics can change without timely update to registration data. –Use of telemetered ramp rates in SCED would require protocol changes.

TPTF7 August, 2006 Questions? The End