Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ra in Water using MnO2 Resin: New Developments
Advertisements

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Using Eichrom Resins to Simplify the Analyses for Gallium Content and Atom Percent Fission.
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Environmental Samples
Anomalous Behavior of TEVA Resin Prepacked Columns: A Technical Update Anil Thakkar November 1st 2004 Cincinnati, OH.
A NALYTICAL S EPARATIONS G ROUP Megan Bennett, Ashlee Crable, Sherry Faye, Narek Gharibyan, Julie Gostic, and Chris Klug Subgroup Leader: Ralf Sudowe.
UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Alexandre Gagné, Xiongxin Dai, Sheila Kramer-Tremblay, Joel Surette, Candice Didychuk and Dominic Larivière* Atomic Energy of Canada.
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples
New Applications of Rapid Column Extraction for Methods at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III Savannah River Site.
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
New Extraction Methods for Urine and Fecal Samples
 What is the molarity of a bleach containing 9.5 grams of NaOCl per liter of bleach?  How many grams of CaCl 2 would be dissolved in 0.75 L of water.
D. P. DiPrete, C. C. DiPrete, and R. A. Sigg
Technical Updates on UTEVA, TEVA and TRU Resins
Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS
© Copyright, West Valley Nuclear Services Company, LLC (2004) The views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views.
Rapid Separation Methods for Bioassay Samples S. L. Maxwell, III and D. J. Fauth Westinghouse Savannah River Site.
Acid – Base Review Problems
1) In the lab, students follow the chemical reaction above using 30 grams of Barium chloride. If 39 grams of silver chloride are actually produced, what.
MnO 2 Resin: Concentration of Radium Isotopes Deok-Soo Moon Bill Burnett Department of Oceanography Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida.
Solution Stoichiometry
The Determination of 226 Ra in Water Samples Anil H. Thakkar Eichrom Technologies, Inc. eichrom TECHNOLOGIES INC.
The Determination Of 226 Ra In Soil Samples Lawrence D. Morris General Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Anil H. Thakkar Eichrom Technologies, Inc.
The Determination of 224 Ra, 226 Ra, & 228 Ra in Water Samples Michael Fern Eichrom Technologies, Inc.
Applications of Extraction Chromatography in Marine Geochemistry
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
Radioactive Materials Analytical Laboratory Eichrom Technologies Inc. User Group Meeting May 2001 J.M. Giaquinto, L.D. Bible, D.C. Glasgow, J.M. Keller.
Actinide Analysis from Large- Volume Seawater Samples Bill Burnett & Guebuem Kim Department of Oceanography Florida State University and Phil Horwitz PG.
Page A European Perspective on the Use of Eichrom Resins Dr Jon Martin BNFL.
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples-Update Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
MnO 2 Resin: Concentration of Radium Isotopes Deok-Soo Moon Bill Burnett Department of Oceanography Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida.
Lecture 7: Digestion of Samples Digestion of water samples with Kjeldhl method for determination of N Destruction and extraction of soil and sludge for.
00J ppt Rapid Extraction Methods for the Process Laboratory S. L. Maxwell, III V. D. Jones S. T. Nichols J. Satkowski M. A. Bernard Westinghouse.
Idea of the experiment: (1) Qualitative investigation of [Pb ++ ] in a systemic cycle. (2) Preparation of different [Pb ++ ] compounds. (3) Inter-conversion.
Elution and Mounting Techniques for Americium using Eichrom TRU Resin Mitch Abbate Radiochemistry Technical Director Severn Trent Services St. Louis May.
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002 Determination of actinides in emergency preparedness using Diphonix or Actinide resin in combination with gamma spectrometry Ulrika.
General Engineering Laboratories Use of Eichrom Resins for Bioassay Pa-231 Bob Timm - GEL Tim Chandler - GEL Bill Burnett - FSU Mike Schultz - PerkinElmer.
A Process for the Recovery of Strontium from the Urine of Patients Injected with 89 Sr Antioco Franco Sedda Antioco Franco Sedda TRIGA Reactor TRIGA Reactor.
Developments in Environmental Radiochemistry* Environmental Radioactivity Measurement Facility Department of Oceanography Florida State University Tallahassee,
Distribution of radionuclides in soils in surroundings of Bratislava, capital of the Slovak Republic. II. Man-made radionuclides Mátel Ľ., Rosskopfová.
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL May 4, 2004.
Updates from Eichrom’s Tech Support Lab Anil Thakkar May 4 th 2004 Charleston, SC.
The Determination of Be in an Enriched Uranium Matrix YGG Darrin K. Mann, D.H. “Bo” Bowman, Thomas J. Oatts, and Vicki F. Belt Analytical Chemistry.
Mixture of benzoic acid, anthracene, and p-nitroaniline Extractions.
New Extraction Methods for Actinides in Urine at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS S. L. Maxwell, III, D. J. Fauth, R. C. Henderson, J. J. Smiley, S. R. Johnson Westinghouse.
Th, Pu & U Separation Using TEVA and UTEVA Resin
EIChroM I N D U S T R I E S, I N C. Introduction of Eichrom TEVA Disc: Tc-99 Analysis Anil H. Thakkar, Lawrence Jassin, Michael Fern Eichrom Industries,
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Optimizing Peak Separation for Simultaneous Pu and U Measurements Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL May 3, 2005.
Rapid actinide measurements in environmental samples Dr Phil Warwick Geosciences Advisory Unit Southampton Oceanography Centre.
On-line Actinide Quantification with Extractive Scintillating Resins Timothy A. DeVol, James E. Roane, Lara D. Hughes Clemson University Eichrom Users’
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS (Ni-63, I-129, Actinides) Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
One-Column Separation and Analysis of Isotopic Am and Pu in Soil Samples Nidal M. Jadalla, Eberline Services, Albuquerque, NM Anil Thakkar, Eichrom Technologies,
Pyrosulfate fusion vs. TEVA / TRU forcing the issue Shane Knockemus U.S. EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL November 11, 2002.
Winter conference on plasma spectrochemistry Sarah BAGHDADI Ph. advisor: Pr. Gérard COTE UMR 7575 CNRS-ENSCP, Paris Scientific advisor:
Extraction Method #2 Fractionated precipitation: Dried plant of 6g is extracted with Methanol at a mass-volume ratio of 1:10 After extraction, the methanolic.
An Improved Method for Determination of Ra-228 * Jamie Christoff & Bill Burnett Department of Oceanography Florida State University “The Double-Pass Approach”
Anil H.Thakkar Eichrom Industries, Inc.. Darien, IL
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
Strontium Extraction from Urine Samples
Ra in Water using MnO2 Resin: Update
Technical Updates on TRU and TEVA Resins
Rapid Emergency Methods for Actinides and Sr-89/90
Particulate and Dissolved 210Po and 210Pb in Water Columns from the
Eichrom Resin Columns: A New breakthrough
remove 167 mL aliquot for Sr-90 spike with 1 mg stable Sr carrier
National Air and Radiation Environmental Lab
Unit 11 – Solutions and Ions in Aqueous Solutions
Presentation transcript:

Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS S. L. Maxwell, III, D. J. Fauth, R. C. Henderson, J. J. Smiley, S. R. Johnson Westinghouse Savannah River Site

Recent Improvements SRS Environmental Monitoring lab SRS Bioassay lab faster water and air filter analysis for actinides improved soil-fecal sludge analyses (wastewater treatment plant samples) SRS Bioassay lab improved Pu-Np column extraction for urine (better Pu stripping/less volume) faster fecal analysis method (no microwave) Central Laboratory (process lab) improved Pu, Np in HEU and LEU samples TEVA + Pu-236 tracer

SRS Environmental Monitoring Lab Vacuum box systems and stacked cartridges Significant cost and time savings vs. gravity flow Tested both stacked UTEVA+ TRU and TEVA+TRU methods both methods work very well; much faster than gravity flow eliminated evaporation of Am fraction: use 5 mL con HF use 50 ug cerium instead of 100 ug to improve peak resolution

SRS Environmental Monitoring Lab Showed stacked TEVA+TRU can be used on water samples just like urine method- no iron interference may have some advantages for air filters (Po-210 interference) Po-210 can interfere with U-232 on UTEVA allows Pu AND Np together on TEVA use Ti (III) reductant in Pu strip from TEVA when performing cerium fluoride microprecipitation

