1 CRP 834: Decision Analysis Week Three Notes. 2 Review Decision-Flow Diagram –A road map of all possible strategies and outcomes –At a decision fork,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Game Theory
Advertisements

GAME THEORY.
Module 4 Game Theory To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, Tenth Edition, by Render, Stair, and Hanna Power Point slides created by Jeff Heyl.
Two-Person, Zero-Sum Game: Advertising TV N TVN 0 TV N TVN Column Player: Row Player: Matrix of Payoffs to Row.
Game Theory S-1.
15 THEORY OF GAMES CHAPTER.
APPENDIX An Alternative View of the Payoff Matrix n Assume total maximum profits of all oligopolists is constant at 200 units. n Alternative policies.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e by Render/Stair/Hanna 3-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prepared by.
Two-Player Zero-Sum Games
Operations Research Assistant Professor Dr. Sana’a Wafa Al-Sayegh 2 nd Semester ITGD4207 University of Palestine.
1 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game SCIT1003 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game Prof. Tsang.
An Introduction to... Evolutionary Game Theory
MIT and James Orlin © Game Theory 2-person 0-sum (or constant sum) game theory 2-person game theory (e.g., prisoner’s dilemma)
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets
Game theory.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Game Theory.
Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Zero-Sum Games (follow-up)
Part 3: The Minimax Theorem
5/16/20151 Game Theory Game theory was developed by John Von Neumann and Oscar Morgenstern in Economists! One of the fundamental principles of.
Operations Management Decision-Making Tools Module A
Basics on Game Theory For Industrial Economics (According to Shy’s Plan)
Operations Management Decision-Making Tools Module A
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Introduction to Game Theory Yale Braunstein Spring 2007.
Game Theory Objectives:
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 8e by Render/Stair/Hanna S-1 © 2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Supplement 1.
Game Theory.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Game Theory Statistics 802. Lecture Agenda Overview of games 2 player games representations 2 player zero-sum games Render/Stair/Hanna text CD QM for.
Game Theory.
Module 5 Part 2: Decision Theory
1 CRP 834: Decision Analysis Week Two Notes. 2 Review Statistical decision theory Decision Theory Framework –A set of strategies –A set of possible futures.
Game Theory.
Chapter 12 & Module E Decision Theory & Game Theory.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management,9e by Render/Stair/Hanna M4-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Module 4 Game.
Game Theory Warin Chotekorakul MD 1/2004. Introduction A game is a contest involving to or more players, each of whom wants to win. Game theory is the.
Q 5-2 a. E = Efficiency score wi = Weight applied to i ’s input and output resources by the composite hospital.
Chapter 14 Game Theory to accompany Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms 4th edition by Wayne L. Winston Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a.
1 CRP 834: Decision Analysis Week Four Notes. 2 Review Game Theory –Classification and Description –Two Person Zero-Sum Game Game w/ Dominating Strategy.
Chapter 11 Game Theory Math Game Theory What is it? – a way to model conflict and competition – one or more "players" make simultaneous decisions.
Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Lecture 2: two-person non.
Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Introduction Giovanni Neglia.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved. Slides prepared by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Decision Analysis Mary Whiteside. Decision Analysis Definitions Actions – alternative choices for a course of action Actions – alternative choices for.
Welcome Unit 4 Seminar MM305 Wednesday 8:00 PM ET Quantitative Analysis for Management Delfina Isaac.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
1-1 Steps to Good Decisions  Define problem and influencing factors  Establish decision criteria  Select decision-making tool (model)  Identify and.
1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.
Game Theory Optimal Strategies Formulated in Conflict MGMT E-5070.
1. 2 Some details on the Simplex Method approach 2x2 games 2xn and mx2 games Recall: First try pure strategies. If there are no saddle points use mixed.
1. 2 You should know by now… u The security level of a strategy for a player is the minimum payoff regardless of what strategy his opponent uses. u A.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 a1a1 A1A1 a2a2 a3a3 A2A Mixed Strategies When there is no saddle point: We’ll think of playing the game repeatedly. We continue to assume that.
Statistics Overview of games 2 player games representations 2 player zero-sum games Render/Stair/Hanna text CD QM for Windows software Modeling.
INDEX Introduction of game theory Introduction of game theory Significance of game theory Significance of game theory Essential features of game theory.
GAME THEORY Day 5. Minimax and Maximin Step 1. Write down the minimum entry in each row. Which one is the largest? Maximin Step 2. Write down the maximum.
Game Theory [geym theer-ee] : a mathematical theory that deals with the general features of competitive situations in a formal abstract way.
Tools for Decision Analysis: Analysis of Risky Decisions
Steps to Good Decisions
Chapter 6 Game Theory (Module 4) 1.
Game Theory.
Solutions Sample Games 1
Game Theory Solutions 1 Find the saddle point for the game having the following payoff table. Use the minimax criterion to find the best strategy for.
Game Theory II.
Making Decisions Under Uncertainty
Game Theory Solutions 1 Find the saddle point for the game having the following payoff table. Use the minimax criterion to find the best strategy for.
GAMES AND STRATEGIES.
GAMES AND STRATEGIES.
Presentation transcript:

1 CRP 834: Decision Analysis Week Three Notes

2 Review Decision-Flow Diagram –A road map of all possible strategies and outcomes –At a decision fork, the decision maker exercises control of the next choice –At a chance fork, the decision maker relinquishes control to the state of nature Averaging Out-Folding Back –Starting from the termini of a decision tree, repeat the following processes backwards –At each chance juncture, the decision maker carries out an averaging-out process –At decision junction, the decision maker makes a decision

