Ch. 5.1 Models of the Atom. The Development of Atomic Models Rutherford’s model, with the protons and neutrons in a nucleus surrounded by electrons, couldn’t.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 “Electrons in Atoms”
Advertisements

Chemistry.
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising the Atomic Model
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising the Atomic Model
The Development of Atomic Models
Slide 1 of 26 © Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Models of the Atom > The Development of Atomic Models Rutherford’s atomic model could not explain the ___________.
Chapter. 5: Electrons in Atoms
© Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Slide 1 of 26 Light and Atoms. 5.1.
Electron Configuration
The Quantum Model of the Atom
-The Bohr Model -The Quantum Mechanical Model Chemistry.
Chapter 5: Electrons in Atoms. Models of the Atom Rutherford used existing ideas about the atom and proposed an atomic model in which the electrons move.
Electrons in Atoms. Models of the Atom – I can identify the inadequacies in the Rutherford atomic model I can identify the new proposal.
Chemistry.
Development of Atomic Models
Do Now: 1. Determine how many protons, neutrons, and electrons are in: a. Selenium-79 b. Xenon-131 c. Cesium Determine the number of protons, neutrons,
Quantum Theory the modern atomic model. Bohr Model of the Atom a quantum model proposed by Niels Bohr in 1913 It helped to explain why the atomic emission.
Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Shown here is a life-sized model of a skier, but not all models are physical.
5.1 Revising the Atomic Model > 1 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising.
Prentice-Hall Chapter 5.1 Dr. Yager
5.1 Revising the Atomic Model > 1 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising.
End Show Slide 1 of 26 © Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Models of the Atom > The Development of Atomic Models The timeline shoes the development of atomic.
ELECTRONS IN ATOMS.
Electrons in Atoms Chapter 13. Connection to Chapter 5 From the atomists to Rutherford, we discussed the evolution of subatomic particles. The discussion.
Atomic Models and Electron Configuration. The history of the atomic model Democritus Created in 400 BC Atoms are indivisible and indestructible Not scientifically.
Ch. 13 – Electrons in Atoms 13.1 = Models of the atom.
Electrons in Atoms. Flaws in Rutherford’s Atomic Model Discovered dense positive piece at the center of the atom- “nucleus” Atom is mostly empty space.
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms.
Section 5.1. The Development of Atomic Models The timeline shoes the development of atomic models from 1803 to
Slide 1 of 26 chemistry. © Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Slide 2 of 26 Models of the Atom The scale model shown is a physical model. However, not all.
Slide 1 of 26 chemistry. © Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Models of the Atom > Slide 2 of 26 The Development of Atomic Models What was inadequate about.
Slide 1 of 26 chemistry. Slide 2 of 26 © Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Models of the Atom > The Development of Atomic Models The timeline shoes the.
Models of the Atom.  A shortcoming of the discovery of the nucleus and advancements in an atomic model was that it failed to explain chemical behavior.
Chapter 5.  From Democritus to Rutherford, models of the atom have changed due to new experiments.  As technology develops, a more complete model of.
5-1 MODELS OF THE ATOM KEY CONCEPTS 1.What was inadequate about Rutherford’s atomic model? 2.What was the new proposal in the Bohr model of the atom? 3.What.
Quantum Theory and the Atom. Learning Objective Describe the relationship between electron levels, sublevels and atomic orbitals.
Slide 1 of 26 chemistry. Slide 2 of 26 © Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Models of the Atom > The Development of Atomic Models The timeline shoes the.
Do Now: Complete Calculating Average Atomic Mass Worksheet.
5.1 Models of the Atom Models of the atom began with Dalton and have changed over time. As our knowledge of the atom changes so does our model of the atom.
Slide 1 of 26 chemistry. © Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Slide 2 of 26 Models of the Atom The scale model shown is a physical model. However, not all.
Do Now: Describe the what the atom looked like according to Dalton, Thomson and Rutherford.
5.1 Revising the Atomic Model > 1 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising.
Models of the Atom.
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising the Atomic Model
Chemistry.
Models of the Atom Foothill Chemistry.
The Development of Atomic Models
Chemistry.
Drill Determine the following for Na: Name of Element
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising the Atomic Model
ELECTRONS IN ATOMS.
Chemistry.
Chemistry.
Electrons in Atoms Chapter 5.
Section 1: Revising the Atomic Model
Atomic Orbitals.
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising the Atomic Model
5.1 Light and Atoms ..
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising the Atomic Model
Chemistry.
Ch. 5: Electrons in the Atom
Chemistry.
Electrons in Atoms Chapter 5.
The Development of Atomic Models
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms 5.1 Revising the Atomic Model
Electrons In Atoms Chapter 5.
Chapter 5 Models of the Atom.
Chemistry.
ELECTRONS IN ATOMS.
The Development of Atomic Models
Presentation transcript:

