2013 Wind Conference. Congestion Management & Communication Processes CJ Brown.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Draft of proposed metrics for the WEQ BPS to conduct analysis and evaluation of the Parallel Flow Visualization pilot project. (PFV Pilot)
Advertisements

1. ***Confidential*** Concerns Tag Non Firm Option October 10, 2010 Bert Bressers 2.
1 Market Flow Threshold Field Test NERC ORS Meeting November 14 th and 15 th.
Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements NERC ORS Meeting Toronto, Ontario September 23-24, 2009 Jim.
Parallel Flow Visualization and Flowgate Allocations Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners.
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Future NERC Congestion Management Tool Option 3A (Proposed by NERC/NAESB TLR TF) 5/11/2005.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
1 Credit for Redispatch Small Group Review of Unconstrained MFs NAESB BPS Meeting December 14-15, 2011.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair September 13 th, 2012.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 2, 2010.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
Overview Seams Coordination Process. 2 Introduction Midwest ISO Non-profit organization that manages the reliable flow of electricity across much of the.
Interchange Authority Recommendations Board of Directors Meeting December 7, 2007.
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Michelle Mizumori Director of Reliability Coordination
FEBRUARY 27, 2013 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS Parallel Flow Visualization Overview 1.
1 Reliability Coordination (IRO Standards) 2011 System Operator Conferences #3 and #4 September & 20-22, 2011 Nashville/Franklin TN Rocky Williamson.
9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith. 9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
MPID 223 (Failure to Follow Synchronising Instruction) JGCRP 12 th November 2014 (Anne Trotter)
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup BY LOU MIRANDA BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
Business Practices Subcommittee
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
Computer Emergency Notification System (CENS)
Reload PFV September 12, Reload PFV  Concern that need to be addressed:  The RC need to have an option in PFV to allow gradual reload of markets.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Project NERC ORS Meeting May 4, 2011.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
©2004 PJMwww.pjm.com 1 PJM's Perspective on Reliability – Summer 2004 and Beyond Karl Pfirrmann President -- PJM Western Region FERC Summer Reliability.
Transmission Congestion Management – IDC Granularity Option 3A Larry Kezele and Jeff Norman June 28, 2005 NERC/NAESB TLR Subcommittee.
NAESB WHOLESALE ELECTRIC QUADRANT BUSINESS PRACTICES SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES UPDATE TO JOINT ELECTRIC SCHEDULING SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 2012 BY ED SKIBA.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
ERCOT Operational Audit 2005 August 1 - August 19, 2005.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Generator Prioritization Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
Loss of EMS Events 2015 System Operator Seminar. Training Objectives 2 System Operators will be able to identify the ERO Event Analysis Process Category.
NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz– IDCWG Chair January 5 th, 2016.
Highlights of Midwest ISO: 2004 State of the Market Report and Day-2 Energy Markets Prepared by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Midwest.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
Operational Planning Jason Smith. Operational Planning Goals –What Ops Planning is –What Ops Planning is not –What rules we operate under –Limitations.
09/20/20061 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Dumas September 20, 2006.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
The RGGI Auction Allocation Process: Concerns and Recommendations Presented by James H. Savitt, Ph.D To The RFF Auction Workshop in NYC 20 July 2006.
Market Release 1.17 MP Testing Kick-Off January 5,
NAESB BPS UPDATE TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUGUST 21, 2012 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS PARALLEL FLOW VISUALIZATION PROJECT 1.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
1 Parallel Flow Visualization Goals NAESB BPS Meeting September 15-16, 2010.
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update
Wind Management at MISO
Phase Angle Limitations
Market Flow Threshold Field Test
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
PJM & Midwest ISO Market-to-Market Coordination (APEx Conference 2007)
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Future NERC Congestion Management Tool Option 3A (Proposed by NERC/NAESB TLR TF) 5/11/2005.
Market Flow Threshold Field Test
Request for Information IDC Granularity Option 3/3A
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
NERC Congestion Management
WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

2013 Wind Conference

Congestion Management & Communication Processes CJ Brown

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT Section 1 3

Congestion Management Overview Transmission Loading Relief (TLR) Congestion Management Event (CME) Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) Manual Directives CLIPs 4

Congestion Management We manage congestion in one of two ways: –TLR (Transmission Loading Relief) event if there are curtailable (>5%) impacts other than SPP EIS Market impact –Congestion Management Events (CME) if there are no curtailable external impacts 5

6 Typical Event Sequence to Mitigate Congestion The Reliability Coordinator (RC) contacts BA and or TO to confirm the SOL limit and the Real Time Loading of the flow gate The Reliability Coordinator (RC) calls a TLR event in NERC IDC. The TLR event triggers a calculation by NERC IDC to determine who needs to curtail Tags (transactions) and who needs to re-dispatch to what amount to accomplish enough relief to lower the real time loading of flow gate NERC IDC will send out curtailment instructions and relief obligations to entities that need to take action The Reliability Coordinator (RC) monitors the flow gate loading. The loading should go down because of the Tag Curtailments and re-dispatch by Markets (typically a minute delay) The Reliability Coordinator (RC) will request more relief in NERC IDC if necessary SPP Market will accomplish its relief through Security Constraint Economic Dispatch (SCED) Communication Issue TLR in IDC Curtailments Monitor Re-issue TLR in IDC 6