Pu, Np/Am, U, Sr on TEVA/TRU RESIN (Water/Air filters) 1) Redissolve in 10 mL 3M HN03 - 0.5M Al(NO3)3 2) Add 0.5 mL 1.5M Sulfamic Acid + 1 mL 1.5M Ascorbic Acid 3) Add 1 mL 3.5M Sodium Nitrite Th Removal 3mL 9M HCI/25mL 8MHCI Rinse 20 mL 3M HN03 Pu Elution 20mL 0.10M HCl - 0.05MHF - 0.03M TiCl3 Add 0.5 mL 3M sodium nitrite 2mL TEVA Resin (50-100 um) Cerium fluoride Alpha spectrometry Remove TRU cartridge: 1) Elute Am with 15mL 4M HCI 2) Elute U with 10mL 0.1M ammonium bioxalate 2.0mL TRU-Resin (50-100 um) Collect, evaporate, dissolve in 6M HNO3 Sr Resin

Pu-242 Tracer Recoveries 1000 mL water samples/ Pu-242 tracer= 4.40 dpm Calcium phosphate precipitation % Pu242 Recovery % Pu242 Recovery UTEVA+TRU Method TEVA+TRU Method 1) 101 1) 99.3 2) 106 2) 105 3) 106 3) 105 4) 108 4) 109 5) 98.6 6) 102 Avg. = 105% (2.8% @1s) Avg. = 103% ( 3.8% @1s)

Am-243 Tracer Recoveries 1000 mL water samples/ Am-243 tracer= 3.84 dpm Calcium phosphate precipitation % Am-243 Recovery % Am-243 Recovery UTEVA+TRU Method TEVA+TRU Method 1) 105 1) 98.4 2) 100 2) 99.0 3) 91.5 3) 107 4) 98.7 4) 100 5) 102 5) 106 6) 106 6) 105 Avg. = 101% (5.2% @1s) Avg. = 103% ( 3.8% @1s)

U-232 Tracer Recoveries 1000 mL water samples/ U-232 tracer= 5.45 dpm Calcium phosphate precipitation % U-232 Recovery % U-232 Recovery UTEVA+TRU Method TEVA+TRU Method 1) 92.9 1) 87.5 2) 98.2 2) 93.5 3) 96.2 3) 97.4 4) 94.9 4) 92.4 5) 91.6 5) 94.0 6) 93.2 Avg. = 94.5% (2.6% @1s) Avg. = 93.0% ( 3.8 % @1s)

SRS Environmental Monitoring Lab Actinides in soil-fecal samples dissolution and column flow problems with current method need total dissolution/eliminate flow problems & low uranium use Diphonix resin technology as in bioassay lab Initial testing encouraging Use sodium peroxide/sodium hydroxide fusion (Zr crucibles) Precipitate actinides as hydroxides; redissolve in HCL-HF/also boric acid fraction 4 mLs Diphonix Resin + small volume HEDPA strip (15-20 mLs) Faster HEDPA destruction method (no microwave) modified Fenton’s Reagent method Routine size Eichrom columns

Diphonix Stripping-HEDPA 0.5M HEDPA % Pu242 % U232 Strip Volume Tracer Tracer 1) 3 mL resin 15 mL 104 96 2) 4 mL resin 15 mL 99 97 3) 4 mL resin 20 mL 105 84 4) Direct -HEDPA 20 mL 113 113 Avg= 105 % 98 % Redissolve in 10 mLs 6M HNO3 and 10 mls 2.5M aluminum nitrate (to avoid phosphate interference), then TEVA+ TRU Column extraction

Soil-Fecal Sludge Samples Pu-242 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 % Recovery pCi/g pCi/g 1) 101% 0.435 2.18 2) 69 % 0.484 2.33 3) 84% 0.442 2.07 4) 49 % 0.448 2.39 Avg= 76% 0.452 (4.8% @1s) 2.24 (6.5% @1s)

Soil-Fecal Sludge Samples U-232 U-234 U-235 U-238 % Recovery pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 1) 56% 6.16 0.355 5.56 2) 75 % 5.44 0.351 4.76 3) 74% 5.28 0.346 5.04 4) 98 % 4.44 0.253 3.98 Avg= 76% 5.33 (13% @1s) 0.326 (15% @1s) 4.84 (14% @1s)

Soil-Fecal Sludge Samples Am-243 Am-241 Cm-244 % Recovery pCi/g pCi/g 1) 73% 0.746 0.506 2) 53 % 0.684 0.506 3) 64% 0.620 0.462 4) 38 % 0.670 0.378 Avg=57% 0.679 (7.6% @1s) 0.464 (13% @1s)

