Dr. Richard R. Vondrak Director, Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters September 2004 NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 Session 5: Focused DiscussionsMissions in Definition Possible Next Decade Major In-situ Exploration Missions: AFL and Deep Drill Andrew Steele, David.
Advertisements

Jose Castellano, Daniel McNeel Dr. Paul Higbie, Dr. Boris Kiefer Department of Physics i160.photobucket.com/.../shs_moonWater-1.jpg.
Modern Exploration Global Surveyor.  Objectives:  High resolution imaging of the surface  Study the topography and gravity  Study the role of water.
1 Architecture and Planning Strategies for Addressing Radiation, Space Weather, and Space Climatology Impact on NASA Missions Study Sponsor - NASA Office.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter NASA’s Next First Step To The Moon Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center May 12 th, 2009.
Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.
A Polar Volatiles Laboratory A. Smith, R. A. Gowen, I. A. Crawford Shackleton Crater ESA Smart-1.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
LRO/LEND LEND 1 LCROSS Site Selection Workshop October 16 th 2006 Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector Evaluation of Potential LCROSS Impact Sites Igor Mitrofanov.
Astronaut-Aided Construction of a Large Lunar Telescope Background Concepts for large astronomical facilities to follow the Next Generation Space Telescope.
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
School of Earth and Space Exploration Existing Lunar Datasets M. S. Robinson School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Mapping and Modeling Project Summary and Status Go for Lunar Landing Conference Tempe,
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
Flags Courtesy of 3dflags.com Robotic Precursor Missions to the Moon and Mars Douglas. A. Craig Tetsuji Yoshida NASA- HQ Shimizu Corp. November 2008.
LCROSS Our next mission to the surface of the Moon. Developed and managed by NASA Ames Research Center in partnership with Northrop Grumman. Goal: to.
Mars Program Update James L. Green Acting Director, Mars Exploration Program NASA Headquarters May 13, 2014 NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Introduction to Lunar Excavator Senior Design Project Mission Objective: Design a excavator to dig lunar.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
TEMPO Mission Project July 23, 2013 Project Manager: Alan Little.
Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Planning for the Mapping and Exploration of Human.
Oh, Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven: Fueling Up in Space with In-Situ Resource Utilization ASTE-527 Final Presentation Riley Garrett.
Filling Mars Human Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps with Next Generation Meteorological Instrumentation. S. Rafkin, Southwest Research Institute
ESMD Education Presentation to Space Grant Directors March 2007 Jerry Hartman Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Education Lead.
Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Overview 4/13/2005 Craig Tooley.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
Modern Exploration Mars Odyssey  NASA’s theme for Mars exploration, “Follow the Water”, began with the 2001 Mars Odyssey mission  Odyssey, and every.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center RLEP Overview.
Mars Geochemistry and Future Experiment Needs Mark A. Bullock August 7, 2002.
Presented to Kepler Pre-Launch Educator Workshop January 31, 2009 Shari Asplund Discovery and New Frontiers Programs Education and Public Outreach Manager.
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
MATT Report Feb. 20, Philip Christensen (Chair) Lars Borg (ND-SAG Co-Chair) Wendy Calvin (MSO SAG Chair) Mike Carr Dave Des Marais (ND-SAG Co-Chair)
USGS DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS AND MOSAICS FOR LMMP M. R. Rosiek, E. M. Lee, E. T. Howington-Kraus, R. L. Fergason, L. A. Weller, D. M. Galuszka, B. L. Redding,
1 Rita Sambruna Lia LaPiana NASA HQ NASA HQ The Science Definition Team for the astrophysics-focused use(s) of the Telescope Assets.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Overview CRaTER PDR 6/27/2005 Craig Tooley.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Mark Robinson, PI Arizona State University School of Earth and Space Exploration Resource Mapping Surface Operations.
1 LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Introduction to Workshop and Overview of Process Dr. Jennifer L. Heldmann NASA Ames Research Center / SETI Institute.
Discoveries in Planetary Sciencehttp://dps.aas.org/education/dpsdisc/ Water Found on the Moon Analysis of lunar rocks collected by Apollo astronauts did.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 NMP 2-1 EW M ILLENNIUM P ROGRA NNMM Program Overview Dr. Christopher Stevens Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of.
The Mars Exploration Program
NASA’s Exploration Plan: “Follow the Water” GEOLOGY LIFE CLIMATE Prepare for Human Exploration When Where Form Amount WATER NASA’s Strategy for Mars Exploration.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
EGU Conference,Vienna, April15, 2008 An Update to MoonLITE Lunar Mission Rob Gowen, MSSL/UCL On behalf of the UK Penetrator Consortium + international.
Apollo 50 Lunar Mission Concept Goal: Initiate a series of lunar campaign missions, inspired by Apollo 11, to explore the potential of the Moon for science.
Interlude  Viking mission operations ended in the early 1980s  Viking missions gave scientists the most complete picture of Mars to date. What does this.
Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Evaluation of Impact Sites Martin Slade October 16, 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion.
LRO SRR LRO Mission Overview.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project Jennifer Heldmann LCROSS Observation Campaign Coordinator NASA Ames Research Center February 29,
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center RLEP Overview James G. Watzin GSFC/Code 430 (RLEP) August 16-17, 2005.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR LRO Mission Level 1 Requirements.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science 1 NASA—Johnson Space Center Astromaterials Research and Exploration.
Lunar Surface Atmosphere Spectrometer (LSAS) Objectives: The instrument LSAS is designed to study the composition and structure of the Lunar atmosphere.
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
Mission: Moon!. What is it like on the Moon? Length of Day Atmosphere Temperature Water Radiation Gravity Landscape.
Ice At the Moon - How the Moon Mineralogy Mapper on Chandrayaan-1 Will Help Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center March 4 th, 2009.
JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE)
Soviet Venera Program.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter CRaTER Critical Design Review
Return to The Moon: An International Perspective
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
Modern Exploration Mars Odyssey
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
Chang’e 5 Mission Chinese Lunar Exploration Program (CLEP)
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Richard R. Vondrak Director, Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters September 2004 NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration Program 2008 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)

