1 U.S. STUDY RADAR EMISSION MASKS A Review of the Radar Spectrum Engineering Criteria (RSEC) ROBERT L. HINKLE United States Department of Commerce National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2003 Andy Gowans (UK RA) UK Ultra Wide Band (UWB) Compatibility Study Andy Gowans & Bharat Dudhia UK.
Advertisements

Meteorological Radar Radio Spectrum Issues Presented by: David Franc U.S. National Weather Service October 8, 2002.
New Radar Technology MHz Band
ITU-R Working Party 8B Thomas Ewers RegTP Germany Chairman WP8B.
Overview of Regulatory Body Thomas Ewers BNetzA Germany Chairman WP8B.
ICAO Radio Spectrum SeminarMID Office, Cairo, 4 – 6 June RADIO SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT Prepared by Torsten JACOB ANB/CNS.
ITU-R Working Party 8D Status Update Inte rnational Civil Aviation Organization Regional Preparatory Group (RPG) Meeting for World Radiocommunication Conference.
ACD A ITU Working Party 8B Activities Presented By John Mettrop UK Civil Aviation Authority.
National Weather Service 1 Results of Operational Compatibility Studies between ASR, Meteorological Radars and IMT Systems Operating in the –
Interference Effects and Interference- Limit Criteria for Radar Receivers IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Conference Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 26 July 2010.
Technical Challenges to Spectrum Sharing Between Radars and Non-Radar (Communication) Systems 7th Annual ISART Boulder, Colorado 1 March 2005 Frank Sanders.
Protecting RNSS Spectrum Domestic and International Activities Karl B. Nebbia Associate Administrator Office of Spectrum Management National Telecommunications.
1 ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) A POSSIBLE AREA FOR STANDARDS BILL LUTHER FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C
SPECTRUM REGULATION IN EUROPE, ECC ACTIVITIES RELEVANT FOR UTILITIES Bruno ESPINOSA, ECO
Review of ITU-R Study Group Activities Kevin A. Hughes Radiocommunication Bureau.
SE35presentation.ppt France Telecom R&D CEPT ERC SE35 activities on compatibility between radio services and PLT (Power Line Telecommunications) Dubrovnik,
ESE – Andrew Rusek Applications of Computer Modeling in Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Tests (Part1) P8. Field Pattern of Three Radiating.
Current research work and plans Zbigniew M. Jóskiewicz Wroclaw University of Technology Institute of Telecommunication and Acoustics Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego.
NBTC/ITU Workshop on Cross-Border Frequency Coordination June , 2015 Bangkok, Thailand.
What’s Going on in Canada?
Radar: Acronym for Radio Detection and Ranging
RADAR SPECTRUM ENGINEERING CRITERIA (RSEC) A Comprehensive Review
Radar 101 Rick Reaser May 19, 2010.
Overview of ITU-T Study Group 5 “Environment and Climate Change” Cristina Bueti, Adviser, ITU.
1 ITU-R WP8B Radar Symposium “History and Status of 5 GHz RLAN and Radar Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) In the United States” Frank Sanders U.S. Department.
August 16, 2008SSPS session, URSI GA1 Impact to the Radio Astronomy by the Interference caused by the Solar Power Satellite Systems Masatoshi Ohishi NAOJ.
Caribbean Internet Forum 2008 Mobile Internet for Development Spectrum Issues Related to the Mobile Internet Presented By Kirk Sookram Resource Planning.
WMO Workshop on Radio Frequencies for Meteorology Meteorological Satellite Services David F. McGinnis U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA 7 October 2002 Geneva,
National Science Foundation 1 Dr. Tomas E. Gergely Electromagnetic Spectrum Manager National Science Foundation Registration of Radio.
Proposed revision of ITU-R Recommendation providing EESS (active) Performance and Interference Criteria May 13, 2015 Committee On Radio Frequencies Thomas.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Doc.: IEEE 802.RR-01/017-r1 Submission November 2001 Vic Hayes, Agere SystemsSlide 1 Opening report Radio Regulations to Radio Working Groups November.
Meteorological Spectrum Issues- Outcome of the 2003 World Radiocommunication Conference Presented By: David Franc National Weather Service December 2,
Sg-whitespace SubmissionRashid A. Saeed, Telekom MalaysiaSlide 1 February 2009 Slide 1 Work in the ITU: Focus on how 802 can best leverage.
Doc.: IEEE /214r0 Submission May 2003 Bob Huang, Sony ElectronicsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Committed to Connecting the World For the last 25 years, ITU has been coordinating the development of a global broadband multimedia international mobile.
1 Emerging issues Titus Spoelstra ESF Committee on Radio Astronomy Frequencies P.O.Box 2, 7990AA Dwingeloo, Netherlands
1 ITU–R Task Group 1/8 The Bush Administration’s Commitment to Implementing New Technologies Michael D. Gallagher Assistant Secretary for Communications.
Providing Useful Regulatory Solutions T T & C Telecommunication Regulatory Consultants Shayla E. Taylor TT&C USITUA WRC Seminar September 19, 2007.
November 14, 2005Doc: IEEE a Li, Takizawa, Rikuta, Hara, Ikegami, Kohno Slide1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
RALI FX3 Microwave Fixed Services Frequency Coordination Glenn Odlum Senior Engineer Spectrum Engineering Section
Detection and the impact of man-made interference on EES (passive) operations Thomas vonDeak NASA Spectrum Management Office 28-October-2004 “Active Protection.
Doc.: IEEE /503r0 Submission September 2004 McCorkle & Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Nairobi, Kenya September 2007 Preparations for WRC-07 Overview of Regional and National proposals as of 13 September 2007 Presented by Robert Witzen.
CEPT preparations status for WRC-15 Mr. Per Christensen (ECO Director) August 2015 The second Annual Middle East & North Africa Spectrum Management Conference,
CHALLENGES TO EFFECTIVE SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CGSIC – 43 rd MEETING MARCH 10, 2004   Gregory A. Wheeler DOT Office of Navigation.
March 14, 2002 (revised 2/13/2002) 1 Version of CISPR 22 used in the United States by the FCC William S. Hurst Office of Engineering and Technology Federal.
1 ITU–R Task Group 1/8 “Bush Administration’s Commitment to Responsible Development and Deployment of Ultra Wideband” Michael D. Gallagher Acting Assistant.
Key results of World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-07) DOCUMENT #:GSC13-GRSC6-12 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:ITU-R AGENDA ITEM:GRSC 8 CONTACT(S):Kevin.
Doc.: IEEE /455r0 Submission July 2002 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Harmonized Standard from BRAN#29 Mika Kasslin.
Wireless Theory and Regulations For unlicensed wireless networks Presentation by Wyatt Zacharias Except where otherwise noted this work is licensed under.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission January, 2004 CRL & CRL-UWB ConsortiumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
1 John McCloskey NASA/GSFC Chief EMC Engineer Code Effects of Rise/Fall Times on Signal Spectra.
GSC IMT Task Force Report Kohei SATOH ARIB DOCUMENT #:GSC13-PLEN-64r1 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:Kohei Satoh (ARIB) AGENDA ITEM:GRSC (7); Plenary (6.1) CONTACT(S):Kohei.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November, 2003 CRL-UWB ConsortiumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
CRAF POSITION ON WRC-19 AGENDA ITEMS RELEVANT TO RADIO ASTRONOMY Talayeh Hezareh - CRAF FM Max Planck Institute for Radio astronomy Bonn, Germany MAY 20,
Agenda Item: 1.12 Title: Extension of current worldwide allocation to the Earth exploration–satellite (active) service in the frequency band 9300– 9900.
1 70/80/90 GHz Web-Based Coordination Improving the Effectiveness of the Domestic Spectrum Management Process National Spectrum Managers Association Arlington,
ITU Working Party 8B Activities
RADIO SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT
PRELIMINARY POSITION OF THE RCC CAs ON THE AGENDA ITEMS OF THE WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE 2012.
ITS-Related Work Items in ITU-R Study Group 5, Working Party 5A
Submission Title: [High Frequency Band Plan Proposal]
Chap II. Radar Hardware (PART 1)
Submission Title: [Regulatory Update]
World Radiocommunications Conference
September 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Millimeter wave frequency allocation.
Possible Future Agenda Items
Agenda Item Overview & draft India proposal
GSC position on key WRC-19 AI 1.5 ESIMs
Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. STUDY RADAR EMISSION MASKS A Review of the Radar Spectrum Engineering Criteria (RSEC) ROBERT L. HINKLE United States Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration Office of Spectrum Management

