November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Calculation Tool for Estimating Projected Emissions - Methods Roll Out – (Day 2 – 1300-1400) Phase III/IV Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For Missouri Commission PLEXOS Q&A for Missouri Commission.
Advertisements

For Missouri Commission PLEXOS Q&A for Missouri Commission.
Lecture # 2 : Process Models
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
GoldSim Technology Group LLC, 2007 Slide 1 GoldSim User Conference San Francisco, CA October 25-26, 2007 GoldSim Tutorial and Discussion: Techniques for.
ECONOMIC Data MANAGEMENT at the IMF
WRAP 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting February 9-10, 2005 – Round Rock, TX Dave Randall.
Fire Modeling issues: fire effects on regional air quality under a changing climate Douglas G. Fox
CSTEP Cluster Sampling for Tail Estimation of Probability.
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
From Inception to Elaboration Chapter 8 Applying UML and Patterns -Craig Larman.
The Art and Science of Estimating Software Development Cost Glenn Briskin Partner, Sierra Systems Group A. Nicklas Malik Technical Architect Certified.
1 July 12, 2006/10a Fire Emissions Tracking System White Paper Fire Emissions Joint Forum July 11-12, 2006 Portland, OR Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc.
Western Regional Air Partnership Emissions Database Management System Presentation to Fire Emissions Joint Forum Las Vegas, Nevada December 09, 2004 E.H.
WRAP Fire Emissions Tracking System Project Update, Outline, and Timeline WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February p.
Carboncredits.nl Baseline Methodologies Dispatch Analysis Gerhard Mulder Project Officer.
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 3:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Ag Burning – Integration of QC responses -- NIF Format -- Plume Characteristics Update -- Next Steps.
MONTANA REGIONAL HAZE VISIBILITY PROTECTION PLAN REGULATION OF OPEN BURNING SOURCES BOB HABECK Montana Department of Environmental Quality June 17, 2004.
WRAP/FEJF Inter RPO Report WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (c)
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Projections Guidebook Chapter (Version 3 Draft 0) By Justin Goodwin On behalf of The Guidebook Update Project.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 In-house QC Semi-Automated Duplicate Checking, Large Fire Refinement Complex Fire Identification Phase 2 Fire.
WRAP/FEJF Phase III/IV Emissions Inventory Project WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (a)
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 1:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Technical Refinements Large Fires Complex Identification Duplicates -- WF and Rx Fire QC Packets States,
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Fire Plume Rise WRAP (FEJF) Method vs. SMOKE.
November 2, 2005 (Afternoon Revision) San Diego, California1.
2005 WRAP Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 Rangeland Burning (Non-Federal Lands) Methodology Phase 2 Fire Emission Inventory WRAP – FEJF.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
12/14/20151 Fire Emissions Tracking System Development & Implementation Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling Studies Biogenics, Ammonia,
September 28, 2005Ph III/IV Project Team1 Phase III/IV Planning EIs Update and Status Report.
Introduction Session (Day 1 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2, 2005 – San Diego, CA.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
1/13/20161 FETS: State of the System Providers, Features, Lessons Learned August 31, 2009 FETS Project Meeting Boise, ID.
Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development Day 1 – 2:45p Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development.
NEDC/WLTP correlation process Meeting of TCMV on 17 November 2015
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Wildfire Emissions Updated Methodology Neva Sotolongo Emission Inventory Branch.
Overview of ARS Presentations and Review of EI Data Sets AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
309/308 Technical & Policy Overview Fire Emissions Joint Forum March 10-11, 2004 San Diego, CA.
E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 1 EDMS Purpose Regional Haze Rule Implementation Performance Monitoring Region-Wide Emission Inventory Analysis of Collected.
TSS Project Update WRAP Technical Analysis Forum Boise, ID May 22, 2007.
An Integrated Fire, Smoke and Air Quality Data & Tools Network Stefan Falke and Rudolf Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis Washington.
Application of Fuel Characteristic Classification System to Ph II EI (add-on task to Inter RPO project) Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA.
September 28, 2005Missoula, Montana1 Inter-RPO 2002 National Wildfire Emission Inventory - Results - by Air Sciences Inc. and EC/R, Inc. for the Inter-RPO.
WRAP Activities Overview §308 Technical Work Outline June 3, 2003.
November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Strawman Projection Activity Targets (Day 1 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2,
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire group: Peng Gong, Ruiliang Pu, Presented by Nick.
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, & Dust Emissions of Carbon from Fire Fire Emissions Joint Forum Presented by – Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc. May 23, 2006.
Computer Programming 12 Lesson 6 – Loop structure By: Dan Lunney.
Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed 04/02/2013.
1 Fire Emissions Inventories (almost) Closeout -- Ph IV Projections – Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA Day 1 – 1015a part A Dave Randall.
MANE-VU 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Megan Schuster Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting Austin, TX February 2005.
Performing What-if Analysis
Experimental Power Graphing Program
Training Session Fire Emissions Tracking System
Annual Emission Goals for Fire
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
July 11, 2006 / 3p Phase IV Projection Emission Inventories
Module 2B - Data Systems Marco MERENS Nevin MURAD Lima, March 2019
Emissions reduction techniques (ERTs) Whither FEJF?
Fire Emissions and Smoke Management Plans
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
Smoke Management in Alaska
Emissions Reduction Techniques (ERTs)
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Calculation Tool for Estimating Projected Emissions - Methods Roll Out – (Day 2 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2, 2005 – San Diego, CA