Robotic Lunar Exploration “Starting no later than 2008, initiate a series of robotic missions to the Moon to prepare for and support future human exploration activities” - Space Exploration Policy Directive, January 2004

Robotic Lunar Exploration Program  A program-level systems approach to robotic exploration of the Moon that will reduce cost and risk for human exploration missions.  First mission launch in 2008, to be followed by approximately yearly missions –2008 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter –2009/2010 Robotic Lunar Landed Mission –Future Robotic Lunar Testbeds/Orbiters  Managed and implemented by the Robotic Lunar Exploration Program in the Solar System Division of SMD Program implementation modeled after highly successful Mars Program Program implementation assigned to Goddard Space Flight Center  Requirements for these missions determined by Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, in cooperation with the Science Mission Directorate  Funding requested to begin in FY 05 ($70M); $1.3B through FY 09

RLEP Measurement Objectives  Acquisition of a high spatial resolution, 3-dimensional, geodetic grid for the Moon at landing site scales  Characterization of the lunar environment and its biological impacts (including radiation, dust, thermal, and partial gravity)  Characterization of lunar regolith in preparation for ISRU activities  Identification of possible water ice resources on the lunar surface through orbital and in-situ ground truth measurements Hydrogen concentrations in the lunar polar regions measured by Lunar Prospector

 Demonstration of precision landing on the lunar surface  Demonstration of shielding capabilities, as well as prototype hardware and software for monitoring/mitigating space environment effects on humans  Demonstration of ISRU package for water ice, if any is found on the lunar surface, and/or demonstration of oxygen extraction from lunar regolith  Establishment of communications infrastructure for future robotic and human missions Technology and Infrastructure Objectives