Bioassay Lab Improvements Actinides and Sr-90 in urine stacked TEVA+TRU Resin cartridges with vacuum boxes Pu-236 tracer for Pu and Np at same time Pu, Np (TEVA) and U, Am (TRU) Sr (Sr Resin) Pu stripping improvement: improved Pu stripping with rongalite instead of iodide in strip solution (less volume/faster flow rate) rongalite (sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate) compatible with electroplating adjust bisulfate added for sulfate added from rongalite decomposition (2.5 mLs 10 % bisulfate instead of 3 mLs)

Urine Batch: Calcium Phosphate Precipitation

Pu, Np/Am, U, Sr on TEVA/TRU RESIN (URINE) 1) Redissolve in 12 mLs of 3M HN03 - 1M Al(NO3)3 2) Add 0.5 mL 1.5M Sulfamic Acid + 2 mls 1.5M Ascorbic Acid 3) Add 2 mLs 4M Sodium Nitrite Th Removal 5mL 9M HCI/ 25mL 8M HCI Rinse 20 mL 3MHN03 Pu Elution 20mL 0.10M HCl - 0.05M HF - 0.015M Rongalite 4mls 0.02M H2SO4 + 3mls 16M HN03 2mL TEVA Resin (50-100 um) Evaporate/ash Electrodeposition Remove TRU cartridge: 1) Elute Am with 15mL 4M HCI 2) Elute U with 20mL 0.1M ammonium bioxalate 2.0mL TRU-Resin (50-100 um) Collect, evaporate, dissolve in 6M HNO3 Sr Resin

TEVA+ TRU Stacked Column: Pu, Np, U, Am

TRU Cartridge: U, Am Stripping

SR Cartridge: Sr-90 Separation

Pu-236 Recoveries-Urine Using TEVA/Rongalite Pu-236=0.426 dpm 500 mL urine Avg Recovery=99%

Spiked Urine Samples: Rongalite Test Known values: Avg. measured: Pu-238 =0.110 dpm/L Pu-238 =0.143 dpm/L Pu-239 =0.857 dpm/L Pu-239 =0.848 dpm/L Np-237=0.535 dpm/L Np-237=0.508 dpm/L

Bioassay Lab Improvements Bioassay: fecal method wet ashing and dissolution in HCL-HF Diphonix Resin TEVA+TRU Resin cartridges not stacked due to possible iron previously evaporated load plus rinse from TEVA then redissolved, added reductant and loaded onto TRU Pu, Np (TEVA) and U, Am (TRU) Sr (Sr Resin)

Recent Improvements in Fecal Method no evaporation of load solution from TEVA to save time collect load plus minimal rinse from TEVA add sulfamic acid + ascorbic acid and load to TRU resin improved Pu stripping with rongalite instead of iodide in strip solution Also testing: use of HEDPA strip of Diphonix instead of microwave (minimize HEDPA to minimize phosphate and increase Al in final load solution) Use sodium peroxide/sodium hydroxide fusion instead of wet ashing

Microwave Digestion of Diphonix: Fecal Method

Collect load and small rinse ONLY: Eliminated evaporation Testing using 15 mL strip with 0.04M Rongalite; acidify to 3M HNO3, add Al(NO3)3 and nitrite and load to second TEVA column Collect load and small rinse ONLY: Eliminated evaporation 5

(2nd Column to Remove all Th-228) Pu on TEVA Resin-Fecal (2nd Column to Remove all Th-228) Adjust acidity of 15 mL strip solution to 3M HNO3 using 4 mLs 16M HNO3 Add 1 mL of 2.5M aluminum nitrate Add 1mL 3.5 M Sodium Nitrite Th Removal 3mL 9MHCI/7mL 8MHCI Rinse 10mL 3MHN03 Pu Elution 20 mL 0.10MHC1 - 0.05MHF - 0.015M rongalite 1mL TEVA Resin

Process Lab Improvements Process samples to support HEU Blenddown processing Improvements: Pu and Np are key product specification measurements Pu-236 tracer for Pu and Np on TEVA resin in HEU and LEU process solutions 1 mL TEVA cartridges to ensure total Th-228 removal (separated twice on TEVA) use Ti (III) reductant in Pu strip from TEVA

Summary Bioassay lab SRS Environmental Monitoring lab work Process lab Vacuum box technology reduced method time by about 50% Diphonix-HEDPA may help with difficult soil-fecal samples Bioassay lab Improved Pu stripping using rongalite (85% to 99%) HEDPA to eliminate microwave in fecal analysis Process lab Pu-236 tracer use for Pu, Np in process lab on high uranium samples