Flow Flexibility Capacity Joint Office 7 th December 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mod 0508 Revised Distributed Gas Charging Arrangements  Proposed change to take into account that flows from DN Entry points to DN Supply Points should.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Review Group 0166 Review of Necessary Reform of NTS Offtake Arrangements 20 th September 2007 Beverley Grubb SGN.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Linepack ‘Park and Loan’ Quantity - Influencing Factors Review Group 291 – July 2010.
Exit Reform Review Transmission Workstream 07 January 2010.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
20 September 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Introduction of Gas Reserve Arrangements Mark Bailey Gaz de France ESS.
A layman’s guide to the structure of LDZ gas charges 27 July 2009 Please note – in the interests of clarity and accessibility, simplifications have been.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Capacity Release Processes and Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Mod 116B Steve Rose - on behalf of RWE Trading. 2 Background Mod 116 B was raised after discussion with a number of shippers about aspects Mod 116 which.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Flow Variations at Entry Transmission Workstream Martin Watson 1 st November 2007.
Mod 214 – Reservation of firm NTS Exit Capacity at new NTS Exit Points in the transitional period Steve Rose.
Flow Margin Assumptions for NTS Planning and Development Transmission Planning Code Workshop 3 5 th June 2008.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves.
10 November 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Modification Proposal 0086 “Introduction of gas demand management reserve arrangements” 1 st June 2006 Phil Broom and.
DNPC06 LDZ NEC Charges Denis Aitchison 25 th January 2010.
UNC modification proposal 0407 : Standardisation of notice periods for offtake rate changes for all National Grid NTS Exit Users Transmission Workstream.
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
Transmission Planning Code – Design Margin Update Transmission Workstream, 4 th February 2010.
Review Group 221 Session 3: 13 October Introduction  During this presentation we will seek views on the following questions.  What should the.
Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.
1 Operating Margins – Request for Proposals Transmission Workstream 6 th April 2006 Dave Smith, National Grid NTS.
Initial Thoughts on the Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 3 rd April 2008.
DN Operation Iain Ward DNCC Manager. Responsibilities  Licence Holder  Obligation For 1 In 20 Capacity  DNCC Operates Networks Under Direction of The.
1 Modification Proposal 0199: Clarification around the application of the UNC Dispute Resolution Process Alison Chamberlain National Grid Distribution.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
Modification Proposal 0395 & 0398 – Limitation on Retrospective Invoicing and Invoice Correction 1 st December 2011.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Gas Distribution Transportation Charging What are the Risks to Pricing predictability? Stephen Marland Pricing Manager
The calculation of the NTS Optional Commodity tariff (NTS Shorthaul) in the Enduring Exit Period Richard Hounslea/Debra Hawkin National Grid NTS, Gas Charging.
Ofgem Information Request on availability of NTS Exit Flexibility Capacity Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager National Grid Transmission 7 th.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
UNC Modification 0050 – Storage Monitor Adjustment.
RIIO Gas Transmission Workshop - 5 th Sept Supplementary information 1 Hypothetical examples to illustrate the impact of combining the constraint management.
Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements.
MOD0164 Bi-Directional Connection Point Overrun Charge Calculation Stuart Waudby (Centrica Storage Ltd.)
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update Offtake Agreement Workstream, 30 Nov 05 Dave Adlam.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
The Role of TSO. Madrid, 7-8 Feb The Role of TSO2 The roles of industry players First vision of role of TSO in GTE position paper Industry players.
System Operator information transparency. As Transmission System Transporter National Grid Gas undertakes responsibility for safe, effective and efficient.
MIPI Energy – Daily Reports
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
Transmission Workstream, 6 August
Gas Transmission Access Code: Submission on GIC Preliminary Assessment
2 hour / 5% Rule Bethan Winter.
MOD0166 – Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Storage Perspective
DN OAD Processes: RG 0316 : Offtake Workstream
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
Review Group /09/2007.
UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005
Stefan Leedham Transmission Workstream 2nd November 2006
Unidentified Gas (UIG)
Presentation transcript:

Flow Flexibility Capacity Joint Office 7 th December 2006

Effect of Within Day Demand Change ShipperDNNTS  Actual demand is below expectation  Shippers are long and system is in imbalance  Actual demand is below expectation  National Balance depends upon DNs hitting end of day stock  Hence need to reduce offtake from NTS  Actual demand is below expectation  DNs pass imbalance onto NTS  National Balance is achieved by selling gas off the system/shippers informed of imbalance Consider situation where demand is falling: Therefore imbalance should be resolved by flow change not by use of NTS storage

Effect of Within Day Demand Change Offtake Rate Time 22:0006:00 Planned Flow Rate at start of day Flexibility utilisation = cumulative offtake to 22:00 – (2/3) of daily flow

Effect of Within Day Demand Change Offtake Rate Time 22:0006:00 Planned Flow Rate at start of day Actual Flow Rate Change of flow to meet change of demand forecast increases flow flex utilisation The following example demonstrates the effect of a demand change at 22:00; 22:00 was chosen for the sake of clarity

Effect of Within Day Demand Change Offtake Rate Time 22:0006:00 Planned Flow Rate at start of day Actual Flow Rate Change of flow to meet change of demand forecast increases flow flex utilisation The following example demonstrates the effect of a demand change at 22:00; 22:00 was chosen for the sake of clarity Average Flow Rate

Effect of Within Day Demand Change Offtake Rate Time 22:0006:00 Planned Flow Rate at start of day Actual Flow Rate Change of flow to meet change of demand forecast increases flow flex utilisation The following example demonstrates the effect of a demand change at 22:00; 22:00 was chosen for the sake of clarity Average Flow Rate Flexibility utilisation

Impacts  DNs must ensure that their bookings of flow flex allow for this effect.  This artificially inflates the volume of storage required by a DN  Whilst the flow flex apparently taken has no impact on NTS storage  the NTS cannot simply oversell flow flex as they would then be unable to deliver if the DNs chose to use their allocation of flow flex to meet true diurnal demand  DN investment will be required to provide additional storage that is unnecessary  If a DN runs out of flow flex, they will have an incentive to keep within their flow flex limit by increasing their end of day stock  This hides the imbalance from the NTS, undermining both the “national” and “daily” elements of the balance  When demand has been under-forecast the opposite effect occurs with the apparent consumption of flow flex being understated  Thus NTS storage could be over-stretched without the connected parties having broken their flow flex limits

Flow Flex Utilisation Correction  Presently: flow flex = flow (06:00 to 22:00) – 16/24 (end of day flow) But can correct for within day demand change: Real flow flex utilisation = metered flow flex – correction Where correction = demand change * correction factor Overruns triggered if real flow flex utilisation > booked flow flex

Flow Flex Utilisation Correction Factors Time of Forecast Change Coversion of Forecast Change to Flow Flex Hours Action Pre 2200 Hours Action Post 2200Total Hours Action % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %011

Example TimeDemand Change (mcm) Correction factor Flow flex correction (mcm) 10: = : – 35.9 = : – 36.1 = : – 35.7 = Total0.281 The following example shows how a falling demand throughout the day would result in a flow flex correction of mcm representing 8% of the LDZ flow flex requirements

Advantages of Correcting for Within Day Demand Change Reveal real NTS diurnal support required by DNs Avoids undermining NTS balance No incentive for DNs to hide imbalance Provide certainty to DNs when booking flow flexibility Reduce costs of DNs investing to provide storage