4.1 Best practices for centralisation of data in authorizing MS with relation to 50/50 split of collection costs? Make use of indicators to detect declarations. Preferably common indicators when common system, (i.e. Procedure code), until or otherwise national indicators, (i.e. Operator and goods location code) COM to produce a list of national contact points for SASP Execution of payment national competence (could be outside of Customs)

4.2 How to effect transfer of funds? Provide for transfer in currency ˝collected˝ Submit a summary to participating MS according to AA Annex Summary preferably to be possible to generate from ICS (by using indicators) after 1/7 2009, until then by national system Actual payment often outside of Customs

4.3 Should possibility to include more MS when reassesseing be considered? Questionnarie from COM to MS to receive knowledge of position on SASP Questionnaire from MS to holders to get knowledge of desires to expand MS competence to plan reviews

4.4 Concrete measures to take in order to expand existing and future SASP? Knowledge of MS positions, i.e. No use to desire expansion if participating MS not ready COM to offer bilateral assistance to MS when requested under exceptional circumstances COM to create fact-sheet (short) on SASP to be published on the web(s) Produce a list of national contact points for SASP Promote e-learning tool (COM and MS) National promotion to traders

4.5 Opting out because disagreement on the 50/50-split? Not an option, 50/50 decided on political level Possible to opt out for other reasons... RESOLVE ISSUES!!! Dialogue, meetings, professionalism... NOTE: Awareness of differences in AA and Convention regarding opting out (revocation)

4.6 Best practice when application is submitted? (rephrased question) Scrutinize application for formal acceptance Make contact with operator to ensure understanding and also compliance with requirements Arrange physical meeting(s) with participating MS

4.7 How to resolve dispute in practice? Arrangement to run during dispute, i.e. No impact on operator Communication Dialogue Meetings Professionalism Common sense Agree on possible MSs to offer opinion in dispute As a very last resort, use mediator (COM)

1.9 How and when to reflect repayments and audit recoveries? Need to reflect underpayments and repayments when calculating the 25 % Use monthly summary to inform on reason for increased (recovery) or decreased (repaid) amounts from Authorizing MS Errors detected by either MS to be communicated according to agreements in the control plan. Errors relating to consignments outside SASP not to be included. If no supplementary declaration is submitted, commodities considered ˝not declared˝

4.8 Who should handle an appeal if SASP is not granted due to participating MS? The authorizing MS! Only acceptable reason for rejection is if trader does not fulfil the SASP criteria and conditions The reasons to be included in the rejection Appeal handled by authorizing MS, dialogue with participating MS