Single plant yields: The NE experience. Why talk about individual plants when farmers are shelling up to 40ft swaths?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1992, At What resolution are there real biological differences.
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Corn (Zea mays L.) Leaf Angle and Emergence as Affected by Seed Orientation at Planting Guilherme Torres, Jacob Vossenkemper, William Raun, John Solie.
Effects of Cover Crop Management on Corn Production Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Schertz Cooksville corn plot 2010 Plot set-up 2 nd year corn on corn, no till. 10 hybrids used in each test, quoted the average yield of the 10 hybrids.
Jacob P. Vossenkemper Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Results Effect of Simulated Grazing Intensity on Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Growth and Grain Yield Dillon Butchee and Jeff Edwards Department of Plant and.
Producing “New” Small Grain Crops in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Sparse Versus Dense Spatial Data R.L. (Bob) Nielsen Professor of Agronomy Purdue University West Lafayette, IN Web:
SIGNIFICANT FIGURES.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Corn Seeding Densities and Transgenic Traits: Economics and Farmer Behavior Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Wisconsin Crop Management.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Affects of Density on Intraspecific Competition in Marigolds Eric Flatt Undergraduate Student (Marine Biology Concentration) Department of Biology Tennessee.
1 Texas Liquid Fertilizer Sorghum TLF Commitment to you Increase yields Lower Costs Help solve those production problems that limit profitability.
Header (unit) 1) Vertical. Your data table should have columns at the top and the data should be underneath the columns. The data table should not be horizontal.
Use of aerial imagery to detect N response in corn following alfalfa FR 5262 Matt Yost Stephen Palka.
Yield Monitors and Their Applications to Today’s Farmer
By C. Kohn Waterford Agricultural Sciences.   A major concern in science is proving that what we have observed would occur again if we repeated the.
A Statistical Analysis of Seedlings Planted in the Encampment Forest Association By: Tony Nixon.
How USDA Forecasts Production and Supply/Demand. Overview  USDA publishes crop supply and demand estimates for the U.S. each month.  Because of the.
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Corn Plot Overview Jared Shippey Ben Logan. General Information  Planted 5/30/08  Hybrid – Pioneer 38B87 – 94 days  Planted population 35,000  Manure.
Corn Growth Stages Chad Lee, Ph.D. Grain Crops Extension Specialist
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
Soybean Situation &Outlook Chuck Danehower Extension Specialist – Farm Management.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
Plant-to-Plant Variability in Corn Production K.L. Martin, P.J. Hodgen, K.W. Freeman, Ricardo Melchiori, D.B. Arnall, R.K. Teal, R.W. Mullen, K. Desta,
Effect of Compaction of Soil Surface to Increase Herbicide Effect in Upland Rice Cultivation By THAN TOE DEPUTY SUPERVISOR MYANMAR AGRICULTURE SERVICE.
Economic Considerations Chad Hart Assistant Professor of Economics Extension Economist (515)
 What is a variable?  A variable is anything that can affect the results in an experiment.
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Ray Massey University of Missouri Crops Economist.
What did we learn in 2015: growth regulators and mid-season N applications on wheat yield, lodging and protein J Ransom, G Mehring, B Hansen, M Ostlie,
Ag Leader Crop Sensors. May 2008 announced worldwide distribution of Holland Scientific (HS) crop sensor Holland Scientific Crop Sensor Commercializing.
Fantasy Farming Challenge Results 2015 Monsanto – Monmouth Learning Center.
Plant Specific Fertilization NUEWorkshop Paul Hodgen.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Reviewing the Worksheet Get out your “Charting the Data” worksheet We will go over this worksheet as a class.
Do Now: What are some important science skills (not topics) that you learned how to do this year in class? The practical – This Thursday in class!! Your.
CSIR – CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE Kennedy Agyeman. Effect of Fertilizer Application and Plant Density on Growth and Yield of Taro.
Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea.
VI. Acknowledgements I. Introduction Background: The optimum plant population for maximum grain yield in corn (Zea mays L.) has continually increased over.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
How the adoption of the N-Rich Strip has changed N Management
Evaluation of early drought tolerant maize genotypes under low nitrogen conditions Nyasha E. Goredema1, Ms Nakai Goredema2, Ezekia Svotwa1, Gabriel Soropa1,
Rasheed Gibson, Jesse Raike, Ethel Carrillo, Courtney Helmig
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
Responsible Nitrogen Management in 2018: Rates, Treatments and Timing IFCA Webinar February 9, 2018 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois.
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Limiting factors which will affect the rate of photosynthesis
Obtaining and Using USDA Market and Production Reports
REVIEW.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
WARM UP.
Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Stage 3: Growing our own ingredients
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum: Crop Production Shawn P. Conley
Presentation transcript:

Single plant yields: The NE experience. Why talk about individual plants when farmers are shelling up to 40ft swaths?