2 PURPOSE Ensure an acceptable degree of electromagnetic compatibility among radar systems, and between such systems and those of other radio services sharing the frequency spectrum. Promote efficient use of the spectrum.

3 RADAR CHARACTERISTICS ADDRESSED IN THE RSEC Emission bandwidth (40 dB) Emission levels Tunability Antenna patterns Frequency tolerance Receiver selectivity Image and spurious rejection Local-oscillator radiation

4 RSEC EMISSION MASK

5 REVIEW OF RSEC Last major review of RSEC conducted in time frame New generation of radar systems more complex  Waveform characteristics change pulse-to-pulse  Dynamic PRF pulse trains Trend toward solid state output devices Increase in interference from radars ITU-R Working Party 8B (Radiodetermination) has set up a radar group to investigate feasibility of more stringent emission masks than contained in ITU-R Recommendation SM1541, Annex 8, by 2006 Radiocommunication Assembly meeting.  Work Program developed by ITU-R Working Party 8B

6 AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE RADAR (Klystron Output device)

7 RADIONAVIGATION RADAR (Coaxial Magnetron W/WO Filter)

8 RADIONAVIGATION RADAR (Coaxial Magnetron)

9 WEATHER RADAR (Klystron output Device)

10 OVERRVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDEERED Add the following to Group A (Exempt from RSEC).  Maritime Radionavigation MHz  Aeronautical Radionavigation and Radionavigation MHz  Aeronautical Radionavigation GHz

11 OVERVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED Group B (Criteria B)  Retain 40 dB bandwidth formulas  Assess feasibility of roll-off slopes of 30/40 dB per decade  Change X (dB) Level to 60 dB for near term, and consider phasing in X (dB) floor of: X (dB) =10LogP(Watts) + 30 Where: 60 dB ≤ X (dB) ≤ 80 dB

12 OVERVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED Group C (Criteria C)  Retain 40 dB bandwidth formulas  Assess feasibility of roll-off slopes of 30/40 dB per decade  Change X (dB) Level to 60 dB for near term, and consider phasing in X (dB) floor of: X (dB) =10LogP(Watts) + 30 Where: 60 dB ≤ X (dB) ≤ 80 dB

13 OVERVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED Group D (Criteria D)  Retain all of Criteria D except change harmonic levels to 80 dB  New solid state radars can not meet Criteria D without waveguide filter Group E (Criteria E)  No proposed changes

14 APPROACH  Develop a software program that will provide current and optional emission masks.  Identify, through measurements, emission characteristic of radars with various types of output devices and antennas.  Apply software program (emission masks) to measured emission characteristics to assess feasibility of establishing a more spectrum efficient emission mask.  Engage the radar manufacturers and radar output device manufacturers to identify state-of-the-art capabilities.  Through the IRAC/TSC, in coordination with Federal agencies reach agreement regarding draft revised emission masks for future radar systems.