Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

Supporting Continuous Improvement in Low Achieving Schools West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support August.
Title I, Part A Developing Academic Based Accountability School Reform: The Schoolwide Model Principal Workshop Larry Fazzari, Title I/LAP Program Supervisor.
Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Continuous School Improvement Using the High Quality Standards for Schools Federal Programs Fall Directors Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Parent Engagement: The Law, Assessment, Strategies and Evaluation District (LEA) and School/Building Expectations and Requirements.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Planning Part II: Goal Setting
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Archived Information.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Texas Education Agency Updated F-2 FOUNDATION.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN TOMBALL ISD TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
D62 Response to Intervention
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
American Association of School Administrators The Principal as Leader May 9,
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
The Key to Increasing Student Achievement Central Michigan University Center for Charter Schools.
Making the Most of Title I Programs 1. How does ERES use Title I Funds? Human Resources: Title I Instructional Coach and Parent Liaison Professional Development:
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
Effective Schools Effective Superintendents:
Presentation transcript:

Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.

Re-energizing Schoolwide Programs

Effective Schools Particular factors that are present or associated with effective schools are consistent across research and years of study.

Anything less than excellence by all students is not acceptable!

People will ride the fence until they find where the gates are. E. Tong

Factors Associated with Effective Schools Clearly stated goals/objectives High expectations for all students Strong leadership with vision and expertise Emphasis on academics Systems for monitoring and assessment Maximized active learning time Variety of instructional methods/groupings Safe/orderly school climate High levels of parental involvement Ron Edmonds

Reinventing Chapter I Students in high-poverty schools were held to lower expectations than were students in low-poverty schools. When measured on a common test an “A” student in a high poverty school would be about a “C” student in a low-poverty school. U.S. Department of Education, 1993

The focus of schoolwide reform efforts is on the identification of effective, proven, and research-based practices.

Special Strategies for Educating Disadvantaged Children U.S. Department of Education This study reported that: At-risk children are capable of achieving to high standards. Targeting early grades and utilizing externally developed, whole school restructuring designs can lead to high achievement.

SPECIAL STRATEGIES STUDIES FOR EDUCATING DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN: Where: –Technical assistance and staff development were continuous and –Targeted to specific issues and problems Where: –The curriculum was demanding

Special Strategies for Educating Disadvantaged Children Student achievement was positive where: Faculty and administration considered diverse options and chose a program matched to local needs. Principals are central administrators who sustained a focus on full implementation with intelligent local adaptation.

Special Strategies for Educating Disadvantaged Children Special strategies can succeed if they are implemented well.

Early Implementation of the Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program U.S. Department of Education, 2000 States and districts must focus and collaborate on: Using data for school improvement, Assessing and aligning reform models, Cultivating strong and stable leadership, and Clarify roles of external technical assistance providers in the school reform process.

School is in Session Please Plan Carefully

A reform program by any other name would be as sweet. Components of Comprehensive School Reform Program –Comprehensive design with aligned components Components and Elements of a Schoolwide Program –Comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school.

Components of Comprehensive School Reform Program and Components and Elements of a Schoolwide Program Components of Comprehensive School Reform Program –Effective, research-based methods and strategies –Professional Development –Parental and community Involvement –Measurable goals and benchmarks –External technical support and assistance –Evaluation strategies –Coordination of resources –Support within the school Components and Elements of a Schoolwide Program –School reform designs are based on effective means of improving achievement using effective instructional strategies, etc. –Strategies to increase parental involvement such as family literacy –Professional development to help students meet high standards –State standards, assessments, and accountability including adequate yearly progress and school profiles –Support from a State System of Support teams, LEA, and other technical assistance providers –State standards, assessment, and accountability as required by Title I is used for schoolwide programs –Schoolwide programs combine almost all Federal education $$$ along with state and local resources –A schoolwide plan must be developed with the involvement of the community, teachers, principals and other staff.

A reform program by any other name would be as sweet. Components and Elements of a Schoolwide Plan –Instruction by highly qualified staff –Transition of preschool children to school –Measures to include teachers in decisions regarding assessment –Activities to ensure students not mastering state standards receive additional assistance

A required component of a schoolwide program is to provide “activities to ensure hat students who experience difficulty mastering state standards shall be provided with timely, effective additional assistance.” Title I, Part A, 1114(b)(1)(H)

A reform program by any other name would be as sweet. Title I Program Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Project Reading Excellence Program 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program

Accountability Title I requires states to develop standards and assessments that will challenge students served by Title I to perform to higher levels. Research suggests that high standards, when coupled with valid and reliable assessment and aligned support, can exert a powerful influence over what children are taught and how much they learn.

Accountability The inclusion of all children in appropriate assessments is intended to hold school systems accountable for all children, whether or not they have limited-English-proficiency or disabilities.

Accountability State Education Agencies are required to identify schools in need of improvement and take corrective actions for continuously low performing schools and districts whose students fail to make adequate progress toward meeting challenging State standards.

Wake Up Call “We can whenever and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need to do that. Whether or not we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven’t so far.” Ron Edmonds