Development of RLEP Architecture  Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Requirements have been established Objectives and Requirements Definition Team (ORDT) convened in March to prioritize measurements NASA Exploration Systems Review Board approved recommended payload requirements  Architectural Trade Studies underway to aid in determining scope and frequency of missions from 2008 through (first human landing) Pathways approach for post-LRO missions with flexibility to incorporate recent data (I.e. water ice discovery), science findings, and technology developments into architecture Anticipate that Mission #2 might be surface measurement in south polar region  Requests for Information (RFIs) released for: LRO mission ground system and operations Surface water ice validation concepts Radiation/biology surface demonstration Advanced technology for space platform architectures  “Lunar Exploration Program Analysis Group” modeled after Mars group with an Exploration focus will have first meeting soon Analysis from this group will aid in prioritization of lunar program objectives as well as definition of program architecture Plan to involve academia, industry, and NASA centers

2008 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter: First Step in the Lunar Exploration Program Lunar Orbiter camera

LRO Mission Objectives  Four primary objectives, in priority order 1. Characterization of the lunar radiation environment, biological impacts, and potential mitigation –Determine global radiation environment –Investigate shielding capabilities of materials –Validate other deep space radiation prototype hardware and software 2. Determine a high resolution global, geodetic grid of the Moon (in 3 dimensions) –Provide necessary topography sufficient to quantify safety of future landing sites 3. Assess in detail the resources and environments of the Moon’s polar regions, including ices (if any) 4. Assess globally at high spatial resolution the following (for the lunar surface): –Elemental composition –Mineralogy –Regolith characteristics  ORDT recognized that achieving 4th objective for 2008 LRO would be difficult ORDT Recommended Objectives for the LRO Mission

 The AO solicits measurement investigations for the LRO from the eight highest priority measurement sets as follows: Characterization of the deep space radiation environment in lunar orbit Geodetic global topography High spatial resolution hydrogen mapping and assessment of ice (if any) Temperature mapping in polar shadowed regions Imaging of the lunar surface in permanently shadowed regions Identification of putative deposits of appreciable near- surface water ice in the polar cold traps Assessment of meter and smaller scale features for potential landing sites Characterization of the changing lunar surface illumination conditions in polar regions at time scales as short as hours  Mission is “Discovery Class” in Scope  1000 kg spacecraft (wet)  100 kg instruments  One year of observations from 50 km circular polar orbit LRO Mission Overview

LRO Mission Profile Launch from Kennedy Space Center on Delta-II class ELV Primary mission of at least 1 year in circular polar mapping orbit (nominal altitude 50 km) Potential extended mission at low maintenance elliptical “relay” orbit (to end-of-life ~5yrs), or flown for short duration in low altitude orbit which terminates in targeted impact Trajectory analysis by Dave Folta, GSF Code 595

LRO Status  Project schedule established for the 2008 LRO Mission  LRO Measurement Investigations AO was released June 18 Proposal Information Package posted on Web Proposals submitted September 15 Selection planned for November 30  Major design drivers and mission trade studies are ongoing  Communications requirements for RLEP Mission #2 support defined  Project infrastructure & staffing development underway at GSFC /6 FBO 6/18 AO Release 11/30 AO Select 5/15 PDR10/15 Confirm 4/15 CDR10/15 Instrument Delivery 10/15 LRD 7/7 Pre-Prop Conf.

RLEP Synergy with Science  RLEP will have a Research and Analysis (R&A) program Supports science-based data analysis by the broader science community Results will help guide future missions and provide information beneficial to exploration Results will help define science-based activities by human missions and provide basis of landing site choices  Science and technology gained from SMD’s New Frontiers, Discovery, and Mars Scout missions could naturally enhance/extend the RLEP If SMD selects science-driven lunar missions or MoO’s as part of these programs, the results can be leveraged by the RLEP