Ch. 5.1 Models of the Atom

The Development of Atomic Models Rutherford’s model, with the protons and neutrons in a nucleus surrounded by electrons, couldn’t explain the chemical properties of elements. Rutherford’s model, with the protons and neutrons in a nucleus surrounded by electrons, couldn’t explain the chemical properties of elements. Niels Bohr proposed that an electron is found only in specific circular paths around the nucleus, in fixed, exact energy levels. Niels Bohr proposed that an electron is found only in specific circular paths around the nucleus, in fixed, exact energy levels. Electrons must gain or lose exact amounts of energy (quantums) to change energy levels. Electrons must gain or lose exact amounts of energy (quantums) to change energy levels.

An analogy of Bohr’s energy levels would be the rungs on a ladder, except the rungs would not be evenly spaced. The higher rungs (energy levels) would be closer together. An analogy of Bohr’s energy levels would be the rungs on a ladder, except the rungs would not be evenly spaced. The higher rungs (energy levels) would be closer together.

The Quantum Mechanical Model Experimental results were inconsistent with the idea of electrons moving like large objects in orbit. Experimental results were inconsistent with the idea of electrons moving like large objects in orbit. Schrodinger proposed the quantum mechanical model. It does not involve the exact path an electron takes around the nucleus. Schrodinger proposed the quantum mechanical model. It does not involve the exact path an electron takes around the nucleus.

The model determines the allowed energy an electron can have, and how likely it is to find the electron in various locations around the nucleus. The model determines the allowed energy an electron can have, and how likely it is to find the electron in various locations around the nucleus.

Atomic Orbitals Schroeinger’s equation gives the energy levels an electron can have, but also describes the probability of finding an electron at various locations around the nucleus, called atomic orbitals. Schroeinger’s equation gives the energy levels an electron can have, but also describes the probability of finding an electron at various locations around the nucleus, called atomic orbitals. Energy levels are labeled by principal quantum numbers (n). n = 1, 2, 3, etc. Energy levels are labeled by principal quantum numbers (n). n = 1, 2, 3, etc. Several orbitals with different shapes and energy levels (sublevels) exist within each principal energy level. Several orbitals with different shapes and energy levels (sublevels) exist within each principal energy level.

Each energy sublevel corresponds to an orbital of different shape describing where the electron is likely to be found. Each energy sublevel corresponds to an orbital of different shape describing where the electron is likely to be found. Different atomic orbitals are denoted by letters…s, p, d, f. Different atomic orbitals are denoted by letters…s, p, d, f. s orbitals are spherical; p orbitals are dumbbell-shaped. The three kinds of p orbitals have different orientations in space. s orbitals are spherical; p orbitals are dumbbell-shaped. The three kinds of p orbitals have different orientations in space.

Other orbitals have different and more complex shapes. Other orbitals have different and more complex shapes. When n = 1, it has one sublevel…1s. When n = 1, it has one sublevel…1s. n = 2 has two sublevels…2s and 2p. n = 2 has two sublevels…2s and 2p. n = 3 has three sublevels…3s, 3p, and 3d. n = 3 has three sublevels…3s, 3p, and 3d. n = 4 has four sublevels…4s, 4p, 4d, 4f. n = 4 has four sublevels…4s, 4p, 4d, 4f. The principal quantum number always equals the number of sublevels within that principal energy level. The principal quantum number always equals the number of sublevels within that principal energy level.

The maximum number of electrons that can occupy a principal energy level is given by the formula 2n 2. The maximum number of electrons that can occupy a principal energy level is given by the formula 2n 2.