November 2, 2005San Diego, California2 Purpose Software application that generates an event-level prescribed burning emission inventory given estimates of future levels of burning and applies ERTs. The calculation tool will be designed for use by experts in fire and smoke management. Goal of this contract is to develop a prototype version.

November 2, 2005San Diego, California3 Main Features Input projected acres of prescribed burning by state. Characterize the application rate and percent reduction of ERTs. Create a database of fire events with fuel consumption, emissions, location and date suitable for dispersion modeling. The statistics generating the event attributes (not activity levels) are calibrated to the QC’ed WRAP Phase II emission inventory.

November 2, 2005San Diego, California4 Current Status The Calc Tool is an Excel 2003 workbook: –WRAP Phase II Prescribed Fire events pre-loaded. –Targets as acres per state typed into a “control sheet.” –Formulas and macro to add/remove events to meet target acres. –Query to export final DBF of new events. Currently implemented for generating Baseline emission inventories from Phase II events. Adapted version will scale Baseline to Projections. ERT module is under development and will “plug in” to current Calc Tool. All Baseline fire EIs were created using the Calc Tool in house at Air Sciences. No demo today because the interface is rough, better to get weigh in on methods.

November 2, 2005San Diego, California5 Scaling Logic Control Sheet Enter scalars for Less, Likely, and More scenarios. Generate New Events Calc tool selects events until scalars are met (in acres). If exhaust number of Baseline events per state and agency (scalar >1), then start pulling again from top of list Baseline EI Events sorted randomly, grouped by state and agency Repeated events: Given new date in same month. Location assumed to vary within model grid cell. * Projection EI Events with baseline stats and summing to projection activity * This is a deliberate coarse scale assumption in line with a state-level tool. Events effectively move (in time and location) and we don’t risk putting them too far from where they should be.

November 2, 2005San Diego, California6 ERT Logic ERT Input Enter ERT reduction factors, application rates, and scenario weights Apply ERTs For each projection scenario, calc tool applies ERTs to emissions already attached to events coming from the Baseline EI. Performed on anthropogenic/ controllable events only. Rx Projection EI Rx events with baseline stats and summing to projection activity ERT Applied Projection EI Events with baseline stats, summing to projection activity acres, and credited for ERTs

November 2, 2005San Diego, California7 1- User enters scalars 2- Tool calculates number of new events/acres needed 3- Events are “looked up” from randomized Source sheet into New Events sheet

November 2, 2005San Diego, California8 Using Historic Data Resulting EIs consist of modified historic Phase II events –Benefits Realistic day-to-day events… mimic historic variability in events even for a planning inventory with new activity levels. Same overall seasonality, fuel types, locations, etc. preserves realistic annual profile… scenarios are only changing what we want to change. Important to “control” for this in planning EIs. –Potential Limits Requires a historic event database and currently based on WRAP 2002 Phase II. Repeating events risks “data inbreeding” for states going from low activity to very high activity. (However, this was solved for in the case of Baseline WFU by cloning wildfire events.)