The Solar Dynamo NSO Solar Physics Summer School Tamara Rogers, HAO June 15, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The solar dynamo(s) Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Chicago 2003.
Advertisements

Chicago, October 2003 David Hughes Department of Applied Mathematics University of Leeds Nonlinear Effects in Mean Field Dynamo Theory.
Vu Pham A new dynamo pattern revealed by the tilt angle of bipolar sunspot groups Egor Illarionov Moscow State University Helicity Thinkshop on Solar Physics.
Historical Development of Solar Dynamo Theory Historical Development of Solar Dynamo Theory Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute.
The Origin of the Solar Magnetic Cycle Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science.
1. 2 Apologies from Ed and Karl-Heinz
Effects of magnetic diffusion profiles on the evolution of solar surface poloidal fields. Night Song The Evergreen State College Olympia, WA with.
Flux emergence: An overview of thin flux tube models George Fisher, SSL/UC Berkeley.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Influence of depth-dependent diffusivity profiles in governing the evolution of weak, large-scale magnetic fields of the sun Night Song and E.J. Zita,
Solar dynamo and the effects of magnetic diffusivity E.J. Zita and Night Song, The Evergreen State College 1 Mausumi Dikpati and Eric McDonald, HAO/NCAR.
On the Cause of Solar Differential Rotation Ling-Hsiao Lyu Institute of Space Science, National Central University 呂凌霄 中央大學太空科學研究所 太陽差動自轉的成因.
Relationship between the High and mid latitude Solar Magnetic Field Elena E. Benevolenskaya J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University.
Effects of magnetic diffusion profiles on the evolution of solar surface poloidal fields. Night Song The Evergreen State College Olympia, WA with.
Turbulent Dynamos and Small-Scale Activity in the Sun and Stars George H. Fisher Dave Bercik Chris Johns-Krull Lauren Alsberg Bill Abbett.
Kinetic and Magnetic Helicities of Solar Active Regions Ram Ajor Maurya, Ashok Ambastha And Vema Reddy Udaipur Solar Observatory Physical Research Laboratory,
Influence of depth-dependent diffusivity profiles in governing the evolution of weak, large-scale magnetic fields of the Sun Night Song and E.J. Zita,
GEOMAGNETISM: a dynamo at the centre of the Earth Lecture 2 How the dynamo works.
Influence of depth-dependent diffusivity profiles in governing the evolution of weak, large-scale magnetic fields of the Sun Night Song and E.J. Zita,
Prediction on Time-Scales of Years to Decades Discussion Group A.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetism Feb. 09, 2012.
THE CIRCULATION DOMINATED SOLAR DYNAMO MODEL REVISITED Gustavo A. Guerrero E. (IAG/USP) Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino (IAG/USP) Jose D. Muñoz (UNAL)
Magnetic models of solar-like stars Laurène Jouve (Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie) B-Cool meeting December 2011.
The Asymmetric Polar Field Reversal – Long-Term Observations from WSO J. Todd Hoeksema, Solar Observatories H.E.P.L., Stanford University SH13C-2278.
The Sun. Solar Prominence Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth.
The Flux Transport Dynamo, Flux Tubes and Helicity The Flux Transport Dynamo, Flux Tubes and Helicity Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) is operated by the.
Effects of the Observed Meridional Flow Variations since 1996 on the Sun’s Polar Fields David H. Hathaway 1 and Lisa Upton 2,3 1 NASA/Marshall Space Flight.
Large scale magnetic fields and Dynamo theory Roman Shcherbakov, Turbulence Discussion Group 14 Apr 2008.
CAP annual meeting, 7 June 2010 Magnetic cycles in global MHD simulations of solar convection Paul Charbonneau Département de Physique, Université de Montréal.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Solar Photospheric Flows and the Sunspot Cycle David H. Hathaway NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center National Space Science and Technology Center 9 January.
The Solar Dynamo and Emerging Flux Presented by Angelo P. Verdoni Physics 681 Fall 05 George H. Fisher, Yuhong Fan, Dana W. Longcope, Mark G. Linton and.
The Solar Dynamo Saga: Chapter12 David Hathaway NASA Marshall Space Flight Center 2011 December 12 – NSO
R.D. Simitev School of Mathematics & Statistics F.H. Busse Institute of Physics Convection-driven spherical dynamos: bistability and attempts to model.
Origin of Geomagnet 1.Introduction to MHD 2.Dynamo theory 3.Geodynamo 3.5 Secular variation&Field reversals 4.Reference 김희준.
Direct simulation of planetary and stellar dynamos II. Future challenges (maintenance of differential rotation) Gary A Glatzmaier University of California,
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 1: Interior and Photosphere.
Turbulent Dynamos: How I learned to ignore kinematic dynamo theory MFUV 2015 With Amir Jafari and Ben Jackel.
1 The Solar Dynamo I M.R.E.Proctor DAMTP, University of Cambridge Leeds, 6 September 2005.
3D Spherical Shell Simulations of Rising Flux Tubes in the Solar Convective Envelope Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center.
Recent Progress in Understanding The Sun’s Magnetic Dynamo David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center 2004 April 28 University.
Flows in the Solar Convection Zone David Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center 2004 July 21 David Hathaway NASA/MSFC National.
Asteroseismology A brief Introduction
June 08MRI Transport properties1 MRI-driven turbulent resistivity Pierre-Yves Longaretti (LAOG) Geoffroy Lesur (DAMTP)
Team Report on integration of FSAM to SWMF and on FSAM simulations of convective dynamo and emerging flux in the solar convective envelope Yuhong Fan and.
The Solar Dynamo Saga: Chapter 11 Dr. David Hathaway NASA Marshall Space Flight Center 2009 August 15 Huntsville Hamfest.
Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
The Solar Interior NSO Solar Physics Summer School Tamara Rogers, HAO June 14, 2007
Prograde patterns in rotating convection and implications for the dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen  Stockholm) Taylor-Proudman problem Near-surface.
Gary A Glatzmaier University of California, Santa Cruz Direct simulation of planetary and stellar dynamos I. Methods and results.
What the Long-Term Sunspot Record Tells Us About Space Climate David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, AL,
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
CSI /PHYS Solar Atmosphere Fall 2004 Lecture 04 Sep. 22, 2004 Solar Magnetic Field, Solar Cycle, and Solar Dynamo.
H. Isobe Plasma seminar 2004/06/16 1. Explaining the latitudinal distribution of sunspots with deep meridional flow D. Nandy and A.R. Choudhhuri 2002,
Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.
THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.
Turbulence in the Tachocline Mark Miesch HAO/NCAR.
What Thin Flux Tube Models Can Tell Us About Star Spots Thomas Granzer, Vienna,
Stability of magnetic fields in stars Vienna 11 th September 2007 Jonathan Braithwaite CITA, Toronto.
The Sun. Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth 12,742 km or nearly.
An update on convection zone modeling with the ASH code
THEORY OF MERIDIONAL FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION
Introduction to Space Weather
Introduction to Space Weather
A low order dynamo model and possible applications
The Sun.
Presentation transcript:

