Emily C. Prosser, Valerie L. VanTussi, Jaime R. Barth, & Blaine F. Peden, Ph.D. Psychology Department at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Women’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Advising Convenience: Undergraduate Perspective of Alternative Techniques Kathryn Scherber & Carissa Gutsmiedl Department of Psychology University.
Advertisements

NOTE: Women ages years. SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation, 2013 Kaiser Womens Health Survey. Most women have had recent checkups, but the opportunity.
Inferential Statistics
Dr. Hala Hazam Al-Otaibi Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Community Nutrition College of Agriculture and Food Science, King Faisal University.
Comparing One Sample to its Population
Amanda Conley, Megan DeRusha, & Blaine Peden  Department of Psychology University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Peer Pressure in the Potty?: The Relationship.
Psychological Distress and Timely Use of Routine Care: The Importance of Having Health Insurance and a Usual Source of Care among Women with Children Whitney.
Improving health outcomes across England by providing improvement and change expertise How to Measure Patient Activation Measuring Patient Activation In.
“His and Her” Heart Attacks: The Effects of Gender Relevance on Women’s Receptiveness to Health-Related Information Abigail L. Riggs, Traci A. Giuliano,
Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation
CHAPTER 23: Two Categorical Variables: The Chi-Square Test
Introduction Who’s to blame? Effects of Perpetrator Gender and Victim Confrontation on Perceptions of Blame Variables Results Method Domestic violence:
MSS 905 Methods of Missiological Research
Christine Bastedo Robert Magyar Spring,  Determine if students are meeting learning objectives across all sections of PSY 121, Methods and Tools.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS DEPT Esimating Population Value with Hypothesis Testing.
Nemours Biomedical Research Statistics March 19, 2009 Tim Bunnell, Ph.D. & Jobayer Hossain, Ph.D. Nemours Bioinformatics Core Facility.
Matching level of measurement to statistical procedures
Correlations and T-tests
PY 427 Statistics 1Fall 2006 Kin Ching Kong, Ph.D Lecture 6 Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
Method Introduction Results Discussion The Effect of Self-Esteem, Marital Status, and Gender on Trait Anxiety and Stress Emily B Gale University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Note: FPL refers to federal poverty level. * A composite of the following four indicators measures access to a medical home: 1) having a regular doctor.
Genderization of Social Media By: Rakhi, Lisa, Mary, and Tricia.
Statistical Analysis. Purpose of Statistical Analysis Determines whether the results found in an experiment are meaningful. Answers the question: –Does.
Project Background Results Amanda Krueger & Tiffany Huynh  Dr. Robert J. Eierman  ORSP  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire prioritieschallenges The.
1 Faculty of Social Sciences Induction Block: Maths & Statistics Lecture 5: Generalisability of Social Research and the Role of Inference Dr Gwilym Pryce.
Modular 15 Ch 10.1 to 10.2 Part I. Ch 10.1 The Language of Hypothesis Testing Objective A : Set up a Hypothesis Testing Objective B : Type I or Type II.
Statistical Analysis Statistical Analysis
Alcohol Use and Quality of Life of Textile Handcrafters This study was part of a larger study which explored the roles of textiles and handcrafts in women’s.
QNT 531 Advanced Problems in Statistics and Research Methods
Background Purposes of the Study Methods Amanda Rumpca and Dr. Marie Stadler, Ph.D. CCC-SLP  Communication Sciences and Disorders  University of Wisconsin-Eau.
Exploring College Students’ Perceptions of Their Peers With Disabilities Katie Beck a and Kellie Risberg a, Faculty Mentor: Mary Beth Leibham b, Ph.D.
T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.
Jan 17,  Hypothesis, Null hypothesis Research question Null is the hypothesis of “no relationship”  Normal Distribution Bell curve Standard normal.
The Argument for Using Statistics Weighing the Evidence Statistical Inference: An Overview Applying Statistical Inference: An Example Going Beyond Testing.
What do Centurions think about our school spirit? Diana Tapia Period
Provider knowledge of California confidentiality laws: Associations with self-confidence and training Kapphahn C, MD, MPH 1, Rao S, MS, MPH 2, Jesser C,
Introduction Method Implications Educational training programs regarding self-injury have potential to improve professionals’ attitudes towards and comfort.
Friends as Rivals: Perceptions of Attractiveness Predict Mating Rivalry in Female Friendships Stephanie R. A. Maves, Sarah L. Hubert, and April Bleske-Rechek.
Anna L. Lukes & Tara L. Poncelet Faculty Mentor: Blaine F. Peden, Ph.D. Department of Psychology  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Anna L. Lukes & Tara.
Analysis of Variance Chapter 12 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Essential Question:  How do scientists use statistical analyses to draw meaningful conclusions from experimental results?
1.Increase advertisement of UWEC Counseling Services on campus. For example, posters, website information, and signs in the Old Library and dorms would.
Regression Mediation Chapter 10. Mediation Refers to a situation when the relationship between a predictor variable and outcome variable can be explained.
Economics 173 Business Statistics Lecture 4 Fall, 2001 Professor J. Petry
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
REACH Lay Health Worker Intervention Program: A Community-Based Model to Promote Breast Cancer Screening Among Vietnamese-American Women Gem M. Le, MHS.
Issues concerning the interpretation of statistical significance tests.
Fall 2002Biostat Statistical Inference - Confidence Intervals General (1 -  ) Confidence Intervals: a random interval that will include a fixed.
Introduction Results Hayley Schultz and Kathleen Nybroten, Ph.D.  Psychology and Sociology  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Hayley Schultz and Kathleen.