Because there is more to the story then what meets the combine!!!!! Lets talk about yield per area and yield per plant over the past 40 years!

Data from USDA NASS objective yield data available online Average Yields reported for 5 states: IA, IL, IN, MN, NE 2010  5 state avg. = 160 bu ac  5 state avg. = 180 bu ac -1

Data from USDA NASS objective yield data available online

2010  28,427 plants ac  31,261 plants ac -1

Data from USDA NASS objective yield data available online

Well what about those NCGA Contest winners? 2004 winners are as follows: 332 bu ac -1 43,980 plants ac -1 Francis Childs 192 g plant -1 Manchester, IA 320 bu ac -1 38,500 plants ac -1 Mark Dempsey 211 g plant -1 Fowler, IL 296 bu ac -1 47,000 plants ac -1 Jeff Mezera 160 g plant -1 Bagely, WI Data available from

So where is the rest of the story???? Lets look at within a given population at individual plant yield.

Plants with a neighbor on each side Plants with a skip on one side Plants next to a double skip

From the previous graph: 1) Within each cluster, there is enormous amount of variability. 2) In the first cluster of plants with a normally spaced neighbor, there can be 8x difference in yield. 3) Plants do not always adjust yield based on distance to its neighbors. Or they don’t always use the extra space.

Therefore, when converted in individual yield per area, maybe distorting the plants demand for nitrogen. Consider three plants each yielding 150 g of grain, 1 st plant has two normally spaced neighbors. 2 nd plant is missing a neighbor. 3 rd plant is missing both neighbors. The first plant yield is higher per unit area because there is less area occupied. The second plant has a lower yield per unit area because he as more area. The third plant’s yield is drastically lower than the other two because it’s the only show in town.

Individual yield per unit area. However, when averaged out over the entire acre the yield will be the same. Grain Per Plant. More accurate picture of each plant’s potential need for nutrients, but you need to know the number of plants per acre. As Nitrogen management resolutions become smaller there becomes more of a need to know how many plants are in that given area.

20 in rows in southwest Kansas (east of Liberal) Population = 38,500 ac -1 (95,095 ha -1 )

If distance to nearest neighbor is not the Master variable, then what is? Maddonni, G.A., and M.E. Otegui Intra-specific competition in maize:early establishment of hierarchies among plants affects final kernel set. Field Crops Res: 85:1-13. Basically, Maddonni and Otegui said that hierarchies established at V6 are present at harvest. Could these hierarchies be established earlier than V6 and if so can nitrogen management per plant change these relationships?

By Plant NUE Study, Shelton, NE 2004 Plot size 4 rows (76 cm) 15 ft long, RCBD with 4 reps. 9 N management treatments Entire area was planted with a 4 row unit planter and plants were tagged when it was first visible by the eye with a plastic stake.

Treatment Structure Application Time TreatmentV8 VT kg N ha -1 DominateDominatedDominateDominated ml UAN 28 % plant (kg N ha -1 ) By Plant NUE Study

Emerged 5 days after planting Emerged 8 days after planting If you had the power (A magic wand) and could meter out nitrogen per plant, which plant would you give more nitrogen?

Side view with DAP stakes Looking straight down on same plants How about these guys? Which plant should get the N?

Day after plant # of PlantsMean Plant ht. Stand. Dev

A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Plant height measured from the ground to the tip of the tallest leaf when the leaves were folded up at approximately the V5 growth stage. Data taken on 6/26/04 (39 days after planting).

Zero N check treatment.

Broadcast N treatment 150 lbs ac -1 (168 kg ha -1 ) at V8.

Conclusions: 1) Over the long term we are increasing yields by increasing plant population, and yield per plant is stable over time. 2)Individual yield per area may not reflect actual yield of the plant. But will average out over to the true mean per acre. 3) Yield per plant reflects each plant’s potential need for N. But you need to know the number of plants in acre. 4) Big plants yield more than little plants. Early emerging plants yield more than later emerging plants.

5) Nitrogen can boost yield of later emerging plants up to a certain point. 6) Very seldom does a plant yield over 200 g and even more rarely does it yield over 250 g per plant.

With that, Any Questions?

The good news is that to break the standing record (428.5 bu ac -1 )posted by Francis Childs (2002) at the same population he had (44,000 plants ac -1 ) by 1 bu ac -1 you only need to average 248 g plant -1 !