7 Typical Event Sequence – TLR Event 1.Flow approaches or exceeds flowgate limit 2.Reliability Coordinator calls TLR and requests relief from IDC 3.NERC IDC prescribes Tag, Network and Native Load (NNL), and/or Market Flow curtailments as appropriate 4.Constraint Manager and CAT receive Target Market Flow from IDC 5.SPP RC accepts TLR event in Constraint Manager and verifies that the effective limit is appropriate 6.SPP CAT will calculate appropriate schedule adjustments for those schedules not curtailed by IDC and send to RTOSS 7.Flowgate is activated in next Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) 8.Market System will run SCED, attempting to keep flowgate flow below effective limit 9.RC continues to monitor flowgate flow and ask for additional relief as necessary 7

8 Transmission Loading Relief (TLR) Event NERC IDC RC Issues TLR SPP CAT every 15 min SPP Constraint Manager SPP MOS SCED SFT Topper / SPD Runs every 5 min RTOSS scheduling Target Market Flow to SPP CAT Adjusted Schedules Effective Limit of Constraint Sent to MOS Target Market Flow to SPP Constraint Manager Tag Curtailments Dispatch Instructions and NSI values SPP RC accepts TLR 4 Market Flow Calculator Market Flow sent To NERC IDC every 15 minutes 8 2 ETAGGINGNLS 8

Congestion Management Event (CME) A CME is issued in the SPP EIS Market System by the SPP RC through activating a defined flowgate and setting a Target flow limit (typically SOL) for the SPP EIS Market System to maintain the flow on or below through Secure Economic Constraint 9

10 Typical Event Sequence – CME 1.Flow approaches or exceeds flowgate limit 2.Reliability Coordinator verifies in NERC IDC that there are no curtailable Tags or Market relief from other Entities 3.SPP RC calls a CME event in Constraint Manager and sets effective limit 4.SPP CAT will calculate appropriate schedule adjustments for those schedules not curtailed by IDC and send to RTOSS 5.Flowgate is activated in next Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) 6.Market System will run SCED, attempting to keep flowgate flow below effective limit 7.RC continues to monitor flowgate flow and ask for additional relief as necessary (lower effective limit in Constraint Manager) Note: CME = Congestion Management Event. It only results in re-dispatch by SPP Market. It can result schedule curtailments if Market is providing counter flow to support financial schedules. CME is only allowed if there are no Tags to curtail in IDC and no Market relief from other Markets. 10

Congestion Management Tools used by SPP Reliability Coordinator NERC IDC OATI RC Issues CME SPP CAT OATI every 15 min Constraint Manager SPP MOS SCED SFT Topper / SPD Runs every 5 min RTOSS Scheduling OATI Adjusted Schedules Effective Limit of Constraint Sent to MOS Dispatch Instructions and NSI values 1 Market Flow Calculator Alstom 15min Market Flow sent To NERC IDC every 15 minutes 7 ETAGGING NLS CME EVENT CME event Send to CAT CME = Congestion Management Event Only results in re-dispatch by SPP Market and schedule curtailments if Market is providing counter flow to support financial schedules 11

Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) Once a flowgate is activated in constraint manager, the SPP EIS market will redispatch all available generation to provide market flow relief EIS market runs a SCED every 5 minutes for a 10 minute out target 12

Manual Directives When the TLR/CME/SCED processes do not provide enough relief or if the relief cannot be provided in a timely manner, the SPP Reliability Coordinator (RC) will issue manual directives to manage congestion on the bulk electric system 13

CLIP Section 2 14

What is a CLIP? Capacity Limit Implementation process (CLIP) is a communication process in which the SPP RC will electronically communicate a deployment to a specific Non-Dispatchable Resource (NDR), which reflects a reliability output limit for that Resource. This would be comparable to a security constrained dispatch instruction provided to dispatchable Resources 15

Why change? Current communication of output limits for these types of Resources consists of an onerous, time- consuming process in which the deployment takes the form of a directive from the RC The purpose of CLIP is to communicate these same output limitations in the form of an electronic message that is acknowledged and monitored for implementation and efficacy 16

Advantages Reduce Operator/minutes consumed during the curtailment process over the current manual verbal process Greater flexibility in the issuance and release of limitations Greater focus on overall system reliability 17

Process Entry into the RC logging system will include a list of NDR entity names (could be common Resource names, MP names, or any common reference) that are linked to a specific address for the real- time operational function of that resource –The required information is entity name, MW limit, and date/time 18

Process (cont.) When the form is completed, RC will click on a “send ” button which will send a pre-worded message including the required information to the link for that entity RC will initiate a pre-recorded blast call (or individual calls depending on volume to be called) to notify all impacted entities that a CLIP notification message has been sent. –Using the existing Msg911 communication tool –Text and/or computer generated voice message 19

Process (cont.) NDR operating entity will review and comply with the message, by first replying to the received CLIP message and then implementing the output limitation RC shall monitor replies from recipients and ensure real-time data is consistent with the limits communicated within a timely manner (time period TBD) 20

Process (cont.) If RC is unable to obtain a reply, or has obtained a reply but cannot verify the resource has complied with the deployment, RC shall contact that resource and, if appropriate, issue a curtailment directive to that entity (to ensure compliance) Amendments and terminations to the output limitation will be made in the same manner as the initial limit – log, send, and verify 21

Development and Implementation Teams formed to address various aspects of NDR curtailment concerns CLIP project team progress: –Prototype logging pages have been developed, subject to changes based on stakeholder input –Coding is completed based on current version of logging page –Msg911 is being populated with NDR points of contact for control of their respective NDR (CLIP account) –Expected completion by end of July, depending on when final design is set (could be earlier) 22

Questions 23