The Solar Dynamo NSO Solar Physics Summer School Tamara Rogers, HAO June 15, 2007

Regions of strong magnetic field (3000 Gauss) About 20000km diameter Lifetime of a few weeks PSPT (blue) PSPT (CaK) Sunspots on Solar Disk

Yohkoh X-ray images X-ray Activity over sunspot cycle

Joy’s law

Butterfly diagram –Equatorward propagation of activity starting from 35 degrees latitude over 11 years (individual lifetimes of sunspots ~ a few weeks) Hale’s polarity law –Opposite polarity of bipolar groups in north and south hemisphere –Polarity in individual hemisphere changes every 11 years Joy’s law –Bipolar groups are tilted to east-west direction –Leading polarity closer to equator –Tilt angle increases with latitude Summary of Observations

What is a dynamo? A dynamo is a process by which kinetic energy of fluid motion is converted into magnetic energy. By this process a magnetic field can maintain itself against ohmic dissipation Why study the dynamo? It’s the source of all magnetic activity on the Sun and likely most other stars (although the process of the dynamo is different in massive or very low mass stars) Why a dynamo? It is possible that a diffusing primordial field is responsible for the magnetism observed: the diffusion time for a poloidal field of is approximately 10 9 years, so this is not strictly ruled out. However, an oscillating primordial field would likely be observed by helioseismology (unless of course the oscillations took place in the tachocline or deep interior, regions not sampled well by helioseismology).

The (Magneto-) Hydrodynamic Equations

Terms: Poloidal - field in the direction Toroidal - field in the direction Meridional - flow in the direction Azimuthal - flow in the direction

Cowlings Theorem Assume an axisymmetric poloidal field, any such field must have a neutral point where: Because of the assumption of axisymmetry the neutral point must circle the rotation axis on this line the poloidal field must equal zero, however the toroidal current does not But we also know These are in contradiction==>assumptions are not consistent A steady state axisymmetric fluid flow can not maintain an axisymmetric magnetic field. The flow and field must be 3D or time dependent or both

Induction Equation becomes in spherical coordinates Axisymmetric Field, Axisymmetric Flow Poloidal field Toroidal field No source Term!! This is just another way to illustrate Cowling’s theorem: an axisymmetric flow CANNOT maintain an axisymmetric field--NO 2D DYNAMOS!!!