T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.1 Categorical Response: Comparing Two Proportions.
A significance test or hypothesis test is a procedure for comparing our data with a hypothesis whose truth we want to assess. The hypothesis is usually.
Mariana Lopez Carlos Aguilar Alex Rodriguez Period Commute time for senior student’s high school experience.
MODEL 2 MODEL 1 Secular, but not Religious, Coping Predicts Self-Control Gretchen Schultz & Tara Poncelet Faculty Collaborator: Jeffrey Goodman, Ph.D.
Review: Stages in Research Process Formulate Problem Determine Research Design Determine Data Collection Method Design Data Collection Forms Design Sample.
The Idea of the Statistical Test. A statistical test evaluates the "fit" of a hypothesis to a sample.
Uncertainty and confidence Although the sample mean,, is a unique number for any particular sample, if you pick a different sample you will probably get.
GrowingKnowing.com © Sample proportions Standard error for proportion = z score = p s is sample proportion. p is population proportion. σ p is.
Parental, Temperament, & Peer Influences on Disordered Eating Symptoms Kaija M. Muhich, Alyssa Collura, Jessica Hick and Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp Psychology.
Hypothesis Testing and Statistical Significance
Margin of Error S-IC.4 Use data from a sample survey to estimate a population mean or proportion; develop a margin of error through the use of simulation.
Who’s Cheating Who? Perceptions of Infidelity Across Gender and Sexual Orientation Holly M. Albers and Madeline G. Dugolenski University of Wisconsin,
Statistics for Psychology CHAPTER SIXTH EDITION Statistics for Psychology, Sixth Edition Arthur Aron | Elliot J. Coups | Elaine N. Aron Copyright © 2013.
Hypothesis Testing Concepts of Hypothesis Testing Statistical hypotheses – statements about population parameters Examples mean weight of adult.
CHAPTER 15: THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF USING STATISTICS.
Confidence Intervals for Means
Change Score Analysis versus ANCOVA in Pretest/Posttest Designs:
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
More About Tests Notes from
Presentation transcript:

Emily C. Prosser, Valerie L. VanTussi, Jaime R. Barth, & Blaine F. Peden, Ph.D. Psychology Department at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Women’s Preventive Health : Where Are You Getting Your Information? ResultsResults Special thanks to: Office of Research & Sponsor Programs, Learning & Technology Services, and the Differential Tuition Dr. Blaine F. Peden for providing guidance and encouragement Participants 160 women, aged Participants from US and UK Procedure Women’s preventive health is a growing issue needing attention and awareness from women everywhere. Frankenberger, et.al (2004), as well as numerous other studies, concluded that popular, media based, or testimonial information is more effective in getting information across than scientific information. In a study done by Clarke and Meiris (2006), background information about preventive health exams revealed that approximately half of deaths from cancer could have been prevented by getting screened earlier. The purpose of our study was to simulate previous studies, but to use a topic relating to only women including only women participants. Over all the questions, our hypothesis was supported that pre-test scores were much lower than post-test scores. The difference in scores among the testimonials and scientific condition did not prove our hypothesis Our results contradict previous findings by Stanovich (2007), Frankenberger, et al. (2004), and Borgschatz et al. (2009). Over 3/4 of our participants knew someone that had or has women’s health issues (ie tumor, STI, cancer, etc.) Less than 1/8 of participants had personal experience with women’s health issues. Overall, many of the hypotheses were rejected. This may be due to the lack of a sufficient sample size. All four questions had higher responses in the post-test group than in the pre-test. None of the questions displayed a difference between the scientific information and the testimonials. About 2/3 of our participants indicated they had some sort of experience with women’s health issues. Incidental findings showed a relationship between past experience and likelihood to follow the preventive health guidelines. DiscussionDiscussion IntroductionIntroduction MethodMethod AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements Pre-TestPost-Test TestimoniesSubject 1 ScientificSubject 2 Each question in the pre- and post-test was designed for a response on a scale from 1-6: 1.How well do you know the guidelines of preventive health in relation to mammograms and pap smears? 2.How likely are you to get a mammogram when you are supposed to, as specified by the guidelines? 3.How likely are you to get a pap smear when you are supposed to, as specified by the guidelines? 4.How likely are you to tell a friend or family member that they should get their preventive health exams on time Responses were compared between each pre-test question against the testimonies vs. scientific and the same was done for the post-test condition. Additional Research How to Read the Error Bar Graphs  The point on the graph is the average response rating given that specific question and condition. The lines above and below consider the response range between all participants.  The numbers on the Y-axis show the response rating for the specific question graphed.  The two treatments are accounted for on the X-axis of the graphs.  The Y-axis is labeled as 95% Confidence Interval (CI) meaning we believe 95% of the participants includes the true average of the population. This error bar graph shows that there is a significant difference in responses given between the subjects in different groups. Women rated their knowledge of preventive health exams higher if they were presented with the scientific information. Those in the testimonial condition also responded higher, but not as strongly. This error bar graph shows that, on average, women were more likely to tell family and friends to get their health exams done on time, regardless of what group they were in. Both types of information made women more likely to tell a friend or family member. Q1: How well do you know the guidelines of preventive health in relation to mammograms and pap smears? Q4: How likely are you to tell a friend or family member that they should get their preventive health exams on time? 132 participants, recruited from Facebook, were surveyed. They answered questions regarding proactivity, reactivity, and past experience. Women in the reactive and control groups were more reactive in regards to doctor visits. Those presented with proactive materials were more likely to tell a friend or family member to follow the guidelines. No major relationships were found between experience and proactivity versus reactivity.