3 L3L3 -$9.0 R B (L 3, R) Continue Stop Same as (L 1, R) -$20 -$5  AA AA   $4 $100  Replace R B -$20 -$5  AA AA   $4 $100  No replace R B Same as (L 2, RR) Same as (L 2, RB) -$4.5 Averaging out-Folding Back– L3 Path

4 L3L3 -$9.0 R B (L 3, B) Stop Same as (L 1, B) Continue -$4.5 No replace R B Same as (L 2, BR) Same as (L 2, BB) Replace -$20 -$5  AA AA   $4 $100  R B -$20 -$5  AA AA   $4 $100  Averaging out-Folding Back– L3 Path – continued

5 Refuse to play L:L: L:L: L:L: L:L: Cost: $0 EMV: $28 Cost: $0 EMV: $0 Cost: $-8 EMV: $35.2 Cost: $-12 EMV: $42.4 Cost: $-9 EMV: $40.15

6 What is your decision: –Make experiment or not? –If make experiment, which option? –Having decided to take an experiment option, what actions you will take according to experiment results? –What is the benefit of information?

7 Game Theory Game theory: the study of decision-making situations in which conflict and cooperation play important roles Player: decision-maker –The players may be individuals, groups of individuals, firms, and nations. Payoff function: the objective function, –This function gives numeric payoffs to each player. Game: a collection of rules known to all players which determines what players may do and the outcome and payoff resulting from their choice. Move: a point in the game at which players must make a choice between alternatives Play: any particular set of moves and choices Strategy: a set of decision formulated in advance of play specifying choices to be made in every possible contingency. Field of application: parlor game, military battle, political campaign, advertising and marketing campaign by competing firms, etc.

8 Classification and Description Classification –Number of Players: –Number of strategies: –Nature of payoff functions: Zero-Sum game: Constant difference game: Non-zero sum game: –Nature of preplay negotiation: cooperative game noncooperative game. Description –Game in extensive form: (game tree) –Game in normal form (payoff table) II I 12 1(100, 50)(-10,50) 2(20,50)(20, -10)

9 Two-Person Zero-Sum Game Problem Statement: Two politicians are running against each other for the United States Senate. Campaign plans must now be made for the final 2 days before the election, and the both politicians want to spend these two days campaigning in two cities: BigTown and Megapolis. –Strategy 1: Spend 1 day in each city –Strategy 2: Spend both days in Bigtown –Strategy 3: Spend both days in Megapolis

10 Case 1: A dominating strategy II I1124I II 1212 I112I With this solution, player I will receive a payoff of 1 from player II, so that the value of the game is said to be 1

11 Case 2: Games with Saddle Points II 123 I Rule: Player 1: maximize the minimum payoffs (maximin) Player 2: minimize the maximum payoffs (minimax)

12 Case 2: Games with Saddle Points (cont’d) II 123Min I Max506 Maximin strategy by I Lower value of the game Minimax strategy by II Upper value of the game Saddle point. Lower value ( ) = Upper value ( ) = V

13 Case 3: Games with no saddle point II 123Min I Max542 Upper value of the game Lower value of the game

14 Games with Mixed Strategies Criterion for evaluating mixed strategies: the expected payoff ProbabilityII y1y1 y2y2 y3y3 ProbabilityPure Strategy 123 Ix1x x 1 (x 2 ) Example 1

15 Games with Mixed Strategies Step 1: Write the payoff functions for Player I. (y 1, y 2, y 3 )Expected payoff (1, 0, 0) (0, 1, 0) (0, 0, 1) 0x 1 + 5(1- x 1 ) = x 1 -2x 1 + 4(1- x 1 ) = x 1 2x 1 - 3(1- x 1 ) = x 1

16 Games with Mixed Strategies Step 2: Graphical Analysis for player 1 Solve for x* and v? x1 = x1 x* = 7/11 (x1*, x2*) =(7/11, 4/11) v =2/11

17 Games with Mixed Strategies Step 3:write the payoff function for player II (a)According to the definition of the upper value and the minimax theorem, the expected payoff resulting from this strategy (y1, y2, y3) = (y1*, y2*, y3*) y1*(5 - 5 x1) + y2* (4 - 6 x1) + y3* (-3 + 5x1) ≤ = v =2/11. (b) x1= x* = 7/11, then (20/11) y1 + (2/11)y2 +(2/11) y3=2/11. (*) Where y1 + y2 + y3 = 1. (3) we can rewrite (*) as: (18/11) y1 + (2/11)*( y1 + y2 + y3 ) =2/11. Then, y1= 0. (4) The payoff function is then: F(x)= y2* (4 - 6 x1) + y3* (-3 + 5x1), y1* =0

18 Games with Mixed Strategies Step 3 (cont’d) (5) If we rearrange F(x), F(x) = (4 y2* - 3y3* )+ x (-6 y2* + 5y3*) ≤ 2/11 AB F(x) = A + Bx ≤ 2/11 A= 2/11, B=0 Then: 4y2* - 3y3* = 2/11 (a) -6y2* + 5y3* = 0 (b) Solve for Eq. (a) and (b): y2*=5/11, y3*=6/11, y1*=0.

19 Games with Mixed Strategies (Example 2) II 12 I I 123 II