How to make an axisymmetric dynamo Need a way to make poloidal field (A) from toroidal field (B) - Parker (1955) pointed out that a rising field could be twisted by the Coriolis force producing poloidal field from toroidal field Can make toroidal field (B) from poloidal field (A, also B r,B ) with differential rotation effect This alpha effect is fundamentally 3D so how do we put it into 2D equations?

The alpha effect In the simplest approximation In bulk of convection zone (in N.H.), rising fluid elements produce + alpha effect (negative vorticity, positive radial velocity) in tachocline - alpha effect In CZ Note: in subadiabatic regions the above effect has opposite sign. Signs are all reversed in southern hemisphere This alpha effect is fundamentally 3D so how do we put it into 2D equations? Alpha is meant to represent the twisting an induction effect due to turbulent motions but we don’t want to solve for turbulence (hard!) so we will parametrize it

Mean Field Electrodynamics *assume flow and field are nearly axisymmetric with small scale turbulence Flow field and field are 2D axisymmetric Substituting these decompositions into Ohms law and doing the proper averaging Expand Electromotive Force in Taylor Series, keep only first two terms Induction equation then becomes In general alpha and beta should be tensors, in practice they are not

Axisymmetric flow+field with Mean Field approximation “ Dynamos” These models are also called “kinematic” which means that the flow is specified and not allowed to evolve in response to the field

Solutions of the dynamo equations allow wave solutions (Parker 1955) who suggested that a latitudinally propagating wave was the source of the sunspot cycle Dynamo waves travel in the direction (Parker-Yoshimura sign rule): At low latitudes: Need a negative (-) alpha effect for equatorward propagation (good) (from helioseismology) If alpha effect is in tachocline: If alpha effect is in bulk of CZ: At low latitudes: Need a negative (-) alpha effect for equatoward propagation (bad) The Dynamo Wave

The Role of the Tachocline The tachocline provides the proper sign for the alpha effect to produce a dynamo wave that propagates toward the equator at low latitudes - good place for the alpha effect The radial shear in the tachocline provides ideal place for Omega effect. The remarkable coherence of sunspots (Hale’s Law and Joy’s Law) require a field strong enough to resist shredding by turbulent motions in the convection zone. Such a field strength can only be generated in the tachocline where the Parker instability is less efficient Cartoon schematic of dynamo process

Typical Solutions - Kinematic dynamos There are numerous models called by different names: Babcock-Leighton, Interface, Flux Transport, etc. They vary mainly in where the effect occurs: Get VASTLY different results depending on what you specify for alpha (both in radius and latitude) (-) alpha in tachocline gives equatorward propagation (observed) Poleward propagating component amplitude is too high (compared with observations) Can get remarkably periodic Solutions (even 11 years) - due to solutions of the alpha-Omega dynamo equations

alpha-Omega dynamos + Meridional Circulation Take previous alpha-Omega mean field equations (which only had differential rotation) and add a meridional circulation - same profile of alpha as previously Again, get VASTLY different results depending on assumptions

Typical Solutions - Kinematic dynamos The Flux Transport Dynamo Unlike typical dynamos, the flux transport dynamo relies on meridional circulation to bodily advect the toroidal field, instead of a dynamo wave

The Flux Transport Dynamo Again, can get nice periodic solutions with equatorward propagation at low latitude, but poleward branch is bad (typical).

Whats Wrong with these Models? Mean field theory requires that there be clear scale separation (i.e. that the mean quantities (B, u) are much larger than the fluctuating quantities (B’,u’) -- observations and simulations show that there is a range of spatial scales with no clear distinction between “large” and “small” There is no feedback. The MHD equations are COUPLED, the flow affects the field which affects the flow which affects the energy… They are solving 2 equations out of 7!! *Only keep first two terms in series expansion of induction term *The models are HIGHLY PARAMETRIZED, alpha is not known empirically it can be “tuned” to reproduce the results you want (like the butterfly diagram). What we really need (and want) to do is to solve the full MHD equations in a sphere (remember: expensive). This has been done for the Earth’s dynamo and is being done for the Sun

Earth’s Dynamo

Solar Dynamo No reversal and certainly no butterfly diagram or equatorward propagation of toroidal field…but this model does not have a tachocline LOTS OF WORK TO BE DONE

The Induction Equation